RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to assess the current state of digitalization in radiation oncology departments in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. METHODS: A comprehensive survey was conducted in a digital format, consisting of 53 questions that covered various aspects of digitalization including patient workflow, departmental organization, radiotherapy planning, and employee-related aspects. RESULTS: Overall, 120 forms were eligible for evaluation. Participants were mainly physicians or medical physicists responsible for digitalization aspects in their departments. Nearly 70% of the institutions used electronic patient records, with 50% being completely paperless. However, the use of smartphone apps for electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROMs) and digital health applications (DIGA) was limited (9% and 4.9%, respectively). In total, 70.8% of the radio-oncology departments had interfaces with diagnostic departments, and 36% had digital interchanges with other clinics. Communication with external partners was realized mainly through fax (72%), emails (55%), postal letters (63%), or other digital exchange formats (28%). Almost half of the institutions (49%) had dedicated IT staff for their operations. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first of its kind conducted in German-speaking radiation oncology departments within the medical field. The findings suggest that there is a varied level of digitalization implementation within these departments, with certain areas exhibiting lower rates of digitalization that could benefit from targeted improvement initiatives.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (aHL), based on guidelines a multitude of treatment options are available. The availability of PET-guided decision-making and new therapeutic agents increase the complexity of the decision-making process. METHODS: Thirteen experts of Swiss university and cantonal hospitals in Switzerland were asked to describe their institutional decision-making practice in aHL. Variables influencing the decision-making process were identified, standardized, and converted into decision trees for analysis of consent and discrepancies. The algorithms of all participating experts were analyzed with the objective consensus methodology. RESULTS: Four decision criteria (age, fertility preservation, fitness, and interim PET) and 12 unique treatment regimens were identified. Consensus for the treatment of aHL for young and fit, as well as for older patients without comorbidity, was found. Large heterogeneity was identified with use of a variety of different regimens for unfit patients with aHL and for young female patients with a desire of fertility preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Four major decision criteria were identified allowing the representation of expert's approach to first-line treatment of aHL. Among Swiss experts, consensus for a PET-guided curative treatment of aHL was identified. The use of a multitude of treatment regimens was observed for older and comorbid (unfit) aHL patients, highlighting the need for clinical trials and recommendations for this group of patients.
Assuntos
Doença de Hodgkin , Humanos , Doença de Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Consenso , SuíçaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the individual treatment strategies among international experts in peritoneal carcinosis, specifically their decision-making in the process of patient selection for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in women suffering from ovarian cancer, to identify relevant decision-making criteria, and to quantify the level of consensus for or against HIPEC. METHODS: The members of the executive committee of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) were asked to describe the clinical conditions under which they would recommend HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer and to describe any disease or patient characteristics relevant to their decision. All answers were then merged and converted into decision trees. The decision trees were then analyzed by applying the objective consensus methodology. RESULTS: Nine experts in surgical oncology provided information on their multidisciplinary treatment strategy including HIPEC for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Three of the total of 12 experts did not perform HIPEC. Five criteria relevant to the decision on whether HIPEC is performed were applied. In patients with resectable disease, a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) <21, and epithelial ovarian cancer without distant metastasis, consent was received by 75% to perform HIPEC for women suffering from recurrent disease. Furthermore, in the primary disease setting, consent was received by 67% to perform HIPEC according to the same criteria. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Among surgical oncology experts in peritoneal surface malignancy and HIPEC, HIPEC plays an important role in primary and recurrent ovarian cancer, and the PCI is the most important criterion in this decision.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/patologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term oncological, functional and toxicity outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in relation to risk factors and radiation dose in a prospective multicentre cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of patients from 12 Swiss centres undergoing LDR-BT from September 2004 to March 2018 were prospectively collected. Patients with a follow-up of ≥3 months were analysed. Functional and oncological outcomes were assessed at ~6 weeks, 6 and 12 months after implantation and annually thereafter. LDR-BT was performed with 125 I seeds. Dosimetry was done 6 weeks after implantation based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology recommendations. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise above the PSA nadir + 2 was defined as biochemical failure. Functional outcomes were assessed by urodynamic measurement parameters and questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 1580 patients in the database, 1291 (81.7%) were evaluable for therapy outcome. The median (range) follow-up was 37.1 (3.0-141.6) months. Better BRFS was found for Gleason score ≤3+4 (P = 0.03, log-rank test) and initial PSA level of <10 ng/mL (P < 0.001). D'Amico Risk groups were significantly associated with BRFS (P < 0.001), with a hazard ratio of 2.38 for intermediate- and high-risk patients vs low-risk patients. The radiation dose covering 90% of the prostate volume (D90) after 6 weeks was significantly lower in patients with recurrence. Functional outcomes returned close to baseline levels after 2-3 years. A major limitation of these findings is a substantial loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our results are in line with other studies showing that LDR-BT is associated with good oncological outcomes together with good functional results.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , SuíçaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a central pathology review within a randomized clinical trial on salvage radiation therapy (RT) in the presence of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy to assess whether this results in changes in histopathological prognostic factors, such as Gleason score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 350 patients were randomized and specimens from 279 patients (80%) were centrally reviewed by a dedicated genitourinary pathologist. Gleason score, tumour classification and resection margin status were reassessed and compared with the results of local pathology review. Agreement was assessed using contingency tables and Cohen's kappa coefficient. The association between other histopathological features (e.g. largest diameter of carcinoma) and rapid biochemical progression (up to 6 months after salvage RT) was also investigated. RESULTS: There was good concordance between central and local pathology review for seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b: 91%; κ = 0.95 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.89, 1.00]), extraprostatic extension (pT3a/b: 94%; κ = 0.82 [95% CI 0.75, 0.89]) and positive surgical margin (PSM) status (87%; κ = 0.7 [95% CI 0.62, 0.79]). The rate of agreement was lower for Gleason score (78%; κ = 0.61 [95% CI 0.52, 0.70]). The median (range) largest diameter of carcinoma was 16 (3-38) mm. A total of 49 patients (18%) experienced rapid biochemical progression after salvage RT. Largest diameter of carcinoma (odds ratio [OR] 2.04 [95% CI 1.30, 3.20]; P = 0.002), resection margin status (OR 0.36 [95% CI 0.18, 0.72]; P = 0.004) and Gleason score (OR 1.55 [95% CI 1.00, 2.42]; P = 0.05) remained associated with rapid progression after salvage RT after backward selection. CONCLUSION: The results of the central pathology analyses showed concordance between central and local pathology review with regard to seminal vesicle invasion, extraprostatic extension and PSM status, but a lower rate of agreement for Gleason score. Largest diameter of carcinoma was found to be a potential prognostic factor for rapid biochemical progression after salvage RT.
Assuntos
Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Distribuição Aleatória , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the advent of targeted therapies, many treatment options in the first-line setting of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) have emerged. Guidelines and randomized trial reports usually do not elucidate the decision criteria for the different treatment options. In order to extract the decision criteria for the optimal therapy for patients, we performed an analysis of treatment algorithms from experts in the field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment algorithms for the treatment of mccRCC from experts of 11 institutions were obtained, and decision trees were deduced. Treatment options were identified and a list of unified decision criteria determined. The final decision trees were analyzed with a methodology based on diagnostic nodes, which allows for an automated cross-comparison of decision trees. The most common treatment recommendations were determined, and areas of discordance were identified. RESULTS: The analysis revealed heterogeneity in most clinical scenarios. The recommendations selected for first-line treatment of mccRCC included sunitinib, pazopanib, temsirolimus, interferon-α combined with bevacizumab, high-dose interleukin-2, sorafenib, axitinib, everolimus, and best supportive care. The criteria relevant for treatment decisions were performance status, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk group, only or mainly lung metastases, cardiac insufficiency, hepatic insufficiency, age, and "zugzwang" (composite of multiple, related criteria). CONCLUSION: In the present study, we used diagnostic nodes to compare treatment algorithms in the first-line treatment of mccRCC. The results illustrate the heterogeneity of the decision criteria and treatment strategies for mccRCC and how available data are interpreted and implemented differently among experts. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The data provided in the present report should not be considered to serve as treatment recommendations for the management of treatment-naïve patients with multiple metastases from metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma outside a clinical trial; however, the data highlight the different treatment options and the criteria used to select them. The diversity in decision making and how results from phase III trials can be interpreted and implemented differently in daily practice are demonstrated.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Árvores de Decisões , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Metástase NeoplásicaRESUMO
The optimal treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas is unknown and a standard of care does not exist. Re-irradiation with concomitant bevacizumab represents an option. Retrospectively, we analyzed a cohort of heavily pretreated patients (n = 14) with relapsing HGGs who underwent re-irradiation with conventional 3D-conformal or intensified modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Ten of them received re-irradiation in combination with bevacizumab. The study population consisted of eight GBMs and six anaplastic gliomas. All patients had previously undergone irradiation for first-line therapy, including seven patients with radiochemotherapy with temozolomide. Patients without contraindications started with two infusions of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg of body weight every other week) prior to re-irradiation and continued through re-irradiation until progression. The median patient age was 45 years with a median Karnofsky performance scale of 70. The median dose of re-irradiation was 41.6 Gy [39-55 Gy]. The median physical cumulative radiation dose was 101.6 Gy [65-110.4 Gy]. The median PFS from re-irradiation was 5.1 months [1.6-17.4] based on clinical and RANO criteria. Median OS from re-irradiation was 9.0 months [6.4-17.8]. We detected radionecrosis due to advanced imaging in one patient. Other toxicities were expected and attributable well known side effects of bevacizumab. This retrospective study provides additional feasibility and safety data of conventional 3D-conformal re-irradiation and IMRT in combination with bevacizumab in relapsing high-grade gliomas.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Glioma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioma/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Bevacizumab , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Glioma/mortalidade , Humanos , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de SalvaçãoRESUMO
Previous reports suggest a correlation between positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in lung cancer. We analysed positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose SUVmax in 14 patients with EGFR mutations, and a control group of 14 subjects with wild-type EGFR adenocarcinomas. The mean SUV value was 10.7 for EGFR-mutated adenocarcinomas and 9.9 for wild-type tumours. There was no correlation between SUV values and EGFR mutation status. Omitting EGFR testing in lung cancers with low SUVmax is not appropriate.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Mutação/genética , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Proliferação de Células , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/metabolismo , Genótipo , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Positron emission tomography/computed tomographies (PET/CTs) may result in incidental findings of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid lesions in the colon. The aim of this study was to assess the relevance of a colonoscopic workup of such lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all PET/CT reports (n = 4,973) generated in our nuclear medicine department between May 2006 and May 2011; in 69 cases a colonoscopic evaluation was recommended for incidental FDG-avid lesions. RESULTS: Of these 69 cases, 51 underwent colonoscopy because of the potential need for further treatment. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) ranged from 5.0 to 42.0 with an average of 10.9. In 44 of the 51 patients, a histopathological abnormality was found on colonoscopy, 44 in the location described by PET/CT. A further 38 lesions were identified that were not visible on PET/CT. The histopathological evaluation in the 51 patients revealed 14 hyperplastic polyps, 27 adenomas with low-grade and 4 with high-grade dysplasia, 3 adenocarcinomas and 1 neuro-endocrine tumour. CONCLUSION: Incidental findings of focal colorectal FDG uptake should lead to further workup with colonoscopy. The SUVmax was not predictive for higher grade histologies. With an SUV of 5 the yield was high for colonic premalignant and malignant lesions. However, malignancy cannot be ruled out in focal lesions with an SUV of less than 5, and for individual patients a colonoscopy should not be ruled out.
Assuntos
Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem Multimodal , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
In this study. we aimed to detect vestibular schwannomas (VSs) in individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices by using a 2D-CNN. A pretrained CNN (ResNet-34) was retrained and internally validated using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) MRI slices from one institution. In a second step, the model was externally validated using T1c- and T1-weighted (T1) slices from a different institution. As a substitute, bisected slices were used with and without tumors originating from whole transversal slices that contained part of the unilateral VS. The model predictions were assessed based on the categorical accuracy and confusion matrices. A total of 539, 94, and 74 patients were included for training, internal validation, and external T1c validation, respectively. This resulted in an accuracy of 0.949 (95% CI 0.935-0.963) for the internal validation and 0.912 (95% CI 0.866-0.958) for the external T1c validation. We suggest that 2D-CNNs might be a promising alternative to 2.5-/3D-CNNs for certain tasks thanks to the decreased demand for computational power and the fact that there is no need for segmentations. However, further research is needed on the difference between 2D-CNNs and more complex architectures.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of the radiation therapy (RT) quality assurance (QA) program of the phase 3 randomized SAKK 09/10 trial in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Within the Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Klinische Krebsforschung (SAKK) 09/10 trial testing 64-Gy versus 70-Gy salvage RT, a central collection of treatment plans was performed and thoroughly reviewed by a dedicated medical physicist and radiation oncologist. Adherence to the treatment protocol and specifically to the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines for target volume definition (classified as deviation observed yes vs no) and its potential correlation with acute and late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0) and freedom from biochemical progression (FFBP) were investigated. RESULTS: The treatment plans for 344 patients treated between February 2011 and April 2014 depicted important deviations from the EORTC guidelines and the recommendations per trial protocol. For example, in up to half of the cases, the delineated structures deviated from the protocol (eg, prostate bed in 48.8%, rectal wall [RW] in 41%). In addition, variations in clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) occurred frequently (eg, CTV and PTV deviations in up to 42.4% and 25.9%, respectively). The detected deviations showed a significant association with a lower risk of grade ≥2 gastrointestinal acute toxicity when the CTV did not overlap the RW versus when the CTV overlapped the RW (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.85; P = .014), and a higher rate of grade ≥2 late genitourinary (GU) toxicity when the CTV overlapped the RW (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.17-5.72; P = .019). A marginally significant lower risk of grade ≥2 late GU toxicity was observed when the prostate bed did not overlap versus did overlap the RW (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.25-1.03; P = .06). In addition, a marginally significant decrease in FFBP was observed in patients with PTV not including surgical clips as potential markers of the limits of the prostate bed (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.96-2.17; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a thorough QA program, the central review of a phase 3 trial showed limited adherence to treatment protocol recommendations, which was associated with a higher risk of toxicity by means of acute or late gastrointestinal or GU toxicity and showed a trend toward worse FFBP. Data from this QA review might help to refine future QA programs and prostate bed delineation guidelines.
Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias , Neoplasias da Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Reto , Terapia de Salvação/métodosRESUMO
Introduction: Many proposed algorithms for tumor detection rely on 2.5/3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and the input of segmentations for training. The purpose of this study is therefore to assess the performance of tumor detection on single MRI slices containing vestibular schwannomas (VS) as a computationally inexpensive alternative that does not require the creation of segmentations. Methods: A total of 2992 T1-weighted contrast-enhanced axial slices containing VS from the MRIs of 633 patients were labeled according to tumor location, of which 2538 slices from 539 patients were used for training a CNN (ResNet-34) to classify them according to the side of the tumor as a surrogate for detection and 454 slices from 94 patients were used for internal validation. The model was then externally validated on contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced slices from a different institution. Categorical accuracy was noted, and the results of the predictions for the validation set are provided with confusion matrices. Results: The model achieved an accuracy of 0.928 (95% CI: 0.869-0.987) on contrast-enhanced slices and 0.795 (95% CI: 0.702-0.888) on non-contrast-enhanced slices from the external validation cohorts. The implementation of Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) revealed that the focus of the model was not limited to the contrast-enhancing tumor but to a larger area of the cerebellum and the cerebellopontine angle. Conclusions: Single-slice predictions might constitute a computationally inexpensive alternative to training 2.5/3D-CNNs for certain detection tasks in medical imaging even without the use of segmentations. Head-to-head comparisons between 2D and more sophisticated architectures could help to determine the difference in accuracy, especially for more difficult tasks.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in stage III N2 NSCLC is controversial. We analyzed decision-making for PORT among European radiation oncology experts in lung cancer. METHODS: Twenty-two experts were asked before and after presentation of the results of the LungART trial to describe their decision criteria for PORT in the management of pN+ NSCLC patients. Treatment strategies were subsequently converted into decision trees and analyzed. RESULTS: Following decision criteria were identified: extracapsular nodal extension, incomplete lymph node resection, multistation lymph nodes, high nodal tumor load, poor response to induction chemotherapy, ineligibility to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, performance status, resection margin, lung function and cardiopulmonary comorbidities. The LungART results had impact on decision-making and reduced the number of recommendations for PORT. The only clear indication for PORT was a R1/2 resection. Six experts out of ten who initially recommended PORT for all R0 resected pN2 patients no longer used PORT routinely for these patients, while four still recommended PORT for all patients with pN2. Fourteen experts used PORT only for patients with risk factors, compared to eleven before the presentation of the LungART trial. Four experts stated that PORT was never recommended in R0 resected pN2 patients regardless of risk factors. CONCLUSION: After presentation of the LungART trial results at ESMO 2020, 82% of our experts still used PORT for stage III pN2 NSCLC patients with risk factors. The recommendation for PORT decreased, especially for patients without risk factors. Cardiopulmonary comorbidities became more relevant in the decision-making for PORT.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Entrevistas como Assunto , Oncologistas/psicologia , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is a common treatment option for brain metastases secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from the QUARTZ trial suggest that WBRT can be omitted in selected patients and treated with optimal supportive care alone. Nevertheless, WBRT is still widely used to treat brain metastases secondary to NSCLC. We analysed decision criteria influencing the selection for WBRT among European radiation oncology experts. METHODS: Twenty-two European radiation oncology experts in lung cancer as selected by the European Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ESTRO) for previous projects and by the Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice (ACROP) for lung cancer were asked to describe their strategies in the management of brain metastases of NSCLC. Treatment strategies were subsequently converted into decision trees and analysed for agreement and discrepancies. RESULTS: Eight decision criteria (suitability for SRS, performance status, symptoms, eligibility for targeted therapy, extra-cranial tumour control, age, prognostic scores and "Zugzwang" (the compulsion to treat)) were identified. WBRT was recommended by a majority of the European experts for symptomatic patients not suitable for radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. There was also a tendency to use WBRT in the ALK/EGFR/ROS1 negative NSCLC setting. CONCLUSION: Despite the results of the QUARTZ trial WBRT is still widely used among European radiation oncology experts.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Radiocirurgia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Irradiação Craniana , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Proteínas Tirosina Quinases , Proteínas Proto-OncogênicasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is unclear in resected small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Thirteen European radiotherapy experts on SCLC were asked to describe their strategies on PCI and TRT for patients with resected SCLC. The treatment strategies were converted into decision trees and analyzed for consensus and discrepancies. RESULTS: For patients with resected SCLC and positive lymph nodes most experts recommend prophylactic cranial irradiation and thoracic radiotherapy. For elderly patients with resected node negative SCLC, most experts do not recommend thoracic radiotherapy or prophylactic cranial irradiation. CONCLUSION: PCI and TRT are considered in patients with resected SCLC and these treatments should be discussed with the patient in the context of shared decision-making.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Idoso , Irradiação Craniana , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Seleção de Pacientes , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/radioterapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), the CONVERT trial has not demonstrated superiority of once-daily (QD) radiotherapy (66 Gy) over twice-daily (BID) radiotherapy (45 Gy). We explored the factors influencing the selection between QD and BID regimens. METHODS: Thirteen experienced European thoracic radiation oncologists as selected by the European Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ESTRO) were asked to describe their strategies in the management of LD-SCLC. Treatment strategies were subsequently converted into decision trees and analysed for agreement and discrepancies. RESULTS: Logistic reasons, patients' performance status and radiotherapy dose constraints were the three major decision criteria used by most experts in decision making. The use of QD and BID regimens was balanced among European experts, but there was a trend towards the BID regimen for fit patients able to travel twice a day to the radiotherapy site. CONCLUSION: BID and QD radiotherapy are both accepted regimens among experts and the decision is influenced by pragmatic factors such as availability of transportation.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Radio-Oncologistas , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/radioterapiaRESUMO
AIMS: Recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is a disease with poor prognosis. Although several therapeutic approaches such as chemotherapy, irradiation or surgery have been investigated, there is no established standard therapy. A recent survey among Swiss neuro-oncology centres has shown considerable controversy in the treatment recommendations for any specific scenario of recurrent GBM. In view of the cost differences of the available treatment alternatives, the aim of our study was assess the financial impact of different institutional therapeutic strategies for recurrent GBM in Switzerland. METHODS: We created a decision analytic model for each of the eight centres participating in the initial study with a centre-specific treatment algorithm to evaluate the average treatment cost per patient. The probability of decision criteria was varied by univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis over a wide range to account for the high level of uncertainty. Treatment costs were calculated from the perspective of the Swiss healthcare payer. RESULTS: Mean treatment costs per patient calculated on the basis of the institutional treatment algorithms ranged from CHF 13,748 to CHF 22,072 depending on the probability of individual decision criteria. The most influential decision factors for the mean treatment costs were the probability of fit patients and the proportion of patients with resectable tumour recurrences. There was a significant correlation between the complexity of treatment algorithms in a centre and the resulting mean treatment costs. CONCLUSIONS: Institutional treatment algorithms can be used to estimate the average treatment costs per patient, which are, however, highly sensitive to probability changes of individual decision criteria. Our study demonstrates a high variability in treatment costs for recurrent GBM among eight Swiss neuro-oncology centres based on individual institutional treatment algorithms.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Glioblastoma , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Adulto , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Suíça , Temozolomida/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Due to conflicting results between major trials the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in stage IV small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is controversial. METHODS: We obtained a list of 13 European experts from both the European Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). The strategies in decision making for PCI in stage IV SCLC were collected. Decision trees were created representing these strategies. Analysis of consensus was performed with the objective consensus methodology. RESULTS: The factors associated with the recommendation for the use of PCI included the fitness of the patient, young age and good response to chemotherapy. PCI was recommended by the majority of experts for non-elderly fit patients who had at least a partial response (PR) to chemotherapy (for complete remission (CR) 85% of radiation oncologists and 69% of medical oncologists, for PR: 85% of radiation oncologists and 54% of medical oncologists). For patients with stable disease after chemotherapy, PCI was recommended by 6 out of 13 (46%) radiation oncologists and only 3 out of 13 medical oncologists (23%). For elderly fit patients with CR, a majority recommended PCI (62%) and no consensus was reached for patients with PR. CONCLUSION: European radiation and medical oncologists specializing in lung cancer recommend PCI in selected patients and restrict its use primarily to fit, non-elderly patients who responded to chemotherapy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Irradiação Craniana/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Seleção de Pacientes , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Radio-Oncologistas , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/patologiaRESUMO
Multiple treatment strategies exist for many oncologic problems. In this review, we provide a summary of various reasons for the existence of multiple treatment options in oncology, including factors that concern the treating physician (eg, treatment preferences), environmental factors (eg, financial, regulatory, and scientific aspects), and individual patient-specific factors (eg, medical condition, preferences). We demonstrate the vital role of available treatment options and their origins for clinical decision making and patient communication. These aspects are particularly helpful in the process of shared decision making, which is increasingly favored in situations where there are multiple medically reasonable options.
Assuntos
Oncologia/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In non-small cell lung cancer, anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement (ALK+) and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFR+) are targetable with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 27 patients with ALK+ tumours, who underwent positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) prior to any treatment, were identified. 2 equally sized control groups based on consecutive patients with EGFR+ and EGFR/ALK wild-type (wt) were identified. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumour location (central vs. peripheral), as well as patient- and disease-specific characteristics were collected. RESULTS: Mutation status was significantly associated with SUVmax (p < 0.008). The median SUVmax of the primary tumour in the lung for ALK+ patients (SUVmax 13) was significantly higher compared to that of the EGFR+ (SUVmax 9.8, p = 0.010) and the EGFR/ALKwt group (SUVmax 9.6, p = 0.022). No difference was observed between the EGFR+ and the EGFR/ALKwt group (p = 0.961). Mutation status was also associated with primary tumour location (p = 0.001). There was a significantly lower rate of central tumours in the EGFR+ group when compared to ALK+ tumours (15%, p = 0.002). Among EGFR/ALKwt tumours, 41% were central compared to 63% of ALK+ tumours (p = 0.235). CONCLUSION: On initial PET-CT, ALK+ primary lung tumours showed a higher SUVmax and were more frequently centrally located while peripheral tumours were more likely to be EGFR+.