Concomitant Procedures, Black Race, Male Sex, and General Anesthesia Show Fair Predictive Value for Prolonged Rotator Cuff Repair Operative Time: Analysis of the National Quality Improvement Program Database Using Machine Learning.

PURPOSE: To develop machine learning models using the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to predict prolonged operative time (POT) for rotator cuff repair (RCR), as well as use the trained machine learning models, cross-referenced with traditional multivariate logistic regression (MLR), to determine the key perioperative variables that may predict POT for RCR. METHODS: Data were obtained from a large national database (ACS-NSQIP) from 2021. Patients with unilateral RCR procedures were included. Demographic, preoperative, and operative variables were analyzed. An MLR model and various other machine learning techniques, including random forest (RF) and artificial neural network, were compared using area under the curve, calibration, Brier score, and decision curve analysis. Feature importance was identified from the overall best-performing model. RESULTS: A total of 6,690 patients met inclusion criteria. The RF machine learning model had the highest area under the curve upon internal validation (0.706) and the lowest Brier score (0.15), outperforming the other models. The RF model also demonstrated strong performance upon assessment of the calibration curves (slope = 0.86, intercept = 0.08) and decision curve analysis. The model identified concomitant procedure, specifically labral repair and biceps tenodesis, as the most important variable for determining POT, followed by age <30 years, Black or African American race, male sex, and general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advanced machine learning models used in this study, the ACS-NSQIP data set was only able to fairly predict POT following RCR. The RF model identified concomitant procedures, specifically labral repair and biceps tenodesis, as the most important variables for determining POT. Additionally, demographic factors such as age <30 years, Black race, and general anesthesia were significant predictors. While male sex was identified as important in the RF model, the MLR model indicated that its predictive value is primarily in conjunction with specific procedures like biceps tenodesis and subacromial decompression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Arthroscopic Treatment Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Open Treatment for Acute Septic Arthritis of the Native Knee: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To compare complication rates, reoperation rates, and subjective outcomes after arthroscopic and open irrigation and debridement for treatment of native knee septic arthritis. METHODS: Following The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed databases was performed. Comparative studies reporting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic versus open treatment for septic arthritis of the native knee in human adults were included. Excluded were case series with <10 patients, inclusion of patients <18 years old, studies on non-native joints, abstract-only publications, and studies without stratification of the involved joint. Two reviewers in duplicate independently performed search and data extraction. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies instrument. The mean score among the included studies was 18.2 (range 16-23). RESULTS: Eleven studies were included, comprising 2,343 knees treated arthroscopically, and 1,595 treated with arthrotomy. Studies reported no differences in erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, peripheral white blood cells, or symptom chronicity between groups. Nine studies (81.8%) attempted to control for potentially confounding variables in their analyses, and 4 studies (36.4%) reported significant differences in patient characteristics. Reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 50% for arthroscopy and 6% to 71% for arthrotomy. Complication rates ranged from 0% to 39.4% arthroscopically and 0% to 49% for arthrotomy. Superior patient-reported outcomes were achieved after arthroscopy in 2 studies that analyzed subjective outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic management of native knee septic arthritis is a safe and effective alternative to open treatment and is associated with comparable complication rates, reoperation rates, hospitalization lengths, readmission rates, and superior patient-reported outcomes compared with open irrigation and debridement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I, III, and IV studies.

Clinically significant outcome thresholds and rates of achievement by shoulder arthroplasty type and preoperative diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Clinically significant outcome (CSO) benchmarks have been previously established for shoulder arthroplasty by assimilating preoperative diagnoses and arthroplasty types. The purpose of this study was to establish unique CSO thresholds and compare the time-to-achievement of these for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for osteoarthritis (GHOA), RSA for rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA), and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for GHOA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent elective RSA for GHOA, TSA for GHOA, or RSA for RCA between February 2015 and May 2020, with 2-year minimum follow-up, were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained single surgeon registry. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was administered preoperatively and postoperatively at 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year timepoints. Satisfaction and subjective overall improvement anchor questionnaires were administered at the time of final follow-up. Distribution-based methods were used to calculate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), and anchor-based methods were used to calculate the Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for each patient group. Median time to achievement, individual incidence of achievement at each time point, and cumulative incidence of achievement calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis with interval censoring were compared between groups for each CSO. Cox-regression analyses were also performed to determine which patient factors were significantly associated with early or delayed achievement of CSOs. RESULTS: There were 471 patients eligible for study analysis: 276 RSA for GHOA, 107 TSA for GHOA, and 88 RSA for RCA. The calculated MCID, SCB, and PASS scores differed for each group. There were no significant differences in median time to achievement of any CSO between groups. Log-rank testing revealed that cumulative achievements significantly differed between groups for MCID (P = .014) but not for SCB (P = .053) or PASS (P = .620). On cox regression analysis, TSA patients had earlier achievement of SCB, whereas TSA and RSA for GHOA patients had earlier achievement of MCID. At 2-years, a significantly higher percentage of RSA for GHOA patients achieved MCID and SCB compared to RSA for RCA (MCID:100%, 95.5%, P = .003, SCB:94.6%, 86.4%, P = .036). CONCLUSION: Calculated CSO thresholds differ according to preoperative diagnosis and shoulder arthroplasty type. Patients undergoing TSA and RSA for GHOA achieve CSOs earlier than RSA for RCA patients, and a significantly higher percentage of RSA for GHOA patients achieve CSOs by 2 years compared to RSA for RCA patients.

Patients With Functional Somatic Syndromes-Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Chronic Headaches, and Chronic Low Back Pain-Have Lower Outcomes and Higher Opioid Usage and Cost After Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review assessing the relationship between functional somatic syndromes (FSSs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), postoperative opioid consumption, and hospitalization costs after shoulder and elbow surgery. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines to identify all studies evaluating the effect of having at least 1 FSS (fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic headaches, chronic low back pain) on outcomes after shoulder and elbow surgeries. Outcomes of interest included postoperative analgesic use, PROMs, and hospitalization costs. RESULTS: The review identified a total of 320 studies, of which 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The total number of participants in our 8 included studies was 57,389. Three studies (n = 620) reported PROMs. These studies demonstrated that the presence of at least 1 FSS is predictive of significantly greater pain scores and lower quality of recovery, Disability Arm Shoulder and Hand, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores postoperatively. Although scores were inferior in among patients with FSS, 2 of the 3 studies showed improvement in PROMs in this group of patients. Seven studies (n = 56,909) reported postoperative opioid use. Of these, 5 reported that a diagnosis of at least 1 FSS was a strong risk factor for long-term opioid use after surgery. One study (n = 480) found that time-driven activity-based costs were significantly greater in patients with FSSs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with functional somatic syndromes have less-favorable PROMs postoperatively, consume more opioids postoperatively, and have greater health care costs after elective shoulder and elbow procedures. Although PROMs among patients with FSSs are inferior compared with those without FSSs, PROMs still improved compared with baseline. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level II-III studies.

The Majority of Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy-Related Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting Nonsignificant Results Are Statistically Fragile.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the robustness of sports medicine and arthroscopy related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting nonsignificant results by calculating the reverse fragility index (RFI) and reverse fragility quotient (RFQ). METHODS: All sports medicine and arthroscopic-related RCTs from January 1, 2010, through August 3, 2021, were identified. Randomized-controlled trials comparing dichotomous variables with a reported P value ≥ .05 were included. Study characteristics, such as publication year and sample size, as well as loss to follow-up and number of outcome events were recorded. The RFI at a threshold of P < .05 and respective RFQ were calculated for each study. Coefficients of determination were calculated to determine the relationships between RFI and the number of outcome events, sample size, and number of patients lost to follow-up. The number of RCTs in which the loss to follow-up was greater than the RFI was determined. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies and 4,638 patients were included in this analysis. The mean sample size and loss to follow-up were 85.9 patients and 12.5 patients, respectively. The mean RFI was 3.7, signifying that a change of 3.7 events in one arm was needed to flip the results of the study from non-significant to significant (P < .05). Of the 54 studies investigated, 33 (61%) had a loss to follow-up greater than their calculated RFI. The mean RFQ was 0.05. A significant correlation between RFI with sample size (R2 = 0.10, P = .02) and the total number of observed events (R2 = 0.13, P < .01) was found. No significant correlation existed between RFI and loss to follow-up in the lesser arm (R2 = 0.01, P = .41). CONCLUSIONS: The RFI and RFQ are statistical tools that allow the fragility of studies reporting nonsignificant results to be appraised. Using this methodology, we found that the majority of sports medicine and arthroscopy-related RCTs reporting nonsignificant results are fragile. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: RFI and RFQ serve as tools that can be used to assess the validity of RCT results and provide additional context for appropriate conclusions.

The reverse fragility index: RCTs reporting non-significant differences in failure rates between hamstring and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts have fragile results.

PURPOSE: The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a novel metric to appraise the results of studies reporting statistically non-significant results. The purpose of this study was to determine the statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting non-significant differences in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) graft failure rates, defined as re-rupture/revision ACLR rate, between hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts by calculating RFIs. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs that compared HT to BTB grafts for ACLR through January 2022. Studies reporting non-significant differences in graft re-rupture and revision ACLR rate (n.s.) were included. The RFI, defined as the fewest number of event reversals needed to change the non-significant graft re-rupture/revision outcome to statistically significant (P < 0.05), was recorded for each study. In addition, the number of studies in which the loss to follow-up exceeded the RFI was recorded. RESULTS: Among the 16 included RCTs, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) sample size was 71 (64-114), and the median (IQR) total number of graft re-rupture/revision ACLR events was 4 (4-6). The median (IQR) graft re-rupture/revision ACLR rate was 4.3% (3.0-6.4) overall, 4.1% (2.6-6.7) in the BTB group, and 5.4% (3.0-6.3) in the HT group. The median (IQR) RFI was 3 (3-4), signifying that a reversal of the outcome in 3 patients in one arm was needed to flip the studies' result from non-significant to statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median (IQR) number of participants lost to follow-up was 11 (3-13), and 13 (81.3%) of the included studies had a loss to follow-up greater than the studies' RFI. CONCLUSION: The results of RCTs reporting statistically non-significant re-rupture/revision ACLR rates between HT and BTB autografts would become significant if the outcome were reversed in a small number of patients-a number that was less than the loss to follow-up in the majority of studies. Thus, the neutrality of these studies is fragile, and a true statistically significant difference in re-rupture/revision rates may have been undetected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Preoperative factors associated with failure to reach the patient acceptable symptom state after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 40 and older.

PURPOSE: To perform a predictive analysis to identify preoperative patient factors associated with failure to achieve a newly defined patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients aged ≥ 40 years with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective review of all patients aged 40 years or older receiving a primary allograft ACLR at a single institution between the years of 2005 and 2016, with 2-year minimum follow-up. Using an updated PASS threshold of 66.7 for the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score previously established for this patient cohort, a univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify preoperative patient characteristics predictive of failure to achieve PASS. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients with a mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 2.1 years (range 2.7 - 11.2) were included in the analysis (48.5 ± 5.6 years, 51.8% female, Body Mass Index (BMI) 25.9 ± 4.4). PASS was achieved by 162 patients (82.2%). Patients who failed to achieve PASS more often had lateral compartment cartilage defects (P = 0.001) and lateral meniscus tears (P = 0.004), higher BMIs (P = 0.004), and Workers' Compensation status (P = 0.043) on univariable analysis. Factors predictive of failure to achieve PASS on multivariable analysis included BMI and lateral compartment cartilage defect (OR 1.12 [1.03-1.23], P = 0.013; OR 5.1 [1.87-13.9], P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among patients ≥ 40 years who receive a primary allograft ACLR, patients who fail to achieve PASS more often had lateral compartment cartilage defects and higher BMIs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Preoperative allergy testing for patients reporting penicillin and cephalosporin allergies is economically justified in preventing infection after total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The use of alternative antibiotics to cefazolin has been associated with increased risk of infection after shoulder arthroplasty. Routine preoperative allergy testing in patients reporting penicillin and cephalosporin allergies increases the number able to receive cefazolin and may reduce the occurrence of infection after shoulder arthroplasty, but the financial viability of this practice is unclear. We used break-even modeling to determine the economic viability of routine preoperative allergy testing for infection prevention in total shoulder arthroplasty patients reporting penicillin and cephalosporin allergies. METHODS: Allergy testing cost ($248.24), infection rates after shoulder arthroplasty following use of noncefazolin antibiotics (3.09%), and infection-related care costs ($55,243) were derived from the literature. A break-even equation using these variables was developed to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in the infection rate that would economically justify the routine implementation of preoperative allergy testing. The number needed to treat was calculated from the ARR. RESULTS: Preoperative allergy testing is considered economically justified if it prevents at least 1 infection out of 223 shoulder arthroplasties (ARR = 0.45%). These protocols remained economically viable at varying allergy testing costs, initial infection rates, and infection-related care costs. CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative penicillin allergy testing is an economically justified infection prevention strategy among patients reporting penicillin and cephalosporin allergies in the setting of elective shoulder arthroplasty. Widespread implementation of this practice may considerably reduce the economic and societal burden associated with prosthetic infections.

Intraosseous Regional Administration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Intraosseous regional administration (IORA) of antibiotics after tourniquet inflation has recently been introduced as a technique to deliver antibiotics directly to the surgical site among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: PubMed and Embase were queried for studies reporting on IORA for perioperative prophylaxis during TKA. Primary outcome measures were local tissue antibiotic concentrations and rates of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Eight studies were included for analysis. Four studies (all randomized controlled trials) compared local tissue concentrations between patients receiving IORA and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Six studies assessed the rate of PJI among patients receiving IORA versus IV antibiotics. RESULTS: All studies found a statistically significant increase in antibiotic concentration in femoral bone and fat samples in patients who were treated with IORA (44.04 µg/g [fat] and 49.3 µg/g [bone] following 500 mg of intraosseous vancomycin) versus IV (3.5 µg/g [fat] and 5.2 µg/g [bone] following 1 g IV of vancomycin). The two studies powered to determine differences in PJI rates found a statistically significant decrease in the rate of PJI among patients receiving IORA versus IV antibiotics. The incidence of PJI in patients treated with IORA and IV antibiotics across all studies was 0.3 and 1.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Perioperative IORA of antibiotics in TKA provides local tissue concentrations of antibiotics that are on average 10 times higher than IV administration alone. Although more adequately powered investigations are necessary to determine the effectiveness of IORA in reducing PJI rates, adoption of IORA should be considered in high-risk patients where elevated tissue antibiotic concentrations would be of a maximum benefit.

Substantial Inconsistency and Variability Exists Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences for Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: As the value of patient-reported outcomes becomes increasingly recognized, minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds have seen greater use in shoulder arthroplasty. However, MCIDs are unique to certain populations, and variation in the modes of calculation in this field may be of concern. With the growing utilization of MCIDs within the field and value-based care models, a detailed appraisal of the appropriateness of MCID use in the literature is necessary and has not been systematically reviewed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a systematic review of MCID quantification in existing studies on shoulder arthroplasty to answer the following questions: (1) What is the range of values reported for the MCID in commonly used shoulder arthroplasty patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)? (2) What percentage of studies use previously existing MCIDs versus calculating a new MCID? (3) What techniques for calculating the MCID were used in studies where a new MCID was calculated? METHODS: The Embase, PubMed, and Ovid/MEDLINE databases were queried from December 2008 through December 2020 for total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty articles reporting an MCID value for various PROMs. Two reviewers (DAK, MAM) independently screened articles for eligibility, specifically identifying articles that reported MCID values for PROMs after shoulder arthroplasty, and extracted data for analysis. Each study was classified into two categories: those referencing a previously defined MCID and those using a newly calculated MCID. Methods for determining the MCID for each study and the variability of reported MCIDs for each PROM were recorded. The number of patients, age, gender, BMI, length of follow-up, surgical indications, and surgical type were extracted for each article. Forty-three articles (16,408 patients) with a mean (range) follow-up of 20 months (0.75 to 68) met the inclusion criteria. The median (range) BMI of patients was 29.3 kg/m2 (28.0 to 32.2 kg/m2), and the median (range) age was 68 years (53 to 84). There were 17 unique PROMs with MCID values. Of the 112 MCIDs reported, the most common PROMs with MCIDs were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) (23% [26 of 112]), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) (17% [19 of 112]), and the Constant (15% [17 of 112]). RESULTS: The ranges of MCID values for each PROM varied widely (ASES: 6.3 to 29.5; SST: 1.4 to 4.0; Constant: -0.3 to 12.8). Fifty-six percent (24 of 43) of studies used previously established MCIDs, with 46% (11 of 24) citing one study. Forty-four percent (19 of 43) of studies established new MCIDs, and the most common technique was anchor-based (37% [7 of 19]), followed by distribution (21% [4 of 19]). CONCLUSION: There is substantial inconsistency and variability in the quantification and reporting of MCID values in shoulder arthroplasty studies. Many shoulder arthroplasty studies apply previously published MCID values with variable ranges of follow-up rather than calculating population-specific thresholds. The use of previously calculated MCIDs may be acceptable in specific situations; however, investigators should select an anchor-based MCID calculated from a patient population as similar as possible to their own. This practice is preferable to the use of distribution-approach MCID methods. Alternatively, authors may consider using substantial clinical benefit or patient-acceptable symptom state to assess outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although MCIDs may provide a useful effect-size based alternative to the traditional p value, care must be taken to use an MCID that is appropriate for the particular patient population being studied.

Predictors of poor and excellent outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Favorable clinical and functional outcomes can be achieved with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Given the expanding utilization of RSA in the United States, understanding the factors that influence both excellent and poor outcomes is increasingly important. METHODS: A single-surgeon prospective registry was used to identify patients who underwent RSA from 2015 to 2018 with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. An excellent postoperative clinical outcome was defined as a final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in the top quartile of ASES scores. A poor outcome was defined as an ASES score in the bottom quartile. Logistic regression was used to determine preoperative characteristics associated with both excellent and poor outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 338 patients with a mean age of 71.5 years (standard deviation [SD], 6.4 years) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The average preoperative ASES score for the entire cohort was 35.3 (SD, 16.4), which improved to 82.4 (SD, 16.1) postoperatively (P < .001). Univariate analysis demonstrated that a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis (OA), private insurance, and higher preoperative ASES scores were significantly associated with achieving excellent outcomes (P < .01 for all). Variables predictive of poor outcomes were workers' compensation status (P = .03), depression (P = .02), a preoperative diagnosis of rotator cuff tear arthropathy (P < .01), preoperative opioid use (P < .01), a higher number of allergies (P < .01), and prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery (P < .01). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that OA (odds ratio [OR], 5.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-26.5; P = .03) and private insurance (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.12-6.5; P = .02) correlated with excellent outcomes whereas a higher number of reported allergies (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97; P = .02), self-reported depression (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.99; P =.04), a history of ipsilateral shoulder surgery (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.87; P =.02), and preoperative opioid use (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09-0.76; P = .01) were predictive of poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative diagnosis of primary OA is the strongest predictor of excellent clinical outcomes following RSA. Patients with an increasing number of reported allergies, self-reported depression, a history of ipsilateral shoulder surgery, and preoperative opioid use are significantly more likely to achieve poor outcomes after RSA. Given the increasing utilization of RSA, this information is important to appropriately counsel patients regarding postoperative expectations.

Functional somatic syndromes are associated with suboptimal outcomes and high cost after shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The presence of functional somatic syndromes (chronic physical symptoms with no identifiable organic cause) in patients undergoing elective joint arthroplasty may affect the recovery experience. We explored the prevalence of functional somatic syndromes among shoulder arthroplasty patients, as well as their association with postoperative outcomes and costs. METHODS: We identified 480 patients undergoing elective total shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic or reverse) between 2015 and 2018 in our institutional registry with minimum 2-year follow-up. Medical records were queried for the presence of 4 well-recognized functional somatic syndromes: fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic headaches, and chronic low-back pain. Multivariable linear regression modeling was used to determine the independent association of these diagnoses with hospitalization time-driven activity-based costs and 2-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and pain scores. RESULTS: Nearly 1 in 5 patients (17%) reported at least 1 functional somatic syndrome. These patients were more likely to be women, to be chronic opioid users, to report more allergies, to have a diagnosis of anxiety, and to have shoulder pathology other than degenerative joint disease (all P ≤ .001). After multivariable adjustment, the presence of at least 1 functional somatic syndrome was independently predictive of lower 2-year ASES (-9.75 points) and SANE (-7.63 points) scores and greater residual pain (+1.13 points) (all P ≤ .001). When considered cumulatively, each additional functional disorder was linked to a stepwise decrease in ASES and SANE scores and an increase in residual pain (P < .001). These patients also incurred higher hospitalization costs, with a stepwise rise in costs with an increasing number of disorders (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Functional somatic syndromes are common in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty and correlate with suboptimal outcomes and greater resource utilization. Efforts to address the biopsychosocial determinants of health that affect the value proposition of shoulder arthroplasty should be prioritized in the redesign of care pathways and bundling initiatives.

Fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus treated with open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of proximal humerus fracture dislocations can be challenging given the extensive injury to the proximal humeral anatomy and increased risk of devascularization of the humeral head often seen in these injuries. The purpose of this study is to undertake a systematic review of the literature on the functional outcomes, rate of revision, and short- and long-term complications for proximal humerus fracture dislocations treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: The PubMed and OVID Embase databases were queried for literature reporting on proximal humerus fracture dislocations treated with ORIF. Data including study design, patient demographics, functional outcomes, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Twelve studies including 294 patients with Neer type 2-, 3-, or 4-part proximal humerus fracture dislocations met the criteria for inclusion. The mean patient age was 53.4 years (19-89 years) with an average follow-up of 2.9 years (1.15-4.9 years). At the final follow-up, the mean Constant score was 73.2 (52-87.3) and the mean Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score was 26.6 (17.5-32). Avascular necrosis was observed in 20.0% (0%-82.3%) and nonunion was observed in 3.0% (0%-7.7%) of patients. Conversion to arthroplasty was observed in 10.7% (5%-20%) and a total reoperation was observed in 35.6% (11.8%-89.1%) of patients in studies explicitly reporting these outcomes. In addition to conversion to arthroplasty, common causes of reoperation were revision ORIF (5.2%) and hardware removal (22.2%). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing ORIF for proximal humerus fracture dislocations have reasonable functional outcomes but relatively high avascular necrosis and reoperation rates. This information can be used to counsel patients and set expectations about the potential for further surgeries.

The association between anterior shoulder joint capsule thickening and glenoid deformity in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder joint capsule thickening is typically present in osteoarthritic shoulders, but its association with specific patterns of glenoid wear is incompletely understood. We sought to determine the relationship between anterior capsular thickening and glenoid deformity in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 134 consecutive osteoarthritic shoulders with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans performed. Axial fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging slices were used to quantify the anterior capsular thickness in millimeters, measured at its thickest point below the subscapularis muscle. Computed tomography scans were used to classify glenoid deformity according to the Walch classification, and an automated 3-dimensional software program provided values for glenoid retroversion and humeral head subluxation. Multinomial and linear regression models were used to characterize the association of anterior capsular thickening with Walch glenoid type, glenoid retroversion, and posterior humeral head subluxation while controlling for patient age and sex. RESULTS: The anterior capsule was thickest in glenoid types B2 (5.5 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0-6.0) and B3 (6.1 mm, 95% CI: 5.6-6.6) and thinnest in A1 (3.7 mm, 95% CI: 3.3-4.2; P < .001). Adjusted for age and sex, glenoid types B2 (odds ratio: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.3-8.4, P < .001) and B3 (odds ratio: 5.4, 95% CI: 2.8-10.4, P < .001) showed the strongest association with increased anterior capsule thickness, compared to glenoid type A1. Increased capsular thickness correlated with greater glenoid retroversion (r = 0.57; P < .001) and posterior humeral head subluxation (r = 0.50; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, for every 1-mm increase in anterior capsular thickening, there was an adjusted mean increase of 3.2° (95% CI: 2.4-4.1) in glenoid retroversion and a 3.8% (95% CI: 2.7-5.0) increase in posterior humeral head subluxation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased thickening of the anterior shoulder capsule is associated with greater posterior glenoid wear and humeral head subluxation. Additional research should determine whether anterior capsular disease plays a causative role in the etiology or progression of eccentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty performed for glenohumeral arthritis: does glenoid morphology matter?

BACKGROUND: Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) have expanded to include primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) with an intact rotator cuff. Limited evidence exists on RTSA in patients with primary GHOA and no posterior glenoid wear (Walch A1, A2, and B1 morphologies). The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to determine if glenoid morphology is associated with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RTSA for primary GHOA. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed in patients undergoing primary RTSA for GHOA with a minimum of 2-year clinical follow-up. Preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to categorize glenoid morphology as described by the modified Walch classification. Pre- and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and range of motion (ROM) measurements were compared across Walch glenoid subtypes. The percentage of patients that reached previously established clinically significant thresholds for minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) was also comparatively assessed. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the association between glenoid morphology and postoperative ASES score while controlling for potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 247 consecutive patients, 197 were available at a minimum 2-year follow-up (80%). Significant improvements were seen in ASES, VAS pain, SANE, and ROM from baseline to final postoperative follow-up in the combined patient cohort (all P < .001). Most (98.0%) patients reached MCID, and 90.9% of patients reached SCB for ASES threshold. No significant differences were found among Walch subtypes in terms of preoperative to postoperative improvement in ASES (P = .39), SANE (P = .4), VAS pain (P = .49), forward elevation (P = .77), external rotation (P = .45), or internal rotation (P= 0.1). The only significant difference in postoperative outcomes between Walch glenoid subtypes was higher postoperative ASES scores among type B3 glenoids compared with type A1 glenoids (P = .03) on univariate analysis. However, no individual Walch glenoid subtype was associated with lower postoperative ASES scores on multivariable analysis (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Primary RTSA provides excellent short-term outcomes in patients with glenohumeral arthritis with intact rotator cuff, regardless of the degree of preoperative glenoid deformity. Surgeons can use these data to support the use of RTSA for glenohumeral arthritis in a more standardized way.

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage does not predict outcomes or cost after elective shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that the variation in value of shoulder arthroplasty may be mediated by factors external to surgery. We sought to determine if neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation is associated with postoperative outcomes and cost among patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: We identified 380 patients undergoing elective total shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic or reverse) between 2015 and 2018 in our institutional registry with minimum 2-year follow-up. Each patient's home address was mapped to the area deprivation index in order to determine the level of socioeconomic disadvantage. The area deprivation index is a validated composite measure of 17 census variables encompassing income, education, employment, and housing conditions. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on socioeconomic disadvantage (least disadvantaged [deciles 1-3], middle group [4-6], and most disadvantaged [7-10]). Bivariate analysis was performed to determine associations between the level of socioeconomic deprivation with hospitalization time-driven activity-based costs and 2-year postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and pain intensity scores. RESULTS: Overall 19% of patients were categorized as most disadvantaged. These patients were found to have equivalent preoperative pain intensity (P = .51), SANE (P = .50), and ASES (P = .72) scores compared to the middle and least disadvantaged groups, as well as similar outcome improvement at 2 years postoperatively (ASES): least disadvantaged group [35.7-84.3], middle group [35.1-82.4], and most disadvantaged group [37.1-84.0] [P = .56]; SANE: least disadvantaged group [31.8-87.1], middle group [30.8-84.8], and most disadvantaged group [34.2-85.1] [P = .42]; and pain: least disadvantaged group [6.0-0.97], middle group [6-0.97], and most disadvantaged group [5.6-0.80] [P = .88]. No differences in hospitalization costs were noted between groups (P = .77). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroplasty residing in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods demonstrate equivalent preoperative and postoperative outcomes as others, without incurring higher costs. These findings support continued efforts to provide equitable access to orthopedic care across the socioeconomic spectrum.

Patients with limited health literacy have worse preoperative function and pain control and experience prolonged hospitalizations following shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients with limited health literacy (LHL) may have difficulty understanding and acting on medical information, placing them at risk for potential misuse of health services and adverse outcomes. The purposes of our study were to determine (1) the prevalence of LHL in patients undergoing inpatient shoulder arthroplasty, (2) the association of LHL with the degree of preoperative symptom intensity and magnitude of limitations, (3) and the effects of LHL on perioperative outcomes including postoperative length of stay (LOS), total inpatient costs, and inpatient opioid consumption. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 230 patients who underwent elective inpatient reverse or anatomic shoulder arthroplasty between January 2018 and May 2021 from a prospectively maintained single-surgeon registry. The health literacy of each patient was assessed preoperatively using the validated 4-item Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool. Patients with a Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool score ≤ 17 were categorized as having LHL. The outcomes of interest were preoperative patient-reported outcome scores and range of motion, LOS, total postoperative inpatient opioid consumption, and total inpatient costs as calculated using time-driven activity-based costing methodology. Univariate analysis was performed to determine associations between LHL and patient characteristics, as well as the outcomes of interest. Multivariable linear regression modeling was used to determine the association between LHL and LOS while controlling for potentially confounding variables. RESULTS: Overall, 58 patients (25.2%) were classified as having LHL. Prior to surgery, these patients had significantly higher rates of opioid use (P = .002), more self-reported allergies (P = .007), and worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (P = .001), visual analog scale pain scores (P = .020), forward elevation (P < .001), and external rotation (P = .022) but did not significantly differ in terms of any additional demographic or clinical characteristics (P > .05). Patients with LHL had a significantly longer LOS (1.84 ± 0.92 days vs. 1.57 ± 0.58 days, P = .012) but did not differ in terms of total hospitalization costs (P = .65) or total inpatient opioid consumption (P = .721). On multivariable analysis, LHL was independently predictive of a significantly longer LOS (ß, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.42; P = .035). CONCLUSION: LHL is commonplace among patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroplasty and is associated with greater preoperative symptom severity and activity intolerance. Its association with longer hospitalizations suggests that health literacy is an important factor to consider for postoperative disposition planning.

Rotator cuff fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy: relation to glenoid deformity in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Muscle atrophy (MA) and fatty infiltration (FI) are degenerative processes of the rotator cuff musculature that have incompletely understood relationships with the development of eccentric glenoid wear in the setting of primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). METHODS: All patients with GHOA and an intact rotator cuff who underwent both magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans of the affected shoulder prior to total shoulder arthroplasty between 2015 and 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Rotator cuff MA was measured quantitatively on sequential sagittal magnetic resonance images, whereas FI was assessed on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging slices using the Goutallier classification. Preoperative computed tomography scans were reconstructed using automated 3-dimensional software to determine glenoid retroversion, glenoid inclination, and humeral head subluxation. Glenoid deformity was classified according to the Walch classification. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to characterize associations between age, sex, muscle area, FI, and glenoid morphology. RESULTS: Among the 127 included patients, significant associations were found between male sex and larger overall rotator cuff musculature (P < .01), increased ratio of the posterior rotator cuff (PRC) to the subscapularis area (P = .01), and glenoid retroversion (19° vs. 14°, P < .01). Larger supraspinatus and PRC muscle size was correlated with increased retroversion (r = 0.23 [P = .006] for supraspinatus and r = 0.25 [P = .004] for PRC) and humeral head subluxation (r = 0.25 [P = .004] for supraspinatus and r = 0.28 [P = .001] for PRC). The ratio of PRC muscle size to anterior rotator cuff muscle size was not associated with evidence of eccentric glenoid wear (P > .05). After we controlled for confounding factors, increasing glenoid retroversion was associated with high-grade infraspinatus FI (ß, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-10.7; P < .01) whereas larger PRC musculature was predictive of a Walch type B (vs. type A) glenoid (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.5; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Patients with eccentric glenoid wear in the setting of primary GHOA and an intact rotator cuff appear to have both larger PRC musculature and higher rates of infraspinatus FI. Although the temporal and causal relationships of these associations remain ambiguous, MA and FI should be considered 2 discrete processes in the natural history of GHOA.

Online Crowdsourcing Survey of United States Population Preferences and Perceptions Regarding Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been shown to be both safe and cost-effective in appropriately selected patients and continues to expand substantially across the United States. Using online crowdsourcing, we aimed to assess population perceptions regarding outpatient TJA and to determine factors associated with preference for outpatient versus inpatient arthroplasty. METHODS: A closed-ended survey consisting of 39 questions was administered to members of a public platform. Study participants responded to questions regarding demographic factors and outpatient TJA. Validated assessments to capture health literacy and engagement were also used. To determine factors associated with preference for outpatient TJA, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 900 participants completed the survey. After exclusion of surveys with incomplete data, 725 responses remained for analysis (80.6%). Over half (59.9%) of the survey participants would feel comfortable going home the same day of surgery following TJA. However, two-thirds (64.6%) would prefer to stay in the hospital following TJA. The majority (68.0%) of respondents perceive a hospital setting as the safest location for TJA. The 3 major concerns regarding outpatient TJA were cost, post-operative pain control, and post-operative complication. Among the 111 respondents (15.3%) who would prefer outpatient TJA, 45% would pay more out-of-pocket, 63.1% travel further, and 55.9% would be willing to wait longer to have their surgery performed as an outpatient. On multivariable regressions, those living in a suburban setting (adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals: 4.2 [1.3-2.7], P = .02) and >60 year old adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals: 8 [2-33.1], P = .004) were more likely to prefer outpatient TJA. CONCLUSION: Despite the rise in outpatient TJA, the majority of the public appears to prefer inpatient TJA and the minority would expect to be discharged home the same day. Our data can be used to address specific patient concerns regarding outpatient TJA and set realistic expectations for hospital systems and ambulatory facilities.

The Cost-Effectiveness of Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Infection Prevention After Total Joint Arthroplasty in High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis may decrease rates of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in patients at high risk for infection. However, the cost-effectiveness of this practice is not clear. In this study, we used a break-even economic model to determine the cost-effectiveness of routine extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis for PJI prevention in high-risk TJA patients. METHODS: Baseline PJI rates in high-risk patients, the cost of revision arthroplasty for PJI, and the costs of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis regimens were obtained from the literature and institutional purchasing records. These variables were incorporated in a break-even economic model to calculate the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in infection rate necessary for extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis to be cost-effective. ARR was used to determine the number needed to treat (NNT). RESULTS: Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis with Cefadroxil in patients at high risk for PJI was cost-effective at an ARR in baseline infection rate of 0.187% (NNT = 535) and 0.151% (NNT = 662) for TKA and THA, respectively. Cost-effectiveness was preserved with varying costs of antibiotic regimens, PJI treatment costs, and infection rates. CONCLUSION: The use of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce PJI rates in patients at high risk for infection following TJA and appears to be cost-effective. However, the current evidence supporting this practice is limited in quality. The use of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis should be weighed against the possible development of future antimicrobial resistance, which may change the value proposition.