Nucleus accumbens dopamine release reflects Bayesian inference during instrumental learning.

Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens has been hypothesized to signal reward prediction error, the difference between observed and predicted reward, suggesting a biological implementation for reinforcement learning. Rigorous tests of this hypothesis require assumptions about how the brain maps sensory signals to reward predictions, yet this mapping is still poorly understood. In particular, the mapping is non-trivial when sensory signals provide ambiguous information about the hidden state of the environment. Previous work using classical conditioning tasks has suggested that reward predictions are generated conditional on probabilistic beliefs about the hidden state, such that dopamine implicitly reflects these beliefs. Here we test this hypothesis in the context of an instrumental task (a two-armed bandit), where the hidden state switches repeatedly. We measured choice behavior and recorded dLight signals reflecting dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core. Model comparison based on the behavioral data favored models that used Bayesian updating of probabilistic beliefs. These same models also quantitatively matched the dopamine measurements better than non-Bayesian alternatives. We conclude that probabilistic belief computation plays a fundamental role in instrumental performance and associated mesolimbic dopamine signaling.

Diverse operant control of different motor cortex populations during learning.

During motor learning,1 as well as during neuroprosthetic learning,2-4 animals learn to control motor cortex activity in order to generate behavior. Two different populations of motor cortex neurons, intra-telencephalic (IT) and pyramidal tract (PT) neurons, convey the resulting cortical signals within and outside the telencephalon. Although a large amount of evidence demonstrates contrasting functional organization among both populations,5,6 it is unclear whether the brain can equally learn to control the activity of either class of motor cortex neurons. To answer this question, we used a calcium-imaging-based brain-machine interface (CaBMI)3 and trained different groups of mice to modulate the activity of either IT or PT neurons in order to receive a reward. We found that the animals learned to control PT neuron activity faster and better than IT neuron activity. Moreover, our findings show that the advantage of PT neurons is the result of characteristics inherent to this population as well as their local circuitry and cortical depth location. Taken together, our results suggest that the motor cortex is more efficient at controlling the activity of pyramidal tract neurons, which are embedded deep in the cortex, and relaying motor commands outside the telencephalon.