Propensity-score-matching analysis to compare efficacy and safety between 16-gauge and 18-gauge needle in ultrasound-guided biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions.

BACKGROUND: Definitive diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) depends on the histological analysis of the pleural biopsy sample. Ultrasound (US)-guided sampling is now standard practice in the clinical setting. However, determining a suitable needle size and sampling times to improve the efficacy and safety of the biopsy remains challenging. Here, we compared the efficacy between 16- and 18-gauge core biopsy needles in US-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy for PPLs on histological diagnosis and procedure-related complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 1169 patients (767 men, 402 women; mean age, 59.4 ± 13.2 years) who received biopsy for PPLs between September 2011 and February 2019 were included. The propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to adjust the baseline differences, and the rate of successful specimen assessment and complications were compared between the 16-gauge (249 patients) and 18-gauge (920 patients) groups. The number of pleural surfaces crossed (NOPSC) was defined as the number of times the visceral pleural surface was transgressed. Stratified analysis was performed based on NOPSC. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 92.0% (1076/1169). The overall complication rate was 9.6%, including pneumothorax, hemorrhage, and vasovagal reaction, which occurred in 2.5% (29/1169), 6.6% (77/1169), and 0.5% (6/1169) of the patients, respectively. When NOPSC was 1 or > 2, the success and complication rates in the 16-gauge group were comparable to those of the 18-gauge group (all P > 0.05). When the NOPSC was 2, the success rate in the 16-gauge group was significantly higher than that in the 18-gauge group (P = 0.017), whereas the complication rate was comparable (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Higher success rate could be achieved using a 16-gauge than an 18-gauge core biopsy needle in the US-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy for PPLs when the NOPSC was 2. We recommend using 16-gauge needles with 2 times of needle passes in biopsy for PPLs in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of US-guided thermal ablation for primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: To summarize the published literature on thermal ablation for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thermal ablation as a novel treatment strategy.Materials and methods: Two authors carried out the literature search using four databases independently, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The meta-analysis included prospective and retrospective data that compared post-ablative outcomes to pre-ablative values. The primary outcomes were parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum calcium and volume of the parathyroid gland (VPG).Results: From the 184 original articles, five studies (4 retrospective studies and 1 prospective study) examining 84 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed significant reduction of PTH at 3 (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.09, 95% confidence index (CI) = -1.42 to -0.76, p < 0.001) and 6 months (SMD = -1.13, 95% CI = -1.46 to -0.80, p < 0.001) after thermal ablation. Serum calcium level was significantly reduced at 3 (mean difference (MD) = -0.31, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.12, p = 0.001) and 6 months (MD = -0.31, 95% CI = -0.46 to -0.17, p < 0.001) after thermal ablation. There was no significant difference between pre-ablative VPG and that of 6 months after ablation (MD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.70 to 0.09, p = 0.13). The most common complications were transient dysphonia and subcutaneous edema. No major complications or death occurred.Conclusion: Thermal ablation is effective and safe for treatment of PHPT. PTH and calcium levels were reduced significantly at 3 and 6 months after thermal ablation.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules ≤ 2 cm: Diagnostic Performance, Safety and Influence Factors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate diagnostic performance and safety of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPLs) ≤ 2 cm, and the influence factors of sample adequacy and safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 194 patients (99 men, 95 women; mean age, 56.2 ± 13.7 years) who received biopsy for PPLs ≤ 2 cm between January 2014 to January 2019 were included. Variables including patient demographics, lesion location, lesion size, presence of lesion necrosis, presence of emphysema on CT, patient position, biopsy needle size and number of needle passes were recorded. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to explore the influence factor of sample adequacy and safety. RESULTS: Biopsy specimens were adequate for diagnosis in 161/194 (83%) cases; the diagnostic accuracy was 81.4% (158/194). The overall complication rate was 8.8% (17/194), including pneumothorax, hemoptysis and pleural effusion, which occurred in 2.1% (4/194), 5.2% (10/194), and 1.5% (3/194) of patients, respectively. The incidence of pneumothorax in the 16-gauge-needle group were significantly higher than that of the 18-gauge-needle group (5.6% vs 0%, P=0.018). Adequate sampling of 16-gauge and 18-gauge needles were achieved in 90.3%(65/72) and 78.7%(96/122) cases, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed needle size (16-gauge vs 18-gauge) was an independent influence factors of sample adequacy (P=0.015, odds ratio=3.419). A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted and the area under the curve was 0.774. CONCLUSION: US-guided percutaneous needle biopsy is a feasible and safe technique for small PPLs ≤ 2 cm. Needle size is an independent influence factor of sample adequacy and post-procedure pneumothorax. Sixteen-gauge needle has the advantage of achieving adequate sample for pathological analysis, though the risk of pneumothorax should be alerted.