[Investigation of the Filter Performance in a Sample of Standardised Particle-filtering Half Masks]. / Stichprobenuntersuchung der Filterleistung von normierten partikelfilternden Halbmasken.

BACKGROUND: Thanks to a simplified special approval process that was valid until October 1st, 2020, a large number of particle-filtering half masks have come onto the German market. When caring for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, the RKI recommends wearing particle-filtering half masks with a filter performance of at least 94 %, which corresponds to FFP class 2 according to EN 149:2001+A1:2009. We have examined 15 particle-filtering half masks with different specifications for their filter performance METHOD: The masks were clamped in a jig in an airtight test box. Radioactive particles with a size of 0.6 ±â€Š0.4 µm were nebulized into the box and sucked into a filter through the port of the jig and an unfiltered reference port using an artificial lung. The activity deposited on the filter was measured by means of a gamma camera. The filter performance was calculated from this. RESULTS: Five of the 15 masks tested had a filter performance of less than 94 % and therefore do not meet the FFP2 standard. The filter performance of these masks was 71.8 ±â€Š2.3 %, 73.2 ±â€Š2.3 %, 78.2 ±â€Š6.7 %, 92.2 ±â€Š0.5 % and 85.9 ±â€Š1.6 %. CONCLUSION: One third of the examined masks did not meet the recommended FFP2 standard, which is recommended for the care of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. A comprehensive review of already approved products by the supervisory authorities is advisable.

[Assessment of mesopic and contrast vision for driving licences: which cut-off values, which methods are appropriate?]. / Untersuchung des Dämmerungs- und Kontrastsehens nach Fahrerlaubnisverordnung: Welche Grenzwerte, welche Verfahren sind geeignet?

BACKGROUND: Hitherto recommendations and thresholds for contrast tests are available for mesopic but not for photopic methods. While mesopic tests are widespread in ophthalmology, in occupational medicine photopic contrast tests are often used. With regard to the attachment 6 of the German Fahrerlaubnisverordnung (FeV) which is relevant since July 2011 we tested the specificity and sensitivity as well as the test-retest reliability of available test devices and defined cut-off values. METHODS: We examined patients with medium opacities, healthy volunteers and a sample of employees. Optovist EU, Binoptometer 4P and Pelli-Robson charts with standardised illumination were applied for contrast sensitivity testing. All these methods were compared to the Mesotest II as gold standard. We followed the recommendations of the German Qualitätssicherungs-Kommission der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft (DOG) for contrast vision testing and definition of cut-off values. RESULTS: 64 patients with cataract (age 42-70 years, median 62 years), 50 pilots (age 40-69 years, median 53.5 years) and 109 employees of a transportation company (age 40-59 years, median 50 years) were included in the trial. All contrast sensitivity tests showed a good sensitivity and specificity (AUC 0.86 to 0.99). For Optovist EU and Binoptometer 4P a threshold of 15 % Weber contrast is recommended for examinations according to FeV. The test-retest reliability was high in all methods with highly significant Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.77 to 0.94 and a repeatability coefficient between 0.08 und 0.4. The standard distance of 1 m common for the Pelli-Robson chart cannot be recommended for FeV examinations, while the results at 3 m distance are comparable to those of the other contrast vision tests. The preliminary cut-off for the Pelli-Robson chart at 3 m distance is 1.65. CONCLUSIONS: Cut-off values for the lawful assessment of applicants are now available. Both Binoptometer 4P and Optovist EU proved to be appropriate and - as expected due to comparable technical properties - the same cut-off can be recommended. At 1 m distance the Pelli-Robson chart is not sensitive enough. Because the new distance of 3 m for the Pelli-Robson chart was investigated in 55 cataract patients and 10 pilots in this trial, a confirmatory trial for this distance is planned.

A modular spring-loaded actuator for mechanical activation of membrane proteins.

How cells respond to mechanical forces by converting them into biological signals underlie crucial cellular processes. Our understanding of mechanotransduction has been hindered by technical barriers, including limitations in our ability to effectively apply low range piconewton forces to specific mechanoreceptors on cell membranes without laborious and repetitive trials. To overcome these challenges we introduce the Nano-winch, a robust, easily assembled, programmable DNA origami-based molecular actuator. The Nano-winch is designed to manipulate multiple mechanoreceptors in parallel by exerting fine-tuned, low- piconewton forces in autonomous and remotely activated modes via adjustable single- and double-stranded DNA linkages, respectively. Nano-winches in autonomous mode can land and operate on the cell surface. Targeting the device to integrin stimulated detectable downstream phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase, an indication that Nano-winches can be applied to study cellular mechanical processes. Remote activation mode allowed finer extension control and greater force exertion. We united remotely activated Nano-winches with single-channel bilayer experiments to directly observe the opening of a channel by mechanical force in the force responsive gated channel protein, BtuB. This customizable origami provides an instrument-free approach that can be applied to control and explore a diversity of mechanotransduction circuits on living cells.

[Experience in contrast vision testing]. / Erfahrungen mit der Untersuchung des Kontrastsehens.

INTRODUCTION: Since July 2011 driving licensing in Germany requires contrast vision to be tested. Recommendations are available for testing under mesopic conditions only. This study is aimed to provide recommendations for photopic testing. METHOD: 169 persons were tested both under mesopic (Mesotest) and photopic (Optovist) conditions. RESULTS: With the Mesotest the setting without glare and the requirement to recognize contrast 1:5 or with glare contrast 1:23 proved to be suitable. With the Optovist visual acuity size 0.4 without and 0.25 with glare proved to be adequate, if the requirement is to recognize the limit of 5 %. DISCUSSION: Not unexpectedly, there is no perfect congruence between the tests. We therefore recommend that the screening methods used in industrial medicine need to be sufficiently sensitive and specific, unfortunately this is met only by some of the conditions supplied with the instruments.