Simplified temporary right ventricular support after implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

Right ventricular failure is one of the most feared complications after implantation of a left ventricular assist device. We provide the technical details for a simplified, percutaneous approach to temporary right heart support.

Multidisciplinary cardiogenic shock team approach improves the long-term outcomes of patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock treated with short-term mechanical circulatory support.

AIMS: Short-term mechanical circulatory support (STMCS) may be used as an intentional escalation strategy to treat refractory cardiogenic shock (rCS). However, with growing technical possibilities, making the right choice at the right time can be challenging. We established a shock team in January 2013 comprising a cardiac anaesthetist-intensivist, an interventional cardiologist, and a cardiac surgeon. Since then, a diagnosis of rCS has triggered a multidisciplinary team meeting based on a common algorithm. This study aimed to compare the decision-making process for STMCS for rCS before (2007-2013) and after (2013-2019) the creation of the shock team. METHODS AND RESULTS: This before-and-after cohort study was conducted over a 156-month period. Post-cardiotomy rCS were excluded. The primary outcome was a 1-year survival rate. In total, 250 consecutive adult patients were included in the analysis (84 in the control group and 166 in the shock team group). At baseline, the CardShock score was not different between the two groups (5[3-5] vs. 5[4-6], P = 0.323). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the shock team group compared with the control group (59% vs. 45%, P = 0.043). After a Cox regression analysis, the shock team intervention was independently associated with a significantly improved 1-year survival rate (HR: 0.592, 95% CI: 0.398-0.880, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary shock team-based decision for STMCS device implantation in rCS is associated with better 1-year survival rates.

Impact of a phosphorylcholine-coated cardiac bypass circuit on blood loss and platelet function: a prospective, randomized study.

Platelet dysfunction due to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery increases the risk of bleeding. This study analyzed the effect of a phosphorylcholine (PC)-coated CPB circuit on blood loss, transfusion needs, and platelet function. We performed a prospective, randomized study at Strasbourg University Hospital, which included 40 adults undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) (n = 20) or mitral valve repair (n = 20) using CPB. Patients were randomized either to PC-coated CPB or uncoated CPB (10 CABG patients and 10 mitral valve repair patients in each group). Blood loss and transfusion needs were evaluated intra- and postoperatively. Markers of platelet activation and thrombin generation were measured at anesthesia induction, at the beginning and end of CPB, on skin closure, and on days 0, 1, and 5. Comparisons were made by Student's t test or covariance analysis (significance threshold p < or = .05). Blood loss was significantly lower in the PC group during the first 6 postoperative hours (171 +/- 102 vs. 285 +/- 193 mL, p = .024), at the threshold of significance from 6-24 hours (p = .052), and similar in both groups after 24 hours. During CPB, platelet count decreased by 48% in both groups. There was no difference in markers of platelet activation, thrombin generation, or transfusion needs between the two groups. Norepinephrine use was more frequent in the control group (63% vs. 33%) but not significantly. PC-coating of the CPB surface reduced early postoperative bleeding, especially in CABG patients, but had no significant effect on platelet function because of large interindividual variations that prevented the establishment of a causal relationship.

Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 and the Impella Left Direct pumps for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is associated with high mortality rates of 50-80%. Although veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been used as mechanical circulatory support in patients with PCCS, it is associated with a high rate of complications and poor quality of life. The Impella 5.0 and Impella Left Direct (LD) (Impella 5.0/LD) are minimally invasive left ventricular assist devices that provide effective haemodynamic support resulting in left ventricular unloading and systemic perfusion. Our goal was to describe the outcome of patients with PCCS supported with the Impella 5.0/LD at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients supported with the Impella 5.0/LD for PCCS between December 2010 and June 2015. Survival outcome and in-hospital complications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (63 ± 14 years, 17% women) with PCCS were supported with the Impella 5.0/LD. At baseline, 69% experienced chronic heart failure, 66% had dilated cardiomyopathy and 57% had valvular disease. The mean EuroSCORE II was 22 ± 17 and the ejection fraction was 28 ± 11%. Most of the patients underwent isolated valve surgery (45%) or isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (38%). The mean duration of Impella support was 9 ± 7 days. Weaning from the Impella was successful in 72.4%, and 58.6% survived to discharge. Recovery of native heart function was observed in 100% of discharged patients. Survival to 30 days and to 1 year from Impella implant was 58.6% and 51.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Impella 5.0 and the Impella LD represent an excellent treatment option for critically ill patients with PCCS and are associated with favourable survival outcome and native heart recovery.

Benefits of Impella and Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extra Corporeal Life Support Alliance.

Peripheral veno-arterial extra corporeal life support (V-A ECLS) is an effective tool in treating refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS). Despite additional use of intra-aortic balloon pump, insufficient left ventricular unloading is a likely complication. We present herein our experience combining V-A ECLS and Impella to treat symptomatic, critical patients. A retrospective single-center review analyzed patients with V-A ECLS and intra-aortic balloon pump for RCS and subsequently benefiting from Impella implantation, between 2011 and 2015. From 1248 cases, 31 critical patients (2.5%) with a median SOFA score = 12 (7-15) were included. Median age was 53 years, and 74% were male. RCS resulted from myocardial ischemia (52%) and idiopathic dilated myocardiopathy (23%). Forty-seven percentage of patients were treated previously for chronic Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Median time between V-A ECLS and Impella implantation was 84 hours (24-186). The Impella median support duration was 8 days (5-10). ECLS and Impella were weaned simultaneously in 26% of patients, 33% were switched to a long-term assistance, and 10% were transplanted. Overall, day-30 survival was 53%. Factors including diabetes, patients aged over 60 years, surgery using extracorporeal circulation, adrenalin infusion, acute myocardial infarction, and chronic HFrEF are associated with day-30 mortality. Chronic HFrEF was an independent risk factor for the day-30 mortality [hazard ratio = 5.28 (1.38-20.21), P = 0.015]. Impella and V-A ECLS combination is a promising association for critical patients presenting symptomatic insufficient LV unloading, for weaning V-A ECLS or testing the right ventricle before a switch to left ventricle assist device support.

Hybrid Melody Valve Implantation in Mitral Position in a Child: Usefulness of a 3-Dimensional Printed Model for Preprocedural Planning.

We present the case of a 4-month-old child with atrioventricular canal associated with severe left atrioventricular valve dysfunction who previously underwent 3 surgical valve reconstructions without significant improvement. A Hybrid Melody valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) insertion was planned. Because of the low weight, the risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction was significant and therefore evaluated preprocedurally using a cardiac computed tomography-derived 3-dimensional printed model. In vitro tests showed good anchorage of the valve without subaortic obstruction and the procedure was then achieved with an excellent clinical result.

Role of cardiac imaging and three-dimensional printing in percutaneous appendage closure.

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia, affecting up to 13% of people aged>80 years, and is responsible for 15-20% of all ischaemic strokes. Left atrial appendage occlusion devices have been developed as an alternative approach to reduce the risk of stroke in patients for whom oral anticoagulation is contraindicated. The procedure can be technically demanding, and obtaining a complete left atrial appendage occlusion can be challenging. These observations have emphasized the importance of preprocedural planning, to optimize the accuracy and safety of the procedure. In this setting, a multimodality imaging approach, including three-dimensional imaging, is often used for preoperative assessment and procedural guidance. These imaging modalities, including transoesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography, allow acquisition of a three-dimensional dataset that improves understanding of the cardiac anatomy; dedicated postprocessing software integrated into the clinical workflow can be used to generate a stereolithography file, which can be printed in a rubber-like material, seeking to replicate the myocardial tissue characteristics and mechanical properties of the left atrial appendage wall. The role of multimodality imaging and 3D printing technology offers a new field for implantation simulation, which may have a major impact on physician training and technique optimization.

Temporary right ventricular support following left ventricle assist device implantation: a comparison of two techniques.

OBJECTIVES: Right ventricular failure (RVF) after implantation of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a dramatic complication. We compared retrospectively two techniques of temporary right ventricular support after LVAD (HeartMate II, Thoratec Corp, Pleasonton, CA, USA) implantation. METHODS: From 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2012, 78 patients [mean age 52 ± 1.34 years; 15 women (19%)] received a HeartMate II at our institution. Among these, 18 patients (23%) suffered postimplant RVF treated by peripheral temporary right ventricular support. Aetiology of heart failure was ischaemic in 12 (67%) and dilated cardiomyopathy in 6 (33%) patients. The preimplant RV risk score averaged 5.1 ± 0.59. Ten patients were treated using a femorofemoral venoarterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and 8 patients were treated using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a right ventricular assist device (RVAD) established between a femoral vein and the pulmonary artery via a Dacron prosthesis (RVAD). RESULTS: Duration of RV support was 7.12 ± 5.4 days and 9.57 ± 3.5 days in venoarterial ECLS and vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD groups, respectively (P = 0.32). Three patients (17%) died while under RV support (venoarterial ECLS, n = 2; and vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD, n = 1, P = 0.58). In the venoarterial ECLS group, 6 (60%) patients suffered major thromboembolic complications including thrombosis of the ECLS arterial line (n = 2), ischaemic stroke (n = 2) and thrombosis of the ascending aorta (n = 2). No major complication was observed in the vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD group (P = 0.01). RV support was successfully weaned in 8 (80%) patients of the venoarterial ECLS group and in 7 (87.5%) of the vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD group (P = 0.58). The duration of postimplant intensive care unit stay was not different (respectively, 27.5 ± 18.7 days and 20.0 ± 12.0 days; P = 0.38) between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary support of the failing RV after LVAD implantation using temporary vein and the pulmonary artery RVAD is a promising therapeutic option. This approach provides adequate LVAD pre- and afterload and is associated with significantly less thromboembolic complications.

Using the Impella 5.0 with a right axillary artery approach as bridge to long-term mechanical circulatory assistance.

PURPOSE: Impella 5.0 is a short-term left ventricle assist device (LVAD), inserted retrograde into the left ventricle across the aortic valve through a surgical peripheral access. Impella has been utilized for various indications but in the setting of bridge-to-bridge application there are limited reports. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational analysis of Impella utilization at our institution as bridge to long-term LVADs. The primary end-point was survival during Impella support. RESULTS: Between December 2010 and February 2012, we implanted 20 Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock and, among these, 5 were implanted as bridge to long-term LVADs. In this latter group, mean age at the time of implantation was 44 ± 15.6 (range 27-68) years and there was a prevalence of males (80%). Etiology of cardiogenic shock was: decompensated anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (n = 1), myocardial infarction (n = 4). There was no major bleeding requiring surgical revision or infectious complications at the right axillary access. One patient required Impella replacement due to a pump stop. After a mean period of 14.2 ± 9.0 (range 6-27) days of Impella support, patients were switched to a long-term LVAD (Jarvik 2000, n = 2; HeartMate II, n = 3). One patient died 70 days after implantation of the long-term LVAD due to multi-organ failure, while the remaining patients are still alive after a mean period of follow-up of 108.6 ± 66.2 (range 19-191) days. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that an Impella 5.0 implanted through the right axillary artery approach is a valid option as bridge to long-term LVADs.