A predicted-loss based active learning approach for robust cancer pathology image analysis in the workplace.

BACKGROUND: Convolutional neural network-based image processing research is actively being conducted for pathology image analysis. As a convolutional neural network model requires a large amount of image data for training, active learning (AL) has been developed to produce efficient learning with a small amount of training data. However, existing studies have not specifically considered the characteristics of pathological data collected from the workplace. For various reasons, noisy patches can be selected instead of clean patches during AL, thereby reducing its efficiency. This study proposes an effective AL method for cancer pathology that works robustly on noisy datasets. METHODS: Our proposed method to develop a robust AL approach for noisy histopathology datasets consists of the following three steps: 1) training a loss prediction module, 2) collecting predicted loss values, and 3) sampling data for labeling. This proposed method calculates the amount of information in unlabeled data as predicted loss values and removes noisy data based on predicted loss values to reduce the rate at which noisy data are selected from the unlabeled dataset. We identified a suitable threshold for optimizing the efficiency of AL through sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: We compared the results obtained with the identified threshold with those of existing representative AL methods. In the final iteration, the proposed method achieved a performance of 91.7% on the noisy dataset and 92.4% on the clean dataset, resulting in a performance reduction of less than 1%. Concomitantly, the noise selection ratio averaged only 2.93% on each iteration. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed AL method showed robust performance on datasets containing noisy data by avoiding data selection in predictive loss intervals where noisy data are likely to be distributed. The proposed method contributes to medical image analysis by screening data and producing a robust and effective classification model tailored for cancer pathology image processing in the workplace.

Improving quality control in the routine practice for histopathological interpretation of gastrointestinal endoscopic biopsies using artificial intelligence.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal and gastric cancer are major causes of cancer-related deaths. In Korea, gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic biopsy specimens account for a high percentage of histopathologic examinations. Lack of a sufficient pathologist workforce can cause an increase in human errors, threatening patient safety. Therefore, we developed a digital pathology total solution combining artificial intelligence (AI) classifier models and pathology laboratory information system for GI endoscopic biopsy specimens to establish a post-analytic daily fast quality control (QC) system, which was applied in clinical practice for a 3-month trial run by four pathologists. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Our whole slide image (WSI) classification framework comprised patch-generator, patch-level classifier, and WSI-level classifier. The classifiers were both based on DenseNet (Dense Convolutional Network). In laboratory tests, the WSI classifier achieved accuracy rates of 95.8% and 96.0% in classifying histopathological WSIs of colorectal and gastric endoscopic biopsy specimens, respectively, into three classes (Negative for dysplasia, Dysplasia, and Malignant). Classification by pathologic diagnosis and AI prediction were compared and daily reviews were conducted, focusing on discordant cases for early detection of potential human errors by the pathologists, allowing immediate correction, before the pathology report error is conveyed to the patients. During the 3-month AI-assisted daily QC trial run period, approximately 7-10 times the number of slides compared to that in the conventional monthly QC (33 months) were reviewed by pathologists; nearly 100% of GI endoscopy biopsy slides were double-checked by the AI models. Further, approximately 17-30 times the number of potential human errors were detected within an average of 1.2 days. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-assisted daily QC system that we developed and established demonstrated notable improvements in QC, in quantitative, qualitative, and time utility aspects. Ultimately, we developed an independent AI-assisted post-analytic daily fast QC system that was clinically applicable and influential, which could enhance patient safety.