Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Qual Health Res ; 32(12): 1881-1896, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35981561

RESUMO

Most people in high income countries experience dying while receiving healthcare, yet dying has no clear beginning, and contexts influence how dying is conceptualised. This study investigates how UK physicians conceptualise the dying patient. We employed Scoping Study Methodology to obtain medical literature from 2006-2021, and Qualitative Content Analysis to analyse stated and implied meanings of language used, informed by social-materialism. Our findings indicate physicians do not conceive a dichotomous distinction between dying and not dying, but construct conceptions of the dying patient in subjective ways linked to their practice. We argue that the focus of future research should be on exploring practice-based challenges in the workplace to understanding patient dying. Furthermore, pre-Covid-19 literature related dying to chronic illness, but analysis of literature published since the pandemic generated conceptions of dying from acute illness. Researchers should note the ongoing effects of Covid-19 on societal and medical awareness of dying.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Médicos , Humanos , Pacientes , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Reino Unido
2.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 45(2): 369-375, 2021 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33961514

RESUMO

Traditionally teachers display the learning outline at the beginning and conclusions at the end of didactic teaching sessions, and students may find it difficult to understand how teaching activities relate to learning objectives and what they should study for assessments. We introduced the "concept-sharing approach" in our neurophysiology course. This approach explicates how the content relates with learning objectives throughout the entirety of each teaching session to help the students assimilate the learning material and direct their learning in an objective-orientated way. In this study, we aimed to examine satisfaction of the concept-sharing approach in medical students and to investigate the relationship between student perception of this teaching strategy and academic performance. The results demonstrated that most participants (74.1%) had a positive impression of this teaching strategy at the end of the course, which was significantly >50.7% at the beginning of the course (P < 0.001). The participants who agreed the concept-sharing approach was useful had significantly higher final assessment (P = 0.014) and end-of-course formative assessment scores (P = 0.001). The findings indicate that after experiencing this new teaching approach, medical students appreciate its utility and that students who engage with this approach are more likely to perform well in assessments. In summary, the concept-sharing approach is a simple teaching strategy which was favored by students and may promote academic performance.


Assuntos
Desempenho Acadêmico , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina , Currículo , Humanos , Aprendizagem
3.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 43(3): 324-331, 2019 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31305154

RESUMO

Positive attitude and self-evaluation are necessary for medical students and doctors. To explore how best to integrate physiology teaching in our Thai medical curriculum, we investigated relationships between student's academic performance, their attitude, self-evaluated knowledge, and proportion of physiology taught in an organ-system integrated block. We organized 13 physiology laboratory classes, during which students self-rated attitude and knowledge. Academic performance was measured by formative and summative assessments. One hundred thirty-six participants were categorized into most proactive (Most PA), more proactive (More PA), less proactive (Less PA), and least proactive (Least PA) attitude groups by self-preparation questionnaire. Eighty participants were categorized into high (HighE), moderate (ModerateE), and low (LowE) self-evaluation rating groups. Mean formatives score in the Most PA group was significantly higher than in the other PA groups (P = 0.003, P = 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Mean summative score in the Most PA group was significantly higher than the Less PA and the Least PA groups (P = 0.017 and P = 0.015 respectively). There was no significant difference in mean assessment scores among HighE, ModerateE, and LowE groups. Proportion of teaching time dedicated to physiology positively correlated with student attitude (r = 0.84, P = 0.001) and negatively correlated with self-evaluation rating (r = -0.73, P = 0.007). Thai medical students may benefit from a proactive attitude to studying physiology, contrasting with traditional didactic expectations of Thai education. Proportion of teaching time dedicated to physiology does not influence academic performance; therefore, future adjustments to curriculum integration may incorporate classes that facilitate self-directed learning. Future study should explore other influences on learning and assessment performance.


Assuntos
Desempenho Acadêmico/psicologia , Atitude , Autoavaliação Diagnóstica , Fisiologia/educação , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Desempenho Acadêmico/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tailândia/epidemiologia
4.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 42(1): 140-145, 2018 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29446312

RESUMO

Interactive laboratory class (ILC) is a two-way communication teaching method that encourages students to correlate laboratory findings with materials from lectures. In Thai medical education, active learning methods are uncommon. This paper aims to establish 1) if ILCs would effectively promote physiology learning; 2) if effectiveness would be found in both previously academically high-performing and low-performing students; and 3) the acceptability of ILCs to Thai medical students as a novel learning method. Two hundred seventy-eight second-year medical students were recruited to this study. We conducted three ILC sessions, which followed corresponding lectures. We carried out multiple-choice pre- and post-ILC assessments of knowledge and compared by repeated-measures ANOVA and unpaired t-test. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare high-performance (HighP) and low-performance (LowP) students. After the ILCs, participants self-rated their knowledge and satisfaction. Post-ILC test scores increased significantly compared with pre-ILC test scores in all three sessions. Mean scores of each post-ILC test increased significantly from pre-ILC test in both LowP and HighP groups. More students self-reported a "very high" and "high" level of knowledge after ILCs. Most students agreed that ILCs provided more discussion opportunity, motivated their learning, and made lessons more enjoyable. As an adjunct to lectures, ILCs can enhance knowledge in medical students, regardless of previous academic performance. Students perceived ILC as useful and acceptable. This study supports the active learning methods in physiology education, regardless of cultural context.


Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Educação Médica/métodos , Neurofisiologia/educação , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas/métodos , Estudantes de Medicina , Adulto , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Tailândia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Soc Sci Med ; 348: 116517, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38593612

RESUMO

In the mid-twentieth century, the social movement of death revivalism sought to resist the medicalisation of dying and grief through promotion of the dying person retaining autonomy, and societal openness toward death and bereavement. Despite this advocacy, present-day dying in high income countries is largely institutionalised, with value placed on control over the body and emotions. These phenomena are at odds with the ambitions of death revivalism, and demonstrate the re-medicalisation of dying and grief. Furthermore, contemporary society is continually advancing into the post-digital age, reflected in digital technologies being a tacit part of human existence. Within this framework, this study aims to investigate how people living with life-limiting illness and their loved ones experience, negotiate, and resist medicalisation of dying and grief through online internet forums. We collected posts through web-scraping and utilised Natural Language Processing techniques to select 7048 forum posts from 2003 to 2020, and initially categorise data, before utilising Inductive Thematic Analysis, which generated two major themes. The theme of 'Comfort' describes online forums facilitating psychosocial support which was often used to compensate for systemic deficiencies, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Common sources of comfort included animal companions and spirituality, in stark contrast with the medicalised model. The theme of 'Capability' describes online forums acting as solutions for people facing disempowering care systems, including providing information on legal rights and benefits which may not be otherwise easily available, and facilitating collective advocacy. Our findings indicate that community-led online forums can play an effective and sustainable role in democratising care and retaining agency when facing life-limiting illness and grief. Future palliative and bereavement care research must focus on how online forums can be integrated into existing systems, made transparent and accessible, be adequately funded and structured, and be optimised, including compensating for service disruption encountered during future pandemics.


Assuntos
Pesar , Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Medicalização , COVID-19/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Morte , Internet , Apoio Social
6.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 12: 923-935, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34456600

RESUMO

Cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) is a social theory which is useful as a methodological framework for the vital task of studying practice-based learning in complex learning environments. CHAT is an apparatus considering learning as occurring through practice, through collective activity, and mediated by culturally specific instruments. Because CHAT is increasingly drawn upon in medical education academia, it is necessary for medical educationalists to be familiar with this theory. This methodology article explains how CHAT theorizes learning in dynamic workplaces within an activity system comprising multiple practitioners engaged in activity, which is collaborative, multi-voiced, and bounded by a shared intended object. It provides an accessible overview of the central concepts within CHAT and a description of a methodological strategy (activity system analysis) to incorporate CHAT into one's own work. CHAT also theorizes where tensions lie within and between activity systems, causing difficulties in achieving the intended object, defining such tensions as contradictions. It is through the overcoming of past contradictions that activity has come to exist in its current form, abiding by social norms of the present time, and CHAT allows consideration of how practice within a system may be changed through resolution of contradictions. For example, the Change Laboratory is a contrived intervention where practitioners consciously contribute to developing and embedding new, improved ways of practicing using CHAT principles. This allows practitioners to have agency in improving their own areas of learning and practice. Throughout this article, examples are provided of how CHAT has been usefully applied to various aspects of medical education research, including undergraduate education, postgraduate education, and continuous professional development. By building on the introduction to CHAT provided in this article, the reader can start to use CHAT methodologically to describe complexity, identify practice-based contradictions, and develop improved forms of practice-based learning, in his/her own context.

7.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 10: 127-137, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31040739

RESUMO

This methodological article argues for the advantages of trainee health professionals investigating their own work contexts through qualitative research interviews with peers and presents such junior-to-junior interviews as method. The usefulness and flexibility of the method are demonstrated through two vignettes based on the authors' individual experiences as junior medical doctors generating data through interviews with their peers. The article discusses specific considerations of junior-to-junior interviews: academic considerations including cognizance of reflexivity, trustworthiness, commitment, coherence; ethical considerations including hierarchy, confidentiality, support needs. The method has limitations including research being carried out by novices and on a small scale. However, we argue that junior-to-junior interviews allow for unique and valuable data generation, and encourage other practitioner-researchers to consider how this or similar methods may be integrated into research approaches across clinical disciplines, and organizational and cultural contexts.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA