C-reactive protein flare predicts response to checkpoint inhibitor treatment in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of melanoma has been revolutionized by the use of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), but many patients do not benefit. Furthermore, immune-related adverse events may occur during therapy. A predictive biomarker is needed to reliably identify patients benefitting. In lung, renal cell and bladder cancer early C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics were shown to be a predictive biomarker for ICI. OBJECTIVE: Here, we investigate early CRP kinetics as predictive biomarker for ICI in melanoma patients. METHODS: Two independent prospectively collected cohorts were analysed: Cohort 1 (n = 87) with advanced and Cohort 2 (n = 99) with completely resected melanoma. Patients were stratified by in the dynamics of CRP after ICI initiation: A doubling of baseline CRP within 30 days followed by at least a 30% drop within 3 months was classified as a CRP flare. If no doubling of CRP was reported, but a 30% drop within 3 months, patients were classified as CRP responders and all others as CRP non-responders. Analysed factors included clinical characteristics like S100B and LDH. Median follow-up was 1.5 and 1.7 years for Cohorts 1 and 2. RESULTS: In Cohort 1 CRP flare (n = 12), CRP responders (n = 43) and CRP non-responders (n = 32) with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 0.7, 0.6 and 0.2 years (p = 0.017) and an overall survival (OS) of 2.2, 1.5 and 1.0 years (p = 0.014), respectively. Multivariable Cox analysis showed an independent risk reduction of progression for CRP responders by 62% compared to CRP non-responders (p = 0.001). In Cohort 2 CRP flare (n = 13), CRP responders (n = 70) and CRP non-responders (n = 16) the log-rank analysis showed a significant difference between OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) curves (p = 0.046 and p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Early CRP kinetics could indicate a response to ICI with improved OS and RFS/PFS. CRP flare and CRP response indicating significantly improved outcomes compared to CRP non-responders.

Differential predictive value of tissue-specific PD-L1 expression scores in adjuvant immunotherapy of melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant treatment of stage II-IV melanoma with PD-1-based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has improved relapse-free survival (RFS) and has therefore become a standard-of-care treatment option. Approximately 25%-30% of patients still recur within 1 year. Predictive biomarkers reflecting real-world data are desired. The predictive relevance of tumour tissue PD-L1 expression in the adjuvant setting remains inconclusive. OBJECTIVES: This retrospective, observational study was conducted to evaluate the value of PD-L1 expression scores in different tumour tissue locations in predicting response towards adjuvant immunotherapeutic treatment. METHODS: Tumour tissue taken prior to anti-PD-1 adjuvant ICI in 243 stage II-IV melanoma patients was collected at University Skin Cancer Center Hamburg. PD-L1 expression was evaluated on immune cells (ICS), tumour cells (TPS) and combined (CPS). Scores were determined by independent pathological physician quantification and correlated with therapy outcome at different cut-off (CO) levels (relapse-free survival, RFS) for different tumour tissue locations (primary tumour, metastases). RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were eligible for analysis. Positivity of ICS, TPS and CPS showed no predictive RFS outcome association at different CO levels when analysed irrespective of tissue origin. In primary tumours, ICS at CO 1% showed a significantly improved RFS upon positivity (HR 0.22). In contrast, positivity to TPS (CO 1%) correlated significantly and independently with improved RFS when evaluated in metastatic tumour tissue specimens (HR 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 tumour tissue expression may serve as a predictive biomarker for adjuvant ICI treatment response stratification in melanoma, but caution should be spent on the origin of tumour tissue analysed. The cell-type relevant for the predictive value of PD-L1 expression is tissue-specific with immune cells being important in primary tumours while tumour cells are key in metastases. The present results should be validated in a multicentre cohort.

Patient-reported outcomes of topical finasteride/minoxidil treatment for male androgenetic alopecia: A retrospective study using telemedical data.

BACKGROUND: Oral finasteride and topical minoxidil are the current standard of care for male androgenetic alopecia and a combination of the two treatments can be considered for greater efficacy. Clinical trials of topical finasteride have also yielded promising results, but routine care data are lacking. AIMS: To examine patient-reported outcomes of men with androgenetic alopecia who received topical finasteride admixed with minoxidil compared to the current standard of care (oral finasteride). METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study with data from a German direct-to-consumer teledermatology platform between December 2021 and January 2023. Patient-reported outcomes were collected through voluntary follow-up questionnaires provided after 6 weeks on topical finasteride/minoxidil or oral finasteride treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1545 patients who received topical finasteride/minoxidil treatment were included; 238 (15.4%) participated in the follow-up questionnaire. At week six, 62.2% (148/238) reported positive changes in their hair appearance, and 44.1% (105/238) reported an improvement of self-esteem. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 11.8% (28/238). Full treatment adherence was observed in 74.4% (177/238). Comparing the topical treatment group to those receiving oral finasteride, lower treatment adherence was reported, along with higher rates of local adverse events; no difference was found in the incidence of sexual adverse events. CONCLUSION: Based on patient-reported outcomes, topical finasteride/minoxidil seems to be effective and well tolerated, but not superior to oral finasteride. Lower treatment adherence for topical usage must be considered when considering treatment options. Additional real-world data are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical finasteride/minoxidil.

High Serum Levels of CCL20 Are Associated with Recurrence and Unfavorable Overall Survival in Advanced Melanoma Patients Receiving Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized melanoma therapy, but many patients show primary or secondary resistance. Biomarkers are, therefore, urgently required to predict response prior to the initiation of therapy and to monitor disease progression. METHODS: In this prospective study, we analyzed the serum C-C motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) concentration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Blood was obtained at baseline before the initiation of immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 monotherapy or Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma patients (stages III and IV) enrolled at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf. The CCL20 levels were correlated with clinico-pathological parameters and disease-related outcomes. RESULTS: An increased C-C motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20) concentration (≥0.34 pg/mL) at baseline was associated with a significantly impaired progression-free survival (PFS) in the high-CCL20 group (3 months (95% CI: 2-6 months) vs. 11 months (95% CI: 6-26 months)) (p = 0.0033) and could be identified as an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS in univariate (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.98, 95% CI 1.25-3.12, p = 0.004) and multivariate (HR: 1.99, 95% CI 1.21-3.29, p = 0.007) Cox regression analysis, which was associated with a higher risk than S100 (HR: 1.74). Moreover, high CCL20 levels were associated with impaired overall survival (median OS not reached for low-CCL20 group, p = 0.042) with an HR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.02-3.37, p = 0.043) in univariate analysis similar to the established prognostic marker S100 (HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.02-3.88, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: CCL20 may represent a novel blood-based biomarker for the prediction of resistance to immunotherapy that can be used in combination with established strong clinical predictors (e.g., ECOG performance score) and laboratory markers (e.g., S100) in advanced melanoma patients. Future prospective randomized trials are needed to establish CCL20 as a liquid biopsy-based biomarker in advanced melanoma.

Sentinel lymph node risk prognostication in primary cutaneous melanoma through tissue-based profiling, potentially redefining the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is pivotal in the contemporary staging of cutaneous melanoma. In this review, we examine advanced molecular testing platforms like gene expression profiling (GEP) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) as tools for predicting the prognosis of sentinel lymph nodes. We compare these innovative approaches with traditional staging assessments. Additionally, we delve into the shared genetic and protein markers between GEP and IHC tests and their relevance to melanoma biology, exploring their prognostic and predictive characteristics. Finally, we assess alternative methods to potentially obviate the need for SLNB altogether. RECENT FINDINGS: Progress in adjuvant melanoma therapy has diminished the necessity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) while underscoring the importance of accurately identifying high-risk stage I and II melanoma patients who may benefit from additional anti-tumor interventions. The clinical application of testing through gene expression profiling (GEP) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) is gaining traction, with platforms such as DecisionDx, Merlin Assay (CP-GEP), MelaGenix GEP, and Immunoprint coming into play. Currently, extensive validation studies are in progress to incorporate routine molecular testing into clinical practice. However, due to significant methodological limitations, widespread clinical adoption of tissue-based molecular testing remains elusive at present. SUMMARY: While various tissue-based molecular testing platforms have the potential to stratify the risk of sentinel lymph node positivity (SLNP), most suffer from significant methodological deficiencies, including limited sample size, lack of prospective validation, and limited correlation with established clinicopathological variables. Furthermore, the genes and proteins identified by individual gene expression profiling (GEP) or immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests exhibit minimal overlap, even when considering the most well-established melanoma mutations. However, there is hope that the ongoing prospective trial for the Merlin Assay may safely reduce the necessity for SLNB procedures if successful. Additionally, the MelaGenix GEP and Immunoprint tests could prove valuable in identifying high-risk stage I-II melanoma patients and potentially guiding their selection for adjuvant therapy, thus potentially reducing the need for SLNB. Due to the diverse study designs employed, effective comparisons between GEP or IHC tests are challenging, and to date, there is no study directly comparing the clinical utility of these respective GEP or IHC tests.

Immune checkpoint blockade for organ-transplant recipients with cancer: A review.

Clinical trials studying immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have excluded immunocompromised patients, and little is known about the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy for malignancies in this subset of patients. Transplant organ recipients receiving ICIs face two distinct challenges: First, immunotherapy may counteract immunosuppression and with that result in transplant rejection. Second, immunosuppression may make immunotherapy less effective. It remains unclear as to how commonly these seemingly opposing treatment goals, immunosuppression for organ retention and immune stimulation for effective immunotherapy, can be balanced to achieve favourable outcomes. Given a lack of prospective clinical trials, we reviewed the existing literature on this subject (case reports, case series and previous reviews) and present here an updated analysis of treatment outcomes from a total of 144 patients. This is, to our knowledge, the most extensive review on this topic available today. We found that an ideal outcome, meaning effective immunotherapy with retained transplant was achieved in 30.8% of patients. The overall response rates of immunotherapy were similar to non-immunocompromised cancer patients in the reported cases, but publication bias may overestimate positive outcomes. Contrary to expectation, tumour response rates were higher, albeit not significantly, in patients who were able to retain their transplanted organ, suggesting that it is possible to uncouple immunosuppression and immune stimulation in these patients. One possible strategy towards this goal may be to use mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors for immunosuppression, as patients whose immunosuppressive regimen included an mTOR inhibitor had a 1.4-fold higher rate of ideal outcomes (n.s.). Our data support a first line treatment approach that aims for maintaining transplanted organs during ICI treatment.

Immune Characterization in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Reveals Distinct Monocytic Activation and Chemokine Patterns.

The pathophysiology of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is incompletely understood. Intrathecal activation of inflammatory immune cells is suspected to play a major role for the induction of DCI. The aim of this study is to identify immune cell subsets and mediators involved in the pathogenesis of DCI. We prospectively collected blood and CSF from 25 patients with aSAH at early and late time points. We performed multicolor flow cytometry of peripheral blood and CSF, analyzing immune cell activation and pro-inflammatory cyto- and chemokines. In addition to the primary immune analysis, we retrospectively analyzed immune cell dynamics in the CSF of all our SAH patients. Our results show an increased monocyte infiltration secondary to aneurysm rupture in patients with DCI. Infiltrating monocytes are defined by a non-classical (CD14dim CD16+) phenotype at early stages. The infiltration is most likely triggered by the intrathecal immune activation. Here, high levels of pro-inflammatory chemokines, such as CXCL1, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, are detected. The intrathecal cellular activation profile of monocytes was defined by upregulation of CD163 and CD86 on monocytes and a presumable later differentiation into antigen-presenting plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) and hemosiderophages. Peripheral immune activation was reflected by CD69 upregulation on T cells. Analysis of DCI prevalence, Hunt and Hess grade, and clinical outcome correlated with the degree of immune activation. We demonstrate that monocytes and T cells are activated intrathecally after aSAH and mediate a local inflammatory response which is presumably driven by chemokines. Our data shows that the distinct pattern of immune activation correlates with the prevalence of DCI, indicating a pathophysiological connection to the incidence of vasospasm.

Immunophenotyping of Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma Defines Distinct Immune Exhaustion Profiles in Peripheral and Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes.

Purpose: Immunotherapeutic treatment strategies for glioblastoma (GBM) are under investigation in clinical trials. However, our understanding of the immune phenotype of GBM-infiltrating T cells (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TILs) and changes during disease progression is limited. Deeper insight is urgently needed to therapeutically overcome tumor-induced immune exhaustion.Experimental Design: We used flow cytometry and cytokine assays to profile TILs and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) from patients with GBM, comparing newly diagnosed or recurrent GBM to long-term survivors (LTS) and healthy donors. TCR sequencing was performed on paired samples of newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM.Results: We identified a clear immune signature of exhaustion and clonal restriction in the TILs of patients with GBM. Exhaustion of CD8+ TILs was defined by an increased prevalence of PD-1+, CD39+, Tim-3+, CD45RO+, HLA-DR+ marker expression, and exhibition of an effector-/transitional memory differentiation phenotype, whereas KLRG1 and CD57 were underrepresented. Immune signatures were similar in primary and recurrent tumors; however, restricted TCR repertoire clonality and a more activated memory phenotype were observed in TILs from recurrent tumors. Moreover, a reduced cytokine response to PHA stimulation in the blood compartment indicates a dysfunctional peripheral T-cell response in patients with GBM. LTS displayed a distinct profile, with abundant naïve and less exhausted CD8+ T cells.Conclusions: TILs and PBLs exhibit contrasting immune profiles, with a distinct exhaustion signature present in TILs. While the exhaustion profiles of primary and recurrent GBM are comparable, TCR sequencing demonstrated a contracted repertoire in recurrent GBM, concomitant with an increased frequency of activated memory T cells in recurrent tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 24(17); 4187-200. ©2018 AACRSee related commentary by Jackson and Lim, p. 4059.