Central blood pressure and measures of early vascular disease in children with ADPKD.

BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition of hypertension in a significant proportion of children with ADPKD. In this study, we assessed blood pressure and cardiovascular status in children with ADPKD. METHODS: A prospective two-centre observational study of children (< 18 years) with ADPKD was compared against age- and BMI-matched healthy controls. Children underwent peripheral BP (pBP) measured using an aneroid sphygmomanometer and auscultation, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), non-invasive central BP (cBP) measurement, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWVcf) measured using applanation tonometry and measurement of indexed left ventricular mass (LVMI) using echocardiography. This study received independent ethical approval. RESULTS: Forty-seven children with ADPKD and 49 healthy controls were recruited (median age 11 years vs. 12 years). Children with ADPKD had significantly higher systolic pBP (mean 112 ± 13.5 mmHg vs. 104 ± 11 mmHg, p < 0.001), higher systolic cBP (mean 97 ± 12.8 mmHg vs. 87 ± 9.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and lower pulse pressure amplification ratio (1.59 ± 0.2 vs. 1.67 ± 0.1, p = 0.04) compared to healthy children. Thirty-five percent of children with ADPKD showed a lack of appropriate nocturnal dipping on 24-h ABPM. There was no difference in PWVcf between children with ADPKD and healthy children (mean 5.74 ± 1 m/s vs. 5.57 ± 0.9 m/s, p = 0.46). Those with ADPKD had a significantly higher LVMI (mean 30.4 ± 6.6 g/m2.7 vs. 26.2 ± 6.2 g/m2.7, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data highlight the high prevalence of hypertension in children with ADPKD, also demonstrating early cardiovascular dysfunction with increased LVMI and reduced PP amplification despite preserved PWVcf, when compared with healthy peers. These early cardiovascular abnormalities are likely to be amenable to antihypertensive therapy, reinforcing the need for routine screening of children with ADPKD.

Comparison of central SBP in children estimated from a brachial cuff alone, brachial cuff-calibrated applanation radial tonometry and brachial cuff-calibrated carotid wall-tracking.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the agreement between different techniques to estimate central SBP (cSBP) in children and the relative impact of different methods of measuring peripheral blood pressure (BP). METHODS: A total of 135 children, aged 12.9 ±â€Š3.0 years including 67 boys, 85 with chronic kidney disease were studied. We measured cSBP using radiofrequency ultrasound carotid wall-tracking (Esaote ART.LAB system, a previously validated reference method), transformation of the radial artery pressure waveform obtained by tonometry (SphygmoCor) and a cuff-based system (cBP301; Centron Diagnostics) during a single visit. Carotid and radial tonometric-derived values were calibrated from mean and diastolic values of brachial BP obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer. Brachial cuff only values were calibrated from the same aneroid sphygmomanometer values and from oscillometric values obtained from the brachial cuff. RESULTS: cSBP values estimated from radial tonometry were closely correlated with those obtained from the carotid (r = 0.959, mean difference -0.61 ±â€Š3.5 mmHg). cSBP values estimated by the brachial cuff only method agreed reasonably well with those obtained from the carotid (r = 0.847, mean difference 5 ±â€Š7.4 mmHg) when calibrated by the same method but when calibrated by oscillometric values from the brachial cuff, agreement was less good (r = 0.659, mean difference 8.7 ±â€Š11.4 mmHg). CONCLUSION: Radial tonometry with a radial-to-central transfer function can be used to estimate cSBP in children with acceptable accuracy when compared with the invasively validated carotid reference method. All methods are subject to errors introduced by calibration from peripheral BP.