Nursing teachers' experiences of the process of recovery while participating in a group programme for reducing work-related stress: A qualitative content analysis.

Work-related stress is an increasing health problem among nursing teachers, contributing to health problems, disengagement and poor job satisfaction. Negative coping strategies impact on both teachers' and students' teaching-learning experiences. Several interventions have been developed to address work-related stress. There has been less focus on how nursing teachers can learn to recover from work-related stress before it has severe consequences for their health, and to understand it from a nursing perspective. The aim of this study was to explore how nursing teachers who participated in a cognitive relational group programme experienced the process of recovery from work-related stress. Data were collected by means of three focus groups and subjected to qualitative content analysis, resulting in three categories: relatedness, evoking the inner caregiver, and re-orientation in life. These categories were reflected on in relation to Benner and Wrubel's "primacy of caring" and synthesised into a metaphorical theme: "finding one's footings". The findings imply that the development of positive coping strategies as well as knowledge and understanding about psychological processes are vehicles in the process of recovery. We conclude that interventions also need to account for the process of recovery as related to an ontological level and the person's Being-in-the-World.

Is supervision necessary? Examining the effects of internet-based CBT training with and without supervision.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of Internet-based training (IBT), with and without supervision, on therapists' (N = 61) cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) skills in routine clinical practice. METHOD: Participants were randomized into 3 conditions: (1) Internet-based training with use of a consultation worksheet (IBT-CW); (2) Internet-based training with CBT supervision via Skype (IBT-S); and (3) "delayed-training" controls (DTs), who did not receive the training until all data collection was completed. The IBT participants received access to training over a period of 3 months. CBT skills were evaluated at pre-, mid- and posttraining/wait using assessor competence ratings of recorded therapy sessions. RESULTS: Hierarchical linear analysis revealed that the IBT-S participants had significantly greater CBT competence at posttraining than did IBT-CW and DT participants at both the mid- and posttraining/wait assessment points. There were no significant differences between IBT-CW and the delayed (no)-training DTs. CONCLUSIONS: IBT programs that include supervision may be a scalable and effective method of disseminating CBT into routine clinical practice, particularly for populations without ready access to more-traditional "live" methods of training. There was no evidence for a significant effect of IBT without supervision over a nontraining control, suggesting that merely providing access to IBT programs may not be an effective method of disseminating CBT to routine clinical practice.

Randomized trial comparing Internet-based training in cognitive behavioural therapy theory, assessment and formulation to delayed-training control.

OBJECTIVE: There is a need for effective, scalable methods of training clinicians in evidence-based interventions, particularly for populations with significant barriers to accessing traditional methods of training (e.g., developing economies, non-English speaking geographically dispersed populations). Hence this study examined the effectiveness of Internet-based training (IBT) in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) theory, assessment and formulation for participants in Russia with limited previous knowledge or training in CBT. METHOD: Participants (N = 63) were randomized to either immediate IBT (approximately three hours over the course of one month) or a delayed training control group. Participants were assessed immediately prior to and following the training/delay on (a) standardized role-play of a CBT assessment and (b) ability to construct CBT formulation of the role-play 'patient'. In addition the feasibility and acceptability of the training was assessed. RESULTS: Responses indicated that translated and subtitled IBT training was perceived by participants to be feasible and acceptable. Following the training those allocated to IBT scored significantly higher on measures of CBT assessment and formulation skills (between group effects sizes of d = 0.77-1.10) than those allocated to the control group. Participants reported IBT to be a feasible and acceptable form of CBT dissemination. An adaptation of the CTS used to rate a standardized role-play assessment demonstrated good inter-rater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: IBT may be an effective and scalable method of CBT dissemination with particular potential for training CBT skills in populations with significant barrier to accessing traditional methods of training.

Establishing evidence-based training in cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of current empirical findings and theoretical guidance.

Cognitive behavior therapy's (CBT) demonstrated efficacy has prompted calls for its increased dissemination to routine clinical practice settings. For the widespread dissemination of CBT to be successful in achieving effects similar to the original efficacy trials, there must also be effective dissemination of CBT training practices. However, as yet, CBT training is not evidence-based. This review examines what can be learned from existing research into the efficacy and effectiveness of CBT training. Due to the paucity of research specifically investigating CBT training, CBT effectiveness and dissemination studies are also examined to glean information about potentially effective training practices. In order to draw conclusions about effective training practices, comparisons are drawn between studies according to the clinical outcomes that they achieved. Training approaches are compared according to dose and active training elements, and theoretical models of learning are applied to interpret the findings. The limitations of the existing literature are discussed, as well as recommendations for improving training research to meet the standards evident in treatment trials (e.g., random allocation, control conditions, self-report and blind assessment, and adherence monitoring). Finally, the process of developing efficacious CBT treatment protocols is offered as a template for developing evidence-based CBT training protocols.