RESUMO
Persons residing in long-term care facilities are especially vulnerable to potentially preventable morbidity and mortality caused by influenza, S. pneumoniae, and tuberculosis. This project's objective was to increase the rates of pneumococcal vaccination, tuberculosis screening, and annual influenza vaccination. Intervention consisted of staff training videos, sample policies, and educational materials for residents and their families. At baseline during the 1995-1996 flu season, 84% of Colorado long-term care residents were vaccinated for influenza; 16% of residents had ever received pneumococcal vaccination; and 59% had been screened for tuberculosis. At remeasurement during 1997 to 1998, influenza vaccination rates were up to 89%, p = 0.006. The percentage of residents who had ever received pneumococcal vaccination increased to 48% at remeasurement, p < 0.001. Tuberculosis screening rates increased to 83%, p < 0.001. Following an educational intervention targeting both residents and staff, residents were significantly more likely to receive all three preventive services.
Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Capacitação em Serviço/organização & administração , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Tuberculose/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Colorado , Humanos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Gestão da Qualidade Total/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
This column is the third in a series reporting on Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) initiatives to improve care for Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure. The first paper outlined the history of HCFA quality improvement projects and current initiatives to improve care in six priority areas: heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, diabetes, and breast cancer. The second reported in more detail the structure of the national inpatient fee-for-service heart failure initiative, known as the National Heart Failure project. It described the development of the quality indicators, the sampling strategy for selecting charts to be reviewed, and the types of local efforts spurred by the project through the activities of each state's HCFA contractor peer review organization. This article discusses baseline quality indicator rates from the National Heart Failure project. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.
RESUMO
This column is the seventh in a series reporting on the efforts of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), formerly known as the Health Care Financing Administration, to improve care for Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure. In previous columns we have described the overall structure of Medicare quality improvement efforts, detailed the structure of the national inpatient fee-for-service program known as the National Heart Failure project, and discussed the baseline quality indicator rates for the project, which are focused on rates of ejection fraction documentation and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor prescription. In more recent columns, we reported on quality improvement projects from several participating hospitals, and on a pilot project exploring quality improvement efforts for heart failure based in physicians' offices. This column will focus on ways in which systematic examination of data, such as those from the National Heart Failure project, might shape future quality improvement and research efforts. The National Heart Failure project's quality indicator data are collected primarily to guide and evaluate the efforts of the CMS contractor peer-review organizations to facilitate quality improvement efforts in hospitals throughout the United States. (c)2001 CHF, Inc.