Using pulsatility responses to breath-hold maneuvers to predict readmission rates in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic respiratory maneuvers induce heterogenous changes to flow-pulsatility in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients. We evaluated the association of these pulsatility responses with patient hemodynamics and outcomes. METHODS: Responses obtained from HVAD (Medtronic) outpatients during successive weekly clinics were categorized into three ordinal groups according to the percentage reduction in flow-waveform pulsatility (peak-trough flow) upon inspiratory-breath-hold, (%∆P): (1) minimal change (%∆P ≤ 50), (2) reduced pulsatility (%∆P > 50 but <100), (3) flatline (%∆P = 100). Same-day echocardiography and right-heart-catheterization were performed. Readmissions were compared between patients with ≥1 flatline response (F-group) and those without (NF-group). RESULTS: Overall, 712 responses were obtained from 55 patients (82% male, age 56.4 ± 11.5). When compared to minimal change, reduced pulsatility and flatline responses were associated with lower central venous pressure (14.2 vs. 11.4 vs. 9.0 mm Hg, p = 0.08) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (19.8 vs. 14.3 vs. 13.0 mm Hg, p = 0.03), lower rates of ≥moderate mitral regurgitation (48% vs. 13% vs. 10%, p = 0.01), lower rates of ≥moderate right ventricular impairment (62% vs. 25% vs. 27%, p = 0.03), and increased rates of aortic valve opening (32% vs. 50% vs. 75%, p = 0.03). The F-group (n = 28) experienced numerically lower all-cause readmissions (1.51 vs. 2.79 events-per-patient-year [EPPY], hazard-ratio [HR] = 0.67, p = 0.12), reduced heart failure readmissions (0.07 vs. 0.57 EPPY, HR = 0.15, p = 0.008), and superior readmission-free survival (HR = 0.47, log-rank p = 0.04). Syncopal readmissions occurred exclusively in the F-group (0.20 vs. 0 EPPY, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Responses to inspiratory-breath-hold predicted hemodynamics and readmission risk. The impact of inspiratory-breath-hold on pulsatility can non-invasively guide hemodynamic management decisions, patient optimization, and readmission risk stratification.

Longitudinal analysis left ventricular chamber responses under durable LVAD support.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support offers remodeling potential in some patients. Our goal was to use noninvasively derived pressure-volume (PV) loops to understand the effect of demographic and device variables on serial changes in cardiac function under pump support. METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive Medtronic HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD) patients (mean 55.9 ± 12.3 years, 81.3% male) were prospectively recruited. Single-cycle ventricular pressure and volume were estimated using a validated algorithm. PV loops (n = 77) and corresponding cardiac chamber dynamics were derived at predefined postimplant timepoints (1, 3, 6 months). Changes in PV loop parameters sustained across the 6-month period were characterized using mixed-effects modeling. The influence of demographic and device variables on the observed changes was assessed. RESULTS: Across a 6-month period, the mean ventricular function parameters remained stable. Significant predictors of monthly improvement of stroke work include: lower pump speeds (2400 rpm vs 2500-2800 rpm) [0.0.051 mm Hg/liter/month (p = 0.001)], high pulsatility index (>1.0 vs <1.0) [0.052 mm Hg/liter/month (p = 0.012)], and ischemic cardiomyopathy indication for LVAD implantation (vs nonischemic) [0.0387 mm Hg/liter/month (p = 0.007)]. Various other cardiac chamber function parameters including cardiac power, peak systolic pressure, and LV elastance also showed improvements in these cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with improvement in ventricular energetics and hemodynamics under LVAD support can be determined with noninvasive PV loops. Understanding the basis of increasing ventricular load to optimize myocardial remodeling may prove valuable in selecting eligible recovery candidates.