Effect of dose reduction on image registration and image quality for cone-beam CT in radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The additional radiation exposure applied to patients undergoing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for image registration in radiation therapy is of great concern. Since a decrease in CBCT dose is linked to a degradation of image quality, the consequences of dose reduction on the registration process have to be investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This paper examines image quality and registration of low-contrast structures on an Elekta XVI for the two treatment areas prostate and chest while gradually decreasing the mAs per frame and the number of projections per CBCT to achieve dose reduction. RESULTS: Ideal results for image quality were obtained for 1.6 mAs/frame and 377 projections in prostate scans and 0.63 mAs/frame and 440 projections in chest images. Lower as well as higher total mAs lead to a decrease in image quality. In spite of poor image quality, registration can be successfully performed even for lowest possible settings. CONCLUSION: The results for registration allow an extensive dose reduction in both treatment areas. Very low mAs, however, do not qualify for clinical use because subjective judgment of the registration process is impossible. Compared to default presets the use of settings for acceptable image quality already permit a decrease in exposure of about 40 % (29.0 to 16.7 mGy) in prostate scans and 60 % (18.3 to 7.7 mGy) in chest scans.

Image movement of the Elekta EPID during gantry rotation: Effects on the verification of dose distributions.

PURPOSE: The use of Electronic Portal Imaging Devices (EPIDs) to acquire dosimetric information, especially for 3D-back-projection, has been increasingly extended. For a precise back-projection, the accurate knowledge of the movement characteristics of the EPID during gantry rotation is an essential requirement. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Measurements were conducted with different alignments of steel balls, which were mounted on the treatment table to avoid secondary effects such as the mechanical sag of gantry or jaws. The image movement of the EPID was determined by comparing the predicted projections of the phantoms with the EPID acquired image. Effects on dosimetric verifications were evaluated by γ-evaluation. RESULTS: The measurement results showed that the shift of the EPID image is larger in Y direction than in X direction. A maximum rotation of 0.3° and nodding of 2.4° of the detector was calculated. Changes in SDD were found up to 10mm. The angles of nodding are overall higher at discrete gantry angles in comparison to images detected for continuous rotation. Using these results we were able to correct the EPID images used for verification measurements. γ-evaluation revealed a significantly improved agreement between planned and measured EPID signal values. CONCLUSION: The measurement methods and algorithms introduced in this study are simple and comprehensive. Using these methods and algorithms we were able to quantify the major effects on geometrical and dosimetric characteristics. This allows the correction of EPID signal measurements for these effects related to the gantry angle, leading to an improved γ-evaluation for treatment plans.

Increase of surface dose using wound dressings during percutaneous radiotherapy with photons and electrons.

Different wound dressings are used for the supportive treatment of patients with radiation-induced skin lesions. Depending on beam quality and energy, an increase of the dose administered to the skin and thus an aggravated skin reaction is to be expected during percutaneous irradiation. The increase of the skin dose during irradiation with photons (Co60, 6 MV, 42 MV) and electrons (7 MeV, 20 MeV, 42 MeV) was determined using thermoluminescence dosimetry. The use of wound dressings during electron irradiation and during soft irradiation therapy does not significantly increase the dose administered to the skin and does not therefore cause any problems. During irradiation with high energy photons only extremely thin dressings should be used; if there is an aggravated skin reaction, the dressing should be taken off before irradiation commences.

Radiation enhancement of gemcitabine in two human squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (dFdC) is a new nucleoside analogue with promising activity in different solid tumors. We investigated whether dFdC enhances the effect of irradiation in human squamous carcinoma cells of the oropharynx (#4197) and of the uterine cervix (HeLa) with special regard to the time-dose-relationship concerning dFdC and the dependence upon the timing of irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under standardized conditions monolayers of cells were exposed to various dFdC concentrations (0.003-10 mumol/l) for different times (4-24 h). Irradiation (0-6 Gy) followed immediately or 12 h after dFdC exposure (0.003-0.03 mumol/l; 4-24 h). RESULTS: The cytotoxic effect of dFdC depends on its concentration and the exposure duration. Exposed to non and/or slightly cytotoxic concentrations (> or = 0.003-0.03 mumol/l) for 4, 8, 16 and 24 h and followed by immediate irradiation the radiation enhancement ratio (RER) is 1.03-1.67 in #4197 cells and 1.04-2.47 in HeLa cells, respectively. Irradiated 12 h after 24 h exposure (dFdC 0.01-0.03 mumol/l) the RER is reduced to 1.10-1.17 (#4197) and 1.18-1.72 (HeLa). CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the drug concentration, exposure duration, and timing of irradiation, dFdC enhances the irradiation effect on human squamous cell carcinoma cell lines (#4197, HeLa).

Influence of CT contrast agents on dose calculations in a 3D treatment planning system.

In treatment planning for conformal radiotherapy, it is possible to attain high accuracy in contouring the outline of the target volume and organs at risk by giving contrast agents (CAs) during the CT scan. In order to calculate the dose from the CT scans, Hounsfield units (HUs) are converted into the parameters of a standard set of tissues with given atomic composition and density. Due to the high atomic number of contrast media, high HU values are obtained during CT scanning. The Helax treatment planning system, for instance, erroneously takes them for high density tissue. This misinterpretation results in high absorption of high-energy photon beams and thus affects the dose calculation significantly. A typical bolus diameter of 3 cm and HU values of 1,400 cause an overdose of up to 7.4% and 5.4% for 6 MV and 25 MV photon beams, respectively. However, since the CA concentration and its expansion are rather low the effect on dose calculation in treatment planning is negligible.

Three-dimensional BANG gel dosimetry in conformal carbon ion radiotherapy.

In this study we applied BANG polymer-gel dosimetry using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to densely ionizing radiation such as carbon ion beams. BANG polymer gels were irradiated with a quadratic field of monoenergetic 12C ions at different beam energies in the range of 135 MeV u(-1) to 410 MeV u(-1). They were irradiated at the radiotherapy facility of the GSI, Darmstadt, Germany. Our object was to examine the saturation effect for densely ionizing radiation that occurs at high values of linear energy transfer (LET). The examination yielded the first effectiveness values that will be discussed in the following sections. A solid sphere and a hollow sphere were both irradiated with a horizontal pencil beam from the raster scanning facility at energies of 268 MeV u(-1) (solid sphere) and 304 MeV u(-1) (hollow sphere) respectively. MR dosimetry measurements were compared with data from a planning system. As far as quality is concerned, there is good agreement between the measured dose distributions of both samples and the dose maps from the planning software. The measured MR signals cannot be converted into absolute dose, since the relative efficiency is still unknown for mixed radiation fields of primary carbon ions and it is known only to a limited extent for nuclear fragments with different energies from highly energetic photon radiation. Model calculations are in progress in order to facilitate conversions of measured MR signals into dose.

Value of a multileaf prescription preparation system for palliative external beam irradiation.

In palliative treatment, irregularly shaped fields are used to reduce side-effects and can improve, or avoid, field matching. We investigated the effectiveness of a multileaf collimator (MLC) supported by a digitizing data entry system in the palliative radiotherapy treatment of 66 patients and compared it with conventional shielding with geometrically shaped blocks. After conventional simulation of rectangular fields, irregular field shapes were marked on the simulator film in 17 patients (27%) to reduce radiotherapy related side-effects. Individual leading was performed with an MLC. Digitizing and fitting of the optimum leaf position were carried out using a multileaf preparation system (MLP, Elekta, Crawley, UK). Target volumes included bone metastases in the pelvis, spine and extremities, mediastinal soft tissues, lymph nodes and central nervous system. In 10 patients, treated with a parallel pair for pelvic metastases, MLC and conventional shielding were prospectively compared with regard to time requirements and area shielded. Compared with conventional blocking, the mean simulation, preparation and treatment time required for MLP fields was shorter (9.55 +/- 1.44 min vs 16.90 +/- 2.64 min, and 5.50 +/- 1.14 min vs 8.97 +/- 1.75 min). The mean shielded area was 31 cm2 larger for MLC fields compared with geometrically shaped blocks (p < 0.05). Compared with cerrobend blocking, the use of an MLC, supported by preparation data entry software, is more flexible and reduces radiotherapy resources. Therefore, a preparation data entry system as a separate device, or integrated into the treatment planning system, is a useful tool in palliative treatment.

In vivo dose increase in the presence of dental alloys during 60Co-gamma-ray therapy of the oral cavity.

During irradiation of the mouth cavity, dental metallic materials emit secondary electrons and thus increase the applied radiation dose in their vicinity. Therefore, local destruction of the mucous membrane contacting metallic dental crowns and fillings may be observed. Available data on this dose increase are based on measurements with beam arrangements perpendicular to the metallic surface. Since the dose modification depends on the beam direction in relation to specimen surface, a reliable prediction of dose modification in the close vicinity of dental caps on fillings under complex beam arrangements, as applied in the irradiation of head and neck region from the published data is not possible. Therefore, we measured dose increase in the immediate surrounding of metallic dental material using thermoluminescence dosimetry on the phantom and during routinely applied 60Co gamma ray therapy. Phantom measurements were carried out using several oblique irradiation angles and rotational therapy. In vivo measurements were carried out at alloy specimens containing gold, palladium, and amalgam in six patients and at permanently fixed golden teeth in five patients. In vivo, the following relative dose increase values according to a simultaneously measured reference value were obtained at the surface of different dental materials: 61% for fixed golden caps. 68% for the specimen containing gold, 33% for the specimen of palladium and 61% for the specimen of amalgam. The measured dose increases due to metallic dental material during routinely applied external 60Co beam irradiation are lower compared with those of perpendicular beam arrangements. Although, the extent of dose modification is less than expected, we still advocate protection of the oral mucosa to prevent painful lesion spots.

Delta-electron emission in fast heavy ion atom collisions.

Biological damages such as mutations, chromosomal aberrations etc. are a consequence of biochemical changes mostly in the DNA. With ionizing radiation, these chemical changes are due to primary ionization events and secondary ionization effects caused by the primarily produced electrons. Differences in the biological response of densely ionizing radiation, like heavy charged particles, in comparison to sparsely ionizing radiation, such as X- or gamma-rays, are mainly due to the differences in the production of the so called delta-electrons. Therefore, the emission process of electrons i.e. the cross section for the primary ionization event as well as the energy and angular distribution of the emitted electrons should be understood in detail. The delta-electron emission processes occuring in fast heavy ion atom collisions are explained qualitatively. The different spectral structures of electron emission arising from either the target or the projectile are explained in terms of simple models of the kinetics of momentum transfer induced by the COULOMB forces. In collisions of very heavy ions with matter, high nuclear COULOMB forces are created. These forces lead to a strong polarization of the electronic states of the participated electrons. The effects of this polarization are discussed.

Feasibility study of patient positioning verification in electron beam radiotherapy with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of verification and documentation in electron beam radiotherapy using the photon contamination detected with an electronic portal imaging device. For investigation of electron beam verification with an EPID, the portal images are acquired irradiating two different tissue equivalent phantoms at different electron energies. Measurements were performed on an Elekta SL 25 linear accelerator with an amorphous-Si electronic portal imaging device (EPID: iViewGT, Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK). As a measure of EPID image quality contrast (CR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are determined. For characterisation of the imaging of the EPID RW3 slabs and a Gammex 467 phantom with different material inserts are used. With increasing electron energy the intensity of photon contamination increases, yielding an increasing signal-to-noise ratio, but images are showing a decreasing contrast. As the signal-to-noise ratio saturates with increasing dose a minimum of 50 MUs is recommended. Even image quality depends on electron energy and diameter of the patient, the acquired results are mostly sufficient to assess the accuracy of beam positioning. In general, the online EPID acquisition has been demonstrated to be an effective electron beam verification and documentation method. The results are showing that this procedure can be recommended to be routinely and reliably done in patient treatment with electron beams.

Out-of-field dose measurements in a water phantom using different radiotherapy modalities.

This investigation focused on the characterization of the lateral dose fall-off following the irradiation of the target with photons, protons and carbon ions. A water phantom was irradiated with a rectangular field using photons, passively delivered protons as well as scanned protons and carbon ions. The lateral dose profile in the depth of the maximum dose was measured using an ion chamber, a diamond detector and thermoluminescence detectors TLD-600 and TLD-700. The yield of thermal neutrons was estimated for all radiation types while their complete spectrum was measured with bubble detectors during the irradiation with photons. The peripheral dose delivered by photons is significantly higher compared to both protons and carbon ions and exceeds the latter by up to two orders of magnitude at distances greater than 50 mm from the field. The comparison of passive and active delivery techniques for protons shows that, for the chosen rectangular target shape, the former has a sharper penumbra whereas the latter has a lower dose in the far-out-of-field region. When comparing scanning treatments, carbon ions present a sharper dose fall-off than protons close to the target but increasing peripheral dose with increasing incident energy. For photon irradiation, the contribution to the out-of-field dose of photoneutrons appears to be of the same order of magnitude as the scattered primary beam. Charged particles show a clear supremacy over x-rays in achieving a higher dose conformality around the target and in sparing the healthy tissue from unnecessary radiation exposure. The out-of-field dose for x-rays increases with increasing beam energy because of the production of biologically harmful neutrons.

[Radiation load on the skin using a silicone-coated polyamide wound dressing during photon and electron radiotherapy]. / Strahlenbelastung der Haut bei Verwendung einer silikonbeschichteten Wundauflage aus Polyamid während der Radiotherapie mit Photonen und Elektronen.

BACKGROUND: Silicone-coated polyamide wound dressing is frequently used for the supportive treatment in patients with radiation induced skin lesions. The use of this kind of dressing during radiotherapy with high energy beams shifts the dose built-up effect towards the skin surface. Thus the dose delivered to the skin increases. The present work quantifies changes of the skin dose by a commercial silicon-coated polyamide wound dressing. The dependence on the beam quality and on different treatment techniques is investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Measurements were performed with photon (60Co, 6 MV, 42 MV) and electron (7 MeV, 20 MeV, 40 MeV) beams using thin LiF thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) in a perspex phantom. The beams were directed perpendicularly to the phantom surface. For 60Co and 6 MV photon beams the skin dose was evaluated in vivo at different beam arrangements and at a given reference dose. RESULTS: For 60Co, 6 MV and 42 MV photon beams wound dressing caused a dose increase on the surface of the perspex phantom by a factor of 1.65, 1.39 and 1.33 respectively. Using oblique or rotational techniques for 60Co and 6 MV photon irradiation the wound dressing increased the skin dose but less compared to perpendicular beam direction. For electron beams the skin dose is relatively high (from 84% to 92%) and an increase by a dressing has no clinical relevance (factor 1.03 to 1.05). CONCLUSION: The silicone-coated polyamide wound dressing causes no relevant skin dose increase during radiation treatment with electron beams and can be left on the skin during irradiation. During radiation treatment with photon beams like 60Co and 6 MV the protective procedure should be adapted to skin changes, in case of strong skin reactions a removal during the time of irradiation should be considered.

[The intensification of the radiotherapeutic effect on HeLa cells by gemcitabine]. / Verstärkung der radiotherapeutischen Wirkung auf HeLa-Zellen durch Gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (2'.2'-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC) is a new nucleoside analog with promising activity in different solid tumors in vivo and in vitro. As published up to now, combined with irradiation dFdC demonstrates a radiosensitizing effect on pancreas and colon carcinoma cell lines. We investigated the influence of dFdC on the radiosensitization of human squamous carcinoma cells of the cervix (HeLa-cells, ATCC CCL-2). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Under standardized conditions monolayer cultures of HeLa-cells were incubated in medium with dFdC for different times (4 to 24 hours) and exposed to different concentrations (0.003, 0.01 and 0.03 mumol/l). Irradiation (2 to 6 Gy, electron beam) followed immediately or 12 hours after dFdC-exposure. Cell survival was determined by colony forming assay. Using the linear-quadratic model cell survival curves were fit after correction for drug-induced cytotoxicity and the mean inactivation dose (MID) was calculated. Radiation enhancement was defined as the ratio MIDRT(= Control)/MIDRT + dFdC > 1. RESULTS: Exposed to gemcitabine for 4 and 8 hours and followed by immediate irradiation the radiation enhancement ratio (Table 1) is 1.07 to 1.14 and 1.04 to 1.22, respectively, if dFdC concentration is > or = 0.01 to 0.03 mumol/l. Further increase of the irradiation effect is demonstrated in cells exposed to > or = 0.003 to 0.03 mumol/l dFdC for 16 and 24 hours (radiation enhancement ratio 1.08 to 2.0 and 1.08 to 2.48, respectively) (Figure 3). If irradiation is applied 12 hours after 24-hour-exposure (0.01 and 0.03 mumol/l) the enhancement ratio was 1.18 and 1.7, respectively (Figure 4). CONCLUSIONS: In cell cultures the assays combining irradiation with dFdC demonstrate that dFdC is a potent radiation sensitizer of HeLa-cells. The effect of irradiation on cells pre-treated with non- and hardly cytotoxic concentrations of dFdC is increased in dependence of dose and time of exposure.