Germline BRCA mutation evaluation in a prospective triple-negative breast cancer registry: implications for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome testing.

NCCN guidelines recommend genetic testing for all triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients aged ≤60 years. However, due to the lack of prospective information in unselected patients, these guidelines are not uniformly adopted by clinicians and insurance carriers. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of BRCA mutations and evaluate the utility of NCCN guidelines in unselected TNBC population. Stage I-IV TNBC patients were enrolled on a prospective registry at academic and community practices. All patients underwent BRCA1/2 testing. Significant family history (SFH) was defined >1 relative with breast cancer at age ≤50 or ≥1 relative with ovarian cancer. Mutation prevalence in the entire cohort and subgroups was calculated. 207 TNBC patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2013. Racial/ethnic distribution: Caucasian (80 %), African-American (14 %), Ashkenazi (1 %). Deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations were identified in 15.4 % (32/207) of patients (BRCA1:11.1 %, BRCA2:4.3 %). SFH reported by 36 % of patients. Mutation prevalence in patients with and without SFH was 31.6 and 6.1 %, respectively. When assessed by age at TNBC diagnosis, the mutation prevalences were 27.6 % (≤50 years), 11.4 % (51-60 years), and 4.9 % (≥61 years). Using SFH or age ≤50 as criteria, 25 and 34 % of mutations, respectively, were missed. Mutation prevalence in patients meeting NCCN guidelines was 18.3 % (32/175) and 0 % (0/32) in patients who did not meet guidelines (p = .0059). In this unselected academic and community population with negligible Ashkenazi representation, we observed an overall BRCA mutation prevalence rate of 15.4 %. BRCA testing based on NCCN guidelines identified all carriers supporting its routine application in clinical practice for TNBC.

Overcoming challenges in conducting early phase breast cancer prevention trials: Bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens vs waitlist control.

BACKGROUND: The combination of bazedoxifene 20 mg (BZA) and conjugated estrogens 0.45 mg (CE) marketed as Duavee® is approved for vasomotor symptom relief and osteoporosis prevention. Our pilot study suggested it had potential breast cancer risk reduction, and we proposed a multisite Phase IIB primary prevention trial assessing change in breast imaging and tissue risk biomarkers. By the time funding was acquired in February 2021, Duavee® was unavailable with an uncertain return date. A redesign was needed to salvage the study. METHODS: The basic trial design was minimally altered. Women age 45-64 at elevated risk for breast cancer with vasomotor symptoms and no menses for at least 2 months have mammography, phlebotomy, and benign breast tissue sampling before and after 6 months of intervention. However, instead of Duavee® (single pill) vs placebo, women are randomized to 6 months of BZA + CE vs Waitlist. Those initially randomized to Waitlist can receive BZA + CE after 6 months. The primary endpoint is between arm difference in change in a fully automated measure of mammographic density with blood and tissue-based secondary endpoints. OUTCOMES: Accrual initiation was delayed due to contractual difficulties surrounding BZA importation during COVID-19 and deploying a fully automated method (Volpara®) to assess the primary endpoint. To accommodate this delay, a mid-grant no cost extension along with amended eligibility requirements were employed. 61/120 participants needed were entered in the initial 27 months of accrual and 37 months of funding. Despite a late start, accrual is likely to be completed within the funding period. NCT04821141.

Axillary reverse mapping: a prospective study in women with clinically node negative and node positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is to prevent lymphedema by preserving arm versus breast axillary lymphatics. Concerns regarding feasibility and oncologic safety have limited the adoption of the technique. This prospective study was undertaken to investigate ARM in clinically node negative and node positive breast cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 184 patients underwent 212 ARM procedures: 155 sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (group 1) and 57 ALNDs with/without SLNB (group 2). ARM lymphatics were not preserved if they were a SLN, directly entered a SLN, or were within ALND boundaries during ALND. RESULTS: SLN with radioisotope alone was successful in 92 % of procedures (181 of 197). ARM identification was 47 % (73 of 155) in group 1. Criteria were met in 30 % (47 of 155) for preservation, and 25 % (38 of 155) were preserved. Of those who met preservation criteria, 81 % (38 of 47) were preserved. In group 2, ARM identification was 72 % (41 of 57); 7 met criteria for preservation and were preserved. Of the ARM nodes, 10 % (22 of 212) were SLNs (crossover). ARM nodes contained metastatic disease in one crossover and two nonsentinel ARM nodes in clinically node positive patients with N2/N3 disease. CONCLUSIONS: ARM is a feasible technique for identification and preservation of axillary arm lymphatics with an acceptable incidence of SLN crossover. A larger sample size is needed to determine if ARM can reduce the incidence of lymphedema in patients undergoing SLNB alone and to confirm the absence of ARM metastases in clinically node negative patients undergoing ALND.

Symptom monitoring and self-care practices among Filipino cancer patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess patient-reported symptoms and self-care methods used during cancer treatments, using checklists. A descriptive study was performed at the cancer institute of a national medical center in Manila on 100 patients undergoing combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy, n = 37, or chemotherapy alone, n = 63. Instruments used were (a) 25-item patient-reported Therapy-Related Symptoms Checklist (TRSC), (b) Self-care Methods (with the 25 TRSC items) tool, (c) Karnofsky Scale, (d) Demographic form, and (e) Health form. The TRSC (Philippine version) Cronbach alpha = .83. The TRSC scores inversely, significantly correlated with nurse-rated Karnofsky measure of functional status (r = -0.45; P < .001)-all evidences of internal consistency reliability, construct, and concurrent validity; similar findings were found in Midwestern United States and 2 other Asian settings. Compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone, patients who had combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy reported more symptoms with greater severity on several TRSC subscales. Self-care methods most used were in 2 categories: (a) diet/nutrition/lifestyle change (eg, modify food/eating habits; eat vegetables and fruits (papaya); use nutritional supplements; have naps, rest, sleep) to manage eating, oropharynx, nausea, and fatigue subscale symptoms; and (b) mind/body control (eg, prayer, praying the rosary, music) to relieve fatigue subscale, other symptoms. The TRSC (Philippine version) and Self-care Methods assess patient-reported symptoms and patients' self-care use. Oncology symptom management is enhanced by a valid clinical assessment tool.