Which Knee Phenotypes Exhibit the Strongest Correlation With Cartilage Degeneration?

BACKGROUND: Although articular wear has been thoroughly investigated, the effects of abnormal limb alignment on cartilage degeneration over time remain poorly understood. An exact assessment of the correlation between lower limb alignment abnormalities and MRI-observed articular degradation may be helpful for understanding the progression of osteoarthritis and planning future treatment. QUESTION/PURPOSE: In patients with moderate to advanced osteoarthritis, (1) is there a correlation between overall alignment of the knee and the location of cartilage degradation over time, as measured by cartilage metrics on MRI? (2) Is there a correlation between tibial alignment and the location of cartilage degradation over time, as measured by cartilage metrics on MRI? (3) Is there a correlation between femoral alignment and the location of cartilage degradation over time, as measured by cartilage metrics on MRI? METHODS: Between April 2020 and September 2022, we retrospectively evaluated 3106 patients aged 45 to 79 years who were at risk of experiencing knee osteoarthritis. Of those, we considered as potentially eligible 600 symptomatic index knees with radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis-Kellgren-Lawrence Grades 2 or 3-at the baseline visit. Of those, 22% (134 of 600) were excluded because of a lack of proper alignment measurements, leaving 466 knees with measurements of radiologic alignment angles and quantitative MRI cartilage measurements of 16 subregions of the femorotibial compartment at baseline and 12 and 24 months, and 64 knees at the 48-month visit for investigation in the current study. Data regarding cartilage measurements of the patellofemoral compartment were not available for analysis. The knees were categorized into one of the possible 25 different phenotypes of the lower extremity established by previous research, based on the neutral, valgus, or varus distal mechanical angle of the femur and proximal tibial mechanical angle on full-limb radiographs. We applied ANOVA to estimate the effect size of the overall, femoral, and tibial alignments on the location of cartilage degradation over time, as measured by cartilage metrics on MRI. RESULTS: We found that the overall combinations of a valgus femur with valgus tibia or a valgus femur with varus tibia were associated with the highest loss of cartilage in the internal medial tibial subregion and anterior lateral tibial subregion (η 2 p = 0.39 and 0.17, respectively). For the tibia, we found that the combination of a valgus femur with valgus tibia was associated with an increase in the area of subchondral bone denuded of cartilage in the central lateral tibial subregion (η 2 p = 0.2). For the femur, we found that the combination of a valgus femur with valgus tibia was associated with loss of cartilage thickness in the central weightbearing lateral femorotibial compartment (η 2 p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: We found that certain alignment patterns are associated with rapid deterioration of cartilage and exposure of subchondral bone, even over short time periods. In particular, the valgus femur with valgus tibia and valgus femur with varus tibia phenotypes deserve special attention, because they exhibited a strong, atypical correlation with the internal medial tibial subregion and anterior lateral tibial subregion, respectively. This is important because valgus and varus malalignment cause isolated lateral and medial compartment disease, respectively. Therefore, these findings suggest that a more individualized approach for limb axis deformities is valuable, and hint at a more meticulous radiologic and clinical investigation, perhaps using different imaging modalities, especially when assessing the exact cartilage state and planning an intervention. Future studies, ideally biomechanical, might help in assessing the long-term effects of the various phenotypes on cartilage degradation and their relevance in reconstructive surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Tourniquet does not affect intraoperative kinematics during total knee arthroplasty: Results of a prospective study using a robotic assistance system.

PURPOSE: Tourniquet use during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. There are limited data demonstrating the effect of tourniquet use on flexion and extension gaps. The use of a tourniquet can theoretically affect the kinematics of the knee joint, specifically the extension and flexion gaps and the laxity, by mechanically compressing the soft tissues including the muscles above the knee joint. Therefore, this study was designed to prospectively evaluate changes in flexion and extension gaps with and without the use of a tourniquet. METHODS: The following prospective study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent TKA using a surgical robot. The inclusion criteria were advanced osteoarthritis (OA) and varus-alignment or valgus-alignment <3° (hip-knee-ankle angle, standing long-leg X-ray), and the exclusion criteria were BMI >35 kg/m2 and mechanical axis in >3° valgus. A CR-TKA was performed, and the medial and lateral gaps (in mm) throughout the full range of motion in 10° increments were recorded. The procedure was conducted both with and without an applied tourniquet (350 mmHg). RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the medial joint space. By contrast, the lateral gap showed significant differences in 10-20° of flexion (with a tourniquet 1.9 mm vs. without a tourniquet 2.1 mm, p = 0.018), 20-30° (1.6 vs. 1.8 mm, p = 0.02), 100-110° (0.9 vs. 1.1 mm, p = 0.021), and 110-120° (0.8 vs. 1 mm, p = 0.038). Thus, at the above degrees of flexion on the lateral side, there was a decrease in the mean of 0.2 mm with the use of a tourniquet. CONCLUSION: Although the use of a tourniquet showed a detectable change in the lateral gap in four 10° segments of flexion, clinical relevance with an average difference of 0.2 mm is not achieved. Thus, the use of a tourniquet in TKA can still be advocated based on the presented data. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Association between posterior tibial slope and anatomic spinopelvic parameters: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Only a few publications considered the influence of the spinopelvic parameters on below-hip anatomy. There is a lack of evidence about the relationship between the anatomic spinopelvic parameters and the posterior tibial slope (PTS). Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the association between fixed anatomic spinopelvic parameters and PTS. METHODS: Adult patients presenting with lumbar, thoracic, or cervical complaints together with knee pain at a single hospital between 2017 to 2022 with available standing full-spine lateral radiograph and lateral knee radiograph were retrospectively reviewed. The measured parameters included the pelvic incidence (PI), the sacral kyphosis (SK), the pelvisacral angle, the sacral anatomic orientation (SAO), the sacral table angle, the sacropelvic angle and the PTS. Pearson's correlations and linear regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients (44 women), median age 63 years were analyzed. A strong positive correlation was identified between PI and PTS (r = 0.70, p < 0.001). A strong negative correlation was observed between PI and SAO (r = - 0.74, p < 0.001). A strong positive correlation was observed between PI and SK (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). A univariable linear regression analysis showed that PTS can be deduced from PI according to the following formula: PTS = 0.174 × PI - 1.138. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to support a positive correlation between the PI and the PTS. We demonstrate that knee anatomy is individually correlated to pelvic shape and therefore influences spinal posture.

High Acromial Slope and Low Acromiohumeral Distance Increase the Risk of Retear of the Supraspinatus Tendon After Repair.

BACKGROUND: Retearing of the supraspinatus (SSP) tendon after repair is relatively common, but its cause is rarely clear. Although the role of acromion morphology and glenoid orientation in the pathogenesis of primary SSP tendon tears have frequently been analyzed, their association with the risk of rerupture of a repaired SSP tendon is poorly understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is acromial morphology associated with the risk of retear after SSP tendon repair? (2) Is there an association between inclination and version of the glenoid and the odds for retear of the SSP tendon after repair? (3) Are there differences in outcome scores between patients who had intact cuff repairs and those who had retears? METHODS: Between August 2012 and December 2015, we treated 92 patients for SSP tendon tears; all of these patients were considered for inclusion in the present study. We considered patients with complete tear of the SSP that was reconstructed with a double-row repair and a minimum follow-up of 2 years as potentially eligible. Based on these criteria, 28% (26 of 92) were excluded because they had a partial rupture and did not receive a double-row reconstruction. A further 9% (eight of 92) were excluded because of missing planes or slices (such as sagittal, axial, or frontal) on MRI, and another 3% (three of 92) were lost before the minimum study follow-up interval or had incomplete datasets, leaving 60% (55 of 92) for inclusion in the present analysis. All included patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years; follow-up with MRI occurred at a mean duration of 2.3 ± 0.4 years postoperatively. All patients were asked to complete the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and Oxford Shoulder Scores, and they underwent MRI of the operated-on shoulder. Preoperative true AP radiographs and MR images of the affected shoulders were retrospectively assessed by measuring the acromiohumeral interval, critical shoulder angle, acromial slope, acromial tilt, acromial index, lateral acromial angle, and glenoid version and inclination. The patients also underwent acromioplasty, in which the underface of the acromion was flattened. To rule out any change in the above parameters because of acromioplasty, these parameters were compared using preoperative and postoperative MR images and showed no difference. In addition, the tendon integrity and quality on postoperative MRI were analyzed independently of one another by the same two observers using the Sugaya and Castricini classifications, accounting for atrophy and fatty degeneration of the SSP muscle. To assess interobserver reliability, the two observers took measurements independently from each other. They were orthopaedic residents who completed a training session before taking the measurements. All measurements had excellent intrarater (Cronbach alpha 0.996 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.00; p > 0.01) and interrater (interrater correlation coefficient 0.975 [95% CI 0.97 to 0.98]; p > 0.01) reliabilities. To answer the study's first question, SSP integrity on postoperative MRI was compared with acromial morphologic parameters measured on preoperative AP radiographs and MR images. To answer the second question, the postoperative integrity and quality of the SSP tendon were correlated with glenoid inclination and glenoid version. To answer our third question, we compared outcome scores between patients with intact SSP tendons and those with reruptured SSP tendons. To investigate any correlation among the acromial morphology, glenoid orientation, and postoperative outcomes, a binomial logarithmic regression analysis was performed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine cutoff points for the radiologic parameters that showed a correlation in the binomial regression analysis. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as acromioplasty or preoperative fatty infiltration as well as muscle atrophy, the only morphological parameters associated with a higher risk (adjusted odds ratio) of SSP tendon rerupture were the acromiohumeral interval (adjusted OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.9 to 0.99]; p < 0.01) and acromial slope (adjusted OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.8]; p < 0.01). The critical shoulder angle, acromial tilt, acromial index, and lateral acromial angle were not associated with the risk of rerupture. The cutoff values for acromial slope and acromiohumeral interval were 24.5° and 7.4 mm, respectively. Patients with an acromiohumeral interval smaller than 7.4 mm or an acromial slope greater than 24.5° had higher odds (acromiohumeral interval: OR 11 [95% CI 2 to 46]; p = 0.01 and acromial slope: OR 9 [95% CI 2 to 46]; p = 0.04) for rerupture of the SSP. No difference was found between patients with intact SSP tendons and those with reruptured SSP tendons in terms of glenoid inclination (6° ± 4° versus 6° ± 3°, mean difference 0.8° [-1° to 3°]; p < 0.48) and glenoid version (-2° ± 3° versus -3° ± 3°, mean difference 1° [-1° to 3°]; p < 0.30). No difference was found between the intact and reruptured SSP groups regarding clinical outcomes (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index: 98 ± 2 versus 97 ± 3, mean difference 0.73 [95% CI -0.30 to 0.31]; p = 0.96; Oxford Shoulder Score: 26 ± 13 versus 23 ± 10, mean difference 2.80 [95% CI -4.12 to 9.72]; p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: The preoperative acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope are associated with SSP tendon rerupture after repair. Conversely, the critical shoulder angle, acromial tilt, lateral acromial angle, and acromial index had no association with the postoperative outcome. Additionally, glenoid inclination and version were not associated with the rerupture rate after SSP tendon repair. A detailed analysis of the acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope is recommended in clinical practice in patients undergoing SSP tendon repair. Surgeons should consider measuring the acromiohumeral interval and acromial slope preoperatively when performing SSP repair, especially in the context of planned acromioplasties. Future studies should investigate the role of acromioplasty during SSP repair in patients with a pathologic acromial slope and acromiohumeral interval. In this context, it should be determined whether a more-radical acromioplasty could reduce the risk of rerupture of the SSP in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Autologous semitendinosus meniscus graft significantly improves knee joint kinematics and the tibiofemoral contact after complete lateral meniscectomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of a doubled semitendinosus (ST) and a single gracilis tendon (GT) lateral meniscus autograft to restore the knee joint kinematics and tibiofemoral contact after total lateral meniscectomy (LMM). METHODS: Fourteen human knee joints were tested intact, after LMM and after ST and GT meniscus autograft treatment under an axial load of 200 N during full range of motion (0°-120°) and four randomised loading situations: without external moments, external rotation, valgus stress and a combination of external rotation and valgus stress using a knee joint simulator. Non-parametric statistical analyses were performed on joint kinematics and on the tibiofemoral contact mechanics. RESULTS: LMM led to significant rotational instability of the knee joints (p < 0.02), which was significantly improved after ST autograft application (p < 0.04), except for knee joint flexions > 60°. The GT autograft failed to restore the joint kinematics. LMM significantly increased the tibiofemoral contact pressure (p < 0.03), while decreasing the contact area (p < 0.05). The ST autograft was able to restore the contact mechanics after LMM (p < 0.02), while the GT replacement displayed only an improvement trend. CONCLUSION: The doubled ST lateral meniscus autograft improved the knee joint kinematics significantly and restored the tibiofemoral contact mechanics almost comparable to the native situation. Thus, from a biomechanical point of view, ST meniscus autografts might be a potential treatment alternative for patients who are indicated for meniscus allograft transplantation.

Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this examination was to assess, which risk factors impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) in the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia. METHODS: A consecutive series of 241 TPO was reviewed retrospectively. Of these, a set of five postoperative radiographs was available, performed in a standardized regimen in the first year after surgery. Two experienced observers had to agree on the existence of a non-union on the radiographs obtained 1 year after TPO. Both observers measured the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI) on all radiographs. Besides patient-specific risk factors, the magnitudes of acetabular correction and the amounts of a detectable slight change in acetabular correction were assessed. Binary logistic regression analysis and chi-squared test were used to detect the impact of the risk factor on bone healing. RESULTS: A total of 222 cases were left for further examination. In 19 of these, at least one osteotomy was not healed completely one year after surgery. Binary logistic regression showed a significant relationship between the risk factors "age" (p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 1.109 (95% CI 1.05-1.18)) as well as "magnitude of acetabular correction (LCEA)" (p = 0.01; OR 1.087 (95% CI 1.02-1.16)) and non-union. Pearson's chi-square test showed a relationship between the risk factor "wound healing disorder" and non-union (p < 0.001). LCEA and AI showed a slight increase from the first to the last follow-up (observer 1: 1.6° and 1.3°, resp.), but regression analysis for the risk factor "amount of postoperative change of acetabular correction (LCEA, AI)" did not show statistically significant values. CONCLUSION: The age at surgery and the magnitude of acetabular correction negatively influenced the healing progress of the osteotomy sites. The amount of a slight postoperative change of LCEA and AI did not correlate with a non-union.

Acetabular deficiency in borderline hip dysplasia is underestimated by lateral center edge angle alone.

INTRODUCTION: In hip preservation surgery, the term "borderline hip dysplasia" was used when the lateral center edge angle (LCEA), historically described by Wiberg, measured 18-25°. In recent years, several radiographic parameters have been described to assess the antero posterior coverage of the femoral head, for example, the anterior and posterior wall index (AWI and PWI). This allowed an increasingly comprehensive understanding of acetabular morphology and a questioning of the borderline definition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 397 consecutive hips was performed, all treated with triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) due to symptomatic hip dysplasia. On all preoperative pelvic radiographs with a LCEA of 18-25°, acetabular index (AI), AWI and PWI were measured. With these values, the hips were categorized into laterally, antero-laterally and postero-laterally dysplastic and stratified by gender. Intra- and interobserver correlation of the parameters was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: According to LCEA, 192 hips were identified as "borderline dysplastic". Based on AWI and PWI, the categorization resulted in 116 laterally dysplastic (60.4%), 33 antero-laterally (17.2%) and 43 postero-laterally dysplastic hips (22.4%). Gender stratification revealed that male acetabula seemed to be slightly more postero-laterally deficient than female (mean PWI 0.80 vs 0.89; p = 0.017). ICC confirmed highly accurate and reproducible readings of all parameters. CONCLUSION: The rather high proportion of symptomatic hips labelled borderline dysplastic suggested, that there might be substantial acetabular deficiency not recognizable by LCEA. Comprehensive deformity analysis using LCEA, AI, AWI and PWI showed, that 40% of these hips were deficient either antero-laterally or postero-laterally. Male acetabula were more deficient postero-laterally than female.

Acetabular orientation in triple pelvic osteotomy: is intraoperative fluoroscopy reliable?

PURPOSE: In pelvic osteotomies, unfavorable balancing of the anterior and posterior acetabular wall can affect the longevity of the natural joint. This raises the question, whether intraoperative fluoroscopy is sufficiently accurate. The objective was to assess the correlation between acetabular parameters [lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular index (AI), anterior wall index (AWI), posterior wall index (PWI)] acquired on intraoperative fluoroscopic images and postoperative pelvic radiographs and to analyze intra- and interobserver reliability of these parameters. METHODS: A retrospective examination was conducted on 206 consecutive cases (176 patients) after triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO). Every patient received a pre- and postoperative pelvic radiograph in supine position in exactly the same technique. A highly standardized surgical sequence allowed consistent intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging. LCAE, AI, PWI and AWI were measured by an experienced orthopedic surgeon and an orthopedic surgeon in training. Statistics comprised a priori power analysis, Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: A total of 165 cases were included. ICC between the parameters of the fluoroscopic images and postoperative radiographs was for LCEA: 0.935, AI: 0.936, AWI: 0.725 and PWI: 0.878. Intraobserver ICC for all parameters ranged from 0.953 to 0.989, interobserver ICC from 0.798 to 0.968, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the surgical treatment of hip dysplasia by means of TPO, intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging has proven to be reliable and accurate. Intraobserver correlation was excellent for all parameters. The correlation between the intraoperative fluoroscopic images and postoperative radiographs ranged from good to excellent, with the lowest values for the acetabular wall indices (AWI and PWI).

Treatment of borderline hip dysplasia with triple pelvic osteotomy: preoperative values of acetabular index and lateral center edge angle can indicate overcorrection.

INTRODUCTION: After pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia, the longevity of the hip joint can be compromised by acetabular overcorrection. This iatrogenic pincer-type deformity is considered to be one of the major risk factors for persistent pain and progressing osteoarthritis. There is evidence that acetabula in the borderline range, defined by a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) between 18° and 25°, are more delicate to be orientated physiologically. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of acetabular orientation by triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO), established by Tönnis and Kalchschmidt, especially with respect to acetabular overcorrection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective examination on 368 consecutive hips treated with TPOs was conducted. On the preoperative pelvic radiograph and the radiographic control 5 days after surgery, LCEA, acetabular index (AI), and anterior (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI) were measured. According to the above-mentioned definition, the hips were divided into a borderline (n = 196) and a dysplastic (n = 172) group. Acetabular overcorrection was defined as when LCEA exceeded 35°, AI was below 0° and AWI exceeded 0.60, postoperatively. The postoperative occurrence of a relevant femoroacetabular impingement was correlated to these thresholds. Statistics comprised a priori power analysis, correlation analyses and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: In the borderline group, in 64 hips (32.7%), LCEA and AI indicated lateral overcorrection. In the dysplastic group, in 14 hips (8.1%), solely AI indicated overcorrection. In none of the hips, relevant anterior overcorrection was detected since AWI never exceeded 0.60. Chi-square test demonstrated a significant correlation between the occurrence of a postoperative femoroacetabular impingement and LCEA exceeding 35°, as well as AI below 0° (p < 0.001, resp.). Bravais-Pearson's analysis showed a significant correlation between the pre- and postoperative values of all parameters in the borderline and the dysplasia group (p < 0.001). Thus, ROC analysis could be performed and provided preoperative cutoff values for LCEA (23°) and AI (12.5°), hinting at postoperative overcorrection. CONCLUSION: The comparison of radiographic parameters after TPO showed a considerably greater percentage of laterally overcorrected acetabula in the borderline hips than in the dysplastic hips. According to the wall indices, anterior overcorrection was not observed. ROC analysis anticipated unfavorable lateral overcorrection when preoperative LCEA was above 23° and AI below 12.5°. These findings should sensitize the surgeon to the delicate acetabular correction in borderline dysplastic hips.

MRI Allows Accurate Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss.

BACKGROUND: Bony Bankart lesions larger than a certain size can lead to a high redislocation rate, despite treatment with Bankart repair. Detection and measurement of glenoid bone loss play key roles in selecting the appropriate surgical therapy in patients with shoulder instability. There is controversy about which diagnostic modalities, using different measurement methods, provide the best diagnostic validity. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the diagnostic accuracies of true AP radiographs, West Point (WP) view radiographs, MRI, and CT to detect glenoid bone loss? (2) Are there differences in the measurements of glenoid bone loss on MRI and CT? (3) What are the intrarater and interrater reliabilities of CT and MRI to measure glenoid bone loss? METHODS: Between August 2012 and February 2017, we treated 80 patients for anterior shoulder instability. Of those, we considered patients with available preoperative true AP radiographs, WP radiographs, CT images, and MR images of the affected shoulder as potentially eligible. Based on that, 63% (50 of 80) of patients were eligible for analysis; 31% (25 of 80) were excluded because not all planes or slices (such as sagittal, axial, or frontal) of each diagnostic imaging modalities were available and 7% (5 of 80) because of the insufficient quality of diagnostic images (for example, setting of the layers did not allow adequate en face view of the glenoid). Preoperative true AP radiographs, WP radiographs, CT images and MR images of the affected shoulders were retrospectively assessed for the presence of glenoid bone loss by two blinded observers at a median (range) 25 months (12 to 66) postoperatively. To evaluate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and area under the curve (AUC), we compared the detection of glenoid bone loss at follow-up achieved with the aforementioned imaging modalities with intraoperative arthroscopic detection. In all patients with glenoid bone loss, two blinded observers measured the size of the glenoid bone loss on preoperative CT and MR images using six measuring techniques: depth and length of the glenoid bone loss, Bigliani classification, best-fit circle width loss method, AP distance method, surface area method, and Gerber X ratio. Subsequently, the sizes of the glenoid bone loss determined using CT and MRI were compared. To estimate intraobserver and interobserver reliability, measurements were performed in a blinded fashion by two observers. Their level of experience was equivalent to that of orthopaedic residents, and they completed a training protocol before the measurements. RESULTS: For the ability to accurately diagnose Bankart lesions, the AUC (accuracy of a diagnostic test; the closer to 1.0, the more accurate the test) was good for MRI (0.83 [95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.94]; p < 0.01), fair for CT (0.79 [95% CI 0.66 to 0.92]; p < 0.01), poor for WP radiographs (0.69 [95% CI 0.54 to 0.85]; p = 0.02) and failed for true AP radiographs (0.55 [95% CI 0.39 to 0.72]; p = 0.69). In paired comparisons, there were no differences between CT and MRI regarding (median [range]) lesion width (2.33 mm [0.35 to 4.53] versus 2.26 mm [0.90 to 3.47], p = 0.71) and depth (0.42 mm [0.80 to 1.39] versus 0.40 mm [0.06 to 1.17]; p = 0.54), and there were no differences concerning the other measurement methods: best-fit circle width loss method (15.02% [2.48% to 41.59%] versus 13.38% [2.00% to 36.34%]; p = 0.66), AP distances method (15.48% [1.44% to 42.01%] versus 12.88% [1.43% to 36.34%]; p = 0.63), surface area method (14.01% [0.87% to 38.25] versus 11.72% [2.45% to 37.97%]; p = 0.68), and Gerber X ratio (0.75 [0.13 to 1.47] versus 0.76 [0.27 to 1.13]; p = 0.41). Except for the moderate interrater reliability of the Bigliani classification using CT (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.599 [95% CI 0.246 to 0.834]; p = 0.03) and acceptable interrater reliability of the Gerber X ratio using CT (0.775 [95% CI 0.542 to 0.899]; p < 0.01), all other measurement methods had good or excellent intrarater and interrater reliabilities on MRI and CT. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that CT and MRI can accurately detect glenoid bone loss, whereas WP radiographs can only recognize them poorly, and true AP radiographs do not provide any adequate diagnostic accuracy. In addition, when measuring glenoid bone loss, MRI images of the analyzed measurement methods yielded sizes that were no different from CT measurements. Finally, the use of MRI images to measure Bankart bone lesions gave good-to-excellent reliability in the present study, which was not inferior to CT findings. Considering the advantages including lower radiation exposure and the ability to assess the condition of the labrum using MRI, we believe MRI can help surgeons avoid ordering additional CT imaging in clinical practice for the diagnosis of anterior shoulder instability in patients with glenoid bone loss. Future studies should investigate the reproducibility of our results with a larger number of patients, using other measurement methods that include examination of the opposite side or with three-dimensional reconstructions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I diagnostic study.

Are Knotted or Knotless Techniques Better for Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Tears of the Superior Portion of the Subscapularis Tendon? A Study in Cadavers.

BACKGROUND: Knotted and knotless single-anchor reconstruction techniques are frequently performed to reconstruct full-thickness tears of the upper portion of subscapularis tendon. However, it is unclear whether one technique is superior to the other. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) When comparing knotless and knotted single-anchor reconstruction techniques in full-thickness tears of the upper subscapularis tendon, is there a difference in stiffness under cyclic load? (2) Are there differences in cyclic gapping between knotless and knotted reconstructions? (3) Are there differences in the maximal stiffness, yield load, and ultimate load to failure? (4) What are the modes of failure of knotless and knotted reconstruction techniques? METHODS: Eight matched pairs of human cadaveric shoulders were dissected, and a full-thickness tear of the subscapularis tendon (Grade 3 according to the Fox and Romeo classification) was created. The cadavers all were male specimens, with a median (range) age of 69 years (61 to 75). Before biomechanical evaluation, the specimens were randomized into two equal reconstruction groups: knotless single anchor and knotted single anchor. All surgical procedures were performed by a single orthopaedic surgeon who subspecializes in sports orthopedics and shoulder surgery. With a customized set up that was integrated in a dynamic material testing machine, the humeri were consecutively loaded from 10 N to 60 N, from 10 N to 100 N, and from 10 N to 180 N for 50 cycles. Furthermore, the gapping behavior of the tear was analyzed using a video tracking system. Finally, the stiffness, gapping, maximal stiffness, yield loads, and maximum failure loads of both reconstruction groups were statistically analyzed. Failure was defined as retearing of the reconstructed gap threshold due to rupture of the tendon and/or failure of the knots or anchors. After biomechanical testing, bone quality was measured at the footprint of the subscapularis using microCT in all specimens. Bone quality was equal between both groups. To detect a minimum 0.15-mm difference in gap formation between the two repair techniques (with a 5% level of significance; α = 0.05), eight matched pairs (n = 16 in total) were calculated as necessary to achieve a power of at least 90%. RESULTS: The first study question can be answered as follows: for stiffness under cyclic load, there were no differences with the numbers available between the knotted and knotless groups at load stages of 10 N to 60 N (32.7 ± 3.5 N/mm versus 34.2 ± 5.6 N/mm, mean difference 1.5 N/mm [95% CI -6.43 to 3.33]; p = 0.55), 10 N to 100 N (45.0 ± 4.8 N/mm versus 45.2 ± 6.0 N/mm, mean difference 0.2 N/mm [95% CI -5.74 to 6.04]; p = 0.95), and 10 N to 180 N (58.2 ± 10.6 N/mm versus 55.2 ± 4.7 N/mm, mean difference 3 N/mm [95% CI -5.84 to 11.79]; p = 0.48). In relation to the second research question, the following results emerged: For cyclic gapping, there were no differences between the knotted and knotless groups at any load levels. The present study was able to show the following with regard to the third research question: Between knotted and knotless repairs, there were no differences in maximal load stiffness (45.3 ± 8.6 N/mm versus 43.5 ± 10.2 N/mm, mean difference 1.8 [95% CI -11.78 to 8.23]; p = 0.71), yield load (425.1 ± 251.4 N versus 379.0 ± 169.4 N, mean difference 46.1 [95% CI -276.02 to 183.72]; p = 0.67), and failure load (521.1 ± 266.2 N versus 475.8 ± 183.3 N, mean difference 45.3 [95% CI -290.42 to 199.79]; p = 0.69). Regarding the fourth question concerning the failure modes, in the knotted repairs, the anchor tore from the bone in 2 of 8, the suture tore from the tendon in 6 of 8, and no suture slipped from the eyelet; in the knotless repairs, the anchor tore from the bone in 2 of 8, the suture tore from the tendon in 3 of 8, and the threads slipped from the eyelet in 3 of 8. CONCLUSION: With the numbers available, we found no differences between single-anchor knotless and knotted reconstruction techniques used to repair full-thickness tears of the upper portion of subscapularis tendon. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The reconstruction techniques we analyzed showed no differences in terms of their primary stability and biomechanical properties at the time of initial repair and with the numbers available. In view of these experimental results, it would be useful to conduct a clinical study in the future to verify the translationality of the experimental data of the present study.

The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray.

PURPOSE: One of the key factors to the successful revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is the reconstruction of the joint line, which can be determined using the epicondylar ratio (ER). The measurement is established in X-ray and MRI. However, it is not known whether computed tomography (CT) allows a more reliable determination. The objective was to assess the reliability of the ER in CT and to determine the correlation between the ER in CT and a.p. X-ray of the knee. METHODS: The ER was determined on X-ray and CT images of a consecutive series of 107 patients, who underwent rTKA. Measurements were made by two blinded observes, one measured twice. The inter- and intraobserver agreement, as well as the correlation between the two methods, were quantified with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. RESULTS: The average lateral ER was 0.32 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.32 (± 0.04) in CT. On the medial side, the average ER was 0.34 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.35 (± 0.04) in CT. The interobserver agreement for the same imaging modality was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.81 in X-ray as well as lateral 0.74 and medial 0.85 in CT. The correlation between the two methods was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: The ER can be reliably determined in X-ray and CT. Measurements of the two image modalities correlate. Prior to rTKA, the sole use of the X-ray is possible.

Proximal to distal phalangeal articular angle of the first proximal phalanx: Reliability and correlation with round sign.

BACKGROUND: To reduce the rate of correction loss in hallux valgus surgery, a proximal to distal phalangeal articular angle (PDPAA) of the proximal phalanx of the greater toe of> 8° is considered an indication for a combined Akin and Chevron osteotomy. The PDPAA is measured between the articular surfaces of the proximal phalanx of the greater toe. Viewed from a sagittal perspective, the joint surfaces are not perpendicular aligned to the phalanx axis. Therefore, the PDPAA might be confounded by pronation. This study aims to, first, evaluate the intra- and interobserver reliability of the PDPAA and, second, to analyze the correlation to first ray pronation. METHODS: In a consecutive series of 59 feet who underwent hallux valgus (HV) surgery, PDPAA, round sign and other angles were measured on weight-bearing radiographs pre- and postoperatively. After power analysis, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate the intra- and interobserver reliability. The correlation of PDPAA with the round sign as well as angles defining the HV and the Hallux valgus interphalangeus (HVI) were evaluated. RESULTS: The PDPAA showed an excellent intra- and interobserver reliability (ICC 0.92 and 0.89, p < 0.05). The round sign did not correlate significantly with the PDPAA (p = 0.51). However, the PDPAA showed a moderate correlation with the interphalangeal angle (r = 0.51, p < 0.05) and fair inversely with the intermetatarsal angle (r = -0.45, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: First, measurement of PDPAA is reliable. Second, PDPAA is not associated with first ray pronation, but a false low PDPAA is geometrically possible. A high PDPAA correlates with a relevant HVI and inversely correlates with the HV like the HVI. Hence, first ray pronation should be treated first and a remaining PDPAA of> 8° after intraoperatively reevaluation separately.

Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: a comparative in vitro study regarding primary stability and maximum fracture load.

PURPOSE: In total hip arthroplasty, uncemented short stems have been used more and more frequently in recent years. Especially for short and curved femoral implants, bone-preserving and soft tissue-sparing properties are postulated. However, indication is limited to sufficient bone quality. At present, there are no curved short stems available which are based on cemented fixation. METHODS: In this in vitro study, primary stability and maximum fracture load of a newly developed cemented short-stem implant was evaluated in comparison to an already well-established cemented conventional straight stem using six pairs of human cadaver femurs with minor bone quality. Primary stability, including reversible micromotion and irreversible migration, was assessed in a dynamic material-testing machine. Furthermore, a subsequent load-to-failure test revealed the periprosthetic fracture characteristics. RESULTS: Reversible and irreversible micromotions showed no statistical difference between the two investigated stems. All short stems fractured under maximum load according to Vancouver type B3, whereas 4 out of 6 conventional stems suffered a periprosthetic fracture according to Vancouver type C. Mean fracture load of the short stems was 3062 N versus 3160 N for the conventional stems (p = 0.84). CONCLUSION: Primary stability of the cemented short stem was not negatively influenced compared to the cemented conventional stem and no significant difference in fracture load was observed. However, a clear difference in the fracture pattern has been identified.

[Revision TKA due to instability: diagnostics, treatment options and outcomes]. / K-TEP-Wechsel bei Instabilität: Diagnostik, Therapie und Ergebnisse.

BACKGROUND: Instability after primary TKA is a frequent reason for revision surgery. Other mechanisms of failure must be ruled out before an in-depth analysis of instability. DIAGNOSTICS: Diagnostic tools for instability consist of medical history, clinical examination, and imaging. The clinical examination must focus primarily on the extent of the instability, the location of the instability and the levels of instability. Varus and valgus stress radiographs in the mediolateral plane in extension and flexion, as well as anteroposterior stress images (drawer) are mandatory. In addition, the underlying cause (or a combination of causes) must be defined. Possible causes include malalignment, component malposition (rotation), bony and ligamentous insufficiencies and implant-associated instabilities. THERAPY: Once the mechanism of failure is understood in detail, various therapeutic options are available. Conservative therapy is only considered in patients where there is borderline instability, and the patient has adequate compensatory options in daily life. Some authors postulate the need for 3 months of conservative therapy in every case before possible surgery. Isolated inlay exchange is usually only a compromise and shows failure rates of up to 60%. Partial component exchange requires some preconditions and is technically demanding. RESULTS: If the indication is correct, the results are consistently comparable with those after full component revision. In the case of full component revision, attention must be paid to the degree of constraint to achieve stability but also to avoiding over-treatment (too highly constrained TKA with an probability of loosening). In general, the results after revision surgery are worse in cases of instability than in cases of exchange surgery due to aseptic loosening or patellar abnormalities but better than in cases of infection or arthrofibrosis.

Chondral lesions at the medial femoral condyle, meniscal degeneration, anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, and lateral meniscal tears impair the middle-term results after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to analyse which clinical, radiological and arthroscopic findings are able to predict the postoperative outcome after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Furthermore, the present study aimed to investigate the postoperative outcome after partial meniscectomy in patients with degenerative meniscal lesions. METHODS: A total of 91 patients with a follow-up period of 34.7 ± 11.4 months after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were included in this retrospective study. Clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic data were analysed at the time of follow-up. The multivariable linear regression analysis for postoperative outcome, based on the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET), included age, gender, body mass index, physical activity, presence of cartilage lesions, leg alignment, grade of radiographic osteoarthritis, location of meniscal lesions, meniscal extrusion, meniscal degeneration, presence of an anterior cruciate ligament tears as well as bone marrow lesions. RESULTS: WOMET and WOMAC scores showed a significant improvement of 45.0 ± 48.1 points (CI 34.9-55.1; p ≤ 0.0001) and 75.1 ± 69.3 points (CI 60.6-89.6; p = 0.001) within the follow-up period. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that poor preoperative WOMET scores (p = 0.001), presence of cartilage lesions at the medial femoral condylus (p = 0.001), meniscal degeneration (p = 0.008), the presence of an anterior cruciate ligament lesion (p = 0.005), and lateral meniscal tears (p = 0.039) were associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Patients with femoral bone marrow lesions had better outcome (p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Poor preoperative WOMET scores, presence of cartilage lesions at the medial femoral condylus, meniscal degeneration, concomitant anterior cruciate ligament lesions as well as lateral meniscal tears are correlated with worse postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Patients with femoral bone marrow lesions femoral are more likely to gain benefit from arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the middle term. Despite justified recent restrictions in indication, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy seems to effectively reduce pain and alleviate symptoms in carefully selected patients with degenerative meniscal tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes After Implantation of a Curved Bone Preserving Hip Stem Compared to a Standard Length Straight Stem: 5-Yr Results of a Prospective, Randomized DXA-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate differences in periprosthetic bone mineral density changes in the proximal femur after implantation of a cementless bone preserving stem (Fitmore) compared to a cementless straight stem (CLS Spotorno). METHODOLOGY: Periprosthetic bone mineral density was measured in 140 patients (aged 33-74 yr) before surgery, 7 d, 3, 12, and 60 mo postoperatively, using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The 1-yr results have already been published. The results of the first postoperative measurement served as the baseline value. Because of the different length of the 2 implants we used adapted Gruen zones to divide the periprosthetic bone in seven regions of interest with comparable length. Clinical results were recorded using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and the Harris hip score. RESULTS: Clinical findings showed comparable results in both groups at all follow-ups (p > 0.05). A total of 5 yr after surgery, the comparison of periprosthetic bone mineral density changes showed significant differences in regions of interests 3 (CLS -3.9% vs Fitmore -0.2%, p < 0.001) and 5 (CLS -3.6% vs Fitmore -1.3%, p = 0.0028) between both implants. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that no exclusive proximal load distribution could be observed, proximal periprosthetic bone loss in the proximal femur was less pronounced after implantation of the bone preserving stem than with the straight stem.

Biocomposite Suture Anchors Remain Visible Two Years After Rotator Cuff Repair.

BACKGROUND: Biocomposite suture anchors containing osteoconductive materials have gained popularity in rotator cuff repairs. However, little is known about the influence of the addition of osteoconductive materials on implant resorption, bone reaction, tendon healing, and clinical outcomes scores. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of suture anchors were not completely resorbed 2 years after implantation? (2) What are the diameters of the bone bed in relation to the implant? (3) Is tendon integrity correlated with bone tunnel diameter? (4) Is there an association between tunnel widening, periimplant fluid film grade, biodegradation grade, and retear with clinical outcomes scores, such as the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)? METHODS: Thirty-six patients were enrolled from August 2012 to January 2014. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) reparable full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears, (2) double-row suture bridge techniques applied for supraspinatus repair, (3) use of biocomposites suture anchor implants composed of poly L-lactic acid (PLLA) and ß-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) exclusively, and (4) a minimum of 2 years followup. Four patients met the exclusion criteria, and seven of 36 patients (19%) were lost to followup. Thereby, 25 patients (84 implants) were included in this retrospective study. To answer the study's questions, the following methods were applied: (1) The resorption of the implants and periimplant fluid film were assessed on MRI using a four-stage scale system, (2) bone bed diameter was measured on MRI at three different points on the longitudinal central axis of each anchor, (3) tendon integrity was evaluated on MRI according to the Sugaya classification and correlated to bone tunnel diameter, and (4) assessed tunnel diameters, periimplant fluid film grade, biodegradation grade, and tendon condition were related to clinical outcomes scores at the time of followup (2.3 ± 0.3 years). The intraobserver reliability was 0.981 (p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability was 0.895 (p < 0.001). RESULTS: At 2.3 ± 0.3 years, most analyzed suture anchors (76 of 84 [90%]) were, with varying degrees of degradation, still visible. Bone tunnels showed minor widening (0.4 ± 1.4 mm) at the base, but osseous ingrowth was detected as narrowing at the middle (0.1 ± 1.1 mm) and at the apex (1.4 ± 1.7 mm) of the implants. Patients with retears (Sugaya Grades 4-5) had narrower tunnels (3.6 ± 1.8 mm) than patients without retears (Sugaya Grades 1-3; 4.4 ± 1.6 mm; mean difference, 0.782 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.009-1.6]; p = 0.050). WORC and Oxford scores were not associated with the tunnel widening amount, fluid film grade, biodegradation grade, or tendon retear. CONCLUSIONS: In light of the results of the present study, surgeons should consider in their daily practice that the resorption process of these implants may be slower than assumed so far, but no association with severe implant-related complications has been found in the short term. Future studies should focus on the evaluation of the effects of osteoconductive materials on resorption, tendon healing, and clinical outcomes in the long term and on the integration process in different rotator cuff reconstruction techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Diagnostic Value of Clinical Tests for Infraspinatus Tendon Tears.

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the diagnostic value and interpretation of 6 established clinical tests for infraspinatus tendon tears; to assess their ability to distinguish between partial- and full-thickness tears of the infraspinatus tendon; and to investigate whether conducting multiple tests increases the precision of diagnosis. METHODS: A total of 91 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroscopy from March 2015 to April 2017 were included in the present study. To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the area under the curve (AUC), intraoperative findings were compared with the results of 6 established clinical infraspinatus tests: the hornblower's test, the drop sign, the Patte sign, the external rotation lag sign (ERLS), the resisted external rotation test (RERT), and the infraspinatus scapular retraction test. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between the results of the drop sign (P = .02), the ERLS (P = .02), and the RERT (P = .02) and the intraoperative findings. The RERT achieved the highest AUC (0.673). Assessing muscle weakness led to the highest diagnostic precision on the RERT (AUC = 0.673) as compared with pain (AUC = 0.528) or using both criteria (AUC = 0.655). No single clinical test was found to be useful in distinguishing between partial- and full-thickness tears. The combination of at least 2 or more tests improved the diagnostic precision significantly (P ≤ .007). The combination of the RERT and the Patte sign showed the best AUC (0.681) and highest correlation with the intraoperative findings (P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that out of all the clinical tests investigated, the drop sign and the RERT were in isolation able to accurately diagnose tears of the infraspinatus tendon. Only muscle weakness should be considered when interpreting the RERT because of its greater AUC values and correlation with the arthroscopic findings. The present study also showed that the analyzed tests are not capable of distinguishing between partial- and full-thickness tears of the infraspinatus tendon and that the combination of at least 2 tests improved the diagnostic value. The combination of the RERT and the Patte sign showed the best AUC and highest correlation with the intraoperative findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study, prospective comparative study.