Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in hypertensive patients with different sizes of instruments.

OBJECTIVES: The risk of major complications, especially hemorrhage, is significantly elevated during surgery in hypertensive patients. To determine whether percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be safely performed in the hypertensive patients using different sized instruments. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 602 patients undergoing PCNL at our institution and identified 53 who were on antihypertensive therapy at the time of surgery. Patients were categorized into three groups according to size of devices used in surgery : those 24 F percutaneous tract with 22 F nephroscope (Group 1, n = 12 [22.7%]; 26 F percutaneous tract with 24 F nephroscope (Group 2, n = 19 [35.8%]) and 30 F percutaneous tract with 26 F nephroscope (Group 3, n = 22 [41.5%]). We compared the groups with regard to baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters, stone-free and complication rates, and the length of hospitalization. RESULTS: There were no differences between the three groups in age, gender, weight and stone laterality. Fluoroscopy time, access to the collecting system and mean operative time for per cm2 stone did not differ between the groups. Hemoglobin decrease, postoperative hospital stay and blood transfusion rate was higher in group 3. Stones were completely cleared in 83.3%, 84.2% and 81.3% of patients, which increased to 91.6%, 89.5%, and 90.1% with adjunctive therapy in the group 1,2 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PCNL with smaller devices is a safe and effective method in hypertensive patients. It has significantly a shorter hospital stay and less bleeding rates compared to classical PCNL.

The role of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of medium-sized (1-2 cm) lower-pole renal calculi.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy (defined by stone-free rates) and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the treatment of medium sized (1-2 cm) symptomatic lower pole renal calculi, and establishment of the short-term morbidity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 60 evaluable patients who had undergone PNL for 1 to 2 cm diameter lower-pole (LP) stones between November 2006 to March 2009 and compared these results with other treatment modalities in published literature. RESULTS: In all cases, stones were located in the lower calix. Thirty-six procedures were performed on the left side, and 24 were performed on the right side. The mean time to access the collecting system was 20.4 minutes (range 8-70 min) and mean operative time was 62.2 minutes (range 13-155 min). Abdominal radiography performed on postoperative day 1 demonstrated a stone free status in 56 (93.3%) patients. However, 4 patients (6.7%) required ancillary procedures (secondary PNL in 1, retrograde intrarenal surgery in 1, and SWL in 2). After this secondary procedures a complete stone-free status was achieved in 98.3% of patients. The morbidity of patients undergoing PNL at our hospital was minimal, with a mean hospital stay of 3.7 days. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that, PNL is a safe and effective method for medium sized (1 to 2 cm) lower pole renal calculi and percutaneous removal should be considered the primary approach for lower pole stones greater than 10 mm.

Effectiveness of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: A number of comorbid health problems can be found in obese patients. These problems increase the surgical risk in obese patients. AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stone treatment in obese patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 106 patients who had retrograde intrarenal surgery with the diagnosis of renal stone in our clinic. The patients were divided into three groups regarding their body mass indexes: ≥30 kg/m2 being obese (group 1), 25-29.9 kg/m2 being overweight (group 2), and <25 kg/m2 being normal weight (group 3). The patients were compared for age, gender, and stone characteristics. In addition, the duration of surgery, stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, and the duration of the hospital stay were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Twenty eight patients were obese (group 1), 49 patients were overweight (group 2), and 29 patients were normal weight (group 3). The mean ages of groups 1, 2 and 3 were 51.5 (29-84), 47 (30-76) and 35 (19-84) years, respectively (p = 0.001). SFR was 85.7 % in group 1, 89.8 % in group 2, and 75.9 % in group 3 (p = 0.24). The duration of surgery was similar in groups 1, 2, and 3, being 45.5 (25-95), 50 (30-120), and 45.5 (10-100) min, respectively (p = 0.23). None of the patients had major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that retrograde intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient surgical method for renal stone treatment in obese and overweight patients.

Is a contrast study really necessary prior to ureteroscopy?

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative imaging techniques on the success and complication rates of ureteroscopy. We performed a retrospective analysis of 736 patients (455 males and 281 females), with a mean age of 45.5±15.2 years (range, 1-88 years), who underwent rigid ureteroscopic procedures for removal of ureteral stones. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the type of imaging modality used: group I, intravenous urography (n=116); group II, computed tomography (n=381); group III, computed tomography and intravenous urography (n=91), and group IV, ultrasonography and abdominal plain film (n=148). Patients' demographics, stone size and location, prior shock wave lithotripsy, lithotripsy technique, operation time, success rate, and rate of intraoperative complications were compared among the groups. There were no significant differences in success and complication rates among the groups. The stone-free rate after primary ureteroscopy was 87.1% in group I, 88.2% in group II, 96.7% in group III, and 89.9% in group IV (P=0.093). The overall incidence of intraoperative complications was 11.8%. According to the modified Satava classification system, 6.1% of patients had grade 1, 5.1% had grade 2, and 0.54% had grade 3 complications. Intraoperative complications developed in 12.1% of patients in group I, 12.6% of patients in group II, 7.7% of patients in group III, and 12.2% of patients in group IV (P=0.625). Our findings clearly demonstrate that ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral stones can be safely and effectively performed with no use of contrast study imaging, except in doubtful cases of anatomical abnormalities.

Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients of different age groups.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) to treat renal stones in different age groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 947 patients who underwent RIRS for renal calculi between January 2008 and January 2014. Age at RIRS was analysed both as a continuous and categorical variable and patients were categorized into three age groups; aged ≤ 15 years at surgery (group i, n=51), 16 - 60 years (group Ii, n=726) and>60 years (group iii, n=170). We compared the 3 groups with the regard to stone characteristics, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The stone-free rate was 78.4% in group i, 77.5% in group ii, and 81.1% in group iii (P=.587). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only stone size and stone number had significant influence on the stone-free rates after RIRS. Intraoperative complications occurred 13.7% in group i, 5.6% group ii, and 7.6% in group iii. Overall complication rates in children were higher than adult patients but the differences were not statistically significant. We found that only operation time was associated with the increased risk of intraoperative complications. Peroperative medical complications developed in 8 patients (.8%) in group ii and 2 patients (1.1%) in group iii. A 48-year-old man died from septic shock 5 days after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS was observed to be a safe and effective procedure in all age groups of patients with stone disease, therefore age should not be considered as a limiting factor.

Is a contrast study really necessary prior to ureteroscopy?

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative imaging techniques on the success and complication rates of ureteroscopy. We performed a retrospective analysis of 736 patients (455 males and 281 females), with a mean age of 45.5±15.2 years (range, 1-88 years), who underwent rigid ureteroscopic procedures for removal of ureteral stones. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the type of imaging modality used: group I, intravenous urography (n=116); group II, computed tomography (n=381); group III, computed tomography and intravenous urography (n=91), and group IV, ultrasonography and abdominal plain film (n=148). Patients’ demographics, stone size and location, prior shock wave lithotripsy, lithotripsy technique, operation time, success rate, and rate of intraoperative complications were compared among the groups. There were no significant differences in success and complication rates among the groups. The stone-free rate after primary ureteroscopy was 87.1% in group I, 88.2% in group II, 96.7% in group III, and 89.9% in group IV (P=0.093). The overall incidence of intraoperative complications was 11.8%. According to the modified Satava classification system, 6.1% of patients had grade 1, 5.1% had grade 2, and 0.54% had grade 3 complications. Intraoperative complications developed in 12.1% of patients in group I, 12.6% of patients in group II, 7.7% of patients in group III, and 12.2% of patients in group IV (P=0.625). Our findings clearly demonstrate that ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral stones can be safely and effectively performed with no use of contrast study imaging, except in doubtful cases of anatomical abnormalities.