Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Placement in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction after mastectomy has gained increasing popularity. While concerns over ischemic complications related to tension on the mastectomy flap persist, newer techniques and technologies have enhanced safety of this technique. OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes of DTI and 2-stage tissue expander (TE) reconstruction. METHODS: A prospective cohort design was utilized to compare the incidence of reconstructive failure among patients undergoing DTI and TE reconstruction by unadjusted bivariate and adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses. Secondary clinical outcomes of interest included specific complications requiring intervention (infection, seroma, hematoma, mastectomy flap necrosis, incisional dehiscence, device exposure) and time to final drain removal. Patient-reported outcomes on BREAST-Q were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients (257 breasts) underwent DTI reconstruction and 222 patients (405 breasts) received TEs. DTI patients were significantly younger with lower BMIs; less diabetes, hypertension, and smoking; and smaller breast sizes; they also underwent more nipple-sparing mastectomies with prepectoral reconstructions. Rates of any complication (18% DTI vs 24% TE, P = .047), reconstructive failure (5.1% vs 12%, P = .004), and seroma (3.9% vs 11%, P < .001) were significantly lower in the DTI cohort on unadjusted analyses; however, there were no significant differences on adjusted regressions. Patient-reported satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being were more substantively improved with DTI reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral DTI reconstruction is a viable option for postmastectomy reconstruction in carefully selected patients, with no significant increase in reconstructive failure or other complications.

Sutureless vascular anastomotic approaches and their potential impacts.

Sutureless anastomotic devices present several advantages over traditional suture anastomosis, including expanded global access to microvascular surgery, shorter operation and ischemic times, and reduced costs. However, their adaptation for arterial use remains a challenge. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of sutureless anastomotic approaches that are either FDA-approved or under investigation. These approaches include extraluminal couplers, intraluminal devices, and methods assisted by lasers or vacuums, with a particular emphasis on tissue adhesives. We analyze these devices for artery compatibility, material composition, potential for intimal damage, risks of thrombosis and restenosis, and complications arising from their deployment and maintenance. Additionally, we discuss the challenges faced in the development and clinical application of sutureless anastomotic techniques. Ideally, a sutureless anastomotic device or technique should eliminate the need for vessel eversion, mitigate thrombosis through either biodegradation or the release of antithrombotic drugs, and be easily deployable for broad use. The transformative potential of sutureless anastomotic approaches in microvascular surgery highlights the necessity for ongoing innovation to expand their applications and maximize their benefits.

Vaso-Lock for sutureless anastomosis in a pig arteriovenous loop model.

A vascular anastomosis is a critical surgical skill that involves connecting blood vessels. Traditional handsewn techniques can be challenging and resource intensive. To address these issues, we have developed a unique sutureless anastomotic device called Vaso-Lock. This intraluminal device connects free vascular ends using anchors to maintain traction and enable a rapid anastomosis. We tested the anastomotic capability of Vaso-Locks in a pig common carotid-internal jugular arteriovenous model. The use of Vaso-Lock allowed us to accomplish this procedure in less than 10 min, in contrast to the approximately 40 min required for a handsewn anastomosis. The Vaso-Lock effectively maintained patency for at least 6 weeks without causing significant tissue damage. Histological analysis revealed that the device was successfully incorporated into the arterial wall, promoting a natural healing process. Additionally, organ evaluations indicated no adverse effects from using the Vaso-Lock. Our findings support the safety and effectiveness of the Vaso-Lock for arteriovenous anastomosis in pigs, with potential applicability for translation to humans. Our novel sutureless device has the potential to advance surgical practice and improve patient outcomes.

The adjunct use of descending neurogenic-evoked potentials when transcranial motor-evoked potentials degrade into warning criteria in pediatric spinal deformity surgery: minimizing false-positive events.

PURPOSE: This studies objective was to evaluate the utility of descending neurogenic-evoked potentials (DNEPs) in the setting of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TCeMEPs) degradation into warning criteria during pediatric spinal deformity surgery. METHODS: An institutional spinal cord monitoring database was queried to identify all primary and revision pediatric spinal deformity cases, < / = 21 years of age performed from 1/2006 to 12/2021, in which TCeMEPs were the primary motor tract assessment modality which degraded into warning criteria, with subsequent initiation of adjunct DNEPs. RESULTS: Fourteen surgical cases (0.42%; 3351 total cases) in fourteen patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 13.2 years (7.5-21.3). DIAGNOSES: syndromic (n = 7), kyphosis (n = 3), congenital (n = 2), and idiopathic (n = 2). Three-column osteotomies (3CO)were done in eight patients. TCeMEPs degraded into warning criteria during screw placement (n = 7), 3CO performance/closure (n = 4), or deformity correction (n = 3). DNEPs were present in all cases of warning-criteria TCeMEPs and one case had degradation of DNEPs. Intraoperative Stagnara wake-up tests were performed in only 2/14 cases, with one transient new neurologic deficit (NND). In this specific scenario, DNEPs sensitivity was 50%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 92% to detect aNND. CONCLUSION: DNEPs were useful in assessing spinal cord function in the setting of TCeMEP data degradation in complex pediatric deformity surgeries. DNEPs demonstrated a higher specificity and positive predictive value in this clinical setting than TCeMEPs when assessing long-term neurologic function after surgery. Based on this small cohort, DNEPs appear to be a useful adjunct modality to TCeMEPs, in this challenging clinical scenario.

Dual-port and single-port tissue expanders in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Novel dual-port tissue expanders allow easy access to the periprosthetic space for seroma drainage and potentially reduce risk of infection or reconstruction failure. We analyzed outcomes after first-stage alloplastic breast reconstruction in patients receiving dual-port tissue expanders in comparison to those of patients receiving traditional, single-port devices. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent tissue expander placement from 2020 to 2021. A propensity-matched analysis was performed to compare the incidence of reconstruction failure in dual- and single-port expanders. Secondary outcomes included rates of seroma, hematoma, skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and patient-reported outcome measures. RESULTS: After propensity matching, the dual- and single-port cohorts each INCLUDED 190 breasts. There was no difference in reconstruction failure rate (17% vs. 15%, p = 0.48). Dual-port expanders had a significantly higher incidence of surgical site infections (20% vs. 12%, p = 0.04), but fewer infected dual-port expanders were explanted (58% vs. 91% of infections, p = 0.006). The remaining complication rates did not differ. Patient-reported pain interference was significantly higher in the dual-port cohort (59.1 vs. 56, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction failure rates did not differ when using single- or dual-port tissue expanders. Increased incidence of surgical site infections in dual-port expanders, possibly attributable to increased detection, and increased rate of salvage of the infected expanders were observed.