Rapid Passive Gamma Mapping as an Adjunct to Electrical Stimulation Mapping for Functional Localization in Resection of Primary Brain Neoplasms.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the utility of passive high gamma mapping (HGM) as an adjunct to conventional awake brain mapping during glioma resection. We compared functional and survival outcomes before and after implementing intraoperative HGM. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 75 patients who underwent a first-time, awake craniotomy for glioma resection. Patients were stratified by whether their operation occurred before or after the implementation of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved high-gamma mapping tool in July 2017. RESULTS: The preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts included 28 and 47 patients, respectively. Median intraoperative time (261 vs. 261 minutes, P = 0.250) and extent of resection (97.14% vs. 98.19%, P = 0.481) were comparable between cohorts. Median Karnofsky performance status at initial follow-up was similar between cohorts (P = 0.650). Multivariable Cox regression models demonstrated an adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival of 0.10 (95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.43, P = 0.002) for the postimplementation cohort relative to the preimplementation cohort. Progression-free survival adjusted for insular involvement showed an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.00 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.06, P = 0.999) following HGM implementation. Falling short of statistical significance, prevalence of intraoperative seizures and/or afterdischarges decreased after HGM implementation as well (12.7% vs. 25%, P = 0.150). CONCLUSIONS: Our results tentatively indicate that passive HGM is a safe and potentially useful adjunct to electrical stimulation mapping for awake cortical mapping, conferring at least comparable functional and survival outcomes with a nonsignificant lower rate of intraoperative epileptiform events. Considering the limitations of our study design and patient cohort, further investigation is needed to better identify optimal use cases for HGM.

Defining the Clival Recess Surgical Corridor and Clival Classification System for Approach to Sellar Pathology.

BACKGROUND: Sellar masses within the pars intermedius, bordered anteriorly by normal pituitary gland/stalk, and/or with ectatic cavernous carotid anatomy are challenging and high risk when approached through the endonasal standard direct/anterior sellar approach. This approach portends itself to a higher risk of pituitary gland/stalk injury and subtotal resection with the aforementioned anatomic variants. OBJECTIVE: To describe the indirect clival recess corridor approach to sellar lesions. This corridor is a "silent" point of access to lesions in this region endoscopically. While skull base teams may have used this approach to some degree, it has not yet been described in the literature to our knowledge. METHODS: We defined the clival recess surgical corridor with skull base craniometric measurements and use a case example with aberrant anatomy to illustrate the approach. We cross-sectionally reviewed 42 patients with sellar and suprasellar masses. To describe the approach's anatomy, we devised and defined the terms dorsum sella plumb line, anatomic corridor, angle of osseous, and operative corridor. RESULTS: Created novel clival aeration grade informing surgical planning. Classified clival aeration as Grade 1 (100%-75% aeration), Grade 2 (75%-50% aeration), Grade 3 (50%-25% aeration), and Grade 4 (25%-0% aeration). This classification system determines extent of drilling of the clivus required to optimize the clival recess corridor approach and its limitations. CONCLUSION: The clival recess surgical corridor is effective for accessing pituitary lesions within the sella. Consider the indirect approach when a standard direct/anterior sellar approach has high risk for vascular injury and/or endocrinological dysfunction.

Response to Preoperative Dexamethasone Predicts Postoperative Neurological Improvement of Focal Neurological Deficits in Patients With Brain Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Steroids are used ubiquitously in the preoperative management of patients with brain tumor. The rate of improvement in focal deficits with steroids and the prognostic value of such a response are not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate at which focal neurological deficits respond to preoperative corticosteroids in patients with brain metastases and whether such an improvement could predict long-term recovery of neurological function after surgery. METHODS: Patients with brain metastases and related deficits in language, visual field, or motor domains who received corticosteroids before surgery were identified. Characteristics between steroid responders and nonresponders were compared. RESULTS: Ninety six patients demonstrated a visual field (13 patients), language (19), or motor (64) deficit and received dexamethasone in the week before surgery (average cumulative dose 43 mg; average duration 2.7 days). 38.5% of patients' deficits improved with steroids before surgery, while 82.3% of patients improved by follow-up. Motor deficits were more likely to improve both preoperatively ( P = .014) and postoperatively ( P = .010). All 37 responders remained improved at follow-up whereas 42 of 59 (71%) of nonresponders ultimately improved ( P < .001). All other clinical characteristics, including dose and duration, were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: A response to steroids before surgery is highly predictive of long-term improvement postoperatively in brain metastasis patients with focal neurological deficits. Lack of a response portends a somewhat less favorable prognosis. Duration and intensity of therapy do not seem to affect the likelihood of response.

Corrigendum: Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Mortality During Hospitalization for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Call to Action.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.690971.].

Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Mortality During Hospitalization for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Call to Action.

The health disparities which drive inequities in health outcomes have long plagued our already worn healthcare system and are often dismissed as being a result of social determinants of health. Herein, we explore the nature of these inequities by comparing outcomes for racial and ethnic minorities patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI). We retrospectively reviewed all patients enrolled in the Trauma One Database at the Oregon Health & Science University Hospital from 2006 to October 2017 with an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) for the head or neck >2. Racial and ethnic minority patients were defined as non-White or Hispanic. A total of 6,352 patients were included in our analysis with 1,504 in the racial and ethnic minority cohort vs. 4,848 in the non-minority cohort. A propensity score (PS) model was generated to account for differences in baseline characteristics between these cohorts to generate 1,500 matched pairs. The adjusted hazard ratio for in-hospital mortality for minority patients was 2.21 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.43-3.41, p < 0.001] using injury type, probability of survival, and operative status as covariates. Overall, this study is the first to specifically look at racial and ethnic disparities in the field of neurosurgical trauma. This research has demonstrated significant inequities in the mortality of TBI patients based on race and ethnicity and indicates a substantive need to reshape the current healthcare system and advocate for safer and more supportive pre-hospital social systems to prevent these life-threatening sequelae.