Transplantation of adult-sized kidneys in low-weight pediatric recipients achieves short-term outcomes comparable to size-matched grafts.

Low-weight pediatric recipients are disadvantaged by scarcity of size-matched donors. ASK have been successfully used for pediatric recipients. We report the results of renal transplantation using ASK in low-weight pediatric recipients and compare outcomes in weight-matched and unmatched donor-recipient pairs. The outcomes of renal transplants using ASK grafts in low-weight (<20 kg) recipients from a single center over a 10-yr period were reviewed. Two groups, comprising recipients of grafts from weight-matched and mismatched donors, were compared. Primary outcome was one-yr graft survival. Secondary outcomes were one- and two-yr calculated eGFR, changes in recipient body weight, perioperative cardiovascular stability, rates of AR and DGF. Twenty-three low-weight recipients were transplanted. Eleven received ASK grafts from high-weight donors and 12 grafts from low-weight donors. One patient in each group had early graft loss. No significant difference was observed in rates of DGF, AR, one-yr graft or patient survival and perioperative cardiovascular parameters. ASK with considerable donor:recipient weight discrepancies can be safely transplanted into small pediatric recipients with comparable outcomes to grafts with less weight discrepancy.

Predicting donor asystole following withdrawal of treatment in donation after cardiac death.

Donation after cardiac death donation allows donor pool expansion. The period between withdrawal of treatment and donor a systole is extremely variable; its prolongation often results in unsuccessful organ procurement. We sought to assess a variety of donor variables to determine whether they predicted successful organ retrieval. We included all Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) retrievals between 2002 and 2009, which were grouped as successful (n = 104) versus unsuccessful (n = 42). Factors that predicted unsuccessful organ procurement included older donor age, donor history of hypertension, higher at withdrawal, and absence of inotropic support. On multivariate analysis, mean arterial pressure retained its significance. Prediction of withdrawal-to-asystole time is complex, but our analysis suggested that donor blood pressure at withdrawal is an important predictor of whether retrieval would be successful.

Comparable outcomes in donation after cardiac death and donation after brainstem death: a matched analysis of renal transplants.

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors provide a valuable source of grafts for renal transplantation. They are exposed to an initial warm ischemic insult, which can affect early function. We sought to compare our initial DCD experience in renal transplantation with a case-matched donation after brain death (DBD) cohort from the same period. We included all DCD transplantations in the first 5 years of the program. A control DBD group was matched with a variety of donor and recipient factors. We demonstrated a significantly increased early dysfunction (DGF and primary nonfunction). DCD graft function was poorer than the DBD equivalent at 1- and 3-years. However, medium-term recipient and graft outcomes were comparable. DCD grafts continue to play a vital role in renal transplantation despite evidence of early graft dysfunction.

Impact of cold ischemia on renal transplant outcomes following donation after cardiac death.

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) provides grafts in renal transplantation but is associated with increased early graft dysfunction. Cold ischemia time (CIT) is a factor that is thought to affect outcomes in renal transplantation. We sought to assess the impact of the length of CIT among our DCD cohort of renal transplants performed between April 2002 and December 2009. Since the median CIT was 15.5 hours, we formed two groups CIT < 15.5 (n = 100) and CIT > 15.5 hr (n = 98). We demonstrated an increased incidence of DGF among the extended CIT group, but the long outcomes and the mean graft function were otherwise comparable. In conclusion, CIT affects early graft function; every effort should be made to minimize it in renal transplantation using DCD kidneys.

Impact of age matching of donors to recipients on renal transplant outcomes following donation after cardiac death.

Organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) provides a valuable supply of grafts for renal transplantation. Age matching of donors to recipients is often used. We sought to determine the impact of age matching on the outcomes among our cohort of DCD renal transplant recipients. Using our institutional database, we gathered information on all DCD renal transplants performed between April 2002 and December 2009. We divided the cohort into two groups based upon the donor:recipient age ratio: age-matched (between 25th and 75th percentiles, n = 99) and non-age-matched (<25th percentile and >75th centile, n = 100). We failed to demonstrate any significant difference between the two groups in terms of early complications or long-term outcome or function. Age matching did not appear to affect graft outcomes, particularly for young donors, but may have a role in older donors.

Outcomes following renal transplantation after multiorgan retrieval versus kidney-only retrieval in donation after cardiac death donors.

With the increase of donation after cardiac death (DCD) now including procurements for not only kidney but also liver, pancreas, and lung transplantations, we analyze whether multiorgan DCD retrievals have a negative impact on immediate and short-term renal transplant outcomes due to increased length of time of explantation of the kidney from the donor and the associated risks of re-warming. We performed a retrospective study of all DCD donors from 2002 to 2009 at a single unit. Immediate and short-term outcomes between kidney-only versus multiorgan retrieval were compared. Cold ischaemia was significant between the two groups (P = .04), but all other variables were nonsignificant. The results show that immediate graft function, rates of acute rejection and graft/recipient survival are comparable when DCD allografts are procured from both multiorgan and kidney-only donors. The comparable outcomes from kidney-only and multiorgan donations in this study may be due to by the highly selective use of donors for multiorgan DCD donation. This selectivity may explain the "better" quality of kidney for these cases in which patients were able to tolerate potentially injurious rewarming.

Renal transplantation following donation after cardiac death: impact of duration from withdrawal to asystole.

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) allows for expansion of the donor pool, however, the process for DCD donation can lead to a donor's physiological instability before asystole. This may have a detrimental effect on graft and patient outcomes. We analyzed all 201 DCD donations at our unit from 2002 to 2009 and compared short versus long durations to asystole around the median time (20 min). Delayed graft function was comparable between the groups (P = .13), primary nonfunction was increased in the long duration to asystole group (P < .0001), and acute rejection was increased in the short duration group (P < .001). Five year patient survival was comparable (P = .6). In conclusion, long duration asystole may have an immediate effect on graft survival, but it has no overall detrimental effect on longer-term outcomes. Further studies are required to investigate the acceptable time to wait from withdrawal to asystole.

Sequential transplant of paired kidneys following donation after cardiac death: impact of longer cold ischemia time on the second kidney on graft and patient outcome.

The United Kingdom has no national sharing scheme for kidneys received from donation after cardiac death (DCD). Therefore, both kidneys retrieved by a transplant team are implanted at a single unit, often sequentially. This study analyzes the impact of a prolonged cold ischaemia time on the second transplanted kidney and the effects on short-term and long-term outcomes in all our DCD renal implants from 2002 to 2009. Cold ischaemia time was significantly longer with the second kidney (P = .04) as was delayed graft function (P = .02). Acute rejection was increased in the first transplanted kidney (P < .001). Five-year patient survival was comparable between groups, but 5-year graft survival was higher in the second transplanted group (P = .04). The results confirm that, provided recipient centers are willing to accept higher initial rates of delayed graft function, it is acceptable to transplant DCD grafts sequentially without jeopardizing long-term graft or recipient outcome.

A blinded, randomised, controlled trial of stapled versus tissue glue closure of neck surgery incisions.

INTRODUCTION: Cosmetic acceptability of scar and neck mobility are important outcomes after collar line incision for neck surgery. This randomised, controlled trial compares these parameters in closures using tissue glue (Dermabond, Ethicon, UK) and skin staples. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients requiring a collar line incision were randomised to receiving tissue glue or staples for skin closure. Time for closure to be completed was recorded. Mobility of the neck was assessed using a visual analogue scale at 48 h and 1 week after surgery. At 6 weeks, cosmetic appearance was assessed using a linear 1-10 visual analogue scale by the patient, surgeon and an independent blinded assessor. Results were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: Glued (n = 14) and stapled (n = 15) closures were performed for hemithyroidectomy (n = 8 versus 6), sub-total thyroidectomy (n = 2 versus 4), total thyroidectomy (n = 1 versus 4) and parathyroidectomy (n = 3 versus 1). Closure with tissue glue took significantly longer than with staples (mean, 95 versus 28 s; P < 0.001). Neck mobility scores were comparable at 48 h and 1 week (mean, 4.8 versus 4.4; P = 0.552: and 2.7 versus 2.6; P = 0.886). Cosmetic appearance at 6 weeks was comparable when patient (mean, 1.7 versus 1.8; P = 0.898), surgeon (mean, 2.6 versus 2.3; P = 0.633) and independent assessment (mean, 1.4 versus 1.9; P = 0.365) was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of glued skin closure may increase the duration of surgery but acceptable neck mobility and wound cosmesis can be achieved by the more rapid application of stapled skin closure in cervicotomy incisions.