RESUMO
An artificial fruit (AF) was used to test for social learning in pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) and adult humans (Homo sapiens). A monkey demonstrator opened the AF, showing alternative methods to 2 groups of cage mates. Video films of the monkey demonstrations were presented to adult humans. Compared with chimpanzees and children, the macaques watched the demonstrations significantly less and in a much more sporadic manner. They also produced only very weak and transitory evidence of social learning. In contrast, the adult humans performed as one might expect of optimum imitators, even producing evidence of components of a "ratchet effect."
Assuntos
Comportamento Imitativo , Macaca nemestrina/psicologia , Meio Social , Socialização , Adulto , Animais , Atenção , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Motivação , Resolução de Problemas , Desempenho Psicomotor , Especificidade da EspécieRESUMO
Four puzzle boxes were used to investigate localized stimulus enhancement and object movement reenactment (OMR) in 13 pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) and 30 human infants (Homo sapiens). Participants received contrasting demonstrations on each box. A circular lid was gripped by its rim or handle and swiveled to the left or right. A flap door was pushed or flipped. A sliding lid was pushed to the left or right. A pin bolt was demonstrated being pushed down, or the participants were left to solve the puzzle for themselves. Despite the fact that the monkeys watched the demonstrations about 60% of the time, only a weak OMR effect was found on the sliding lid. In contrast, the children watched significantly more, and there was clear evidence of socially mediated learning on all of the boxes.
Assuntos
Pré-Escolar , Comportamento Imitativo , Macaca nemestrina , Percepção de Movimento , Psicologia da Criança , Desempenho Psicomotor , Fatores Etários , Animais , Atenção , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Orientação , Resolução de Problemas , Especificidade da EspécieRESUMO
This research is based on the idea that some prosimian species are good models in which to test certain postulates of the "postural origins" theory proposed by MacNeilage and colleagues [Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10:247-303, 1987] to explain the evolution of hand preference within the order Primates. We investigated manual laterality in 16 wild indris (eight males and eight females, living in four social groups) in their habitat, the Madagascan tropical rain forest. Data were collected on two spontaneous behaviors: "branch-reach," an action that occurs during foraging, and "higher support," a posture typical of clingers and leapers. A total of seven subjects were significantly lateralized for branch-reach (two showed a right preference, and five showed a left preference). Four subjects were significantly lateralized for higher support, and all of them showed a right-hand preference. Most of the indris we studied showed no preference. Our research suggests that indri are at "level 1 of laterality" in the classification framework proposed by McGrew and Marchant [Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 40:201-232, 1997]. The data presented here are not discordant with the "postural origins" theory, as lateralized subjects are often in the direction predicted by MacNeilage and colleagues [Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10:247-303, 1987], but they are the minority.