Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in hemodialysis patients: an updated review.

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading life-threatening complications in hemodialysis patients. In this scenario, both tachy-arrhythmias and brady-arrhythmias are involved with related hemodialysis and nonhemodialysis-dependent mechanisms; moreover, those arrhythmias usually occur in different time intervals before sudden cardiac death (SCD). Furthermore, current evidence shows that the presence of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) reduces the benefits of implantable cardioverter--defibrillators (ICDs), which increases the risk of both arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death, especially in patients with advanced stages of heart failure. Notably, patients with advanced CKD show a more severe degree of heart failure compared with mild CKD patients. However, the benefits of the ICD implantation in the primary prevention of hemodialysis patients is still controversial, and by now, no significant benefits have emerged compared with nonhemodialysis-dependent CKD patients. In secondary prevention, hemodialysis patients with ICD implantation have higher mortality rates compared with nonhemodialysis-dependent CKD patients with ICD. On the other hand, most articles include hemodialysis patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, neglecting those with preserved systolic function. This review focuses on the epidemiology of SCD in the setting of hemodialysis and the current evidence on ICD implantation in patients on hemodialysis therapy analyzing novel strategies, which might reduce the risk of ICD placing.

[Covid-19 vaccination and renal patients: overcoming unwarranted fears and re-establishing priorities].

The SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) has infected about 124 million people worldwide and the total amount of casualties now sits at a staggering 2.7 million. One enigmatic aspect of this disease is the protean nature of the clinical manifestations, ranging from total absence of symptoms to extremely severe cases with multiorgan failure and death. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) has emerged as the primary risk factor in the most severe patients, apart from age. Kidney disease and acute kidney injury have been correlated with a higher risk of death. Notably the Italian Society of Nephrology have reported a 10-fold increase in mortality in patients undergoing dialysis compared to the rest of the population, especially during the second phase of the pandemic (26% vs 2.4). These dramatic numbers require an immediate response. At the moment of writing, three Covid-19 vaccines are being administered already , two of which, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, share the same mRNA mechanism and Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) based on a more traditional approach. All of them are completely safe and reliable. The AIFA scientific commission has suggested that the mRNA vaccines should be administered to older and more fragile patients, while the Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) vaccine should be reserved for younger subjects above the age of 18. The near future looks bright: there are tens of other vaccines undergoing clinical and preclinical validation, whose preliminary results look promising. The high mortality of CKD and dialysis patients contracting Covid-19 should mandate top priority for their vaccination.

Impact of European medicines agency recommendations for hypersensitivity reactions on intravenous iron prescription in haemodialysis centres of the Lombardy region.

BACKGROUND: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended measures to minimize the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to intravenous iron (IVFe). We analysed the effects of these recommendations on IVFe clinical management among haemodialysis centres (HDCs) in Lombardy, Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all 117 HDCs to collect information on centre characteristics, e.g. HDC type [hospital centre (HC) vs. centre with limited assistance (CAL)], presence/absence of intensive care unit (ICU) and/or emergency trained staff, IVFe therapy regarding molecules, administration modalities, side effects, and percentage variations in iron prescription between 2014 and 2013 (outcome, Δ-IVFe%). A linear regression model was applied to evaluate the focus effect (ß) of HDC type on the outcome, controlling for possible confounding effects of the other characteristics. RESULTS: Response rate was 73.5 %. IVFe therapy was used in 69.1 % (HDC range 11-100) of patients. Following EMA recommendations, prescription was reduced by 12.6 %, with the largest reduction observed in CALs. No severe HSRs were reported. HCs had more frequently an ICU [97.2 vs. 20 %, odds ratio (OR) = 63.6 (95 % confidence interval 15.56; 537.47), p < 0.001], emergency trained staff [97.2 vs. 61.2 %, OR = 10.7 (2.68; 85.33), p < 0.001] and instrumental facilities (91.7 vs. 58 %, OR = 5.8 (2.03; 23.55), p < 0.001] than CALs. Linear regression demonstrated a significant raw effect of HDC type on Δ- IVFe% [ß =  19.6 (9.82; 30.63), p < 0.001]. No association was found when HDC type was adjusted for ICU-presence [ß = 6.7 (-2.32; 18.30), p = 0.199] or for all-confounding factors [ß = 5.6 (-5.50; 17.08), p = 0.337]. CONCLUSIONS: This survey shows a disparity in IVFe therapy prescription following EMA recommendations, which is largely influenced by the presence/absence of ICUs in HD centres.

Dipyridamole stress echocardiography in diagnosis and prognosis of hemodialysis patients with asymptomatic coronary disease.

The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) is high in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of dipyridamole stress echocardiography (DSE) in nondiabetic HD patients without signs or symptoms of CAD. In 51 out of 158 evaluated HD patients (21 females, age 67 [33-85] years, HD duration 38 [9-271] months), resting echocardiography and DSE were performed. Exclusion criteria were known CAD, diabetes mellitus, and pulmonary and oncologic pathologies. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify predictors of abnormal DSE response, while Cox regression analysis was performed to determine variables associated with total and cardiovascular mortality, after 43.3 (11-60) months of follow-up. Seven patients (14%) showed a positive response to DSE (DSE+). In 5/7, CAD was documented by angiography: All of them underwent coronary revascularization. DSE+ patients had significantly smaller body mass index than patients with a negative response (DSE-): 21.7 ± 1.9 vs. 25.1 ± 3.4 kg/m(2) (p = 0.018). During follow-up, 16 (31%) patients died. Older age hazard ratio [HR = 1.07; confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.12; p = 0.02] and higher plasma phosphate levels (HR = 10.41; CI = 2.30-47.17; p < 0.01) were predictors of total mortality. Male gender (HR = 22.7; CI = 1.45-354.4; p = 0.03), older age (HR = 1.24; CI = 1.03-1.50; p = 0.02), longer HD duration (HR = 1.13; CI = 1.01-1.26; p = 0.04), and positive response to DSE (HR = 5.82; CI = 1.04-32.65; p = 0.04) were associated with cardiovascular mortality. Ten percent of asymptomatic HD patients had significant CAD, but timely diagnosis did not seem to improve their prognosis. Total survival was associated with age and higher levels of plasma phosphate, while male gender, older age, longer HD duration, and DSE+ were predictors of cardiovascular mortality.