RESUMO
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVES: It is widely accepted that the prediction of long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) can be done more accurately with neurological examinations conducted days to weeks post injury. However, modern clinical trials of neuroprotective interventions often require patients be examined and enrolled within hours. Our objective was to determine whether variability in timing of neurological examinations within 48 h after SCI is associated with differences in observations of follow-up neurologic recovery. SETTING: Level I trauma hospital. METHODS: An observational analysis testing for differences in AIS conversion rates and changes in total motor scores by neurological examination timing, controlling for potential confounders with multivariate stepwise regression. RESULTS: We included 85 patients, whose mean times from injury to baseline and follow-up examinations were 11.8 h (SD 9.8) and 208.2 days (SD 75.2), respectively. AIS conversion by 1+ grade was significantly more likely in patients examined at ≤4 h in comparison with later examination (78% versus 47%, RR = 1.66, p = 0.04), even after controlling for timing of surgery, age, and sex (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.1-10, p = 0.04). We failed to identify any statistically significant associations for total motor score recovery in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: AIS grade conversion was significantly more likely in those examined ≤4 h of injury; the effect of timing on motor scores remains uncertain. Variability in neurological examination timing within hours after acute traumatic SCI may influence observations of long-term neurological recovery, which could introduce bias or lead to errors in interpretation of studies of therapeutic interventions.
Assuntos
Exame Neurológico/normas , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Background: People of Aboriginal (Indigenous) ancestry are more likely to experience traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) than other Canadians; however, outcome studies are limited. This study aims to compare Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations with acute TSCI with respect to preinjury baseline characteristics, injury severity, treatment, outcomes and length of stay. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of participants with a TSCI who were enrolled in the prospective Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR), Saskatoon site (Royal University Hospital), between Feb. 13, 2010, and Dec. 17, 2016. Demographic, injury and management data were assessed to identify any differences between the populations. Results: Of the 159 patients admitted to Royal University Hospital with an acute TSCI during the study period, 62 provided consent and were included in the study. Of these, 21 self-identified as Aboriginal (33.9%) and 41 as non-Aboriginal (66.1%) on treatment intake forms. Compared with non-Aboriginal participants, Aboriginal participants were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a similar severity of neurologic injury and had similar clinical outcomes. However, the time to discharge to the community was significantly longer for Aboriginal participants (median 104.0 v. 34.0 d, p = 0.016). Although 35% of non-Aboriginal participants were discharged home from the acute care site, no Aboriginal participants were transferred home directly. Conclusion: This study suggests a need for better allocation of resources for transition to the community for Aboriginal people with a TSCI in Saskatchewan. We plan to assess outcomes from TSCI for Aboriginal people across Canada.
Contexte: Au Canada, les personnes d'origine autochtone sont plus susceptibles que les autres de vivre un traumatisme médullaire. Malgré cela, il y a peu d'études sur les conséquences de cet événement. Notre étude visait à comparer les cas de traumatisme médullaire aigu dans les populations autochtones et non autochtones sur plusieurs plans : les caractéristiques initiales des patients, la gravité du traumatisme, la nature du traitement, les issues cliniques et la durée de séjour. Méthodes: Nous avons fait une analyse rétrospective des dossiers de personnes ajoutées au Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) [Registre des traumatismes médullaires Rick Hansen] entre le 13 février 2010 et le 17 décembre 2016 pour l'établissement de Saskatoon (l'Hôpital universitaire Royal). Nous avons comparé les renseignements de base des patients ainsi que les données sur le traumatisme et la prise en charge afin de cerner toute différence entre les populations. Résultats: Sur les 159 traumatisés médullaires admis à l'Hôpital universitaire Royal pendant la période à l'étude, 62 ont consenti à l'utilisation de leurs données. Parmi eux, 21 s'étaient identifiés comme Autochtones (33,9 %) sur le formulaire d'hospitalisation, et 41 comme non-Autochtones (66,1 %). Par rapport aux non-Autochtones, les Autochtones étaient plus jeunes, avaient moins de comorbidités, présentaient une atteinte neurologique de gravité comparable et connaissaient à peu près le même tableau clinique. Toutefois, le délai avant leur retour en communauté était significativement plus long (médiane : 104,0 jours contre 34,0 jours; p = 0,016). Aucun participant autochtone n'a été renvoyé directement à la maison, alors que 35 % des participants non autochtones sont retournés chez eux en quittant les soins de première ligne. Conclusion: Cette étude montre qu'il faut améliorer la répartition des ressources de retour dans la communauté pour les traumatisés médullaires autochtones de la Saskatchewan. Enfin, nous comptons examiner les répercussions cliniques du traumatisme médullaire chez les Autochtones de partout au Canada.
Assuntos
Etnicidade , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco/métodos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/etnologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Saskatchewan/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To characterize the problem of community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPIs) in a work-related spinal cord injury (SCI) population in Canada and assess the benefits of a person-centered solution. Characterization of the problem and a solution, albeit in an insured Worker's Compensation Board of British Columbia (WorkSafeBC) cohort, may inform the supply of solutions in the larger SCI population with disparate access to healthcare. METHODS: For this observational study, data on 244 WorkSafeBC clients, who received an intervention featuring pressure injury (PI) assessment between 2011 and 2015, were used to characterize the problem. Data on observed injuries, risk, referrals, and outcomes were linked to healthcare service claims. Employing an activity-based costing methodology, total expenditures on attributed services were calculated for clients with 1 or more PIs. Intervention cost and benefits from the insurer's perspective are considered. RESULTS: 84 of 244 clients had 1 or more PIs at assessment, with attributed mean cost of $56,092 in 2015 Canadian dollars (CAD). Mean cost by PI severity range from $9580 to $238,736. At an intervention cost of $820,618, detection of less severe injuries provided an opportunity to prevent progression and achieve $3 million in cost avoidance. Follow-up data suggest reasonable returns. Reductions in the incidence, number, and risk of pressure injuries were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis establishes the cost of CAPIs in a Canadian-based work-related SCI population and suggests preventative and early intervention is not only feasible but also practical. Results are relevant to decisions regarding the use of proactive prevention-based treatment models as opposed to reactive, solutions in the larger SCI population.
Assuntos
Úlcera por Pressão/etiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/complicações , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/epidemiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/etiologiaRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study OBJECTIVES: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most frequent types of infections following spinal cord injury (SCI). Here we assess the relationship between frequency of UTIs and activity level/overall quality of life (QOL) measures, determine the frequency of temporally associated conditions associated with UTI and identify factors associated with frequent UTIs. SETTING: Canada METHODS: The Spinal Cord Injury Community Survey was developed to assess major dimensions of community living and health outcomes in persons with chronic SCI in Canada. Participants were stratified by self-reported UTI frequency. The relationship between UTI frequency and QOL, health resource utilization, and temporally associated conditions were assessed. Results were analysed with cross tabulations, χ2 tests, and ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall 73.5% of participants experienced at least one self-reported UTI since the time of injury (mean 18.5 years). Overall QOL was worse with increasing frequency of these events. Those with frequent self-reported UTIs had twice as many hospitalizations and doctors' visits and were limited in financial, vocational and leisure situations, physical health and ability to manage self-care as compared with those with no UTIs. Self-reported UTIs were associated with higher incidence of temporally associated conditions including bowel incontinence, constipation, spasticity, and autonomic dysreflexia. Individuals who were younger and female were more likely to have frequent UTIs and those with constipation and autonomic dysreflexia had worse QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Higher frequency self-reported UTIs is related to poor QOL of individuals with long-term SCI. These findings will be incorporated into SCI UTI surveillance and management guidelines.
Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Autorrelato , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/psicologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate response shift effects in spinal cord injury (SCI) over 5 years postinjury. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study observed at 1, 2, and 5 years post-SCI. SETTING: Specialized SCI centers. PARTICIPANTS: Sample included 1125, 760, and 219 participants at 1, 2, and 5 years post-SCI (N = 2104). The study sample was 79% men; 39% were motor/sensory complete (mean age, 44.6±18.3y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported outcomes included the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 and the Life Satisfaction-11 Questionnaire. Participant latent variable scores were adjusted for (1) potential attrition bias and (2) propensity scores reflecting risk of worse outcomes. The Oort structural equation modeling approach for detecting and accounting for response shift effects was used to test the hypothesis that people with SCI would undergo response shifts over follow-up. RESULTS: The study data comprised the time after FIM scores, an objective measure of motor and cognitive function, had improved and stabilized. Three latent variables (Physical, Mental, and Symptoms) were modeled over time. The response shift model indicated uniform recalibration and reconceptualization response shift effects over time. When adjusted for these response shift effects, Physical showed small true change improvements at 2- and 5-year follow-up, despite FIM stability. CONCLUSIONS: We detected recalibration and reconceptualization response shift effects in 1- to 5-year follow-up of people with SCI. Despite stable motor and cognitive function, people with SCI are adapting to their condition. This adaptation reflects a progressive disconnection between symptoms and physical or mental health, and a real improvement in the Physical latent variable.
Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/psicologia , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Classes Latentes , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Índices de Gravidade do TraumaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze relations among injury, demographic, and environmental factors on function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and life satisfaction in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Prospective observational registry cohort study. SETTING: Specialized acute and rehabilitation SCI centers. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=340) from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) who were prospectively recruited from 2004 to 2014 were included. The model cohort participants were 79.1% men, with a mean age of 41.6±17.3 years. Of the participants, 34.7% were motor/sensory complete (ASIA Impairment Scale [AIS] grade A). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Path analysis was used to determine relations among SCI severity (AIS grade and anatomic level [cervical/thoracolumbar]), age at injury, education, number of health conditions, functional independence (FIM motor score), HRQoL (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [Version 2] Physical Component Score [PCS] and Mental Component Score [MCS]), and life satisfaction (Life Satisfaction-11 [LiSat-11]). Model fit was assessed using recommended published indices. RESULTS: Goodness of fit of the model was supported by all indices, indicating the model results closely matched the RHSCIR data. Higher age, higher severity injuries, cervical injuries, and more health conditions negatively affected FIM motor score, whereas employment had a positive effect. Higher age, less education, more severe injuries (AIS grades A-C), and more health conditions negatively correlated with PCS (worse physical health). More health conditions were negatively correlated with a lower MCS (worse mental health), however were positively associated with reduced function. Being married and having higher function positively affected Lisat-11, but more health conditions had a negative effect. CONCLUSIONS: Complex interactions and enduring effects of health conditions after SCI have a negative effect on function, HRQoL, and life satisfaction. Modeling relations among these types of concepts will inform clinicians how to positively effect outcomes after SCI (eg, development of screening tools and protocols for managing individuals with traumatic SCI who have multiple health conditions).
Assuntos
Satisfação Pessoal , Qualidade de Vida , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/psicologia , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Older people are at increased risk of traumatic spinal cord injury from falls. We evaluated the impact of older age (≥ 70 yr) on treatment decisions and outcomes. METHODS: We identified patients with traumatic spinal cord injury for whom consent and detailed data were available from among patients recruited (2004-2013) at any of the 31 acute care and rehabilitation hospitals participating in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry. Patients were assessed by age group (< 70 v. ≥ 70 yr). The primary outcome was the rate of acute surgical treatment. We used bivariate and multivariate regression models to assess patient and injury-related factors associated with receiving surgical treatment and with the timing of surgery after arrival to a participating centre. RESULTS: Of the 1440 patients included in our study cohort, 167 (11.6%) were 70 years or older at the time of injury. Older patients were more likely than younger patients to be injured by falling (83.1% v. 37.4%; p < 0.001), to have a cervical injury (78.0% v. 61.6%; p = 0.001), to have less severe injuries on admission (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C or D: 70.5% v. 46.9%; p < 0.001), to have a longer stay in an acute care hospital (median 35 v. 28 d; p < 0.005) and to have a higher in-hospital mortality (4.2% v. 0.6%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis did not show that age of 70 years or more at injury was associated with a decreased likelihood of surgical treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-1.07). An unplanned sensitivity analysis with different age thresholds showed that a threshold of 65 years was associated with a decreased chance of surgical treatment (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.80). Older patients who underwent surgical treatment had a significantly longer wait time from admission to surgery than younger patients (37 v. 19 h; p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: We found chronological age to be a factor influencing treatment decisions but not at the 70-year age threshold that we had hypothesized. Older patients waited longer for surgery and had a substantially higher in-hospital mortality despite having less severe injuries than younger patients. Further research into the link between treatment delays and outcomes among older patients could inform surgical guideline development.
Assuntos
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Sistema de Registros , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/mortalidade , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with pressure ulcers (PUs) report that pain is their most distressing symptom, but there are few PU pain prevalence studies. We sought to estimate the prevalence of unattributed pressure area related pain (UPAR pain) which was defined as pain, soreness or discomfort reported by patients, on an "at risk" or PU skin site, reported at a patient level. METHODS: We undertook pain prevalence surveys in 2 large UK teaching hospital NHS Trusts (6 hospitals) and a district general hospital NHS Trust (3 hospitals) during their routine annual PU prevalence audits. The hospitals provide secondary and tertiary care beds in acute and elective surgery, trauma and orthopaedics, burns, medicine, elderly medicine, oncology and rehabilitation. Anonymised individual patient data were recorded by the ward nurse and PU prevalence team. The analysis of this prevalence survey included data summaries; no inferential statistical testing was planned or undertaken. Percentages were calculated using the total number of patients from the relevant population as the denominator (i.e. including all patients with missing data for that variable). RESULTS: A total of 3,397 patients in 9 acute hospitals were included in routine PU prevalence audits and, of these, 2010 (59.2%) patients participated in the pain prevalence study. UPAR pain prevalence was 16.3% (327/2010). 1769 patients had no PUs and of these 223 patients reported UPAR pain, a prevalence of 12.6%. Of the 241 people with pressure ulcers, 104 patients reported pain, a UPAR pain prevalence of 43.2% (104/241). CONCLUSION: One in six people in acute hospitals experience UPAR pain on 'at risk' or PU skin sites; one in every 8 people without PUs and, more than 2 out of every five people with PUs. The results provide a clear indication that all patients should be asked if they have pain at pressure areas even when they do not have a PU.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: There is growing enthusiasm for robotic-assisted laparoscopic operations across many surgical specialities, including colorectal surgery, often not supported by robust clinical or cost-effectiveness data. A proper assessment of this new technology is required, prior to widespread recommendation or implementation. METHODS/DESIGN: The ROLARR trial is a pan-world, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, superiority trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. It will investigate differences in terms of the rate of conversion to open operation, rate of pathological involvement of circumferential resection margin, 3-year local recurrence, disease-free and overall survival rates and also operative morbidity and mortality, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. The primary outcome measure is the rate of conversion to open operation. For 80% power at the 5% (two-sided) significance level, to identify a relative 50% reduction in open conversion rate (25% to 12.5%), 336 patients will be required. The target recruitment is 400 patients overall to allow loss to follow-up. Patients will be followed up at 30 days and 6 months post-operatively and then annually until 3 years after the last patient has been randomised. DISCUSSION: In many centres, robotic-assisted surgery is being implemented on the basis of theoretical advantages, which have yet to be confirmed in practice. Robotic surgery is an expensive health care provision and merits robust evaluation. The ROLARR trial is a pragmatic trial aiming to provide a comprehensive evaluation of both robotic-assisted and standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative resection of rectal cancer.
Assuntos
Cooperação Internacional , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Robótica/métodos , Adulto , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/ética , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Retais/economia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Robótica/economia , Robótica/ética , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Current prognostic tools such as the Injury Severity Score (ISS) that predict mortality following trauma do not adequately consider the unique characteristics of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). PURPOSE: Our aim was to develop and validate a prognostic tool that can predict mortality following tSCI. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Data was collected from 1245 persons with acute tSCI who were enrolled in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry between 2004 and 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital and 1-year mortality following tSCI. METHODS: Machine learning techniques were used on patient-level data (n=849) to develop the Spinal Cord Injury Risk Score (SCIRS) that can predict mortality based on age, neurological level and completeness of injury, AOSpine classification of spinal column injury morphology, and Abbreviated Injury Scale scores. Validation of the SCIRS was performed by testing its accuracy in an independent validation cohort (n=396) and comparing its performance to the ISS, a measure which is used to predict mortality following general trauma. RESULTS: For 1-year mortality prediction, the values for the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for the development cohort were 0.84 (standard deviation=0.029) for the SCIRS and 0.55 (0.041) for the ISS. For the validation cohort, AUC values were 0.86 (0.051) for the SCIRS and 0.71 (0.074) for the ISS. For in-hospital mortality, AUC values for the development cohort were 0.87 (0.028) and 0.60 (0.050) for the SCIRS and ISS, respectively. For the validation cohort, AUC values were 0.85 (0.054) for the SCIRS and 0.70 (0.079) for the ISS. CONCLUSIONS: The SCIRS can predict in-hospital and 1-year mortality following tSCI more accurately than the ISS. The SCIRS can be used in research to reduce bias in estimating parameters and can help adjust for coefficients during model development. Further validation using larger sample sizes and independent datasets is needed to assess its reliability and to evaluate using it as an assessment tool to guide clinical decision-making and discussions with patients and families.
Assuntos
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Algoritmos , Hospitais , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Traumatic cauda equina injury (TCEI) is usually caused by spine injury at or below L1 and can result in motor and/or sensory impairments and/or neurogenic bowel and bladder. We examined factors associated with recovery in motor strength, walking ability, and bowel and bladder function to aid in prognosis and establishing rehabilitation goals. The analysis cohort was comprised of persons with acute TCEI enrolled in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry. Multi-variable regression analysis was used to determine predictors for lower-extremity motor score (LEMS) at discharge, walking ability at discharge as assessed by the walking subscores of either the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) or Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), and improvement in bowel and bladder function as assessed by FIM-relevant subscores. Age, sex, neurological level and severity of injury, time from injury to surgery, rehabilitation onset, and length of stay were examined as potential confounders. The cohort included 214 participants. Median improvement in LEMS was 4 points. Fifty-two percent of participants were able to walk, and >20% recovered bowel and bladder function by rehabilitation discharge. Multi-variable analyses revealed that shorter time from injury to rehabilitation admission (onset) was a significant predictor for both improvement in walking ability and bowel function. Longer rehabilitation stay and being an older female were associated with improved bladder function. Our results suggest that persons with TCEI have a reasonable chance of recovery in walking ability and bowel and bladder function. This study provides important information for rehabilitation goals setting and communication with patients and their families regarding prognosis.
Assuntos
Cauda Equina/lesões , Intestinos/fisiopatologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/fisiopatologia , Bexiga Urinária/fisiopatologia , Caminhada/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Estado Funcional , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitação , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion and perfusion imaging are used to identify ischaemic penumbra, but there are few comparisons with neuronal loss and ischaemia in vivo. The authors compared N-acetyl aspartate (NAA, found in intact neurons) and lactate (anaerobic metabolism) with diffusion/perfusion parameters. METHODS: The authors prospectively recruited patients with acute ischaemic stroke and performed MR diffusion tensor, perfusion (PWI) and proton chemical shift spectroscopic imaging (CSI). We superimposed a 0.5 cm voxel grid on the diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and classified voxels as 'definitely abnormal,' 'possibly abnormal' or normal on DWI appearance, and 'mismatch' for voxels in DWI/PWI mismatch areas. The authors compared metabolite (NAA, lactate), perfusion and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in each voxel type. RESULTS: NAA differentiated 'definitely' from 'possibly abnormal,' and 'possibly abnormal' from 'mismatch' (both comparisons p<0.01) voxels, but not 'mismatch' from 'normal' voxels. Lactate was highest in 'definitely abnormal,' and progressively lower in 'possibly abnormal,' 'mismatch,' than 'normal' voxels (all differences p<0.01). There was no correlation between NAA and ADC or PWI values, but high lactate correlated with low ADC (Spearman r=-0.41, p=0.02) and prolonged mean transit time (Spearman r=0.42, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: ADC and mean transit time indicate the presence of ischaemia (lactate) but not cumulative total neuronal damage (NAA) in acute ischaemic stroke, suggesting that caution is required if using ADC and PWI parameters to differentiate salvageable from non-salvageable tissue. Further refinement of the DWI/PWI concept is required prior to more widespread use.
Assuntos
Ácido Aspártico/análogos & derivados , Isquemia Encefálica/metabolismo , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Encéfalo/irrigação sanguínea , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Ácido Láctico/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ácido Aspártico/metabolismo , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Circulação Cerebrovascular/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Traumatic spinal cord injury can have a dramatic effect on a patient's life. The degree of neurologic recovery greatly influences a patient's treatment and expected quality of life. This has resulted in the development of machine learning algorithms (MLA) that use acute demographic and neurologic information to prognosticate recovery. The van Middendorp et al. (2011) (vM) logistic regression (LR) model has been established as a reference model for the prediction of walking recovery following spinal cord injury as it has been validated within many different countries. However, an examination of the way in which these prediction models are evaluated is warranted. The area under the receiver operators curve (AUROC) has been consistently used when evaluating model performance, but it has been shown that AUROC overemphasizes the most common event resulting in an inaccurate assessment when the data are imbalanced. Furthermore, there is evidence that the use of more advanced MLA, such as an unsupervised k-means model, may show superior performance compared to LR as they can handle a larger number of features. PURPOSE: The first objective of the study was to assess the performance of both an unsupervised MLA and LR model with complete admission neurologic information against the vM and Hicks models. Second, a comparison between the accuracy of the AUROC and the F1-score will be made to determine which method is superior for the assessment of diagnostic performance of prediction models on large-scale datasets. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) was used in this study. All patients enrolled between 2004 and 2017 with complete neurologic examination and Functional Independence Measure outcome data at ≥1 year follow-up or who could walk at discharge were included. The prognostic variables included age (dichotomized at ≥65 years old); American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade; and individual motor, light touch, and pinprick score from L2 to S1. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Functional Independence Measure locomotor score was used to assess independent walking ability at discharge or 1-year follow-up. METHODS: An unsupervised MLA with k=2 was chosen in order to identify a "walk" cluster and a "not walk" cluster. Model performance was assessed through the development of a receiver operating characteristic curve with associated AUROC and a precision-recall curve with associated F1-score. The study and the RHSCIR are supported by funding from Health Canada, Western Economic Diversification Canada, and the Governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, and Ontario. These funders had no role in the study or study reporting and the authors have no conflicts of interest to report. RESULTS: No clinically relevant differences were found between with the use of an unsupervised MLA with a greater amount of initial neurologic information compared to the established standards for any AIS classification. Although demonstrated for all separate AIS classifications, most notably, the AUROC for the vM (0.78) and Hicks models (0.76) were found to be superior to that of the new LR model (0.72); however, the vM and Hicks models had more than double the amount of false negative classifications compared to the LR. The F1-scores between these three models were also found to be different but with the vM and Hicks models being lower than the LR (0.85, 0.81, and 0.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No clinically relevant differences were found between the use of an unsupervised MLA with complete admission neurologic information compared to the previously validated standards; however, when comparing the performance of the AUROC and F1-score, the AUROC showed inaccurate prognostic performance when there was an imbalance toward a greater amount of false negatives. Importantly, the F1-score did not succumb to this imbalance. As AUROC has been used as the standard when evaluating performance of prediction models, consideration as to whether this is the most appropriate method is warranted. Future work should focus on comparing AUROC and F1-scores with other previously validated models.
Assuntos
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Aprendizado de Máquina não Supervisionado , Caminhada , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exame Neurológico/métodos , Prognóstico , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/reabilitaçãoRESUMO
Frailty negatively affects outcome in elective spine surgery populations. This study sought to determine the effect of frailty on patient outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). Patients with tSCI were identified from our prospectively collected database from 2004 to 2016. We examined effect of patient age, admission Total Motor Score (TMS), and Modified Frailty Index (mFI) on adverse events (AEs), acute length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and discharge destination (home vs. other). Subgroup analysis (for three age groups: <60, 61-75, and 76+ years), and multi-variable analysis was performed to investigate the impact of age, TMS, and mFI on outcome. For the 634 patients, the mean age was 50.3 years, 77% were male, and falls were the main cause of injury (46.5%). On bivariate analysis, mFI, age at injury, and TMS were predictors of AEs, acute LOS, and in-hospital mortality. After statistical adjustment, mFI was a predictor of LOS (p = 0.0375), but not of AEs (p = 0.1428) or in-hospital mortality (p = 0.1245). In patients <60 years of age, mFI predicted number of AEs, acute LOS, and in-hospital mortality. In those aged 61-75, TMS predicted AEs, LOS, and mortality. In those 76+ years of age, mFI no longer predicted outcome. Age, mFI, and TMS on admission are important determinants of outcome in patients with tSCI. mFI predicts outcomes in those <75 years of age only. The inter-relationship of advanced age and decreased physiological reserve is complex in acute tSCI, warranting further study. Identifying frailty in younger patients with tSCI may be useful for peri-operative optimization, risk stratification, and patient counseling.
Assuntos
Fragilidade/mortalidade , Fragilidade/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/mortalidade , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/lesões , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Vértebras Torácicas/lesões , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
As the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) in the elderly rises, clinicians are increasingly faced with difficult discussions regarding aggressiveness of management, likelihood of recovery, and survival. Our objective was to outline risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality in elderly surgical and non-surgical patients following tSCI and to determine those unlikely to have a favorable outcome. Data from elderly patients (≥ 65 years of age) in the Canadian Rick Hansen SCI Registry from 2004 to 2017 were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Survival and mortality groups in each of the surgical and non-surgical group were compared to explore factors associated with in-hospital mortality and their impact, using logistical regression. Of 1340 elderly patients, 1018 had surgical data with 826 having had surgery. In the surgical group, the median time to death post-injury was 30 days with 75% dying within 50 days compared with 7 days and 20 days, respectively, in the non-surgical group. Significant predictors for in-hospital mortality following surgery are age, comorbidities, neurological injury severity (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale [AIS]), and ventilation status. The odds of dying 50 days post-surgery are six times higher for patients ≥77 years of age versus those 65-76 years of age, five times higher for those with AIS A versus those with AIS B/C/D, and seven times higher for those who are ventilator dependent. An expected probability of dying within 50 days post-surgery was determined using these results. In-hospital mortality in the elderly after tSCI is high. The trend with age and time to death and the significant predictors of mortality identified in this study can be used to inform clinical decision making and discussions with patients and their families.
Assuntos
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/mortalidade , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In acute ischemic stroke, the amount of neuronal damage in hyperintense areas on MR diffusion imaging (DWI) is unclear. We used spectroscopic imaging to measure N-acetyl aspartate (NAA, a marker of normal neurons) and lactate (a marker of ischemia) to compare with diffusion and perfusion values in the diffusion lesion in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We recruited patients with acute ischemic stroke prospectively and performed MR diffusion weighted (DWI), perfusion, and spectroscopic imaging. We coregistered the images, outlined the visible diffusion lesion, and extracted metabolite, perfusion, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from the diffusion lesion. RESULTS: 42 patients were imaged, from 1.5 to 24 hours after stroke. In the DWI lesion, although NAA was reduced, there was no correlation between NAA and ADC or perfusion values. However, raised lactate correlated with reduced ADC (Spearman rho=0.32, P=0.04) and prolonged mean transit time (MTT, rho=0.31, P=0.04). Increasing DWI lesion size was associated with lower NAA and higher lactate (rho=-0.44, P=0.003; rho=0.49, P=0.001 respectively); NAA fell with increasing times to imaging (rho=-0.3, P=0.03), but lactate did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Although larger confirmatory studies are needed, the correlation of ADC and MTT with lactate but not NAA suggests that ADC and MTT are better markers of the presence of ischemia than of cumulative neuronal loss. Further studies should define more precisely the rate of neuronal loss and relationship to diffusion and perfusion parameters with respect to the depth and duration of ischemia.
Assuntos
Ácido Aspártico/análogos & derivados , Isquemia Encefálica/metabolismo , Circulação Cerebrovascular/fisiologia , Ácido Láctico/metabolismo , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/metabolismo , Doença Aguda , Ácido Aspártico/metabolismo , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatologia , Morte Celular , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Modelos Lineares , Estudos Prospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Brain size is associated with cognitive ability in adulthood (correlation approximately .3), but few studies have investigated the relationship in normal ageing, particularly beyond age 75 years. With age both brain size and fluid-type intelligence decline, and regional atrophy is often suggested as causing decline in specific cognitive abilities. However, an association between brain size and intelligence may be due to the persistence of this relationship from earlier life. METHODS: We recruited 107 community-dwelling volunteers (29% male) aged 75-81 years for cognitive testing and neuroimaging. We used principal components analysis to derived a 'general cognitive factor' (g) from tests of fluid-type ability. Using semi-automated analysis, we measured whole brain volume, intracranial area (ICA) (an estimate of maximal brain volume), and volume of frontal and temporal lobes, amygdalo-hippocampal complex, and ventricles. Brain atrophy was estimated by correcting WBV for ICA. RESULTS: Whole brain volume (WBV) correlated with general cognitive ability (g) (r = .21, P < .05). Statistically significant associations between brain areas and specific cognitive abilities became non-significant when corrected for maximal brain volume (estimated using ICA), i.e. there were no statistically significant associations between atrophy and cognitive ability. The association between WBV and g was largely attenuated (from .21 to .03: i.e. attenuating the variance by 98%) by correcting for ICA. ICA accounted for 6.2% of the variance in g in old age, whereas atrophy accounted for < 1%. CONCLUSION: The association between brain regions and specific cognitive abilities in community dwelling people of older age is due to the life-long association between whole brain size and general cognitive ability, rather than atrophy of specific regions. Researchers and clinicians should therefore be cautious of interpreting global or regional brain atrophy on neuroimaging as contributing to cognitive status in older age without taking into account prior mental ability and brain size.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento/patologia , Encéfalo/patologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/patologia , Cognição/fisiologia , Características de Residência , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Envelhecimento/psicologia , Atrofia/patologia , Transtornos Cognitivos/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Tamanho do ÓrgãoRESUMO
Clinical trials of novel therapies for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) are challenging because variability in spontaneous neurologic recovery can make discerning actual treatment effects difficult. Unbiased Recursive Partitioning regression with Conditional Inference Trees (URP-CTREE) is a novel approach developed through analyses of a large European SCI database (European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury). URP-CTREE uses early neurologic impairment to predict achieved motor recovery, with potential to optimize clinical trial design by optimizing patient stratification and decreasing sample sizes. We performed external validation to determine how well a previously reported URP-CTREE model stratified patients into distinct homogeneous subgroups and predicted subsequent neurologic recovery in an independent cohort. We included patients with acute cervical SCI level C4-C6 from a prospective registry at a quaternary care center from 2004-2018 (n = 101) and applied the URP-CTREE model and evaluated Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) recovery, considered correctly predicted when final UEMS scores were within a pre-specified threshold of 9 points from median; sensitivity analyses evaluated the effect of timing of baseline neurological examination. We included 101 patients, whose mean times from injury baseline and follow-up examinations were 6.1 days (standard deviation [SD] 17) and 235.0 days (SD 71), respectively. Median UEMS recovery was 7 points (interquartile range 2-12). One of the predictor variables was not statistically significant in our sample; one group did not fit progressively improving UEMS scores, and three of five groups had medians that were not significantly different from adjacent groups. Overall accuracy was 75%, but varied from 82% among participants whose examinations occurred at <12 h, to 64% at 12-24 h, and 58% at >24 h. A previous URP-CTREE model had limited ability to stratify an independent into homogeneous subgroups. Overall accuracy was promising, but may be sensitive to timing of baseline neurological examinations. Further evaluation of external validity in incomplete injuries, influence of timing of baseline examinations, and investigation of additional stratification strategies is warranted.
Assuntos
Modelos Lineares , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/classificação , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Models for predicting recovery in traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) patients have been developed to optimize care. Several models predicting tSCI recovery have been previously validated, yet recent findings question their accuracy, particularly in patients whose prognoses are the least predictable. PURPOSE: To compare independent ambulatory outcomes in AIS (ASIA [American Spinal Injury Association] Impairment Scale) A, B, C, and D patients, as well as in AIS B+C and AIS A+D patients by applying two existing logistic regression prediction models. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANT SAMPLE: Individuals with tSCI enrolled in the pan-Canadian Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR) between 2004 and 2016 with complete neurologic examination and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) outcome data. OUTCOME MEASURES: The FIM locomotor score was used to assess independent walking ability at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Two validated prediction models were evaluated for their ability to predict walking 1-year postinjury. Relative prognostic performance was compared with the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: In total, 675 tSCI patients were identified for analysis. In model 1, predictive accuracies for 675 AIS A, B, C, and D patients as measured by AUC were 0.730 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.622-0.838), 0.691 (0.533-0.849), 0.850 (0.771-0.928), and 0.516 (0.320-0.711), respectively. In 160 AIS B+C patients, model 1 generated an AUC of 0.833 (95% CI 0.771-0.895), whereas model 2 generated an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI 0.754-0.887). The AUC for 515 AIS A+D patients was 0.954 (95% CI 0.933-0.975) with model 1 and 0.950 (0.928-0.971) with model 2. The difference in prediction accuracy between the AIS B+C cohort and the AIS A+D cohort was statistically significant using both models (p=.00034; p=.00038). The models were not statistically different in individual or subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Previously tested prediction models demonstrated a lower predictive accuracy for AIS B+C than AIS A+D patients. These models were unable to effectively prognosticate AIS A+D patients separately; a failure that was masked when amalgamating the two patient populations. This suggests that former prediction models achieved strong prognostic accuracy by combining AIS classifications coupled with a disproportionately high proportion of AIS A+D patients.