A Reduction in Opioid Prescription Size After Total Joint Arthroplasty Can be Safely Performed Without an Increase in Complications.

BACKGROUND: Excessive opioid prescriptions after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) increase risks for adverse opioid-related events, chronic opioid use, and unlawful opioid diversion. Decreasing postoperative prescriptions may improve quality after TJA. Concerns exist that a decrease in opioids prescribed may increase complications, such as readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, or worsened patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this study was to explore whether a reduction in opioids prescribed after TJA resulted in increased complications. METHODS: Data originated from a statewide database prospectively abstracted, including oral morphine equivalents prescribed at discharge, readmissions, ED visits, and PROs. Data were collected from 84,998 TJA occurring 1 year before and after the creation of an opioid-prescribing protocol that had decreased prescriptions by approximately 50%. Trends were monitored using Shewhart control charts. Regression models were used to determine statistically significant changes over time. RESULTS: All groups showed a reduction in opioids prescribed by almost 50% without an increase in emergency room visits or readmissions and without a detrimental effect on PROs. Compared to baseline data before opioid reduction, opioid-naive total knee arthroplasty had significant improvements in all outcomes (P = .03, P = .02, P < .001, P < .001). Opioid-tolerant total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty had no worsened outcomes and significant improvement in (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score for Joint Replacement P = .03) and (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement P = .03). Opioid-naive total hip arthroplasty had significant improvements in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (P = .003) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative opioid prescription recommendations from a statewide registry decreased prescribing by approximately 50% without decreasing PROs or increasing ED visits or readmissions. A reduction in opioids prescribed after TJA can be accomplished safely and without increased complications.

The Efficacy and Safety of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Direct Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have become widely used to manage perioperative pain following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs in support of the combined clinical practice guidelines of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Hip Society, Knee Society, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. METHODS: Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published prior to November 2018 on NSAIDs in TJA. Studies included after a systematic review evaluated through direct comparisons and/or meta-analysis, including qualitative and quantitative heterogeneity testing, to evaluate effectiveness and safety of NSAIDs. RESULTS: After critical appraisal of 2921 publications, 25 articles represented the best available evidence for inclusion in the analysis. Oral selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and non-selective NSAIDs and intravenous ketorolac safely reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption during the hospitalization for primary TJA. Administration of an oral selective COX-2 NSAID reduced postoperative opioid consumption after discharge from TKA. CONCLUSION: Strong evidence supports the use of an oral selective COX-2 or non-selective NSAID and intravenous ketorolac as adjunctive medications to manage postoperative pain during the hospitalization for TJA. Although no safety concerns were observed, prescribers need to remain vigilant when prescribing NSAIDs.

Prescribing and Consumption of Opioids After Primary, Unilateral Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Opioid-Naive Patients.

BACKGROUND: This cohort study was designed to determine the discrepancy between the quantity of opioid prescribed vs that which was consumed after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in opioid-naive patients. METHODS: Seven hundred twenty-three opioid-naive patients (426 TKAs and 297 THAs) from 7 hospitals in Michigan were contacted within 3 months of their surgery. Opioid prescribing and self-reported consumption was calculated in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Secondary outcomes included opioid refill in the first 90 days, pain in the first 7 days post-operatively, and satisfaction with pain care. RESULTS: For TKA, the mean prescribing was 632 mg OME (±229), and the mean consumption was 416 mg (±279). For THA, the mean prescribing was 584 mg OME (±335), and the mean consumption was 285 mg (±301). There were no associations between the amount of opioid prescribed and the likelihood of refill, post-operative pain, or satisfaction with pain control. The amount of opioid prescribed was associated with increased consumption, such that each increase of 1 pill was associated with approximately an additional half pill consumed after adjusting for other covariates. Moreover, 48.2% felt that they received "More" or "Much more" opioid than they needed. CONCLUSION: We recommend no more than 50 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone or its equivalent after TKA and 30 tablets after THA. Although dose reductions in other surgeries have not resulted in harm, continued assessment is needed to ensure that there are no unintended effects of opioid reduction, including worsened pain, decreased satisfaction, emergency department visits, or hospital readmissions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective, cohort study.

No Difference in Dislocation Seen in Anterior Vs Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has rapidly become popular, but there is little consensus regarding the risks and benefits of this approach in comparison with a modern posterior approach (PA). METHODS: A total of 2147 patients who underwent DAA THA were propensity score matched with patients undergoing PA THA on the basis of age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesia classification using data from a state joint replacement registry. Mean age of the matched cohort was 64.8 years, mean body mass index was 29.1 kg/m(2), and 53% were female. Multilevel logistic regression models using generalized estimating equations to control for grouping at the hospital level were used to identify differences in various outcomes. RESULTS: There was no difference in the dislocation rate between patients undergoing DAA (0.84%) and PA (0.79%) THA. Trends indicating a slightly longer length of stay with the PA and a slightly greater risk of fracture, increased blood loss, and hematoma with the DAA are consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSION: On the basis of short-term outcome and complication data, neither approach has a compelling advantage over each other, including no difference in the dislocation risk.

Management of hip fractures in the elderly.

The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to help improve treatment and management of hip fractures in the elderly based on current best evidence. The guideline contains twenty-five recommendations, including both diagnosis and treatment. Of those recommendations, strong evidence supports regional analgesia to improve preoperative pain control, similar outcomes for general or spinal anesthesia, arthroplasty for patients with unstable (displaced) femoral neck fractures, the use of a cephalomedullary device for the treatment of patients with subtrochanteric or reverse obliquity fractures, a blood transfusion threshold of no higher than 8 g/dL in asymptomatic postoperative patients, intensive physical therapy postdischarge, use of an interdisciplinary care program in patients with mild to moderate dementia, and multimodal pain management after hip fracture surgery. In addition to the recommendations, the work group highlighted the need for better research in the treatment of hip fractures.

Public Interest in Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis in the United States and Europe: An International Google Trends Analysis.

Background: Hyaluronic acid injections remain a common nonsurgical alternative for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis despite limited clinical evidence and varying global recommendations regarding its use. We used the Google Trends tool to provide a quantitative analysis of public interest in hyaluronic acid injections for knee osteoarthritis in the United States and Europe. Methods: We customized Google Trends parameters to obtain search data from January 2009 to December 2019 in both the United States and Europe. Combinations of "arthritis", "osteoarthritis", "hyaluronic acid", "knee arthritis", "knee osteoarthritis", and "knee injection" were entered into the Google Trends tool, and trend analyses were performed. Results: The models generated to describe public interest in hyaluronic acid for knee injections in both the United States and Europe showed increased Google queries as time progressed (P < .001). The United States growth model displayed linear growth (r2 = 0.90) while the European growth model displayed exponential growth (r2 = 0.90). Conclusions: Our results indicate a significant increase in Google queries related to hyaluronic acid injections for knee osteoarthritis since 2009 in both the United States and Europe. Our models suggest that despite mixed evidence supporting its use, orthopedic surgeons should expect continued public interest in hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis. The results of our study may help to prepare surgeons for patient inquiries, inform the creation of evidence-based shared decision-making tools, and direct future research.

Rim Fracture of a Tibial Base-Plate Due to Retained Cement as a Cause of Catastrophic Failure of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

CASE: We report a case of catastrophic implant failure due to fatigue fracture of a well-functioning unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 7 years in an active 55-year-old man, who presented with sudden onset of atraumatic knee pain and effusion. The patient underwent revision to total knee arthroplasty. Intraoperative findings included a metallic fragment fractured off the rim of the tibial base-plate and cement retained in the tibial tray. CONCLUSION: Retained cement in the tibial tray resulted in increased tibial tray contact stresses and fatigue fracture of the rim of the tray, creating a free metallic loose body that produced symptoms.

The Michigan Experience with Safety and Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid Use in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in total hip and knee arthroplasty has been well established in small controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses. The purpose of the current study was to determine the risks and benefits of TXA use in routine orthopaedic surgical practice on the basis of data from a large, statewide arthroplasty registry. METHODS: From April 18, 2013, to September 30, 2014, there were 23,236 primary total knee arthroplasty cases and 11,489 primary total hip arthroplasty cases completed and registered in the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI). We evaluated the association between TXA use and hemoglobin drop, transfusion, length of stay (LOS), venous thromboembolism (VTE), readmission, and cardiovascular events by fitting mixed-effects generalized linear and mixed-effects Cox models. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to enhance causal inference. RESULTS: For total hip arthroplasty, TXA use was associated with a smaller drop in hemoglobin (mean difference = -0.65 g/dL; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.60 to -0.71 g/dL), decreased odds of blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.86), and decreased readmissions (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.93) compared with no TXA use. There was no effect on VTE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.33), LOS (incident rate ratio [IRR] = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.03), or cardiovascular events (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.47 to 1.52). For total knee arthroplasty, TXA was associated with a smaller drop in hemoglobin (mean difference = -0.68 g/dL; 95% CI = -0.64 to -0.71 g/dL) and one-fourth the odds of blood transfusion (OR = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.31). There was an association with decreased risk of VTE within 90 days after surgery (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.73), slightly decreased LOS (IRR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.92 to 0.95), and no association with readmissions (OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.04) or cardiovascular events (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.71). CONCLUSIONS: In routine orthopaedic surgery practice, TXA use was associated with decreased blood loss and transfusion risk for both total knee and total hip arthroplasty, without evidence of increased risk of complications. TXA use was also associated with reduced risk of readmission among total hip arthroplasty patients and reduced risk of VTE among total knee arthroplasty patients, and did not have an adverse effect on cardiovascular complications in either group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.