The Family Rorschach with families of schizophrenics: replication and extension.

Using a modified version of procedures outlined by Shapiro and Wild (9), this study evaluates the use of a Family Rorschach technique as a means of distinguishing families of schizophrenic patients from those of psychiatrically hospitalized, nonschizophrenic individuals. The patients were diagnosed using Research Diagnostic Criteria, and families were matched for age, intelligence, and socioeconomic characteristics. Results showed that the families with schizophrenic offspring scored significantly lower (that is, they had more communication and attentional difficulties) than those with nonschizophrenic offspring; offspring gender and family constellation had little effect on scores. Subsequent analyses indicated that lower scores were not simply a reflection of the psychoticism of the patient. These findings suggest that families of schizophrenics have interpersonal communication difficulties that compromise their ability to maintain a shared focus of attention. The findings are consistent with the suggestion that deviant patterns of family communication in interaction with genetic vulnerability in an offspring may result in the development of a schizophrenic disorder.

The 20 questions task with families of schizophrenics: divergent findings.

The study attempted to replicate and extend the results of an earlier study by Wild and Shapiro (16), establishing the utility of Mosher and Hornsby's (8) 20 Questions Task as a means of differentiating families with schizophrenic patients from those of psychiatrically hospitalized but nonschizophrenic individuals. In the current study, Wild and Shapiro's original design was expanded and revised by (a) diagnosing patients using Research Diagnostic Criteria rather than hospital diagnoses and (b) including families with schizophrenic daughters and/or one-parent families, in addition to intact families with schizophrenic sons. Families were comparable on age, intelligence, and socioeconomic variables. The results failed to replicate those reported by Wild and Shapiro, and indicated that the 20 Questions Task was sensitive to differences in family constellation and offspring gender as well as offspring diagnosis. The findings suggest that forms of familial communication deviance detected with the 20 Questions Task may not be unique to families of schizophrenics, thus highlighting the need to expand research on family communication deviance in families with schizophrenic offspring to families with varied family constellations and characteristics.

Comparison of Pf1 and Fd gene 5 proteins and their single-stranded DNA complexes by NMR spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry.

The Pf1 gene 5 protein forms a large helical nucleoprotein complex (Mr = 3.1 x 10(7)) with single-stranded viral DNA, from which a 32 amino acid sequence rich in alanine, proline, and glutamine residues can be removed from the C-terminus by limited proteolysis. Sharp resonances in the 1H NMR spectrum of the Pf1 nucleoprotein complex indicate that the C-terminal region of the protein subunits enjoys remarkable conformational flexibility in the complex. In contrast, the globular N-terminal domain of the protein subunits is rigidly held and does not contribute to the spectrum. The Fd gene 5 protein lacks this C-terminal flexible domain, and no distinct resonances can be observed in the 1H NMR spectrum when this protein is complexed to single-stranded viral DNA. Differential scanning calorimetry shows that the thermal stability of both the Pf1 and Fd gene 5 protein is increased by 8 degrees C in the complex with DNA, and the transition is highly cooperative. Removal of the C-terminal domain of the Pf1 gene 5 protein subunits has no appreciable effect either on the Tm of the DNA-protein complex or on the cooperative nature of the thermal transition. It is suggested that the C-terminal domain of the Pf1 gene 5 protein acts as a dynamic clamp which kinetically stabilizes the nucleoprotein complex.