FMD vaccine matching: Inter laboratory study for improved understanding of r1 values.

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is a highly variable RNA virus existing as seven different serotypes. The antigenic variability between and within serotypes can limit the cross-reactivity and therefore the in vivo cross-protection of vaccines. Selection of appropriate vaccine strains is crucial in the control of FMD. Determination of indirect relationships (r1-value) between potential vaccine strains and field strains based on antibody responses against both are routinely used for vaccine matching purposes. Aiming at the investigation of the repeatability, reproducibility and comparability of r1-value determination within and between laboratories and serological tests, a small scale vaccine matching ring test for FMDV serotype A was organized. Well-characterized serum pools from cattle vaccinated with a monovalent A24/Cruzeiro/Brazil/55 (A24) FMD vaccine with known in vivo protection status (homologous and heterologous) were distributed to four laboratories to determine r1-values for the heterologous FMD strains A81/Argentina/87, A/Argentina/2000 and A/Argentina/2001 using the virus neutralization tests (VNT) and liquid phase blocking ELISA (LPBE). Within laboratories, the repeatability of r1-value determination was high for both antibody assays. VNT resulted in reproducible and comparable r1-values between laboratories, indicative of a lack of antigenic relatedness between the A24 strain and the heterologous strains tested in this work, thus corresponding to some of the in vivo findings with these strains. Using LPBE, similar trends in r1-values were observed in all laboratories, but the overall reproducibility was lower than with VNT. Inconsistencies between laboratories may at least in part be attributed to differences in LPBE protocols as well as the in preexisting information generated in each laboratory (such as antibody titer-protection correlation curves). To gain more insight in the LPBE-derived r1-values standard bovine control sera were included in the antibody assays performed in each laboratory and a standardization exercise was performed.

Rapid methodology for antigenic profiling of FMDV field strains and for the control of identity, purity and viral integrity in commercial virus vaccines using monoclonal antibodies.

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) developed against different foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) vaccine strains were extensively used to study any possible antigenic variations during vaccine production in Argentine facilities. Additionally, a typing ELISA using strain specific MAbs was developed to detect potential cross contaminations among FMDV strains in master and working seeds with high specificity and sensitivity and to confirm strains identity in formulated vaccines. This assay was carried out for the South American strains currently in use in production facilities in Argentina (A24/Cruzeiro, A/Argentina/01, O1/Campos and C3/Indaial) and for the strain O/Taiwan, produced only for export to Asia. These non-cross reactive MAbs were also used to analyze the integrity of viral particles belonging to each one of the individual strains, following isolation of 140S virions by means of sucrose density gradients from the aqueous phase of commercial polyvalent vaccines. Antigenic profiles were defined for FMDV reference strains using panels of MAbs, and a coefficient of correlation of reactivity with these panels was calculated to establish consistent identity upon serial passages of master and production seeds. A comparison of vaccine and field strain antigenic profiles performed using coefficients of correlation allowed the rapid identification of two main groups of serotype A viruses collected during the last FMD epidemic in Argentina, whose reactivity matched closely to A/Argentina/2000 and A/Argentina/2001 strains.

Quantitative single serum-dilution liquid phase competitive blocking ELISA for the assessment of herd immunity and expected protection against foot-and-mouth disease virus in vaccinated cattle.

A single serum-dilution liquid phase ELISA (slpELISA) was standardized to be used for serological evaluation of herd immunity against foot-and-mouth disease. The absorbance value at a dilution 1:64 of each serum sample was interpolated in a standard curve by plotting the antibody titers of six control sera determined by end point dilution liquid phase ELISA (lpELISA), against the absorbance values for the same control sera at 1:64 dilutions. A straight line was obtained by linear regression analysis (r>0.90) in the titer range of 1.40-2.40. The reliability of the antibody titers was confirmed by the simultaneous titration of 60 cattle sera by slpELISA and lpELISA, which showed an acceptable correlation (R(2)>0.87) for viral strains A24/Cruzeiro, A/Argentina/01, O1/Campos and C3/Indaial. Titers obtained by both methods were not significantly different (p>0.05), thus confirming that slpELISA could be used successfully to replace the conventional serial dilution ELISA for the assessment of protection status of cattle in epidemiological studies. In addition, this quantitative slpELISA provides an adequate method for monitoring the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns and is also suitable for the assessment of seroconversion of naive animals during early stages of infection.

Confidence in indirect assessment of foot-and-mouth disease vaccine potency and vaccine matching carried out by liquid phase ELISA and virus neutralization tests.

The necessity of avoiding the use of animals in vaccine potency testing has been widely recognized. The repeatability and reproducibility of the Expected Percentage of Protection (EPP) as a serological potency surrogate for A24 Cruzeiro foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) strain was assessed, and compared with the results obtained with challenge in the Protection against Podal Generalization (PPG) test. To determine the EPPs, the serum titers obtained by liquid phase blocking competitive ELISA (lpELISA) and virus neutralization (VNT) in 10 potency trials using the same A24 Cruzeiro vaccine, were interpolated into previously validated logit transformation curves that correlate PPG with serology. Indirect serological assessment of vaccine matching between the serotype A FMDV strains A24 Cruzeiro and A/Argentina/01 was also carried out by lpELISA and VNT. The results obtained in this study strongly support the replacement of challenge tests for vaccine potency by indirect serological assays, at least for A24 Cruzeiro FMDV strain. While determination of EPPs by lpELISA titers showed an excellent repeatability, reproducibility and concordance with PPG for vaccine potency, assessments of cross-protection by VNT titers were more consistent with the PPG outcome.

Some guidelines for determining foot-and-mouth disease vaccine strain matching by serology.

The selection of matching strains for use in outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus can be assessed in vivo or by serological r-value determination. Sera from animals involved in vaccine potency and cross-protection trials performed using the "Protection against Podal Generalization" (PPG) test for two serotype A strains were collected and analyzed by the virus neutralization test (VNT) and liquid-phase ELISA (lpELISA) in three laboratories. The average VNT r-values for medium and high serum titer classes from the A(24) Cruzeiro vaccinated animals were in line with the A/Arg/01 heterologous PPG outcome for all testing laboratories, suggesting that the vaccine strain A(24) Cruzeiro is unlikely to protect against the field isolate A/Arg/01. The corresponding lpELISA r-values were slightly higher and indicate a closer relationship between both strains. Pooling of serum samples significantly reduced the inter-animal and inter-trial variation. The results suggest that a suitable reference serum for vaccine matching r-value experiments might be a pool or a medium to high VNT or lpELISA titer serum. Furthermore, the VNT seems to produce the most reproducible inter-laboratory results. More work is, however, needed in order to substantiate these claims.

Updating of the correlation between lpELISA titers and protection from virus challenge for the assessment of the potency of polyvalent aphtovirus vaccines in Argentina.

Routine vaccination campaigns are carried out in Argentina twice a year, involving more than 100 million doses of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccine. Although the challenge test in cattle has not been totally replaced for the assessment of FMD vaccine potency, Argentine Animal Health authorities have used an indirect alternative method based on specific correlation studies of protection against podal generalization (PPG) tests performed in cattle with a validated liquid phase blocking ELISA (lpELISA). The change of vaccine formulations that took place after the 2000-2001 outbreaks, generated a gap in the correlation between lpELISA titers and PPG for the new FMD virus strains. A reappraisal of the correlation between lpELISA titers measured at 60 dpv and virus challenge by the PPG method at 90 dpv, performed for the four virus strains presently included in the Argentine vaccine is presented in this work. The data were obtained from 40 bovine challenge trials (647 sera) performed using exclusive batches of commercial vaccine from the year 2001 to January 2008 for A24/Cruzeiro, A/Argentina/2001, O1/Campos and C3/Indaial FMD virus strains. Curves of percentage of expected protection (EPP) versus lpELISA titers were obtained by logit regression for A/Argentina/2001, O1/Campos and C3/Indaial strains, but not for A24/Cruzeiro strain. The concordance between the direct and indirect tests using an EPP cut off value of 75% (82%, kappa = 0.62), in agreement with data originating from many years of vaccine control in Argentina, remarks the relevance of the acceptance of indirect alternatives to in vivo potency testing.

Analysis of the immune response to FMDV structural and non-structural proteins in cattle in Argentina by the combined use of liquid phase and 3ABC-ELISA tests.

The successful sanitary campaign implemented to control the 2000-2002 outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in Argentina was greatly assisted by the combination of an ELISA test (3ABC-ELISA) that detects antibodies directed against FMDV viral non-structural proteins (NSPs) and a liquid phase blocking competitive ELISA (lpELISA) for the detection of antibodies against the viral structural proteins (SPs). The combined use of these two assays in large-scale analysis of field samples allowed for a clear differentiation between infected and uninfected animals, with high specificity and sensitivity, regardless of the animal's vaccination status. In order to validate the application in indirect vaccine potency assays and assessment of vaccination efficiency, a preliminary correlation between serological response and protection from challenge with O1/Campos and A/Arg/01 FMD virus strains was established with data derived from commercial vaccine series challenge trials. Determination of antibodies to NSPs in vaccinated and revaccinated animals proved helpful in the analysis of vaccine purity. A review and discussion of the epidemiological status of cattle herds and real time monitoring of FMD in Argentina using these assays before, during and after the outbreaks is presented.

Foot-and-mouth disease polyvalent oil vaccines inoculated repeteadly in cattle do not induce detectable antibodies to non-structural proteins when evaluated by various assays.

The use of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines that do not induce antibodies against non-structural proteins (NSP) is extremely relevant for the demonstration of regions "free of FMDV infection" and control strategies. In this study cattle were primed and boosted with five doses of oil vaccines containing high antigenic payloads on days 0, 90, 130, 160 and 200. The serological response against NSP was measured using four commercially available assays: two 3ABC-ELISAs; one 3B-ELISA (and complementary 3A-ELISA) and an enzyme-immunotransfer blot assay (EITB). Additionally, locally produced NSP antibodies detection reagents and VIAA antibodies were evaluated. A high level of specific immune response against vaccine strains was shown. After four doses of vaccine, non-reactive animals were detected by any of the NSP assays. After the fifth immunization, 2 of 17 animals were reactive in one ELISA kit, but these samples proved negative by confirmatory tests. Antibodies against NSP were not detected in single dose immunized cattle. The principle of the NSP-ELISA used as a screening test for large sero-surveys in South America is established and this paper emphasizes the importance of using vaccines that have demonstrated no interference with NSP antibodies detection assays.

Reintroduction of foot-and-mouth disease in Argentina: characterisation of the isolates and development of tools for the control and eradication of the disease.

This paper describes the antigenic and molecular characterisation of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) strains isolated during the 2000-2002 epidemic in Argentina, and the strategy implemented for disease control. Two different FMDV serotypes, O and A, were involved. Of the various field isolates studied, two distinct O1 lineages (strains Corrientes/00 and Misiones/00) and two serotype A lineages (A/Argentina/00 and A/Argentina/01 prototypes) were identified. The genome sequences of these strains were compared with sequences of previous regional isolates and sequences of vaccine strains. O1 strains were found to be related to regional strains while serotype A strains were found to be more distanced from them. The updating of the antigenic composition of the vaccines used in the emergency was a key issue, since the outbreaks stopped shortly after the implementation of the vaccination programs. The O1 strains quickly disappeared from the field following strict control measures and the use of vaccines containing O1/Campos strain. However, in the case of the A serotype strains, the situation was different, since the use of a vaccine containing strain A24/Cruzeiro yielded acceptable levels of protection only after re-vaccination. Therefore, the new field strains A/Argentina/00 and A/Argentina/01 were incorporated into the vaccine, leading to an effective control of the disease. Viral circulation greatly diminished, as indicated by the significant reduction in the number of outbreaks and in the number of animals with antibodies against non-structural proteins. Satisfactory levels of protective antibodies were subsequently detected in the cattle population (above 75% protection). The absence of outbreaks after January 2002 indicated that the epidemic was controlled.