Reasons for Migration and Their Associations with HIV Risk and Prevention Among Cisgender Sexual Minority Men: A Latent Class Analysis.

The immigrant population in the United States (U.S.) is rapidly growing; yet there is limited knowledge about how reasons for migrating to the U.S. are associated with HIV prevention behaviors. Using data from the American Men's Internet Survey (2018-2020), we performed a Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to identify patterns in reasons for migration among cisgender gay, bisexual, and other sexual minority men (SMM) who born outside the U.S. We used multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographic characteristics to assess class associations with the following in the past 12 months: condomless anal sex (CAS), illicit drug use, marijuana use, HIV testing, and PrEP use. LCA identified six distinct patterns in reasons for migration among the sample (n = 1,657): (1) Family and friends (14%); (2) Financial (17%); (3) Personal freedom related to being gay (10%); (4) Pursuit of opportunities while living openly as SMM (12%); (5) Educational purposes (18%); (6) Not my decision (29%). While HIV testing (range = 57.6-65.4%) and PrEP use (range = 15.6-21.4%) did not vary by class (p > .05 for all), CAS and illicit drug use were significantly different (p < .05). SMM who migrated to pursue opportunities while living openly and whose reasons were not their decision had greater odds of CAS than SMM who migrated for educational purposes (aOR:1.72, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]:1.15-2.59; 1.57, 1.13-2.19, respectively). Reasons for migration among SMM were associated with behaviors that can increase HIV risk, but not testing or PrEP. Push and pull factors related to migration should be considered when developing behavioral HIV interventions for immigrant SMM.

RESUMEN: La población inmigrante en los Estados Unidos (EE. UU.) está creciendo rápidamente; sin embargo, hay un conocimiento limitado acerca de cómo las razones para migrar a los EE. UU. se asocian con comportamientos de prevención del VIH. Utilizando datos del American Men's Internet Survey (2018­2020), realizamos un Análisis de Clases Latentes (ACL) para identificar patrones en las razones de migración entre hombres cisgénero gays, bisexuales y otros hombres de minorías sexuales (HMS) que reportaron haber nacido fuera de los EE. UU. Utilizamos regresión logística multivariable controlando las características demográficas para evaluar las asociaciones de clases con los siguientes comportamientos en los últimos 12 meses: sexo anal sin condón (SAC), consumo de drogas ilícitas, uso de marihuana, prueba del VIH y uso de PrEP. El ACL identificó seis patrones distintos en las razones de migración en la muestra (n = 1,657): (1) Familia y amigos (14%); (2) Motivos financieros (17%); (3) Libertad personal relacionada con ser gay (10%); (4) Búsqueda de oportunidades mientras viven abiertamente como HMS (12%); (5) Propósitos educativos (18%); (6) No fue decisión propia (29%). Mientras que las pruebas del VIH (rango = 57.6­65.4%) y el uso de PrEP (rango = 15.6­21.4%) no variaron según la clase (p > .05 para todos), el SAC y el consumo de drogas ilícitas fueron significativamente diferentes (p < .05). Los HMS que emigraron para perseguir oportunidades mientras vivían abiertamente, y aquellos cuyas razones no fueron decisión propia, tuvieron mayores probabilidades de tener SAC que los HMS que emigraron con propósitos educativos (razón de probabilidades ajustada [aOR]: 1.72, intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%]: 1.15­2.59; 1.57, 1.13­2.19, respectivamente). Las razones de migración a los EE. UU. entre los HMS estuvieron asociadas con comportamientos que pueden aumentar el riesgo de VIH, pero no con pruebas o PrEP. Los factores que impulsan y atraen relacionados con la migración deben considerarse al desarrollar intervenciones de prevención del VIH para HMS inmigrantes.

Optimizing Individual HIV Testing and Counseling for Emerging Adult Sexual Minority Men (Aged 18 to 24) in Relationships: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjunct Communication Components.

The majority of new HIV infections in the US occur among sexual minority men (SMM) with older adolescent and emerging adult SMM at the highest risk. Those in relationships face unique HIV prevention challenges. Existing sexual HIV transmission risk interventions for male couples often encounter implementation challenges and engaging younger SMM early in relationships may be particularly difficult. This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the acceptibility and feasibility of We Test HIV testing - a behavioral health intervention tailored for younger SMM in realtionships - and generated preliminary estimates of effect size. The intervention comprises two adjunct moduls - video-based communication skills training as well as communication goal setting and planning - delivered in conjunction with routine HIV testing and counseling in individual or dyadic formats. A sample of 69 SMM aged 17 to 24 were recruited online. Following baseline assessment, youth were randomized to receive either the experimental, We Test, intervention or routine HIV testing (the control condition). Follow-up assessments were completed 3 and 6 months post-baseline. Results suggested the study was feasible and the individually delivered format was acceptible. We Test HIV testing was associated with significant improvements in communication skills. In addition, youth who remained in a relationship experienced an increase in communal coping to reduce HIV infection risk and relationship power. While groups did not differ with respect to condomless anal sex with casual partners, these psycho-social constructs (communication, communal coping with HIV prevention, and relationship power) may serve as mediators of intervention effects on sexual risk reduction in a larger study.

Reactions to Testing HIV Negative: An Assessment of Measurement Invariance and Associations with Condomless Anal Sex among English and Spanish-speaking Latinx Sexual Minority Men in the United States.

Among the many effective prevention strategies, frequent HIV testing continues to be promoted to reduce the risk of HIV transmission among sexual minority men (SMM). Testing negative for HIV can result in varied reactions that influence subsequent HIV transmission behaviors, yet the extant research has primarily been conducted in English. The current study examined measurement invariance of a Spanish-translated Inventory of Reactions to Testing HIV Negative (IRTHN). The study also examined whether the IRTHN was associated with subsequent condomless anal sex. Data were drawn from 2,170 Latinx SMM subsample of the UNITE Cohort Study. We conducted a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis to test for measurement invariance between participants who opted to take the survey in English (n = 2,024) and those who opted to take it in Spanish (n = 128). We also examined if the IRTHN is associated with subsequent CAS. The results were suggestive of partial invariance. The subscales of Luck and Invulernability were associated with CAS at the 12-month follow-up. Practice and research-based implications are discussed.

Methods in HIV-Related Intersectional Stigma Research: Core Elements and Opportunities.

Researchers are increasingly recognizing the importance of studying and addressing intersectional stigma within the field of HIV. Yet, researchers have, arguably, struggled to operationalize intersectional stigma. To ensure that future research and methodological innovation is guided by frameworks from which this area of inquiry has arisen, we propose a series of core elements for future HIV-related intersectional stigma research. These core elements include multidimensional, multilevel, multidirectional, and action-oriented methods that sharpen focus on, and aim to transform, interlocking and reinforcing systems of oppression. We further identify opportunities for advancing HIV-related intersectional stigma research, including reducing barriers to and strengthening investments in resources, building capacity to engage in research and implementation of interventions, and creating meaningful pathways for HIV-related intersectional stigma research to produce structural change. Ultimately, the expected payoff for incorporating these core elements is a body of HIV-related intersectional stigma research that is both better aligned with the transformative potential of intersectionality and better positioned to achieve the goals of Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States and globally. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S4):S413-S419. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306710).

Differences in HIV Risk and Prevention Among Cisgender Latino Sexual Minority Men by Language of Online Survey Completion: Analysis of National and Washington State Data.

Internet-based surveys can be programmed and advertised in multiple languages to reach non-English-speaking individuals, but it is unclear the extent to which this enhances the diversity of participants and supports inclusion of individuals at higher risk for HIV. We sought to examine how language of survey completion (English or Spanish) was associated with sociodemographic characteristics and indicators of HIV risk and prevention among cisgender Latino sexual minority men (SMM). We analyzed national and Washington State data using the Understanding New Infections through Targeted Epidemiology (UNITE) Cohort Study (2017 and 2018) and the Washington HIV/STI Prevention Project (WHSPP) survey (2017 and 2018/2019), respectively. Latino SMM who completed online surveys in Spanish differed from those who completed surveys in English across several sociodemographic characteristics including age, education, and income. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and HIV-related risk factors, Spanish language respondents in UNITE were less likely to have tested for HIV in the past year, and those in WHSPP were more likely to report a recent STI diagnosis. Findings suggest that Latino SMM who complete surveys in Spanish comprise a unique subgroup that may have a specific HIV health and risk behavior profile. Our results suggest a need for increased and tailored efforts to recruit and include Spanish-speaking Latino SMM for local and national research and public health programming.

RESUMEN: Encuestas por internet pueden ser programadas y anunciadas para alcanzar a personas que no hablan inglés, pero no queda claro si esto pueda mejorar la diversidad de los participantes de investigación y apoyar la inclusión de los individuos de alto riesgo a infección con el VIH. En este estudio examinamos la relación del idioma de completar la encuesta en línea (inglés o español) entre hombres Latinos de minorías sexuales (HLMS) cisgénero con características sociodemográficas y determinantes para el riesgo y prevención del VIH. Analizamos los datos nacionales y estatales con el estudio de cohorte de Understanding New Infections through Targeted Epidemiology (UNITE) (2017 y 2018) y El Proyecto de Washington para la Prevención del VIH/Infecciones de Transmisión Sexual (WHSPP) (2017 y 2018/2019), respectivamente. Los HLSM quienes completaron las encuestas por internet en español fueron diferentes a los que completaron las encuestas en inglés por varias características sociodemográficas incluso la edad, la educación, y el ingreso. Después de ajustar por las características sociodemográficas y los factores de riesgo asociados con el VIH, los participantes de UNITE que respondieron en español tuvieron menos probabilidad de haberse hecho la prueba de VIH en el año pasado y los que participaron en el WHSPP eran más probable que reportaran un diagnóstico de ITS. Los resultados indican que los HLSM quienes completan las encuestas en español representan un subgrupo distinto que tiene un perfil específico de comportamiento de riesgo y salud respecto al VIH. Los resultados demuestran la necesidad de mayores esfuerzos especializados para reclutar e incluir los HLSM quienes hablan español para que participen en las investigaciones en línea a nivel local y nacional y la programación de la salud pública.

Engagement of Latino immigrant men who have sex with men for HIV prevention through eHealth: preferences across social media platforms.

OBJECTIVE: eHealth has growing potential to enhance access to HIV prevention for hard to reach populations, including young Latino immigrant men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States. We examined the feasibility and acceptability of using eHealth tools, specifically social media platforms, to facilitate HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake among this population. DESIGN: We utilized a community sensitive approach to conduct 30 in-depth interviews and five focus groups with young Latino immigrant MSM in Seattle, WA. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with both data-driven inductive and a priori deductive approaches. RESULTS: Participants were open to receiving HIV information via social media platforms. Participants recommended that social media content be tailored with their language preferences, cultural norms, and beliefs about HIV testing and PrEP in mind. Further, participants emphasized that content avoid stigmatizing HIV or Latino MSM's complex identities. CONCLUSIONS: Results have implications for utilizing social media platforms and developing HIV prevention interventions for Latino immigrant MSM. Findings highlight that HIV prevention content should acknowledge how identities as an emerging adult, Latino, immigrant, and MSM, warrant unique consideration.

Talking to My Partners About PrEP: Factors Associated with PrEP-Related Communication in a Longitudinal US Study of Sexual Minority Men Living with HIV.

Treatment as prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have reduced HIV transmission among sexual minority men (SMM). However, little is known about PrEP-related communication in serodiscordant partnerships. In 2015-2016, 965 US SMM living with HIV (Mage = 39; 63% White, 19% Black, 18% Latinx) enrolled in a year-long longitudinal study with surveys every 3 months (2,850 surveys). Multilevel models explored factors associated with PrEP-related communication with HIV-negative partners. Most participants (77%) reported PrEP-related communication. Participants were more likely to discuss PrEP during periods with more sexual partners, AOR = 2.89, p < .001, and group sex, AOR = 1.99, p = .001. Those with more partners on average, ß = 0.48, p < .001, and those engaging in other drug use more frequently, ß = 0.11, p = .002, were more likely to discuss PrEP. PrEP-related communication was more common for men who disclosed their HIV status, ß = 0.22, p < .001, and who had undetectable viral loads, ß = 0.25, p = .007. Communication was also more common for those with higher incomes, ß = 0.12, p = .02, and from larger cities, ß = 0.07, p = .048, and less common for Black participants, ß = - 0.29, p = .003, and older participants, ß = - 0.18, p < .001. PrEP-related communication increased over the course of the study, AOR = 1.16, p= .02. PrEP can confer additional HIV prevention benefits within serodiscordant partnerships, and future research should continue to explore the role PrEP plays in these partnerships.

PrEP Demonstration Project Showed Superior Adherence with Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine Compared to Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine in a Sample of Partnered Sexual Minority Men.

Sexual minority men (SMM) remain at high risk of HIV infection in the United States, and for those in relationships, dyadic functioning may contextualize prevention decisions. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention was previously limited to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) until the FDA approved tenofovir alafenamide/FTC (TAF/FTC) for PrEP in 2019. Data regarding substance use, sexual behavior, holding an active PrEP prescription, and type of PrEP regimen (TDF/FTC versus TAF/FTC) were analyzed from a sample of 421 partnered SMM. The majority of the sample on PrEP reported a TDF/FTC prescription as opposed to TAF/FTC. However, SMM reported significantly better adherence to TAF/FTC than TDF/FTC in multivariable models. Novelty of TAF/FTC, treatment fatigue with TDF/FTC, and/or a belief in TAF/FTC's superior efficacy and mitigated side effects may be plausible contributing factors. More studies using objective adherence metrics and surveys are needed.

RESUMEN: Los hombres de minorías sexuales (SMM, por sus siglas en inglés) permanecen en alto riesgo de infección por VIH en los Estados Unidos y, para quienes están en una relación romántico, el funcionamiento diádico puede contextualizar las decisiones de prevención del VIH. La profilaxis previa a la exposición (PrEP) para la prevención del VIH se limitaba a tenofovir disoproxil fumarato / emtricitabina (TDF / FTC) hasta que la FDA aprobó tenofovir alafenamida / FTC (TAF / FTC) para PrEP en 2019. Datos sobre el uso de sustancias, comportamientos sexuales, teniendo una prescripción de PrEP activa, y el tipo de régimen de PrEP (TDF / FTC versus TAF / FTC) se analizaron de una muestra de 421 SMM asociados. La mayoría de la muestra que toma PrEP indicó teniendo una prescripción de TDF / FTC en lugar de TAF / FTC. Sin embargo, comparando la adherencia auto-informada, SMM indica mejor adherencia a TAF / FTC que TDF / FTC en modelos multivariables. La novedad de TAF / FTC, la fatiga del tratamiento con TDF / FTC y/o la creencia en la eficacia superior de TAF / FTC y los efectos secundarios mitigados pueden contribuir a la mejor adherencia a TAF / FTC. Se necesitan más estudios que utilicen métricas y encuestas de adherencia objetivas.

Healthy Choices Intervention is Associated with Reductions in Stigma Among Youth Living with HIV in the United States (ATN 129).

Considering the lack of validated stigma reduction interventions for youth living with HIV (YLWH), we evaluated effects of the Healthy Choices intervention on HIV-related stigma among YLWH. We analyzed data from the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network protocol 129, multi-site randomized controlled trial, applying latent growth curve modeling with two linear slopes estimating changes in Berger's Stigma Scale pre-intervention, 16, 28, and 52 weeks post-intervention, as well as the trajectory of stigma scores over the follow-up period (N = 183). Expected value for the growth intercept was statistically significant (Bintercept = 2.53; 95% CI 2.32, 2.73; p < 0.001), as were differences in the change from baseline to 16-week follow-up (Bintercept slope1 = - 0.02; 95% CI - 0.04, 0.01; p = 0.034). Expected value of the slope factor measuring growth over the follow-up period was non-significant suggesting that stigma scores were stable from 28 to 52 weeks. Our findings warrant replication and additional research comparing effects of this intervention to counterfactual controls.

RESUMEN: Teniendo en cuenta la falta de intervenciones validadas de reducción del estigma para los jóvenes que viven con el VIH (PVVS), evaluamos los efectos de la intervención Healthy Choices sobre el estigma entre los PVVS. Analizamos los datos del ensayo controlado aleatorio de múltiples sitios del protocolo 129 de Adolescent Medicine Trials Network, aplicando un modelo de curva de crecimiento latente con dos pendientes lineales que estiman los cambios de Berger's Stigma Scale antes de la intervención, ya a las 16, 28 y 52 semanas después de la intervención, así como la trayectoria de los niveles de estigma durante el período de seguimiento (N = 183). El valor esperado para el intercepto de crecimiento fue estadísticamente significativo (Bintercept = 2.53 IC del 95%: 2.32, 2.73 p < 0.001), así como las diferencias en el cambio desde el inicio hasta el seguimiento de 16 semanas (Bintercept slope 1 = -0.02 IC del 95% IC: -0.04, 0.01 p = 0.034). El valor esperado del factor que mide el crecimiento durante el período de seguimiento no fue significativo, sugiere que los niveles de estigma se mantuvieron estables de 28 a 52 semanas. Nuestros resultados justifican la replicación y la investigación adicional al comparar la intervención con comparativos.

Developmental Barriers to Couples' HIV Testing and Counseling Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males: A Dyadic Socio-ecological Perspective.

Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) is now a standard of care for partnered sexual minority men. While adolescent sexual minority men (ASMM; ages 15-19) face disproportionate HIV risk, the emergent nature of relationships and communication skills may present challenges to accessing and engaging in CHTC. This study utilized qualitative data from 28 ASMM recruited in 4 urban centers in the USA during the formative stage of Adolescent Trials Network study ATN-156. Participants were cis-male, HIV-negative, and in a relationship with a similarly-aged cis-male partner. Thematic analysis indicated low and high levels of commitment were barriers to CHTC. Concerns about caregiver attitudes towards HIV testing were salient. Adolescents' perception of structural barriers highlighted reliance on caregiver resources, which limited access to sexual health services. Prevention programming must address structural barriers to access encountered by adolescents. ASMM in relationships may benefit from programming that includes options for individual and dyadic participation.

Population-Specific Correlates of Sexual Arrangements and Communication in a National Sample of Latinx Sexual Minority Men.

While the literature on sexual arrangements has expanded considerably, less is known about sexual arrangements among ethnically diverse populations, particularly Latinx sexual minority men (LSMM). Relationship research may overlook culturally salient correlates (e.g., ideals of masculinity or immigration-related factors) of sexual arrangements. The current study explored relationship-related factors (i.e., sexual arrangements, sexual communication, and relationship functioning) as well as Latino-specific factors, including dominant cultural views of masculinity (machismo/caballerismo) and immigration among partnered LSMM. Participants were recruited nationwide through social media and geo-location dating apps. All participants were aged 18 or older, cisgender male, lived in the U.S., including Puerto Rico, were able to read in either English or Spanish, and indicated they were currently in a relationship with a cismale partner. Multinomial regression was used to calculate the odds of being in an open or monogamish arrangement relative to a monogamous arrangement. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to examine factors related to sexual communication. Language spoken with partner, adherence to more general heteronormative beliefs (genderism), and substance use were associated with specific sexual arrangement groups. The findings also suggested that birthplace, language spoken with partner variables, and machismo were associated with specific sexual arrangements and with sexual communication. This study highlights that factors associated with sexual arrangements and sexual communication may be population specific. The current study points to a complex interplay between culturally relevant ideals of masculinity and sexual arrangements as well as sexual communication among partnered Latinx sexual minority men.

A Pilot Randomized Trial of Intervention Components Addressing Drug Use in Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) with Male Couples.

Men who have sex with men (MSM) experience high rates of substance use and HIV infection. Main partners are the source of many (35-68%) of these new HIV infections. This study developed and examined the efficacy of two adjunct components to couples HIV testing and counseling (CHTC)-communication training (CT) videos and a substance use module (SUM)-to reduce drug use and sexual HIV transmission risk in MSM couples. Participants included 70 male couples randomized into one of four conditions: CHTC, CHTC + CT videos, CHTC + SUM, and CHTC + CT videos + SUM. Participants completed a survey pre-intervention and 1-, 3-, and 6-months later. Completion of the SUM in the absence of CT videos was associated with significant immediate decreases in drug use and related problems; however, at 3- and 6-month follow ups, the SUM was only associated with reductions in drug use and related problems among men who also viewed the CT videos. There were no between-condition differences in sexual behavior. CHTC may serve as a vehicle for the delivery of brief substance use intervention for MSM couples.ClinicalTrails.gov NCT # 03125915.

The Prevalence and Correlates of Sexual Arrangements in a National Cohort of HIV-Negative Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States.

Sexual agreements have received considerable attention as an aspect of dyadic functioning associated with HIV risk. To date, this research has primarily utilized convenience samples which overrepresented men from large urban areas and with higher HIV risk. The current study utilized a national cohort of 1061 HIV-negative gay and bisexual men recruited to be geographically diverse within the U.S. The sample included 531 (50.0%) men who identified as single. Of the 530 partnered men, 240 (45.3%) were monogamous; 238 (44.9%) were in open relationships (where sex with outside partners was permitted); and 52 (9.8%) were in monogamish relationships (where sex with outside partners was limited to instances where both primary partners were present). Regardless of urban (vs. non-urban) residence, men in monogamous relationships engaged in less anal sex generally and condomless anal sex (CAS) specifically with casual partners. Single men reported significantly more frequent anal sex with casual partners compared to open and monogamish men; however, there were no significant differences among these three groups with respect to CAS with casual partners. In multivariable models, monogamish men reported significantly more frequent marijuana use and alcohol consumption compared to all other groups. Urban (vs. non-urban) residence moderated associations between sexual arrangements and depression as well as the use of illicit drugs other than marijuana. These findings point to the need to better examine the potentially unique mechanisms which confer risk and resilience for gay male couples in urban versus non-urban settings. The observed association between sexual arrangements and substance use suggests interventions which facilitate the negotiation of sexual agreements may present an opportunity to engage in dyadic substance use intervention.

Substance Use and Discrimination in a sample of U.S.-based Latinx Sexual Minority Men and their main partners.

OBJECTIVES: Substance use, including drug and alcohol misuse, is associated with myriad health conditions, including higher risk for HIV infection. While preliminary evidence suggests that higher levels of relationship functioning can buffer against the deleterious health consequences of discrimination on mental health broadly, such protective associations have been understudied with respect to alcohol and drug use. The topic is particularly understudied among Latinx sexual minority men - despite the fact that they are at greater risk for problematic substance use behaviors and are likely to experience multiple forms of discrimination (e.g., racism, homophobia). METHOD: To address this gap in the literature, we sampled 95 predominately Latinx sexual minority male couples to assess their drinking and drug use behaviors, relationship functioning, and experiences of discrimination. We used Actor-Partner Interdependence models to test our hypotheses. RESULTS: We found that having a partner who experienced discrimination and higher partner reports of relationship functioning buffered against the negative relationship between own experiences of discrimination and drug use, but not problematic drinking. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that higher relationship functioning serves as a buffer between the negative ramifications of discrimination on drug use, but not problematic drinking. We explicate implications for policy and practice to facilitate well-being among coupled Latinx sexual minority men.

Emotions and cognitions as correlates of early adolescent sexual behavior among Dominican youth in the United States and Dominican Republic.

The present study examined cognitive and emotional correlates of sexual decision-making among three groups of Dominican adolescents: (a) Dominican youth who were born and raised in New York City, (b) Dominican youth who recently immigrated to New York City from the Dominican Republic, and (c) Dominican adolescents who were born and currently reside in the Dominican Republic. Data were collected via self-administered questionnaires from Dominican mother-adolescent dyads in New York City (n = 1,008) and the Dominican Republic (n = 213). Across groups, positive emotion constructs were consistently among the most important correlates of intentions to engage in sexual intercourse while issues related to STIs and HIV showed the lowest correlations. Interestingly, positive correlations with intentions to engage in intercourse were found among Dominican-residing males, as were positive correlations with intentions among Dominican-residing females. The implications for HIV prevention programs for Dominican youth are discussed.

HIV sexual risk behavior and family dynamics in a Dominican tourism town.

Expansion of the tourism industry in the Dominican Republic has had far-reaching health consequences for the local population. Research suggests families with one or more members living in tourism areas experience heightened vulnerability to HIV/STIs due to exposure to tourism environments, which can promote behaviors such as commercial and transactional sex and elevated alcohol use. Nevertheless, little is known about how tourism contexts influence family dynamics, which, in turn, shape HIV risk. This qualitative study examined family relationships through in-depth interviews with 32 adults residing in Sosúa, an internationally known destination for sex tourism. Interviewees situated HIV risk within a context of limited employment opportunities, high rates of migration, heavy alcohol use, and separation from family. This study has implications for effective design of health interventions that make use of the role of the family to prevent HIV transmission in tourism environments.

Factors associated with HIV-testing history among Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) in Los Angeles County.

Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) are disproportionately affected with HIV, and nearly half are unaware of their status. Those unaware of their status are more likely to engage in risky behavior; thus, HIV-testing uptake is crucial. This study explored correlates of past-two-year HIV-testing history. BMSM (n = 102) completed self-administered questionnaires. Fisher exact test indicated that BMSM at clubs/bars and Gay Pride events had higher rates of being tested within the past two years (86%-65%) than did participants who responded to online advertisements (44%, p < .001). Among those untested for HIV, slightly half reported receptive anal sex without a condom (48%, p = .033), used the Internet seeking sex (54%, p < .001), low HIV knowledge (52%, p = .005), and less education. Literacy and tailored online interventions might be worth considering to increase HIV-testing uptake.

What Should Students Learn About the Importance of Cultural Brokering in Immigrant Communities?

Cultural brokers can help clinicians meet needs of immigrant patients. This article considers loneliness as an endemic experience of immigrants in the United States and discusses how cultural brokerage practices can reduce the ill health effects of loneliness by helping clinicians contextualize their interactions with immigrant patients and by helping immigrants navigate the health care system and build social connections.

Multilevel Analysis of Sociopolitical Contexts, Social Support, Mental Health, and Alcohol Use Among Partnered Sexual Minority Latino Men in the U.S.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to examine how state-level characteristics relate to social support and mental health outcomes among Latino sexual minority men in the U.S. METHODS: Multilevel linear regression analyses were used to estimate the effect of social support and contextual-level characteristics on mental health and alcohol use among Latino sexual minority men (n = 612). Individual-level data were collected via a national, online survey between November 2018 and May 2019. State-level data were drawn from the 2019 American Community Survey and the Human Rights Campaign's 2018 State Equality Index score cards. RESULTS: The interaction between friend support and supportive LGBTQ+ policies was associated with anxiety (B = 1.77; 95% CI 0.69, 2.85; p = 0.001) and depression (B = 2.25; 95% CI 0.99, 3.50; p<0.001). The interaction between friend support and Latino population size was associated with greater problematic alcohol use (B = 0.06; 95% CI 0.03, 0.10; p<0.001). The interaction between partner support and supportive LGBTQ+ policies were also associated problematic drinking (B = -1.72; 95% CI -3.05, -0.38; p<0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Contextual factors can affect the everyday experiences of Latino sexual minority men. The effect of social support on mental health outcomes may depend on state-level factors. Public health efforts that seek to address the mental health and problematic drinking behaviors of Latino sexual minority men must consider the impact of macro-level policies on program and intervention development.

Everyday Discrimination and HIV Testing Among Partnered Latino/x Sexual Minority Men in the United States: A Stratified Analysis by Birth Location.

We examined the association between everyday discrimination and HIV testing patterns-current (≤ 6 months), recent (7-12 months), and delayed (> 12 months or never tested)-among partnered Latino/x sexual minority men (SMM). Multinomial regression analyses revealed that in the full sample (N = 484) experiencing discrimination based on sexual orientation and race/ethnicity attributions concurrently (vs. no discrimination) was associated with higher odds of delayed (vs. current) HIV testing (AOR = 2.6, 95% CI [1.0, 6.7]). Similarly, in the subset of Latino/x SMM born outside the mainland U.S. (n = 209), experiencing concurrent sexual orientation- and race/ethnicity-based discrimination (vs. no discrimination) was associated with higher odds of recent (AOR = 12.4, 95% CI [1.3, 115.7]) and delayed HIV testing (AOR = 7.3, 95% CI [1.6, 33.0]), compared with current testing. Findings suggest that addressing discrimination may improve HIV testing uptake among partnered Latino/x SMM, particularly those born outside the U.S.