Comparison of #Enzian classification and revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stages for the description of disease extent in women with deep endometriosis.

STUDY QUESTION: How is endometriosis extent described by the #Enzian classification compared to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) stages in women undergoing radical surgery for deep endometriosis (DE)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The prevalence and severity grade of endometriotic lesions and adhesions as well as the total number of #Enzian compartments affected by DE increase on average with increasing rASRM stage; however, DE lesions are also present in rASRM stages 1 and 2, leading to an underestimation of disease severity when using the rASRM classification. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Endometriotic lesions can be accurately described regarding their localization and severity by sonography as well as during surgery using the recently updated #Enzian classification for endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective multicenter study including a total of 735 women between January 2020 and May 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Disease extent in women undergoing radical surgery for DE at tertiary referral centers for endometriosis was intraoperatively described using the #Enzian and the rASRM classification. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 735 women were included in the study. Out of 31 women with rASRM stage 1, which is defined as only minimal disease, 65% (i.e. 20 women) exhibited DE in #Enzian compartment B (uterosacral ligaments/parametria), 45% (14 women) exhibited DE in #Enzian compartment A (vagina/rectovaginal septum) and 26% (8 women) exhibited DE in #Enzian compartment C (rectum). On average, there was a progressive increase from rASRM stages 1-4 in the prevalence and severity grade of DE lesions (i.e. lesions in #Enzian compartments A, B, C, FB (urinary bladder), FU (ureters), FI (other intestinal locations), FO (other extragenital locations)), as well as of endometriotic lesions and adhesions in #Enzian compartments P (peritoneum), O (ovaries) and T (tubo-ovarian unit). In addition, the total number of #Enzian compartments affected by DE lesions on average progressively increased from rASRM stages 1-4, with a maximum of six affected compartments in rASRM stage 4 patients. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Interobserver variability may represent a possible limitation of this study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The #Enzian classification includes the evaluation of DE in addition to the assessment of endometriotic lesions and adhesions of the ovaries and tubes and may therefore provide a comprehensive description of disease localization and extent in women with DE. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was received for this study. All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Practical Recommendations for the Management of Benign Adnexal Masses.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a comprehensive review to provide practical recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment of benign adnexal masses, as well as information for appropriate consent, regarding possible loss of the ovarian reserve. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify the most relevant data about this subject. RESULTS: In total, 48 studies addressed the necessary aspects of the review, and we described their epidemiology, diagnoses, treatment options with detailed techniques, and perspectives regarding future fertility. CONCLUSIONS: Adnexal masses are extremely common. The application of diagnosis algorithms is mandatory to exclude malignancy. A great number of cases can be managed with surveillance. Surgery, when necessary, should be performed with adequate techniques. However, even in the hands of experienced surgeons, there is a significant decrease in ovarian reserves, especially in cases of endometriomas. There is an evident necessity of studies that focus on the long-term impact on fertility.

OBJETIVO: Realizar uma revisão abrangente para fornecer recomendações práticas sobre o diagnóstico e tratamento de massas anexiais benignas, bem como informações para um consentimento adequado com relação à possível perda da reserva ovariana. MéTODOS: Uma revisão abrangente da literatura foi realizada para identificar os dados mais relevantes sobre o assunto. RESULTADOS: No total, 48 estudos abordaram os aspectos necessários da revisão, e descrevemos sua epidemiologia, diagnósticos, opções de tratamento com técnicas detalhadas, e perspectivas sobre fertilidade futura. CONCLUSõES: As massas anexiais são extremamente comuns. A aplicação de algoritmos de diagnóstico é obrigatória para excluir a malignidade. A maioria dos casos pode ser manejada conservadoramente. A cirurgia, quando necessária, deve ser realizada com técnicas adequadas. No entanto, mesmo nas mãos de cirurgiões experientes, há diminuição significativa da reserva ovariana, principalmente nos casos de endometriomas. Há uma evidente necessidade de estudos que enfoquem o impacto das massas anexiais benignas na fertilidade em longo prazo.

Practical recommendations for the management of benign adnexal masses / Recomendações práticas para o tratamento de massas anexiais benignas

Abstract Objective To performa comprehensive review to provide practical recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment of benign adnexal masses, as well as information for appropriate consent, regarding possible loss of the ovarian reserve. Methods A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify the most relevant data about this subject. Results In total, 48 studies addressed the necessary aspects of the review, and we described their epidemiology, diagnoses, treatment options with detailed techniques, and perspectives regarding future fertility. Conclusions Adnexal masses are extremely common. The application of diagnosis algorithms is mandatory to exclude malignancy. A great number of cases can bemanaged with surveillance. Surgery, when necessary, should be performed with adequate techniques. However, even in the hands of experienced surgeons, there is a significant decrease in ovarian reserves, especially in cases of endometriomas. There is an evident necessity of studies that focus on the long-term impact on fertility.

Resumo Objetivo Realizar uma revisão abrangente para fornecer recomendações práticas sobre o diagnóstico e tratamento demassas anexiais benignas, bemcomo informações para um consentimento adequado com relação à possível perda da reserva ovariana. Métodos Uma revisão abrangente da literatura foi realizada para identificar os dados mais relevantes sobre o assunto. Resultados No total, 48 estudos abordaram os aspectos necessários da revisão, e descrevemos sua epidemiologia, diagnósticos, opções de tratamento com técnicas detalhadas, e perspectivas sobre fertilidade futura. Conclusões As massas anexiais são extremamente comuns. A aplicação de algoritmos de diagnóstico é obrigatória para excluiramalignidade. A maioria dos casos pode ser manejada conservadoramente. A cirurgia, quando necessária, deve ser realizada com técnicas adequadas. No entanto, mesmo nas mãos de cirurgiões experientes, há diminuição significativa da reserva ovariana, principalmente nos casos de endometriomas. Há uma evidente necessidade de estudos que enfoquemo impacto das massas anexiais benignas na fertilidade em longo prazo.