[Severe bowel complications in SARS-CoV-2 patients receiving protocolized care]. / Complicaciones intestinales graves en pacientes SARS-CoV-2 recibiendo manejo protocolizado.

Introduction and aims: A case series of ten patients that received protocolized care for SARS-CoV-2 infection and developed severe gastrointestinal complications, is presented. The aim of our study was to contribute to the ongoing discussion regarding gastrointestinal complications related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. After reviewing the current literature, ours appears to be the first detailed case series on the topic. Materials and methods: A retrospective filtered search of all patients admitted to our hospital for SARS-CoV-2 infection, who developed severe gastrointestinal complications, was performed. All relevant data on hospital patient management, before and after surgery, were collected from the medical records. Results: Of the 905 patients admitted to our hospital due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, as of August 26, 2020, ten of them developed severe gastrointestinal complications. Seven of those patients were men. There were four cases of perforation of the proximal jejunum, three cases of perforations of the ascending colon, one case of concomitant perforation of the sigmoid colon and terminal ileum, one case of massive intestinal necrosis, and one preoperative death. Three right colectomies, four intestinal resections, one Hartmann's procedure with bowel resection, and one primary repair of the small bowel were performed. The mortality rate of the patients analyzed was 50%. Conclusion: Spontaneous bowel perforations and acute mesenteric ischemia are emerging as severe, life-threatening complications in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients. More evidence is needed to identify risk factors, establish preventive measures, and analyze possible adverse effects of the current treatment protocols.

Severe bowel complications in SARS-CoV-2 patients receiving protocolized care.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: A case series of ten patients that received protocolized care for SARS-CoV-2 infection and developed severe gastrointestinal complications, is presented. The aim of our study was to contribute to the ongoing discussion regarding gastrointestinal complications related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. After reviewing the current literature, ours appears to be the first detailed case series on the topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective filtered search of all patients admitted to our hospital for SARS-CoV-2 infection, who developed severe gastrointestinal complications, was performed. All relevant data on hospital patient management, before and after surgery, were collected from the medical records. RESULTS: Of the 905 patients admitted to our hospital due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, as of August 26, 2020, ten of them developed severe gastrointestinal complications. Seven of those patients were men. There were four cases of perforation of the proximal jejunum, three cases of perforations of the ascending colon, one case of concomitant perforation of the sigmoid colon and terminal ileum, one case of massive intestinal necrosis, and one preoperative death. Three right colectomies, four intestinal resections, one Hartmann's procedure with bowel resection, and one primary repair of the small bowel were performed. The mortality rate of the patients analyzed was 50%. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous bowel perforations and acute mesenteric ischemia are emerging as severe, life-threatening complications in hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 patients. More evidence is needed to identify risk factors, establish preventive measures, and analyze possible adverse effects of the current treatment protocols.

Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum: The answer for treating giant inguinal hernias while avoiding morbidities?

PURPOSE: Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) is mostly used for giant abdominal incisional hernias, and only a few isolated or paired cases that used PPP in the treatment of giant inguinal hernias (GIH) have been reported. The main objective of this study is to describe our technique in the use of PPP in the treatment of GIH in a series of patients who presented with this challenging condition. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of a series of patients treated with PPP for GIH during a 6-year period (2012-2018) at a single institution. The demographics, preoperative, and surgical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 7 patients were treated for GIH with PPP. The median age was 64 (range 30-89) years. The median history time with the inguinal hernia was 8 (range 2-20) years. The median time of PPP was 22 (range 15-30) days. All patients underwent the Lichtenstein technique. The median follow-up time was 12 (range 3-84) months. Three (42.8%) of the patients had preoperative complications. Two patients developed mild dyspnea during PPP, and another patient had subcutaneous emphysema during the insertion of the catheter. Two (28.5%) patients had postoperative complications. One of them developed a right scrotal abscess, and another patient developed bilateral grade III hydrocele. CONCLUSION: With our limited experience, it is too early to tell if this should be the gold standard for the treatment of GIH. To see if there is superiority among different procedures, more studies that compare the morbidity of PPP with that of other trans operative techniques are needed. Nevertheless, the procedure we propose has provided satisfactory results.

Large inguinal bladder hernias: can a preoperative diagnosis be made?

PURPOSE: Bladder hernias are asymptomatic in most cases and are found incidentally during exploration for inguinal hernia repair. The treatment of inguinal bladder hernia is either reduction or resection of the herniated bladder, followed by herniorrhaphy. We present a case series with preoperative diagnoses, along with their surgical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records from a single institution over a 5-year period (2012-2017) of five patients with diagnosis of large bladder inguinal hernia. Demographics, clinical status, medical history, anatomical structure of the hernia, and surgical outcomes were all analyzed. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 51 years (range 45-81 years). The median size of the hernial sac was 13 cm (range 8-20 cm). The diagnosis was made with computed tomography in three patients and with ultrasonography and cystography in two patients. Median length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-6 days), and median length of follow-up was 28 months (range 18-72 months). All patients continue to be alive and well, without hernia recurrence. The five cases are described separately along with their surgical managements. CONCLUSION: The main objectives in treatment of inguinal bladder hernia are to preserve the voiding function and to avoid bladder injuries in a tension-free hernia repair. To our knowledge, this is the first series of cases in which all inguinal bladder hernias were diagnosed preoperatively.