Effect of a Surgical Care Bundle on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery: A Quasi-Experimental Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) have an important impact on morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: This study, therefore, sought to assess the effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of SSI in colorectal surgery. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study with reference to the introduction of a surgical care bundle in 2011. Our study population, made up of patients who underwent colorectal surgery, was divided into the following two periods: 2007-2011 (pre-intervention) and 2012-2017 (post-intervention). The intervention's effect on SSI incidence was analyzed using adjusted odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: A total of 1,727 patients were included in the study. SSI incidence was 13.0% before versus 11.6% after implementation of the care bundle (OR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.17, p = 0.37). Multivariate analysis showed that cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neutropenia, and emergency surgery were independently associated with SSI. In contrast, laparoscopic surgery proved to be a protective factor against SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Care bundles have proven to be very important in reducing SSI incidence since the measures that constitute these protocols are mutually reinforcing. In our study, the implementation of a care bundle reduced SSI incidence from 13% to 11.6%, though the reduction was not statistically significant.

[Adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in an university teaching hospital in Madrid (Spain).] / Adecuación de la higiene prequirúrgica de manos en un hospital universitario de Madrid.

OBJECTIVE: We know the importance of hand hygiene in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. However, its compliance is still a challenge. Moreover, when it is complied with, as in the case of preoperative hygiene, there are few studies on the proper performance of the technique. The aim of this paper is to assess adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in operating room staff of different surgical specialities at a university teaching hospital in Madrid. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was made. Adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene was assessed in operating room staff of the different specialities and professional categories by direct covert observation. It was evaluated in 852 opportunities during the months of October, November and December 2020. A specific form was designed for data collection, following the recommendations of the World Health Organisation (WHO). Adequacy was described with frequency distributions of the different groups observed. Whether Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the different categories. RESULTS: Pre-surgical hand hygiene opportunities were evaluated, 75.5% in surgeons and 24.5% in nurses. Overall compliance with pre-surgical hand hygiene technique was 80.5 % (686). The most frequent surgical service evaluated was General Surgery with 240 observations. The professional category with the best adequacy was nursing (86.1%) and the surgical service one was Traumatology (90.2%). An stopwatch was used by some 25.8% of the evaluated professionals, with an adequate hygiene time of 96,8% (p<0,05) for that group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in the operating room professionals is high. Significant statistically differences in adequacy are found between professional categories and surgical specialities, with better compliance in nursing staff and in Traumatology. Better results are achieved by the use of an stopwatch.

OBJETIVO: Sabemos la importancia que tiene la higiene de manos en la prevención de infecciones asociadas a la asistencia sanitaria. Sin embargo, a día de hoy, su cumplimiento, es un reto. Además, cuando se cumple, como es el caso de en la higiene prequirúrgica, pocos estudios hay sobre la adecuada realización de la técnica. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la adecuación de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica en profesionales de quirófano de un Hospital Universitario de Madrid. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo trasversal. Se evaluó la adecuación de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica mediante observación directa y enmascarada en 852 oportunidades durante los meses de octubre, noviembre y diciembre de 2020. Se consideró adecuada la higiene de manos si ésta se realizaba según la técnica correcta y durante el tiempo indicado. La adecuación de la higiene de manos se describió con la distribución de frecuencias y las diferencias entre categorías se compararon con la prueba x2 de Pearson o prueba exacta de Fisher. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron las oportunidades de higiene de manos prequirúrgica, el 75,5% en cirujanos y el 24,5% en personal de enfermería. La adecuación global de la higiene de manos fue del 80,5%. La categoría profesional con mejor adecuación fue Enfermería (86,1%) (p<0,05) y el servicio quirúrgico con mejor adecuación fue Traumatología (90,2%) (p<0,05). Un 25,8% de los profesionales evaluados utilizó el apoyo del cronómetro, consiguiendo este grupo una adecuación al tiempo de higiene del 96,8% (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La adecuación global de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica en nuestros profesionales es muy alta. Se encuentran diferencias estadísticamente significativas de cumplimiento entre categorías profesionales y especialidades quirúrgicas, siendo mejor la adecuación en el personal de Enfermería y en la especialidad de Traumatología. El apoyo del cronómetro consigue mejores resultados en la adecuación al tiempo de higiene.

Antibiotic prophylaxis adequacy assessment and its influence on surgical site infection in peripheral vascular bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the degree of antibiotic prophylaxis adequacy to our surgical antibiotic prophylaxis protocol among patients who underwent peripheral vascular bypass surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Adequacy to protocol was studied by comparing the different aspects of prophylaxis received by patients to those stipulated in the protocol in force at our hospital. Incidence of surgical wound infection was calculated and the effect of prophylaxis inadequacy on the incidence of surgical wound infection was estimated using the relative risk. RESULTS: The study covered 266 patients. Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after the follow-up period was 5.3% (95% Confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-9.4). Overall adequacy to the protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis was 91.0% (95% CI: 87.6-94.4). The most frequent cause of inadequacy to the protocol was time of initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis (94.1%). No relationship was found between SSI and antibiotic prophylaxis inadequacy (relative risk: 2.4; 95% CI: 0.49-12.5; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Global adequacy to protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis was high. The most frequent cause of inadequacy to the protocol was time of initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis.

OBJETIVO: Buscamos evaluar el grado de adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica a nuestro protocolo de profilaxis antibiótica quirúrgica entre los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de bypass vascular periférico. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes prospectivo. La adecuación al protocolo se estudió comparando los diferentes aspectos de la profilaxis recibida por los pacientes con los estipulados en el protocolo vigente en nuestro hospital. Se calculó la incidencia de infección de herida quirúrgica y se estimó el efecto de la inadecuación de la profilaxis sobre la incidencia de infección de herida quirúrgica mediante el riesgo relativo. RESULTADOS: El estudio abarcó 266 pacientes. La incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico (ISQ) tras el periodo de seguimiento fue del 5,3% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 3,0-9,4). La adecuación global al protocolo de profilaxis antibiótica fue del 91,0% (IC 95%: 87,6-94,4). La causa más frecuente de inadecuación al protocolo fue el momento de inicio de la profilaxis antibiótica (94,1%). No se encontró relación entre ISQ e inadecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica (riesgo relativo: 2,4; IC 95%: 0,49-12,5; p > 0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La adecuación global al protocolo de la profilaxis antibiótica fue alta. La causa más frecuente de inadecuación al protocolo fue el momento de inicio de la profilaxis antibiótica.

Incidence of surgical infection and risk factors in colorectal surgery - A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to measure the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and identify risk factors, in patients undergoing elective surgery of the colon and rectum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed from January 2017 to December 2018. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were studied. The cumulative incidence of SSI was 12.3%. The 56.25% were superficial wound infections and the 31.25%, organ-space infection. The risk factors significantly associated with SSI were the non-administration of pre-operative oral nutrition, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, symptomatic state at the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), and ≥ 2 altered nutritional biochemical parameters at diagnosis. After multivariate , risk factors associated with SSI were: non-administration of preoperative enteral nutrition (odds ratio [OR] = 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-1.0), DM (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 0.9-9.9), the heart disease (OR = 4.6; 95% CI: 1.1-18.6), and laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.08-0.97). The average stay was higher in patients with a diagnosis of SSI (11.9 vs. 9.2 days). CONCLUSIONS: Independent risk factors for SSI in CRC were the non-administration of pre-operative enteral nutrition, the existence of heart disease, and open surgery.

OBJETIVO: Estudiar la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico y evaluar sus factores de riesgo en pacientes intervenidos de cirugía colorrectal electiva. MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivo desde enero de 2017 hasta diciembre de 2018. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 130 pacientes. La incidencia acumulada de infección del sitio quirúrgico fue del 12,3% (n = 16), siendo el 56,25% infecciones de herida y el 31,25% infecciones órgano-espacio. Los factores de riesgo asociados a infección del sitio quirúrgico con significación estadística fueron la no administración de nutrición oral preoperatoria, la diabetes mellitus, la enfermedad cardiaca, la presencia de síntomas en el momento del diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal y tener al menos dos parámetros bioquímicos nutricionales alterados. Tras el análisis multivariante se asociaron la no administración de nutrición enteral preoperatoria (odds ratio [OR] = 0,27; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 0,07-1,0), la diabetes mellitus (OR = 3,0; IC95%: 0,9-9,9), la enfermedad cardiaca (OR = 4,6; IC95%: 1,1-18,6) y la cirugía laparoscópica (OR = 0,28; IC95%: 0,08-0,97). La estancia media fue mayor en los pacientes con diagnóstico de infección del sitio quirúrgico (11,9 frente a 9,2 días). CONCLUSIONES: Los factores de riesgo independientes para el desarrollo de infección del sitio quirúrgico en los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal fueron la no administración de nutrición oral preoperatoria, la enfermedad cardiaca y la cirugía abierta.

Surgical site infection in hip arthroplasty in a 10-year follow-up prospective study: Risk and factors associated.

BACKGROUND: The increased demand for hip arthroplasty means a growing number of postsurgical complications. This study aims to assess the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) in a teaching hospital; develop regional, national and international external comparisons; and evaluate SSI-related risk factors, particularly according to the timing of surgery (urgent/unplanned or elective). METHODS: Prospective cohort study from January 2008 to December 2018. Patients were followed up to 90 days after surgery. Primary endpoint was SSI incidence according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Multivariate analysis was conducted to find independently associated SSI risk factors. The association between risk factors and SSI incidence was assessed by reference to odds ratio (OR). Analyses were also performed among urgent/unplanned and elective patients to identify whether SSI risk factors differed between groups. RESULTS: The study population (n = 1,808) has an overall SSI rate of 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-3.9). Timing of surgery caused an effect modification, so surgery duration> 75th percentile (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.5-9.8) and inadequate preparation (OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.1-10.0) were independent risk factors in the urgent/unplanned group; National Healthcare Safety Network risk index≥ 2 (OR: 6.3; 95% CI: 0.1-19.2) and transfusion (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.1-11.9) in the elective group. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital infection surveillance systems allow identifying risk factors susceptible to change. Characterization of factors that caused an effect modification is key to identify areas of quality improvement, including reducing operating times, preventing perioperative blood transfusion, or improving patient preparation before surgery.

Adequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis protocol in appendectomies in children.

OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery for acute appendicitis in children and its effect on surgical site infection. METHODS: We carried out a prospective cohort study to evaluate compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis in appendectomies in children. An assessment of the level of compliance with prophylaxis was made, as well as the causes of non-compliance. The effect of non-compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of surgical site infection was studied with the adjusted relative risk (RR) with a backstep logistic regression model. RESULTS: The study included a total of 412 patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated in 348 patients, and administered in 95.7% of cases, with an overall protocol compliance of 90.7%. The principal cause of non-compliance was time of initiation. Cumulative incidence of surgical site infection was 2.7%. No relationship was found between inadequate prophylaxis compliance and infection (RR: 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.11; p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Compliance of antibiotic prophylaxis was high, but could be improved. No relationship was found between prophylaxis compliance and surgical site infection rate.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica en la cirugía de apendicitis aguda en niños y su efecto en la infección del sitio quirúrgico. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohortes prospectivo para evaluar la adecuación al protocolo de la profilaxis antibiótica en apendicectomías en población infantil. Se evaluaron la administración de la profilaxis y las causas de la inadecuación. Se estudió el efecto de la inadecuación en la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico con el riesgo relativo (RR) ajustado con un modelo de regresión logística por pasos hacia atrás. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 412 pacientes. La profilaxis antibiótica estaba indicada en 348 pacientes y se administró en el 95.7% de los casos, con una adecuación global al protocolo del 90.7%. La causa principal del incumplimiento fue la hora de inicio. La incidencia acumulada de infección del sitio quirúrgico fue del 2.7%. No se encontró relación entre la adecuación de la profilaxis y la infección del sitio quirúrgico (RR: 1.01; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 0.95-1.11; p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONES: La adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica fue alta, pero puede mejorarse. No se encontró relación entre la adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica y la incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico.

Effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: a quasi-experimental intervention

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) have an important impact on morbidity and mortality. Objective: This study, therefore, sought to assess the effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of SSI in colorectal surgery. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study with reference to the introduction of a surgical care bundle in 2011. Our study population, made up of patients who underwent colorectal surgery, was divided into the following two periods: 2007-2011 (pre-intervention) and 2012-2017 (post-intervention). The intervention's effect on SSI incidence was analyzed using adjusted odds ratios (OR). Results: A total of 1,727 patients were included in the study. SSI incidence was 13.0% before versus 11.6% after implementation of the care bundle (OR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.17, p = 0.37). Multivariate analysis showed that cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neutropenia, and emergency surgery were independently associated with SSI. In contrast, laparoscopic surgery proved to be a protective factor against SSI. Conclusions: Care bundles have proven to be very important in reducing SSI incidence since the measures that constitute these protocols are mutually reinforcing. In our study, the implementation of a care bundle reduced SSI incidence from 13% to 11.6%, though the reduction was not statistically significant.