The Use of Silver Oxynitrate Wound Dressings in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds: A Feasibility Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a silver oxynitrate (Ag 7 NO 11 ) dressing on wound healing in patients with stalled chronic wounds. METHODS: A prospective pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility and effect of using silver oxynitrate dressings within an outpatient setting in Alberta, Canada. A total of 23 patients (12 women and 11 men; mean age, 66.1 ± 13.8 years) with a chronic wound that failed to heal with conventional treatment were included in the study. Wound assessments including the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool, wound-related pain, wound size, and patient quality of life (QoL) were conducted at baseline, after dressing application for 1 and 2 weeks, and during 4- and 12-week follow-ups. RESULTS: Dressing application at 1 and 2 weeks improved patients' wound healing progression as measured through significantly decreased Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool scores with a more than 10% decrease at 4- and 12-week follow-up ( P < .001). Pain ( P = .004), and QoL psyche subscore ( P = .008) significantly improved at 4-week follow-ups, although wound area, perimeter, and QoL body and everyday subscores were not significantly affected. Wound size was not significantly affected. CONCLUSIONS: The silver oxynitrate dressing may improve healing progression in patients with chronic wounds, enhance patient experience by reducing wound-related pain, and improve patients' mental well-being. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the effect of silver oxynitrate dressings on wound area, perimeter, and volume measurements.

A Scoping Review of the Use of Silver-impregnated Dressings for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.

Topical silver agents and dressings are used to control infection and promote healing in chronic wounds, but reviews published from 2006 to 2011 found heterogeneous results regarding their effectiveness. A scoping review was conducted to examine the extent, range, and nature of research activity surrounding chronic wound care that employed silver-impregnated dressings; identify research gaps in the existing literature; and summarize the evidence to provide recommendations for future clinical studies. Ten (10) electronic databases and additional sources were screened from their inception to May 2016; search terms for the different databases included but were not limited to silver, chronic, complications, wound, ulcer, and sore. English-language articles that compared silver dressings with an alternate treatment in adults with chronic wounds and that reported clinical outcome measures were included. Of 222 full-text reviewed studies, 27 were included for qualitative analysis. Qualitative analysis was guided by key findings identified among the included studies that were analyzed in aggregate form where appropriate. In comparative analyses of the 26 studies that investigated wound healing, 15 revealed significantly positive wound healing outcomes with silver treatments versus 9 that did not; the remaining 2 failed to provide statistical values of significance. Of 17 studies that presented data on microbiology, 3 reported significant microbial load improvement for silver dressings, 9 noted nonsignificant findings, and 4 provided no statistical values. Pain, adverse events, and treatment cost were included in 5, 7, and 3 studies, respectively, with heterogeneous findings. The heterogeneous evidence regarding the impact of silver dressings on clinical outcomes may be related to differences in the silver treatments themselves, heterogeneous intervention strategies, study designs, outcomes, and measures. Well-designed clinical studies with multiple outcome parameters are necessary to determine the optimal type and use of silver-dressings in chronic wounds.

An intact microbiota is required for the gastrointestinal toxicity of the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is commonly prescribed after transplantation and has major advantages over other immunosuppressive drugs, but frequent gastrointestinal (GI) side-effects limit its use. The mechanism(s) underlying MMF-related GI toxicity have yet to be elucidated. METHODS: To investigate MMF-related GI toxicity, experimental mice were fed chow containing MMF (0.563%) and multiple indices of toxicity, including weight loss and colonic inflammation, were measured. Changes in intestinal microbial composition were detected using 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing, and downstream PICRUSt analysis was used to predict metagenomic pathways involved. Germ-free (GF) mice and mice treated with orally administered broad-spectrum antibiotics (ABX) were utilized to interrogate the importance of the microbiota in MMF-induced GI toxicity. RESULTS: Mice treated with MMF exhibited significant weight loss, related to loss of body fat and muscle, and marked colonic inflammation. MMF exposure was associated with changes in gut microbial composition, as demonstrated by a loss of overall diversity, expansion of Proteobacteria (specifically Escherichia/Shigella), and enrichment of genes involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis, which paralleled increased levels of LPS in the feces and serum. MMF-related GI toxicity was dependent on the intestinal microbiota, as MMF did not induce weight loss or colonic inflammation in GF mice. Furthermore, ABX prevented and reversed MMF-induced weight loss and colonic inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: An intact intestinal microbiota is required to initiate and sustain the GI toxicity of MMF. MMF treatment causes dynamic changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota that may be a targetable driver of the GI side-effects of MMF.