Survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer according to lymph node disease: single pN1 vs multiple pN1 vs single unsuspected pN2.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to describe the characteristics and survival of NSCLC patients treated with surgery and single pN1 disease, multiple pN1, and single unsuspected pN2. METHODS: In 2005-2009, we treated 378 lung cancer patients with surgery with radical intent; 152 cases were pN1 or pN2. We excluded patients with neoadjuvant treatment, incomplete resection, incomplete lymph node dissection, metastasis, cN2 disease, multiple pN2, SCLC, and lack of PET-CT. All patients were staged with TNM 2010. We included 72 patients: 21 single pN1, 26 multiple pN1, and 25 single unsuspected pN2. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The sample included 62 men (86 %) and 10 women (14 %), mean age 64 ± 9 years. The three subgroups did not show statistically significant differences in the main characteristics. Adjuvant treatment was performed in 56 patients (78 %). The 5 year overall survival (OS) for single pN1 was 73 %; for multiple pN1, 34 %; and for single unsuspected pN2, 25 % (P = 0.15). The mean OS for single pN1 was 63 ± 6 months; median OS for multiple pN1 was 45 (range, 42-48) months and for single pN2 was 54 (range, 32-77) months. Multivariate analysis found the following negative prognostic factors of OS: for single pN1, age, female sex, and microscopic intratumoral lymphatic and vascular invasion; for multiple pN1, ≤10 lymph nodes resected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with single pN1 had better OS than patients with multiple pN1. Patients with single unsuspected pN2 had OS similar to that of multiple pN1.

Molecular Nodal Restaging Based on CEACAM5, FGFR2b and PTPN11 Expression Adds No Relevant Clinical Information in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The relapse rate in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is high, even in localized disease, suggesting that the current approach to pathological staging is insufficiently sensitive to detect occult micrometastases present in resected lymph nodes. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prognostic value of the expression of embryonic molecular markers in histologically-negative lymph nodes of completely-resected NSCLC. METHODS: 76 completely-resected NSCLC patients were included: 60 pN0 and 16 pN1. Primary tumors and 347 lymph node were studied. CEACAM5, FGFR2b, and PTPN11 expression levels were evaluated through mRNA analysis using real-time RT-qPCR assay. Statistical analyses included the Kruskal-Wallis test, Kaplan Meier curves, and log-rank tests. RESULTS: CEACAM5 expression levels were scored as high in of 90 lymph nodes (26%). The molecular-positive lymph nodes lead to the restaging of 37 (62%) pN0 patients as molecular N1 or N2 and 5 (31%) pN1 cases were reclassified as molecular-positive N2. Surprisingly, molecular-positive patients associated with a better OS (overall survival, p = 0,04). FGFR2b overexpression was observed in 41 (12%) lymph nodes leading to the restaging of 17 patients (22%). Again a trend was observed toward a better DFS (disease-free survival) in the restaged patients (p = 0,09). Accordingly, high expression levels of CEACAM5 or FGFR2b in the primary were related to better DFS (p = 0,06; p < 0,02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Molecular nodal restaging based on expression levels of CEACAM5 and/or FGFR2b, does not add relevant clinical information to pathological staging of NSCLC likely related to the better prognosis of their overexpression in primary tumors.