Digital dermatitis in Swedish dairy herds assessed by ELISA targeting Treponema phagedenis in bulk tank milk.

BACKGROUND: Digital dermatitis (DD) is a contagious hoof infection affecting cattle worldwide. The disease causes lameness and a reduction in animal welfare, which ultimately leads to major decreases in milk production in dairy cattle. The disease is most likely of polymicrobial origin with Treponema phagedenis and other Treponema spp. playing a key role; however, the etiology is not fully understood. Diagnosis of the disease is based on visual assessment of the feet by trained hoof-trimmers and veterinarians, as a more reliable diagnostic method is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on bulk tank milk samples testing for the presence of T. phagedenis antibodies as a proxy to assess herd prevalence of DD in Swedish dairy cattle herds. RESULTS: Bulk tank milk samples were collected in 2013 from 612 dairy herds spread across Sweden. A nationwide DD apparent prevalence of 11.9% (8.1-14.4% CI95%) was found, with the highest proportion of test-positive herds in the South Swedish regions (31.3%; 19.9-42.4% CI95%). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals an underestimation of DD prevalence based on test results compared to hoof trimming data, highlighting the critical need for a reliable and accurate diagnostic method. Such a method is essential for disease monitoring and the development of effective control strategies. The novelty of ELISA-based diagnostic methods for DD, coupled with the disease's polymicrobial origin, suggests an avenue for improvement. Developing an expanded ELISA, incorporating antigens from various bacterial species implicated in the disease, could enhance diagnostic accuracy. The significance of this study is underscored by the extensive analysis of a substantial sample size (612). Notably, this investigation stands as the largest assessment to date, evaluating the application of ELISA on bulk tank milk for DD diagnosis at the herd level.

Potential risks of treating bacterial infections with a combination of ß-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics: A systematic quantification of antibiotic interactions in E. coli blood stream infection isolates.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Blood Stream Infections (BSIs) with a combination of a ß-lactam and an aminoglycoside antibiotic is widely used in intensive care units (ICUs) around the world. However, no studies have systematically examined how these drugs interact and potentially influence the antimicrobial efficacy of the overall treatment. METHODS: We collected 500 E. coli isolates from the Uppsala University hospital that were isolated from blood of patients with suspicion of infection. Of those we tested the efficacy of combinations of 2 common ß-lactam antibiotics (Ampicillin and Cefotaxime) combined with 2 common aminoglycosides (Gentamicin and Tobramycin) on 254 isolates. The efficacy of all 4 pairwise combinations in inhibiting bacterial growth was then examined on all susceptible strains. That was done by quantifying the Fractional Inhibitory index (FICi), a robust metric for antibiotic combinatorial behaviour, of all possible treatments on every strain. When non additive interactions were identified, results of the original screen were verified with time kill assays. Finally, combination behaviours were analysed for potential cross correlations. FINDINGS: Out of the 4 antibiotic combinations screened none exhibited synergistic effects on any of the 254 strains. On the contrary all 4 exhibited important antagonistic effects on several isolates. Specifically, the combinations of AMP-GEN and CTX-GEN were antagonistic in 1.97% and 1.18% of strains respectively. Similarly, the combinations of AMP-TOB were antagonistic on 0.78% of all strains. PCA analysis revealed that an important factor on the responses to the combination treatments was the choice of a specific aminoglycoside over another. Subsequent cross correlation analysis revealed that the interaction profiles of combinations including the same aminoglycoside are significantly correlated (Spearman's cross correlation test p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: The findings of this study elucidate potential risks of the common combination treatment for blood stream infections. They also demonstrate, previously unquantified metrics on how antibiotics in combination therapies are not interchangeable with others of the same class. Finally, they reiterate the need for case-by-case testing of antibiotic interactions in a clinical setting. FUNDING: This work was funded by grants to DIA from the Swedish Research Council, the Wallenberg foundation and the Swedish Strategic Research Foundation.