Early initiation of three-drug combinations for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii among COVID-19 patients.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who received three-drug combination regimens for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections during a single-centre outbreak. Our objective was to describe the clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics and in vitro synergy of antibiotics against CRAB isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with severe COVID-19 admitted between April and July 2020 with CRAB infections were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical success was defined as resolution of signs/symptoms of infection without need for additional antibiotics. Representative isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and in vitro synergy of two- or three-drug combinations was assessed by checkerboard and time-kill assays, respectively. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with CRAB pneumonia or bacteraemia were included. Treatment regimens included high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, plus polymyxin B (SUL/MEM/PMB; 72%), SUL/PMB plus minocycline (MIN; 17%) or other combinations (12%). Clinical resolution was achieved in 50% of patients and 30-day mortality was 22% (4/18). Seven patients had recurrent infections, during which further antimicrobial resistance to SUL or PMB was not evident. PMB/SUL was the most active two-drug combination by checkerboard. Paired isolates collected before and after treatment with SUL/MEM/PMB did not demonstrate new gene mutations or differences in the activity of two- or three-drug combinations. CONCLUSIONS: Use of three-drug regimens for severe CRAB infections among COVID-19 resulted in high rates of clinical response and low mortality relative to previous studies. The emergence of further antibiotic resistance was not detected phenotypically or through WGS analysis. Additional studies are needed to elucidate preferred antibiotic combinations linked to the molecular characteristics of infecting strains.

Impact of ompk36 genotype and KPC subtype on the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae clinical isolates.

Objectives: The availability of new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam have redefined contemporary treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections. We aimed to characterize and contrast the in vitro activity of these agents against genetically diverse KPC-Kp clinical isolates. Methods: We analysed genomes of 104 non-consecutive KPC-Kp isolates and compared the in vitro antibiotic activity by KPC subtype and ompK36 genotype. MICs were determined in triplicate by CLSI methods. Twenty representative isolates were selected for time-kill analyses against physiological steady-state and trough concentrations, as well as 4× MIC for each agent. Results: Fifty-eight percent and 42% of isolates harboured KPC-2 and KPC-3, respectively. OmpK36 mutations were more common among KPC-2- compared with KPC-3-producing Kp (P < 0.0001); mutations were classified as IS5 insertion, glycine-aspartic acid insertion at position 134 (GD duplication) and other mutations. Compared to isolates with WT ompK36, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam MICs were elevated for isolates with IS5 by 2-, 4- and 16-fold, respectively (P < 0.05 for each). Against isolates with GD duplication, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam MICs were increased, but ceftazidime/avibactam MICs were not. In time-kill studies, ceftazidime/avibactam-mediated killing correlated with ceftazidime/avibactam MICs, and did not vary across ompK36 genotypes. Imipenem/relebactam was not bactericidal against any isolate at trough concentrations. At steady-state imipenem/relebactam concentrations, regrowth occurred more commonly for isolates with IS5 mutations. Log-kills were lower in the presence of meropenem/vaborbactam for isolates with GD duplication compared with IS5 mutations. Conclusions: Our investigation identified key genotypes that attenuate, to varying degrees, the in vitro activity for each of the new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors. Additional studies are needed to translate the importance of these observations into clinical practice.

Mutations in ompK36 differentially impact in vitro synergy of meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with other antibiotics against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objectives: Ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam are preferred agents for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) infections and are often used in combination with other agents. We aimed to characterize the synergy of combinations against KPC-Kp with varying ompK36 genotypes. Methods: KPC-Kp that harboured ompK36 WT, IS5 or glycine-aspartic acid duplication (GD) genotypes were selected. MICs were determined in triplicate. Synergy was assessed by time-kill assays for ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in combination with colistin, gentamicin, tigecycline, meropenem or fosfomycin against 1 × 108 cfu/mL KPC-Kp. Results: KPC-Kp harboured ompK36 WT (n = 5), IS5 (n = 5) or GD (n = 5); 11 were KPC-2 and 4 were KPC-3. All were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam. In time-kill analysis, ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam 1 × MIC exhibited mean 24 h log-kills of -2.01 and -0.84, respectively. Ceftazidime/avibactam was synergistic in combination with colistin independent of ompK36 genotype. Ceftazidime/avibactam combinations impacted by porin mutations (compared to WT) were meropenem (-5.18 versus -6.62 mean log-kill, P < 0.001) and fosfomycin (-3.98 versus -6.58, P = 0.058). Mean log-kills with meropenem/vaborbactam were greatest in combination with gentamicin (-5.36). In the presence of porin mutations, meropenem/vaborbactam killing activity was potentiated by the addition of colistin (-6.65 versus -0.70, P = 0.03) and fosfomycin (-3.12 versus 1.54, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Our results shed new light on the synergy of ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam combinations against KPC-Kp with or without porin mutations. Killing activity of ceftazidime/avibactam with other cell wall active agents was decreased against isolates with porin mutations. On the other hand, some meropenem/vaborbactam combinations demonstrated enhanced killing in the presence of porin mutations.