RESUMO
Epilepsy is the third most frequent neurological disorder in aged patients after stroke and dementia. The incidence of epilepsy increases with age with the highest rates in patients ≥â¯65 years old. Due to demographic changes the number of aged patients with epilepsy is expected to increase further in the coming years. The leading cause of new onset epilepsy in aged patients is cerebrovascular disease followed by dementia. The recognition of seizures in aged patients is often delayed. Status epilepticus occurs more frequently in aged patients and is associated with a high mortality and morbidity. Antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment of aged patients is complicated by comorbidities and polypharmacy and AEDs with a low interaction profile and high tolerability should be selected. Levetiracetam and lamotrigine are the AEDs of choice due to low interactions and good tolerability.
Assuntos
Carbamazepina , Epilepsia , Idoso , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Carbamazepina/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lamotrigina/uso terapêutico , Levetiracetam/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Several emergencies were admitted less frequently to the hospital during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To investigate whether this also occurred with status epilepticus (SE) we compared admissions due to first SE from March to April 2020 ("Time of COVID," TOC) with January to February 2020 ("pre-COVID," preCOV). We also compared admission numbers in TOC and preCOV with the respective 2-month periods in 2018 and 2019 in a retrospective cohort analysis. Two investigators independently searched the hospital patient database for various forms of SE. There was no significant change in the 2-month incidences of first SE in the city of Salzburg from preCOV of 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-12.3) to TOC of 6.9/100 000 adults (95% CI 3.4-13.3). Admission numbers did not differ significantly from previous years. Estimated adjusted incidence was in line with a recent 5-year epidemiological study in Salzburg. However, a trend toward less-frequent nonconvulsive SE (NCSE) and loss of female predominance were indirect hints of underdiagnosing SE. In contrast to other medical conditions, SE most often presents clinically with impaired consciousness, which may promote admission to emergency departments even in times of lock-down. Further research of medical support of women and patients with NCSE during pandemic-related restrictions is warranted.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Estado Epiléptico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Áustria , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) proposed a new definition of status epilepticus (SE): 5 minutes of ongoing seizure activity to diagnose convulsive SE (CSE, ie, bilateral tonic-clonic SE) and 10 minutes for focal SE and absence SE, rather than the earlier criterion of 30 minutes. Based on semiology, several types of SE with prominent motor phenomena at any time (including CSE) were distinguished from those without (ie, nonconvulsive SE, NCSE). We present the first population-based incidence study applying the new 2015 ILAE definition and classification of SE and report the impact of the evolution of semiology and level of consciousness (LOC) on outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based incidence study of all adult patients with SE residing in the city of Salzburg between January 2011 and December 2015. Patients with hypoxic encephalopathy were excluded. SE was defined and classified according to the ILAE 2015. RESULTS: We identified 221 patients with a median age of 69 years (range 20-99 years). The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of a first episode of SE, NCSE, and SE with prominent motor phenomena (including CSE) was 36.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.2-48.5), 12.1 (95% CI 6.8-20.0), and 24.0 (95% CI 16.0-34.5; including CSE 15.8 [95% CI 9.4-24.8]) per 100 000 adults per year, respectively. None of the patients whose SE ended with or consisted of only bilateral tonic-clonic activity died. In all other clinical presentations, case fatality was lower in awake patients (8.2%) compared with patients with impaired consciousness (33%). SIGNIFICANCE: This first population-based study using the ILAE 2015 definition and classification of SE found an increase of incidence of 10% compared to previous definitions. We also provide epidemiologic evidence that different patterns of status evolution and LOCs have strong prognostic implications.
Assuntos
Vigilância da População , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Áustria/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Epiléptico/classificação , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Novel treatments are needed to control treatment-resistant status epilepticus (SE). We report a summary of clinical cases where perampanel was used in established SE, refractory SE (RSE), or super-refractory SE (SRSE). METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for perampanel administration in SE at five European hospitals between 2011 and 2015. RESULTS: Of 1319 patients identified as experiencing SE, 52 (3.9%) received perampanel. Median latency from SE onset to perampanel initiation was 10 days. Patients with SE had previously failed benzodiazepines (when received) and a median of five other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Median initial perampanel dose was 6 mg/d, up-titrated to a median maximum dose of 10 mg/d. Perampanel was the last drug added in 32/52 (61.5%) patients, with response attributed to perampanel in 19/52 (36.5%) patients. A greater proportion of perampanel non-responders had SRSE (51.5%; 17/33) vs perampanel responders (31.6%; 6/19), and had failed a higher mean number of AEDs before initiating perampanel (5.9 vs 5.1, respectively). Most commonly reported adverse effects during perampanel treatment were dizziness (n = 1 [1.9%]) and somnolence (n = 1 [1.9%]). No serious adverse effects were documented, and none led to discontinuation of perampanel. CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel was administered to patients with established SE, RSE, or SRSE at greater initial doses than those administered in clinical practice to patients with epilepsy. The SE cases reported here represent a refractory and heterogeneous population, and rate of seizure cessation attributed to perampanel treatment (36.5%) represents a notable response. These data should be confirmed in a larger patient population.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Áustria , Feminino , Finlândia , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões/prevenção & controle , Espanha , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
In refractory status epilepticus (SE), γ-aminobutyric acidergic drugs become less effective and glutamate plays a major role in seizure perpetuation. Data on the efficacy of perampanel (PER) in treatment of refractory SE in humans are limited. Here, we present a single-center case series of patients with refractory SE who received PER orally in an intensive care unit. We retrospectively analyzed treatment response, outcome, and adverse effects of all patients with refractory SE in our Neurological Intensive Care Unit who received add-on PER between September 2012 and February 2018. Thirty patients with refractory SE (median = 72 years, range = 18-91, 77% women) were included. In 14 patients (47%), a high-dose approach was used, with a median initial dose of 24 mg (range = 16-32). In five patients (17%), SE could be terminated after PER administration (median dose = 6 mg, range = 6-20 mg, 2/5 patients in high-dose group). Clinical response was observed after a median of 24 hours (range = 8-48 hours), whereas electroencephalogram resolved after a median of 60 hours (range = 12-72 hours). Time to treatment response tended to be shorter in patients receiving high-dose PER (median clinical response = 16 hours vs 18 hours; electroencephalographic response = 24 hours vs 72 hours), but groups were too small for statistical analysis. Continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring showed no changes in cardiorespiratory function after "standard" and "high-dose" treatment. Elevated liver enzymes without clinical symptoms were observed after a median of 6 days in seven of 30 patients (23%; 57% high dose vs 43% standard dose), of whom six also received treatment with phenytoin (PHT). Outcome was unfavorable (death, persistent vegetative state) in 13 patients (43%; 39% high dose vs 61% standard dose), and good recovery (no significant disability, moderate disability) was achieved in nine patients (56% high dose vs 44% standard dose). Oral PER in loading doses up to 32 mg were well tolerated but could terminate SE only in a few patients (5/30; 17%). Long duration of SE, route of administration, and severe underlying brain dysfunction might be responsible for the modest result. An intravenous formulation is highly desired to explore the full clinical utility in the treatment of refractory SE.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Áustria , Eletroencefalografia , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Brivaracetam (BRV) is a high-affinity synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A ligand that is structurally related to levetiracetam (LEV). Compared to LEV, its affinity to the ligand is >10%-30% higher. Due to its more lipophilic characteristics, it might have a quicker penetration across the blood-brain barrier and potentially also a stronger anticonvulsant effect. Thus, we aimed to explore its usefulness in the treatment of status epilepticus (SE). We retrospectively assessed treatment response and adverse events in adjunctive treatment with intravenous BRV in patients with SE from January 2016 to July 2017 at our institution. Seven patients aged median 68 years (range = 29-79) were treated with intravenous BRV. Three patients had SE with coma and four without. SE arose de novo in two patients; etiology was remote symptomatic in four patients and progressive symptomatic in one patient. The most frequent etiology was remote vascular in two patients. BRV was administered after median four antiepileptic drugs (range = 2-11). Time of treatment initiation ranged from 0.5 hours to 105 days (median = 10.5 hours). Immediate clinical and electrophysiological improvement was observed in two patients (29%). Median loading dose was 100 mg intravenously over 15 minutes (range = 50-200 mg), titrated up to a median dose of 100 mg/d (range = 100-300). Median Glasgow Outcome Scale score was 3 (range = 3-5), with an improvement in 86% of patients compared to admission. We observed no adverse events regarding cardiorespiratory function. BRV might have potential as a novel antiepileptic drug in early stages of SE. Its potential may lie its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier more quickly than LEV and its favorable safety profile. Prospective studies for the use of BRV in SE are required.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/administração & dosagem , Pirrolidinonas/administração & dosagem , Estado Epiléptico/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Idoso , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The European Union-funded E-PILEPSY network (now continuing within the European Reference Network for rare and complex epilepsies [EpiCARE]) aims to harmonize and optimize presurgical diagnostic procedures by creating and implementing evidence-based guidelines across Europe. The present study evaluates the current evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring (LTM) in identifying the epileptogenic zone in epilepsy surgery candidates. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant articles. First, we used random-effects meta-analytical models to calculate pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity with respect to postsurgical seizure freedom. In a second phase, we analyzed individual patient data in an exploratory fashion, assessing diagnostic accuracy within lesional and nonlesional temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE) patients. We also evaluated seizure freedom rate in the presence of "localizing" or "nonlocalizing" LTM within each group. The quality of evidence was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool and the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Ninety-four studies were eligible. Forty-four were included in sensitivity meta-analysis and 34 in specificity meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.60-0.80) and specificity was 0.40 (95% CI = 0.27-0.54). Subgroup analysis was based on individual data of 534 patients (41% men). In lesional TLE patients, sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI = 0.81-0.89) and specificity was -0.19 (95% CI = 0.13-0.28). In lesional ETLE patients, a sensitivity of 0.47 (95% CI = 0.36-0.58) and specificity of 0.35 (95% CI = 0.21-0.53) were observed. In lesional TLE, if LTM was localizing and concordant with resection site, the seizure freedom rate was 247 of 333 (74%), whereas in lesional ETLE it was 34 of 56 (61%). The quality of evidence was assigned as "very low." SIGNIFICANCE: Long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring is associated with moderate sensitivity and low specificity in identification of the epileptogenic zone. Sensitivity is remarkably higher in lesional TLE compared to lesional ETLE. Substantial heterogeneity across the studies indicates the need for improved design and quality of reporting.
Assuntos
Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Epilepsia/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Humanos , Monitorização Fisiológica , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To pool observational data on the routine use of perampanel to obtain information on real-world outcomes and data in populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials. METHODS: Individual-level data of people with epilepsy treated with perampanel at 45 European centers were merged into a single dataset. Prespecified outcomes were: 1-year retention rate, 1-year seizure freedom rate (duration ≥6 months), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). In addition, relationships were explored with logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 2396 people: 95% had focal seizures; median epilepsy duration was 27 years; median number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was 2; and median prior AEDs was 6. One-year retention rate was 48% (1117/2332; 95% confidence interval [CI] 46-50%), and 1-year seizure-free rate (≥6-month duration) was 9.2% (74/803; 95% CI 7-11%). Median treatment duration was 11.3 months (1832 patient-years); median dose was 8 mg. In 388 individuals with available data at 3, 6, and 12 months, responder rates were 42%, 46%, and 39%, respectively. During the first year, TEAEs were reported in 68% of participants (1317/1497; 95% CI 66-70%). Logistic regression found higher age at perampanel initiation was associated with higher seizure-free rate, and higher number of prior AEDs with lower seizure-free rate and lower rates of somatic TEAEs. In 135 individuals aged ≥65 years, 1-year retention rate was 48% and seizure-free rate was 28%. SIGNIFICANCE: Across a large, treatment-resistant population, add-on perampanel was retained for ≥1 year by 48% of individuals, and 9% were seizure-free for ≥6 months. TEAEs were in line with previous reports in routine clinical use, and less frequent than in the clinical trial setting. No new or unexpected TEAEs were seen. Despite the limitations of observational studies, our data indicate that some individuals may derive a marked benefit from the use of perampanel.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Perampanel (PER) is a noncompetitive ß-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in animal models of status epilepticus (SE). We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the efficacy and tolerability of PER in the treatment of refractory and super-refractory SE. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL (accessed from inception to April 30, 2018) to identify studies evaluating oral PER as treatment of SE of any type. We also searched the OpenGrey repository and conference proceedings of international congresses by the International League Against Epilepsy and by the American Epilepsy Society from 2012 onwards. RESULTS: Ten articles were included, with a total of 69 episodes of SE occurring in 68 patients (aged 18 to 91â¯years). The type and etiology of SE varied remarkably across studies. The number of drugs used prior to PER ranged from 1 to 9. The time from SE onset to PER administration ranged from 9.25â¯h to 35â¯days. The initial PER dose ranged from 2 to 32â¯mg. The proportion of patients achieving clinical SE cessation varied from 17% to 100%. The time from PER administration to SE cessation ranged from 1â¯h to 4â¯weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The currently available evidence supporting the use of PER in SE is weak and hampered by several confounding factors. Further studies should be performed in more clinically homogeneous and larger cohorts to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PER administered in earlier stages of SE, at higher dosages, and at intervals shorter than 24â¯h.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Receptores de AMPA/antagonistas & inibidores , Estado Epiléptico/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Humanos , Nitrilas , Receptores de AMPA/fisiologia , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Wolf Dietrich of Raitenau (WD) ruled the archiepiscopal Salzburg from March 2nd 1587 to December 17th 1611. He was condemned by his successor Archbishop Markus Sittikus of Hohenems to spend his last years imprisoned at the Fortress Hohensalzburg, where he died on January 16th 1617. This historical note describes the causes of his death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The original Latin handwriting, including the detailed medical history and the autopsy of the Archbishop's body performed by his personal physician, was analyzed in conjunction with historical handwritings provided by St. Peter's Abbey, Salzburg handwriting assigned to Markus Sittikus. RESULTS: Wolf Dietrich of Raitenau had his first well-documented left hemispheric stroke in winter 1604/05. He had palsy of his right arm, was unable to write, and, therefore, used a stamp instead of his signature until October 1605. After another stroke, right hemispheric in origin with persisting palsy of his left arm ["leva corporis pars iam pridem simili ex apoplectico assultu in paralysin resoluta"], he developed symptomatic epilepsy with recurring seizures ["epileptico insultu quo etiam alias correptus est"]. On January 15th 1617, he suffered from a secondarily generalized convulsive status epilepticus ["toto corpore convellitur epileptico insultu"] with stertorous breathing and distortion of his face ["spuma stertore insigni faciei perversione"] and was unconscious for 8h. He recovered from coma and showed dysphagia, buccofacial apraxia ["abolitam diglutiendi facultatem"], reversible speech disturbance ["accisa etiam verba loqui"], and left-sided hemiplegia ["leva corporis pars immobilis prorsus est reddita"]. The following day, he had speech disturbances, and he died at noon. His autopsy showed large but intact liver ["hepar magnum sanum"] and heart ["cor magnum in quo lapsus nullus"]. There was intrapulmonal mucus ["pituita imbutus"], and part of the lungs adhered to its pleura. He had five kidney stones and a partly cirrhotic spleen. The cause of his death was assumed to be intracerebral ["causa mortis in capite requienda fuisset"]. DISCUSSION: The terminal suffering of Wolf Dietrich of Raitenau is the first witnessed case report on a fatal status epilepticus in Salzburg. Most likely, he suffered from vascular epilepsy due to a right hemispheric stroke, leading to status epilepticus with left-sided Todd's palsy and speech disturbances. An acute symptomatic etiology of this disease cannot be ruled out, as for religious reasons, the Archbishop's brain was not autopsied. CONCLUSION: Meticulous medical reporting including autopsy was already available in Salzburg in 1617, and the symptomatic etiology of epilepsy was diagnosed correctly. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".
Assuntos
Estado Epiléptico/história , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/história , Áustria , Pessoas Famosas , História do Século XVII , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Epiléptico/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicaçõesRESUMO
Introduction: Epilepsy surgery is the only curative treatment for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is the gold standard to delineate the seizure-onset zone (SOZ). However, up to 40% of patients are subsequently not operated as no focal non-eloquent SOZ can be identified. The 5-SENSE Score is a 5-point score to predict whether a focal SOZ is likely to be identified by SEEG. This study aims to validate the 5-SENSE Score, improve score performance by incorporating auxiliary diagnostic methods and evaluate its concordance with expert decisions. Methods and analysis: Non-interventional, observational, multicentre, prospective study including 200 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy aged ≥15 years undergoing SEEG for identification of a focal SOZ and 200 controls at 22 epilepsy surgery centres worldwide. The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic accuracy and generalisability of the 5-SENSE in predicting focality in SEEG in a prospective cohort. Secondary objectives are to optimise score performance by incorporating auxiliary diagnostic methods and to analyse concordance of the 5-SENSE Score with the expert decisions made in the multidisciplinary team discussion. Ethics and dissemination: Prospective multicentre validation of the 5-SENSE score may lead to its implementation into clinical practice to assist clinicians in the difficult decision of whether to proceed with implantation. This study will be conducted in accordance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2014). We plan to publish the study results in a peer-reviewed full-length original article and present its findings at scientific conferences. Trial registration number: NCT06138808.
RESUMO
Objectives: New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite extensive work-up, the underlying etiology remains unknown in 50% of affected individuals. Mitochondrial disorders represent rare causes of NORSE. Biallelic variants in FASTKD2 were reported as a cause of infantile encephalomyopathy with refractory epilepsy. Case description: In the study, we report a previously healthy 14-year-old with a new, homozygous FASTKD2 variant presenting with NORSE. Following a seizure-free period of 7 years, he experienced another super-refractory SE and subsequently developed drug-resistant focal epilepsy, mild myopathy, optic atrophy, and discrete psychomotor slowing. Structural MRI at the time of NORSE showed right temporo-parieto-occipital FLAIR hyperintensity and diffusion restriction, with extensive right hemispheric atrophy at the age of 22 years. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a novel homozygous loss of function variant [c.(1072C>T);(1072C>T)] [p.(Arg358Ter);(Arg358Ter)] in FASTKD2 (NM_001136193), resulting in a premature termination codon in the protein-coding region and loss of function of FASTKD2. Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in muscle and skin fibroblasts was unremarkable. Conclusion: This is the first case of a normally developed adolescent with a new homozygous loss of function variant in FASTKD2, manifesting with NORSE. The phenotypical spectrum of FASTKD2-related mitochondrial disease is heterogeneous, ranging from recurrent status epilepticus and refractory focal epilepsy in an adolescent with normal cognitive development to severe forms of infantile mitochondrial encephalopathy. Although mitochondrial diseases are rare causes of NORSE, clinical features such as young age at onset and multi-system involvement should trigger genetic testing. Early diagnosis is essential for counseling and treatment considerations.
RESUMO
Importance: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has become the criterion standard in case of inconclusive noninvasive presurgical epilepsy workup. However, up to 40% of patients are subsequently not offered surgery because the seizure-onset zone is less focal than expected or cannot be identified. Objective: To predict focality of the seizure-onset zone in SEEG, the 5-point 5-SENSE score was developed and validated. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a monocentric cohort study for score development followed by multicenter validation with patient selection intervals between February 2002 to October 2018 and May 2002 to December 2019. The minimum follow-up period was 1 year. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing SEEG at the Montreal Neurological Institute were analyzed to identify a focal seizure-onset zone. Selection criteria were 2 or more seizures in electroencephalography and availability of complete neuropsychological and neuroimaging data sets. For validation, patients from 9 epilepsy centers meeting these criteria were included. Analysis took place between May and July 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Based on SEEG, patients were grouped as focal and nonfocal seizure-onset zone. Demographic, clinical, electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and neuropsychology data were analyzed, and a multiple logistic regression model for developing a score to predict SEEG focality was created and validated in an independent sample. Results: A total of 128 patients (57 women [44.5%]; median [range] age, 31 [13-58] years) were analyzed for score development and 207 patients (97 women [46.9%]; median [range] age, 32 [16-70] years) were analyzed for validation. The score comprised the following 5 predictive variables: focal lesion on structural magnetic resonance imaging, absence of bilateral independent spikes in scalp electroencephalography, localizing neuropsychological deficit, strongly localizing semiology, and regional ictal scalp electroencephalography onset. The 5-SENSE score had an optimal mean (SD) probability cutoff for identifying a focal seizure-onset zone of 37.6 (3.5). Area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity were 0.83, 76.3% (95% CI, 66.7-85.8), and 83.3% (95% CI, 72.30-94.1), respectively. Validation showed 76.0% (95% CI, 67.5-84.0) specificity and 52.3% (95% CI, 43.0-61.5) sensitivity. Conclusions and Relevance: High specificity in score development and validation confirms that the 5-SENSE score predicts patients where SEEG is unlikely to identify a focal seizure-onset zone. It is a simple and useful tool for assisting clinicians to reduce unnecessary invasive diagnostic burden on patients and overutilization of limited health care resources.
Assuntos
Eletroencefalografia , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Convulsões/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Estudos de Coortes , Epilepsia/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Convulsões/cirurgiaRESUMO
Objective: Safety in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) has become an increasing concern because adverse events occur in up to 10% of patients undergoing long-term video EEG in EMUs. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a specific safety protocol in an EMU. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the adverse event rates in a group without (group 1, 84-month period, Innsbruck, Austria) and a group with (group 2, 33-month period, Salzburg, Austria) personalized safety measures utilizing a standardized protocol for long-term epilepsy monitoring in high-risk patients. Differences in adverse event rates during and after long-term video EEG between the two groups were calculated and compared. Results: In group 1, 44/507 (9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5-11.5%) patients experienced 53 adverse events: 20/507 (4%, 95% CI 2.6-6.0%) patients had psychiatric events, 15/507 (3%, 95% CI 1.8-4.8%) patients sustained a total of 19 injuries during seizures, and 10/507 (2%, 95% CI 1.1-3.6%) patients had 13 episodes of status epilepticus; one adverse event was treatment-related (valproic acid-induced encephalopathy; 1/507, 0.2%, 95% CI 0.0-1.1%). By using the new safety protocol in group 2, the adverse event rate was only 5% (95% CI 3.4-7.6%; 30 adverse events in 26/491; 45% reduction; p = 0.036), in contrast. These events included 13 psychiatric complications in 13/491 (2%, 95% CI 1.6-4.5%, p = 0.252) patients, 12 seizure-related injuries in 9/491 (2%, 95% CI 1.0-3.4%, p = 0.250) patients, and 5 episodes of status epilepticus in 4/491 (1%, 95% CI 0.3-2.1%, p = 0.120) patients. Significance: Implementation of personalized safety measures in high-risk patients resulted in a clinically relevant reduction of adverse events in the EMU. Safety protocols are a valid tool to reduce the occurrence of adverse events in EMUs.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Status epilepticus (SE) requires rapid identification of its cause and urgent pharmacological treatment. Despite an estimated incidence of up to 61 per 100,000 per year, evidence from high-class clinical trials is only available for the early stages of SE. AREAS COVERED: Following a four-stage approach of SE (early, established, refractory and super-refractory), we present pharmacological treatment options and their clinical utility. EXPERT OPINION: Intravenous lorazepam and intramuscular midazolam appear as most effective treatments for early SE. In children, buccal midazolam has emerged as first-line non-intravenous drug with similar efficacy and safety to other intravenous or rectal benzodiazepines. In established SE intravenous antiepileptic drugs are in use. There are no double-blind, but six randomized open studies with valproate and two with levetiracetam. A meta-analysis found higher rates of seizure cessation with valproate 75.7% (95% CI 63.7-84.8) and phenobarbital 73.6%, (95% CI 58.3-84.8) than with levetiracetam (68.5%, 95% CI 56.2-78.7) or phenytoin (50.2%, 95% CI 34.2-66.1). Based on the favourable tolerability profile of levetiracetam and valproate, the authors prefer these drugs in established SE over phenytoin. Treatment options in refractory SE are intravenous anaesthetics. In super-refractory SE ketamine, magnesium, steroids and other drugs have been used with variable outcomes. At this stage therapeutic decisions are based on doctors' preferences, patient factors such as age and comorbidity, and cause of SE, if identified.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Levetiracetam , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Piracetam/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/fisiopatologia , Falha de Tratamento , Ácido Valproico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyse registry data of seizure outcome and adverse events (AEs) for perampanel as add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy since its approval in 2012 for adjunctive treatment of focal epilepsy in patients ⩾12 years. METHOD: A retrospective 2-year chart review of all patients receiving perampanel was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients received perampanel [median treatment length: 20.1 (range: 3.4-26.8) months]; 71 (58%) remained on treatment at last follow up. Overall, 33 patients (27%) were seizure-free for ⩾3 months at last follow up; of these, eight were seizure free for ⩾3 times the longest interictal interval before perampanel therapy; 18 (15%) had reduced seizure frequency ⩾50%. A total of 58 (47%) had an AE and 34 (28%) withdrew from treatment because of AEs. AEs included dizziness (33%), fatigue (12%), psychiatric symptoms (8%), cognitive deficits (7%), speech problems (5%), nausea (4%) and gait problems (4%). AEs subsided in 17/18 patients (94%) following a 2 mg dose reduction. A total of 43 (35%) took a concomitant enzyme inducer. Patients not taking enzyme inducers were more likely to be seizure free (p = 0.002); there were no other between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel was well tolerated and improved seizure control in 42% of patients (50- 100% reduction), with higher rates in those not receiving a concomitant enzyme inducer. AEs, particularly dizziness, were common but often disappeared with a slight dose reduction. The results are consistent with those from randomized controlled trials.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) - receptor antagonist perampanel (PER) was approved in 2015 for treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (pGTCS). The aim of this narrative review is to summarize available data on pharmacological properties, efficacy and tolerability of PER in pGTCs. AREAS COVERED: Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov, conference proceedings of the ILAE congresses and the most recent conference proceedings of the American Epilepsy Society (2013 to 2015). EXPERT OPINION: A placebo-controlled clinical phase III study including 164 patients (≥ 12 years) with pGTCS in idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) demonstrated efficacy of PER in reducing pGTCS with good tolerability profile, and without aggravating absence seizures or myoclonic seizures. Dizziness, the main adverse event (AE), can be avoided by bedtime administration. Psychiatric AEs ranging from mild depression to aggression and suicidal attempts should be especially monitored in patients with a history of psychiatric disorders. Co-administration of enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) might decrease PER plasma levels and make dose adjustment necessary. A reduced efficacy of progesterone-containing oral contraceptives should be considered when administering PER to young women. There is lack of evidence on PER treatment in pregnancy. Although no teratogenic effects were observed in animal models, PER is not recommended for women of childbearing age without contraception.
Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamento farmacológico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsia Tônico-Clônica/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Nitrilas , Receptores de AMPA/antagonistas & inibidores , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies with a high incidence in the elderly. Major determinants of prognosis are patients' age, duration of SE and underlying etiology. We aimed identifying differences in clinical presentation of SE, etiologies and outcome between patients (pts.) sixty years or older (≥60) and younger than sixty (<60) years (yrs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 120 patients (48 women) with SE admitted to the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Department of Neurology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria between 1/2011 and 01/2013. KEY FINDINGS: Median age was 69 years (range 14-90) (63% ≥60yrs). Generalized tonic clonic SE was the most common SE type, whereas non convulsive SE with and without coma tended to occur more frequently in the elderly (33% ≥60 yrs. vs. 20%<60 yrs, Chi2=3.511, p=0.061). Preexisting history of epilepsy was more common in the younger age group (64% vs 41% p=0.014). An acute symptomatic cause of SE was identified in 25% (31/120), with cerebrovascular diseases being more frequent in the elderly (47% vs. 11%; p<0.01). Duration of SE did not differ between the age groups (p=0.63). Mortality was higher in elderly patients (31% vs. 7%, p=0.028, Chi Square=5.18) and moderate disability in younger patients (42% vs 17%; p=0.005, Chi Square=7.83). After Bonferroni correction only the higher rate of cerebrovascular etiologies in the elderly was statistically significant. SIGNIFICANCE: In the elder population, SE occurs more often in patients without preexisting epilepsy and is most frequently caused by cerebrovascular diseases. NCSE tends to be more frequent in the elderly and diagnosis is complicated by subtle clinical presentation. Even though comorbidities represent treatment limitations, in our sample no differences in choice of AED as well as dosage were observed between the age groups, reflecting a trend toward AEDs with more favorable adverse event profile in all patients. SE in older patients is associated with poorer outcome and higher mortality.
Assuntos
Estado Epiléptico/epidemiologia , Estado Epiléptico/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticonvulsivantes , Comorbidade , Cuidados Críticos , Epilepsia/complicações , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several EEG criteria have been proposed for diagnosis of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), but none have been clinically validated. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the EEG criteria proposed by a panel of experts at the fourth London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus in Salzburg, 2013 (henceforth called the Salzburg criteria). METHODS: We did a retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study using EEG recordings from patients admitted for neurological symptoms or signs to three centres in two countries (Danish Epilepsy Centre, Dianalund, Denmark; Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; and Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria). Participants were included from the Danish centres if they were aged 4 months or older, and from the Austrian centre if aged 18 years or older. Participants were sorted into two groups: consecutive patients under clinical suspicion of having NCSE (the clinical validation group) or consecutive patients with abnormal EEG findings but no clinical suspicion of NCSE (the control group). Two raters blinded to all other patient data retrospectively analysed the EEG recordings and, using the Salzburg criteria, categorised patients as in NCSE or not in NCSE. By comparing with a reference standard inferred from all clinical and para-clinical data, therapeutic response, and the final outcome, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and inter-rater agreement for the Salzburg criteria. The reference standard was inferred by two raters who were blinded to the scorings of the Salzburg criteria. FINDINGS: We retrospectively reviewed EEG data from 220 patients. EEGs in the clinical validation group were recorded in 120 patients between Jan 1, and Feb 28, 2014 (Austria), and Aug 1, 2014, and Jan 31, 2015 (Denmark). EEGs in the control group were recorded in 100 patients between Jan 13 and Jan 22, 2014 (Austria) and Jan 12 and Jan 26, 2015 (Denmark). According to the reference standard, 43 (36%) of the 120 patients in the validation group had NCSE. In the validation cohort sensitivity was 97·7% (95% CI 87·9-99·6) and specificity was 89·6% (80·8-94·6); overall accuracy was 92·5% (88·3-97·5). Positive predictive value was 84·0% (95% CI 74·1-91·5) and negative predictive value was 98·6% (94·4-100). Three people in the control group (n=100) fulfilled the Salzburg criteria and were therefore false positives (specificity 97·0%, 95% CI 91·5-99·0; sensitivity not calculable). Inter-rater agreement was high for both the Salzburg criteria (k=0·87) and for the reference standard (k=0·95). Therapeutic changes occurred significantly more often in the group of patients fulfilling Salzburg criteria (42 [84%] of 50 patients) than in those who did not (11 [16%] of 70; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: The Salzburg criteria for diagnosis of NCSE have high diagnostic accuracy and excellent inter-rater agreement, making them suitable for implementation in clinical practice. FUNDING: None.
Assuntos
Eletroencefalografia/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the safety and efficacy of (S)-ketamine [(S)-KET] in a series of patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus (RSE and SRSE) in a specialized neurological intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with RSE and SRSE treated with (S)-KET in the NICU, Salzburg, Austria, from 2011 to 2015. Data collection included demographic features, clinical presentation, diagnosis, electroencephalogram (EEG) data, anticonvulsant treatment, timing, and duration of treatment with (S)-KET. Outcomes were seizure control and death. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (14 women) with RSE and SRSE were treated with (S)-KET. The median duration of status epilepticus (SE) was 10 days [first quartile (Q1) 5.0, Q3 21.0]; the median latency from SE onset to the first administration of (S)-KET was 3 days (Q1 2.0, Q3 6.8). Prior to (S)-KET administration, patients had received a median of two (Q1 2.0, Q3 3.0) anesthetics and three (Q1 2.0, Q3 4.0) antiepileptic drugs. Forty percent of patients (17/42) received propofol: 65 % prior to (S)-KET; 35 % at the same time with (S)-KET. Seven patients received a median bolus of (S)-KET of 200 mg (Q1 200, Q3 250) followed by a continuous infusion, while 35 started with a continuous infusion (maximum rate median 2.55 mg/kg/h; Q1 2.09, Q3 3.22). In 64 % of patients (27/42), (S)-KET was the last drug before SE cessation; in five patients, it was given with propofol at the same time. Median duration of administration was 4 days (Q1 2.0, Q3 6.8). Overall (S)-KET treatment was well tolerated, adverse effects were not observed, and overall mortality was 45.2 %. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SRSE in adult patients with (S)-KET led to resolution of status in 64 %. No adverse events were found, indicating a favorable safety profile.