Prolonged delays for research training in medical school are associated with poorer subsequent clinical knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Complementary degree programs and research training are important alternative tracks in medical school that typically interrupt the traditional MD curriculum. OBJECTIVE: Examine effects of such a break on clinical knowledge after reentry into the MD curriculum. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and two graduates of Mayo Medical School. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Compared years of delay between the second and third years of medical school with third year clerkship grades, National Board of Medical Examiner's (NBME) Subject Examinations, and United States Medical License Exam (USMLE) Step 2. MAIN RESULTS: 258, 13, and 31 students spent 0, 1, or > or = 3 years pursuing research between the second and third year. Baseline measures of knowledge before matriculation and before the third year were similar between groups. Whereas a 1-year delay had no significant effect, a > or = 3-year delay was associated with fewer clerkship honors and lower NBME Medicine, Pediatrics, and Psychiatry percentiles compared to no delay (all p < .05). Students with a > or = 3-year delay had a 77% reduction in the odds of honors in Medicine. For each year of delay beyond 3, students' third-year NBME Medicine, Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Psychiatry scores decreased as did USMLE Step 2 scores (r = -.38 to -.50, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Delays of > or = 3 years between the second and third years of medical school are associated with lower grades and scores on clinical knowledge tests. Further research is needed to determine the optimal timing of research training and develop effective interventions to facilitate reentry into the medical school curriculum.

Early clinical experiences from students' perspectives: a qualitative study of narratives.

PURPOSE: To gain insight into how early clinical experiences contribute to medical students' professional development. METHOD: Qualitative content analysis of second-year Mayo Medical School students' reflective journal essays pertaining to their first experiences with inpatients (from 2002 to 2004) was done using a grounded theory approach. The apprenticeship model of professional learning (knowledge and cognitive abilities, technical skills, and ethical standards) and perspectives from learning theory provided the conceptual framework. Major themes were identified, and member checking and interrater reliability was assessed to support the validity and reliability of the content analysis. RESULTS: Four major themes related to the purposes that the early clinical experiences with patients served for students were identified in analysis of reflections from 76 students (participation rate 95%). The themes were issues related to relationships and learning in early encounters with hospitalized patients; integration with learning in the entire curriculum; aspects of doctoring learned; and affiliation with the physician role and professional development. Select quotes illustrate these themes and provide thick description. Member checking supported the analysis; interrater reliability was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: Early hospital-based clinical experiences provide opportunities for apprenticeships in the habits of the head, hand, and heart. Medical students' growth and learning occurs within these apprenticeship domains through contextual experiential learning.

Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching.

The purpose of this study was to assess an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching at Mayo. The Mayo Teaching Evaluation Form (MTEF) is an instrument, based on the Stanford seven-category educational framework, which was developed for the peer review of inpatient teaching. The MTEF has 28 Likert-scaled items derived from the Stanford Faculty Development Program form (SFDP-26), the Mayo electronic evaluation form and three additional items. In this study three physician-evaluators used the MTEF to evaluate 10 attending physicians on the Mayo general internal medicine hospital services. Cronbach's alphas were used to assess the internal consistency of the MTEF, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance was used to summarize the inter-rater reliability. Results of this study reveal that the MTEF is internally consistent, based on average ratings across all evaluators (Cronbach's alpha=0.894). Stanford categories with the highest alphas are Self-Directed Learning, Learning Climate, Communication of Goals, and Evaluation. Categories with lower alphas are Feedback, Understanding and Retention, and Control of Teaching Session. Additionally, the majority of items on the MTEF show significant agreement across all evaluators, and teacher enthusiasm was among the most reliable items. In conclusion, the MTEF is overall internally consistent for the peer review of inpatient teaching at Mayo. Hence, the MTEF may be a useful element in the peer evaluation of teaching at our institution.