Single-needle: an effective alternative to dual-needle peripheral access in therapeutic plasma exchange.

Apheresis treatments, which involve the removal of a component of blood, generally require one access and one return line to continuously draw and return blood into the extracorporeal circuit. At our center, we prefer to use peripheral venous access to avoid central line-related complications, especially infection. Motivated by patient-centered care, the single-needle (SN) option for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) offered on the Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO) was evaluated. Five patients underwent procedures using both SN and dual-needle (DN) plasma exchange procedures using the Spectra Optia. TPE procedures ran a median of 51 (range:10-102) minutes longer using the SN-TPE option. Inlet flow rates, plasma removal efficiency, and incidence of citrate reactions were similar between SN- and DN-procedures. Patients reported great satisfaction with SN-TPE.

Therapeutic plasma exchange: Experience in a third level hospital, 2013-2016, Lima (Peru).

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal procedure which consists of removing the patient's plasma and replacing it with an appropriate replacement fluid. Plasma and blood cells are separated by a centrifugation process. Our department has used TPE for several years, and in 2013 we introduced an institutional apheresis protocol. The main objective of this report is to describe the TPE procedures performed between 2013 and 2016 in the Peruvian population. METHODS: We analyzed the technical and clinical aspects of 864 centrifugal TPE procedures as well as the associated complications. We evaluated 230 patients treated in our institution. RESULTS: The therapeutic indications included 16 different diseases: 89.5% (N = 206/230) neurological, 7.3% (N = 17/230) hematological, 1.7% (N = 4/230) rheumatologic, 0.8% (N = 2/230) dermatological and 0.4% (N = 1/230) nephrological. 70.4% (N = 142/230) of patients were diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome. Albumin 5% solution was the most frequent replacement solution, used in 65.8% (N = 569/864) of the procedures. The mean plasma volume (PV) replaced was 2451.73 ml, corresponding to 1.0 PV in all procedures. Complications occurred in 10.9% (N = 95/864) of the sessions. Allergic reactions were the most common events and cardiopulmonary arrests were recorded in two patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of TPE performed in the Peruvian population. The use of an institutional apheresis protocol was beneficial to improve registries in our service and our professional health attention. This study reports a low rate of complications, suggesting that TPE is safe. There is a need to create a multicenter Peruvian apheresis registry to assess the benefits and risks of TPE in Peru.

Improved planning of leukapheresis endpoint with customized prediction algorithm: minimizing collection days, volume of blood processed, procedure time, and citrate toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Increased emphasis on cost and productivity in apheresis centers calls for a proficient and predictable hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collection. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the value of a customized predictive algorithm that estimates how many blood volumes are required to process for a targeted CD34 cell dose. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on 107 HPC collections completed on the Spectra Optia MNC from January 2013 to June 2014 in 51 patients and 12 donors. In December 2014, a prediction algorithm was implemented, designed from data acquired since January 2013, by linear regression of preapheresis CD34 cell counts (pre-CD34) versus collected CD34 cell dose per volume blood processed. RESULTS: CD34 collection efficiencies (CE2) of 51.9 ± 1.7% (mean ± SEM) and 57.5 ± 3.0% were observed in autologous and allogeneic procedures, respectively. After implementation of the algorithm, the mean number of collections per patient declined from 1.97 to 1.5. Accordingly, the frequency of patients requiring single-day collections increased from 35% to 57%. All donors were collected in single procedures, although only 12.2 ± 1.1 L blood was processed, including for National Marrow Donor Program collections. Cumulative procedure time, processed blood volume, product volume, infused anticoagulant volume, and symptomatic calcium administration decreased in patients, and overcollection was limited. CONCLUSION: A prediction algorithm can provide great value in the planning of leukapheresis, which may optimize resource utilization and capacity of the unit. In addition, predictability was facilitated by a proficient and consistent performance of the Spectra Optia MNC.

Successful granulocyte apheresis using medium molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch.

Granulocyte transfusion (GTX) is a therapeutic option for severe bacterial or fungal infection in patients with sustained neutropenia after chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation. However, high molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES), which has been used for selective sedimentation of red blood cells during apheresis, is not easily available in many countries including Japan. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of granulocyte collection using medium molecular weight HES (130 kDa) in combination with the Spectra Optia apheresis system. Apheresis was performed for 2 consecutive days from seven donors and the mean total neutrophil yield from the first and second apheresis was 5.27 ± 3.10 × 1010 and 2.91 ± 2.92 × 1010, respectively. Infusion of concentrates from the first apheresis resulted in a significant neutrophil count increase and concentrates from the second apheresis were enough for maintenance of the neutrophil counts in all the recipients. Although the number of cases is limited, our results clearly show that sufficient number of granulocytes can be harvested by using medium molecular weight HES and this strategy is a safe and effective clinical practice in countries where high molecular weight HES is not available.