Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Respir Med ; 12(8): 642-654, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801827

RESUMO

The optimal timing of intubation in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure is uncertain and became a point of controversy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Invasive mechanical ventilation is a potentially life-saving intervention but carries substantial risks, including injury to the lungs and diaphragm, pneumonia, intensive care unit-acquired muscle weakness, and haemodynamic impairment. In deciding when to intubate, clinicians must balance premature exposure to the risks of ventilation with the potential harms of unassisted breathing, including disease progression and worsening multiorgan failure. Currently, the optimal timing of intubation is unclear. In this Personal View, we examine a range of parameters that could serve as triggers to initiate invasive mechanical ventilation. The utility of a parameter (eg, the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen) to predict the likelihood of a patient undergoing intubation does not necessarily mean that basing the timing of intubation on that parameter will improve therapeutic outcomes. We examine options for clinical investigation to make progress on establishing the optimal timing of intubation.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Intubação Intratraqueal , Respiração Artificial , Insuficiência Respiratória , Humanos , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , COVID-19/complicações , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Respiração Artificial/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Hipóxia/terapia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA