Correspondence in reference to the previously published manuscript: Reduction of cycles of bendamustine plus rituximab therapy in the cases with good response for indolent B-cell lymphomas.

Takezaki et al. analyzed the outcome of 57 patients with indolent lymphomas treated with Bendamustine plus Rituximab (BR) according to the number of cycles received, showing that patients who discontinued BR after four cycles had similar outcomes compared to patients who received five or six cycles. Considering the similarities but also the differences between indolent lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we enriched the results obtained with a cohort of CLL patients treated with BR starting from the experience of the Lazio region group on CLL. Out of 115 patients, 97 (84%) received 4-6 cycles of BR, while 18 (16%) received 1-3 cycles. The outcome of the group of patients who received at least 4 cycles was superior in terms of response rate (ORR 96% vs. ORR 83%, p = 0.041; CR 58% vs. CR 28%, p = 0.052 respectively) and PFS [median PFS 52.6 (40.3-64.9) versus 26.2 (19.3-33.0) months, p < 0.001]. The number of patients undergoing 4 cycles of BR (4-cycles group) and 5-6 cycles (over-4-cycles group) was 9 and 88, respectively. Compared to analysis conducted by the Japanese group in indolent lymphomas, in CLL we did not observe any difference between the outcome of the 4-cycles group and the over-4-cycles group in terms of ORR (89% vs. 97%, p = 0.268) and in survival [median PFS 40.8 (13.7-67.8) versus 52.6 (38.7-66.5) months, p = 0.117]. Moreover, we observed that patients who achieved a clinical CR showed overlapping outcomes with patients who received more than 4 cycles [CR vs. non-CR median PFS not reached vs. 11.0 months; over-4-cycles group median PFS 52.6 months (40.3-64.9); p < 0.001]. Nowadays chemoimmunotherapy with BR is reserved to fit elderly CLL patients, and there are many chemo-free treatment options available; therefore, discontinuation after 4 cycles may be permissible in patients who obtained a CR in order to limit toxicity as much as possible.

Standard- versus high-dose lenograstim in adults with hematologic malignancies for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study was to compare high- versus standard-dose lenograstim after chemotherapy in collecting target dose of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) in adult candidates for autologous transplant. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 166 consecutive patients (28 acute leukemias [ALs], 77 lymphomas, 61 multiple myeloma [MM]) underwent 182 mobilization procedures. Only the first were analyzed. The CD34+ cell target was at least 2×10(6) , 4×10(6) , and 8×10(6) /kg and lenograstim started on days +19, +1, and +5 from the end of chemotherapy for AL, lymphomas, and MM, respectively. Eighty-seven and 79 patients, respectively, received 5 and 10µg/kg/day lenograstim subcutaneously (sc). An analysis to evaluate factors predicting satisfactory procedures and outcome of transplants performed with first-mobilization-procedure PBPCs was conducted. Most patients received 6mg of pegfilgrastim or 5µg/kg/day lenograstim sc after transplant. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, high-dose lenograstim (p=0.053) in MM and male sex (p=0.028) were positive predictive factors for reaching cell target. Fludarabine negatively influenced stimulation length (p=0.002). Apheresis, CD34+ cells mobilized and collected, blood volume processed, side effects, transplants performed, and engraftment time were similar between lenograstim cohorts. Pegfilgrastim versus lenograstim delayed platelet (PLT) recovery times (13 days vs. 11 days, p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose lenograstim more efficiently mobilized MM patients requiring the highest PBPC target but did not influence transplants performed and engraftment time. Male patients mobilized more efficiently. Fludarabine negatively influenced stimulation length. Finally, pegfilgrastim seems to delay PLT recovery.