RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to compare the interocclusal contact records obtained by three different digital methods (intra- and extraoral digital scanners and T-Scan III system) with the conventional method (articulating paper). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five healthy volunteers were selected. As a control group, maximum intercuspation occlusal contacts were registered and photographed from the patients with an 8 µm articulating paper. Then, intraoral conventional elastomer impressions were taken and after obtaining the corresponding plaster models of every patient they were scanned with an extraoral scanner (Zfx Evolution, Zimmer Biomet Dental) (group 1). Moreover, digital impressions were made with an intraoral scanner (Trios Color POD, Phibo, 3Shape) and contacts were also registered (group 2). Finally, T-Scan III records were made and stored for further analysis (group 3). Two previously calibrated examiners independently evaluated the interocclusal contacts from every group. Data was analyzed by using Kappa index test and Pearson's chi-square test. Diagnostic tests and ROC curve were also performed. RESULTS: Kappa interoperator index was 70.6% (better agreement). In Kappa intraoperator index, the best value was obtained in the intraoral scanner group (moderate agreement) and the worst with T-Scan III group (low agreement). ROC curve showed highest values in the intraoral scanner group (0.817) and lowest values in the T-Scan III group (0.613). CONCLUSION: Results suggest greater reliability to record occlusal contacts with the intraoral scanner. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Intraoral scanners seem to be reliable in registering intermaxillary occlusal contacts when compared with the current gold standard.
Assuntos
Técnica de Moldagem Odontológica , Modelos Dentários , Desenho Assistido por Computador , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
This paper summarizes the structure and findings from the first Workshop on Troubles and Failures in Conversations between Humans and Robots. The workshop was organized to bring together a small, interdisciplinary group of researchers working on miscommunication from two complementary perspectives. One group of technology-oriented researchers was made up of roboticists, Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) researchers and dialogue system experts. The second group involved experts from conversation analysis, cognitive science, and linguistics. Uniting both groups of researchers is the belief that communication failures between humans and machines need to be taken seriously and that a systematic analysis of such failures may open fruitful avenues in research beyond current practices to improve such systems, including both speech-centric and multimodal interfaces. This workshop represents a starting point for this endeavour. The aim of the workshop was threefold: Firstly, to establish an interdisciplinary network of researchers that share a common interest in investigating communicative failures with a particular view towards robotic speech interfaces; secondly, to gain a partial overview of the "failure landscape" as experienced by roboticists and HRI researchers; and thirdly, to determine the potential for creating a robotic benchmark scenario for testing future speech interfaces with respect to the identified failures. The present article summarizes both the "failure landscape" surveyed during the workshop as well as the outcomes of the attempt to define a benchmark scenario.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This observational cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate and compare the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and clinical performance between dentate subjects and edentulous patients restored with conventional dentures or implant overdentures. METHODS: 85 edentulous patients were grouped as follows: Group-1 (CD): conventional denture wearers (n = 42), and Group-2 (IO): implant-retained overdenture wearers (n = 43). For the OHRQoL comparisons, a control group of subjects with a healthy natural dentition (Group-3, ND; n = 50) was included. Participants completed three validated questionnaires (OHIP-14sp, OHIP-20sp, and QoLIP-10). Socio-demographic data, prosthesis-related factors, clinical condition of the mouth, and patient subjective evaluations, were gathered. Descriptive and non-parametric probes were run (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The ND group was the most unsatisfied (OHIP-14sp; p ≤ 0.001). The OHIP-20sp attributed significantly worse Psychological disability (p = 0.029) and Handicap (p = 0.027) to CD wearers when compared to IO wearers. The CD group showed the significantly highest need for relining (p = 0.041), and the lowest retention (p = 0.011). The OHIP-14sp disclosed a significantly worse OHRQoL for those volunteers who had a job (p = 0.003), a basic education instead of a secondary one (p = 0.022), and no partner (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The overall OHRQoL was comparable for both prosthodontic groups, being modulated by socio-demographic and prosthesis-related features. Nonetheless, CD wearers presented prosthetic complications more frequently. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While dentate subjects were the most critical about their oral condition and its repercussion in their life, implant overdenture wearers tended to observe a better OHRQoL and clinical performance compared to conventional denture wearers.
Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Qualidade de Vida , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Revestimento de Dentadura , Humanos , Saúde Bucal , Satisfação do PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dementia is a major and growing health problem, and early diagnosis is key to its management. OBJECTIVE: With the ultimate goal of providing a monitoring tool that could be used to support the screening for cognitive decline, this study aims to develop a supervised, digitized version of 2 neuropsychological tests: Trail Making Test and Bells Test. The system consists of a web app that implements a tablet-based version of the tests and consists of an innovative vocal assistant that acts as the virtual supervisor for the execution of the test. A replay functionality is added to allow inspection of the user's performance after test completion. METHODS: To deploy the system in a nonsupervised environment, extensive functional testing of the platform was conducted, together with a validation of the tablet-based tests. Such validation had the two-fold aim of evaluating system usability and acceptance and investigating the concurrent validity of computerized assessment compared with the corresponding paper-and-pencil counterparts. RESULTS: The results obtained from 83 older adults showed high system acceptance, despite the patients' low familiarity with technology. The system software was successfully validated. A concurrent validation of the system reported good ability of the digitized tests to retain the same predictive power of the corresponding paper-based tests. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, the positive results pave the way for the deployment of the system to a nonsupervised environment, thus representing a potential efficacious and ecological solution to support clinicians in the identification of early signs of cognitive decline.
Assuntos
Disfunção Cognitiva , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Software , TecnologiaRESUMO
Se estudiaron las características y la composicíon química de frutos y semillas de algarrobo (Prosopis chilensis) (Mol.) Stunz) cosechados en Ovalle y Polpaico. A los frutos se les determinó longitud, peso y porcentaje de semillas. La separación de los constituyentes preponderantes de las semillas se realizó con hidróxido de sodio 0,5% a 75-C el cual se eliminó mediante lavados con agua. La composición química se determinó en vaina, semilla, mucílago y cotiledón según AOAC, los glucídos, por el método de Munson y Walker, los glucósidos cianogenéticos y los alcaloides en semilla, mucílago y cotiledón. Los frutos de Polpaico presentaron un mayor rendimiento en semilla (32,5%). Las semillas de ambos frutos revelaron un 30% de mucílago y aproximadamente un 40% de cotiledón. El extracto no nitrogenado de las vainas de Ovalle fue mayor de los de Polpaico lo que se reflejó en el valor de los glúcidos totales (32,9%) y en los glúcidos reductores (7,0%). Cabe hacer notar el alto contenido de proteínas en los cotiledones analizados (70,3-72,4%) y el elevado porcentaje de extracto no nitrogenado (sobre el 85%), en los mucílagos. Los glucósidos cianogenéticos fueron negativos en ambas muestras y los alcaloides positivos en semilla y cotiledón. Los resultados demostraron que los cotiledones necesitarían un mayor estudio para poder ser usados en nutrición humana. En cuanto al mucílago que ocupa un alto porcentaje dentro de la semilla podría utilizarse como aditivo en alimentos