RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration is a classic pediatric emergency, and its associated morbidity particularly depends on the anesthetic management, which differs according to the center and the practitioner. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the different anesthetic practices for tracheobronchial foreign body extraction. METHODS: A survey was sent via email to the member physicians of the Association des Anesthésistes Réanimateurs Pédiatriques d'Expression Française (ADARPEF). The survey included 28 questions about the organizational and anesthetic management of an evolving clinical case. RESULTS: A total of 151 physicians responded to the survey. Only 13.2% of the respondents reported that their institution had a management protocol, and 21.7% required a computerized tomography scan before the procedure was performed for children who were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic during the night. There were 56.3% of the respondents who reported that extraction with a rigid bronchoscope is the only procedure usually performed in their institution. Regarding rigid bronchoscopy, 47.0% used combined intravenous-inhalation anesthesia. The objective was to maintain the child on spontaneous ventilation for 63.6% of the respondents, but anesthesia management differed according to the physician's experience. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the diversity of practices concerning anesthetic for tracheobronchial foreign body extraction and found reveal differences in practice according to physician experience.
Assuntos
Anestésicos , Corpos Estranhos , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Brônquios/cirurgia , Traqueia/diagnóstico por imagem , Traqueia/cirurgia , Broncoscopia/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos/cirurgia , França , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
AIM: To determine the impact of a systematic endotracheal aspiration (ETA) sampling program for mechanically ventilated patients on initial antibiotic therapy for ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; before-after study design. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with 16 medical and surgical beds in a tertiary teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients <16 years of age hospitalized in the PICU who fulfilled VAP criteria. INTERVENTION: Biweekly systematic ETA sampling was conducted in mechanically ventilated patients. MEASUREMENTS: We retrospectively studied patients who received antibiotic therapy for suspected VAP 12 months before and after the initiation of systematic ETA (periods 1 and 2, respectively), evaluating the initial antibiotic therapy spectrum in both periods. RESULTS: During period 1, 56 patients developed VAP and 47 developed VAP during period 2. The incidence was 17 cases of VAP/1000 days of mechanical ventilation in both periods. Ideal antibiotic therapy was prescribed in 19.6% of cases for period 1 and 55.2% for period 2 (P = 0.001). Initial antibiotic therapy for VAP during period 2 had a significantly lower proportion of broad-spectrum antibiotics than therapy during period 1 (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In our PICU, knowledge of bronchial colonization reduced initial broad-spectrum antibiotic use for VAP.
Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Intensive care unit-acquired infection (ICU-AI) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) carriage are a major concern worldwide. Our objective was to investigate the impact of ESBL-PE carriage on ICU-AI. Our study was prospective, observational, and noninterventional. It was conducted over a 5-year period (Jan 2013-Dec 2017) in the medical-surgical intensive care unit of the Cayenne General Hospital (French Amazonia). During the study period, 1,340 patients were included, 271 (20.2%) developed ICU-AI, and 16.2% of these were caused by ESBL-PE. The main sites of ICU-AI were ventilator-associated pneumonia (35.8%) and primary bloodstream infection (29.8%). The main responsible microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-P in 35.8% of isolates), and Enterobacter cloacae (ESBL-P in 29.8% of isolates). Prior ESBL-PE carriage was diagnosed in 27.6% of patients with ICU-AI. In multivariable analysis, the sole factor associated with ESBL-PE as the responsible organism of ICU-AI was ESBL-PE carriage before ICU-AI (P < 0.001; odds ratio: 7.9 95% CI: 3.4-18.9). ESBL-PE carriers (74 patients) developed ICU-AI which was caused by ESBL-PE in 32 cases (43.2%). This proportion of patients carrying ESBL-PE who developed ICU-AI to the same microorganism was 51.2% in ESBL-P K. pneumoniae, 5.6% in ESBL-P Escherichia coli, and 40% in ESBL-P Enterobacter spp. NPV of ESBL-PE carriage to predict ICU-AI caused by ESBL-PE was above 94% and PPV was above 43%. Carriage of ESBL-P K pneumoniae and Enterobacter spp. is a strong predictor of ICU-AI caused by these two microorganisms.
Assuntos
Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , beta-Lactamases , Adulto , Enterobacter cloacae/enzimologia , Enterobacteriaceae/classificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/classificação , Feminino , Guiana Francesa/epidemiologia , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimologia , Staphylococcus aureus/enzimologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Atelectasis frequently occurs early on during anaesthesia in children. We hypothesised that positive expiratory pressure (PEP) generated via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) could prevent atelectasis in non-intubated children under general anaesthesia. The objective was to compare the volume of atelectasis present in patients treated via HFNC to that of patients treated via a face bag-mask without PEP. The outcome used for this comparison was the ratio of the atelectasis volume to the total pulmonary volume. METHODS: A prospective single-centre, single-blind, randomised trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital from November 2018 through May 2019. The trial subjects were infants and children between six months and six years of age who required anaesthesia for an MRI. The children were randomised to receive sevoflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia either via a classic face bag-mask or by HFNC. The atelectasis volume was measured from thoracic MRI images. The judgement criterion was the ratio of the atelectasis volume to the lung volume. RESULTS: Of a trial group of 42 patients, 21 received anaesthesia via a face bag-mask and 21 via HFNC. After three patients were excluded for technical issues, the data for 39 patients were analysed. The atelectasis volume to the lung volume ratio in the HFNC group was significantly smaller than the ratio for the face bag-mask group (1.6% vs 6.8%, respectively; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: HFNC was associated with a lower atelectasis lung ratio compared to using a face bag-mask during anaesthesia for children maintained with spontaneous ventilation. Registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03592589.