G-protein-coupled receptor oligomers: two or more for what? Lessons from mGlu and GABAB receptors.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in the precise tuning of intercellullar communication. In the brain, both major neurotransmitters, glutamate and GABA, act on specific GPCRs [the metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) and GABA(B) receptors] to modulate synaptic transmission. These receptors are encoded by the largest gene family, and have been found to associate into both homo- and hetero-oligomers, which increases the complexity of this cell communication system. Here we show that dimerization is required for mGlu and GABA(B) receptors to function, since the activation process requires a relative movement between the subunits to occur. We will also show that, in contrast to the mGlu receptors, which form strict dimers, the GABA(B) receptors assemble into larger complexes, both in transfected cells and in the brain, resulting in a decreased G-protein coupling efficacy. We propose that GABA(B) receptor oligomerization offers a way to increase the possibility of modulating receptor signalling and activity, allowing the same receptor protein to have specific properties in neurons at different locations.

Allosteric functioning of dimeric class C G-protein-coupled receptors.

Whereas most membrane receptors are oligomeric entities, G-protein-coupled receptors have long been thought to function as monomers. Within the last 15 years, accumulating data have indicated that G-protein-coupled receptors can form dimers or even higher ordered oligomers, but the general functional significance of this phenomena is not yet clear. Among the large G-protein-coupled receptor family, class C receptors represent a well-recognized example of constitutive dimers, both subunits being linked, in most cases, by a disulfide bridge. In this review article, we show that class C G-protein-coupled receptors are multidomain proteins and highlight the importance of their dimerization for activation. We illustrate several consequences of this in terms of specific functional properties and drug development.

Mutational scanning of a hairpin loop in the tryptophan synthase beta-subunit implicated in allostery and substrate channeling.

The tryptophan synthases from Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium are tetrameric enzymes, with an elongated TrpA.TrpB.TrpB.TrpA structure. Structural studies have identified residues 277-283 of TrpB as a potentially important region for the allosteric communication between the TrpA and TrpB subunits and for the transport of indole between their active sites through a hydrophobic tunnel. To explore the functional role of this region, we analyzed the effects of 19 single and double mutations in TrpB on the tryptophan synthase (TSase) and serine deaminase (SDase) activities of the TrpB2 dimer, either in the presence or in the absence of the TrpA subunit. The mutations of residues 273-283 could be divided into 4 classes. Mutations 1278A, F280G and M282A decreased the SDase and TSase activities of TrpB2 to similar extents. F280A decreased the SDase activity of TrpB2 more than its TSase activity, whereas the reverse was true for Y279L. F280A decreased the activation factor of TrpB2 by TrpA, whereas F280G increased it. The reaction steps and intramolecular contacts that could be affected by the mutations are described. The sequence 278-IYFGM-282, which is present in E. coli and S. typhimurium, is only found in 5 out of 42 organisms, whereas the sequence VLHGX is found in 21 organisms. Our results identified several mutations that could be used as structural probes to analyze precisely the roles of residues 278-282 and their evolution.

A mutational approach shows similar mechanisms of recognition for the isolated and integrated versions of a protein epitope.

Antibody mAb164 is directed against the native form of the TrpB2 subunit of Escherichia coli tryptophan synthase. It recognizes a synthetic peptide, P11, constituted of residues 273-283 of TrpB, with high affinity. We introduced 16 single and 3 double mutations in each of the two contexts, TrpB2 and P11, and used them as local probes to study the cross-reactivity of mAb164 toward these two antigens. The equilibrium constant, KD, of dissociation from mAb164 was measured for each of the mutant derivatives of TrpB2 and P11 by a competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared with the wild type one. The variation of the free energy of interaction, DeltaDeltaG, covered nearly 8 kcal/mol for the different mutations. The values of DeltaDeltaG for the mutant derivatives of TrpB2 and for those of P11 were close and the two sets of values were strongly correlated (r = 0.96). This correlation showed that mAb164 recognized the integrated and isolated versions of residues 273-283 with very similar mechanisms. A few significant differences between the recognitions of TrpB2 and P11 by mAb164 suggested some adaptability of the interaction. The results were compatible with a recognition of residues 273-283 of TrpB in a loop conformation, close to their structure in the crystals of the complete tryptophan synthase, TrpA2TrpB2.

Mutational analysis of an antigenic peptide shows recognition in a loop conformation.

We have analyzed the recognition between an antigenic undecapeptide and a monoclonal antibody through a mutational approach. Antibody mAb164 is directed against the native form of the TrpB2 subunit of Escherichia coli tryptophan synthase. It recognizes a synthetic peptide, P11, constituted of residues 273-HGRVGIYFGMK-283 of TrpB with high affinity. P11 was fused with a carrier protein, MalE, to facilitate its manipulation. The affinities between mAb164 and the MalE-P11 hybrids were measured by competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The changes of the P11 residues into progressively shorter residues, the comparison of changes into Pro and Ala, and the study of double mutants showed the following. Four hydrophobic residues of P11, Val276, Ile278, Tyr279, and Phe280, were predominant in the interaction. For some residues, e.g., Tyr279, most groups of the side chain contributed to the interaction. For others, only some groups played a significant role, e.g., the Cdelta group of Ile278 or the Cbeta group of Phe280. The lack of side chain in position Gly281 and a tertiary interaction between the side chains of Ile278 and Lys283 were important. P11 was recognized in a loop conformation, close to that of residues 273-283 of TrpB in the crystal structure of the complete tryptophan synthase, TrpA2TrpB2. Comparison of our mutational data with NMR data on the conformation of the isolated peptide P11 and with kinetic data on its interaction with mAb164 indicate that mAb164 selects a conformer of P11 that represents only a small minority of the molecules. Our results provide useful information on the mechanisms by which linear epitopes and unconstrained peptides are recognized by receptors.

Conformational and functional properties of an undecapeptide epitope fused with the C-terminal end of the maltose binding protein.

Monoclonal antibody mAb164 is directed against the TrpB2 subunit of the Escherichia coli tryptophan synthase. It recognizes the synthetic peptide P11, constituted of residues 273-283 of TrpB, with high affinity. We constructed a hybrid protein in which the C-terminal end of protein MalE was linked with the N-terminal end of P11. Hybrid MalE-P11 was produced in E. coli from a plasmidic gene and purified in one step as MalE. MalE-P11 and the isolated P11 had identical conformational and functional properties according to the following criteria. The NMR spectra of MalE and MalE-P11 in TOCSY experiments showed that the P11 moiety of MalE-P11 moved independently from its MalE moiety. The chemical shifts of the protons for the P11 moiety of MalE-P11 and for the isolated P11 were very close and did not show significant deviations from random coil values. The equilibrium constant of dissociation (KD) from mAb164, measured by a competition ELISA, was identical for MalE-P11 and the isolated P11, around 6 nM. The change of the C-terminal residue of MalE-P11 from Lys into Ala increased 37-fold this dissociation constant. This increase showed that the P11 moiety of MalE-P11 was not degraded. The high molecular mass of MalE-P11 allowed us to follow its kinetics of interaction with immobilized mAb164 by surface plasmon resonance, using the BIAcore apparatus. The rates of association with mAb164 were similar for MalE-P11 and TrpB2, but the dissociation was faster for MalE-P11 than for TrpB2, as previously observed for the isolated P11 by a fluorometric method. Thus, the fusion of peptides with the C-terminal end of MalE could constitute an alternative to chemical synthesis for the study of their recognition by receptors, in vivo or in vitro.

Mutant G protein alpha subunit activated by Gbeta gamma: a model for receptor activation?

How receptors catalyze exchange of GTP for GDP bound to the Galpha subunit of trimeric G proteins is not known. One proposal is that the receptor uses the G protein's betagamma heterodimer as a lever, tilting it to pull open the guanine nucleotide binding pocket of Galpha. To test this possibility, we designed a mutant Galpha that would bind to betagamma in the tilted conformation. To do so, we excised a helical turn (four residues) from the N-terminal region of alpha(s), the alpha subunit of G(S), the stimulatory regulator of adenylyl cyclase. In the presence, but not in the absence, of transiently expressed beta(1) and gamma(2), this mutant (alpha(s)Delta), markedly stimulated cAMP accumulation. This effect depended on the ability of the coexpressed beta protein to interact normally with the lip of the nucleotide binding pocket of alpha(s)Delta. We substituted alanine for an aspartate in beta(1) that binds to a lysine (K206) in the lip of the alpha subunit's nucleotide binding pocket. Coexpressed with alpha(s)Delta and gamma(2), this mutant, beta(1)-D228A, elevated cAMP much less than did beta(1)-wild type; it did bind to alpha(s)Delta normally, however, as indicated by its unimpaired ability to target alpha(s)Delta to the plasma membrane. We conclude that betagamma can activate alpha(s) and that this effect probably involves both a tilt of betagamma relative to alpha(s) and interaction of beta with the lip of the nucleotide binding pocket. We speculate that receptors use a similar mechanism to activate trimeric G proteins.

The activation mechanism of class-C G-protein coupled receptors.

Class-C G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a distant group among the large family of GPCRs. This class includes the receptors for the main neurotransmitters, glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and the receptors for Ca(2+), some taste and pheromone molecules, as well as some orphan receptors. Like any other GPCRs, class-C receptors possess a heptahelical domain (HD) involved in heterotrimeric G-protein activation, but most of them also have a large extracellular domain (ECD) responsible for agonist recognition and binding. In addition, it is now well accepted that these receptors are dimers, either homo or heterodimers. This complex architecture raises a number of important questions. Here we will discuss our view of how agonist binding within the large ECD triggers the necessary change of conformation, or stabilize a specific conformation, of the heptahelical domain leading to G-protein activation. How ligands acting within the heptahelical domain can change the properties of these complex macromolecules.