MRI-defined treatment margins, urinary toxicity, and PSA response in LDR prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Implant quality metrics as measured by D90 and V100 do not address the adequacy of periprostatic margins. Relative margin deficiencies may relate to efficacy and margin excesses to post-implant toxicity. Our purpose is to determine MRI-defined treatment margins on prostate achieved with LDR brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Post implant CT and MR images from 487 consecutive patients who received LDR brachytherapy from 2010 to 14 were co-registered. Four prostate quadrants were defined; anterior-superior (AS), posterior-superior (PS), anterior-inferior (AI), posterior-inferior (PI). Dosimetric variables were measured for prostate, and for each quadrant with a 0-, 2-, 3-, and 5-mm margin, as well as for the membranous urethra defined on MRI. RESULTS: Prostate D90 (no margin) was associated with D90 to the volume enclosed by 2 mm, 3 mm and 5 mm margins (R2 = 0.9 - 1.0) with an average 7.1% decrease in dose per mm of margin. Mean D90 for PS, AI and PI quadrants were > 110% of prescription dose for margins of 2-, 3-, and 5-mm. AS quadrant mean D90s were generally lower (83.2% for 2 mm, 76.4% for 3 mm and 62.2% for 5 mm). Urethral strictures (n = 9) were associated with higher doses in the AI quadrant, and higher membranous urethral V125 (51 vs. 32%, p 0.013) and V150 (34.5 vs. 17.6%, p 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using MR-CT post implant dosimetry, margin coverage up to 5 mm was excellent with less margin coverage in the AS quadrant. Late ≥ grade 2 toxicity and urinary strictures are more likely to occur with relative margin excess in the anterior-inferior quadrant and higher doses caudal to the prostate apex. Within this analysis, there was no relationship between treatment margins, and PSA outcome.

The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

In the setting of castrate-resistant prostate cancer, patients present with a variety of symptoms, including bone metastases, spinal cord compression and advanced pelvic disease. Fortunately, a variety of radiotherapeutic options exist for palliation. This article focuses on these options, including both external beam radiotherapy and radiopharmaceuticals.

Salvage low-dose-rate permanent seed brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer: Association between dose and late toxicity.

PURPOSE: Rates of late toxicity are higher for salvage treatment of local recurrence after prior radiotherapy. We present our experience with salvage prostate brachytherapy (BT) for local recurrence after definitive external beam radiotherapy with attention to the relationship between dose and late toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2005 to 2012, 18 patients with biopsy proven locally recurrent prostate cancer and negative staging received low-dose-rate BT with a prescribed dose of 130-144 Gy. Toxicities were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. RESULTS: Median followup is 31.5 months (range, 12-104). International Prostate Symptom Scores peaked at 3 months (median, 21/35), returning to baseline by 24 months. Urinary catheterization rate was 33% (median duration, 14 days; range, 1-90 days). Late Grade 3/4 genitourinary toxicity occurred in 1 patient each, one of whom also had Grade 3 late gastrointestinal toxicity; urethral strictures developed in three others. These 5 patients with late toxicity had higher dose to the prostate (isodose enclosing 90% [D90] median, 151 Gy; range, 135-185 Gy) compared with those without late complications (median, 134 Gy; range, 105-165; p < 0.04). Acute gastrointestinal toxicity Grade <3 occurred in 44%. Four patients (22%) experienced biochemical failure. CONCLUSION: Salvage low-dose-rate prostate BT can provide durable biochemical control. Care should be taken to select patients with higher likelihood of organ-confined disease. The goal of planning should be to treat the recurrent disease to an adequate dose with careful attention to maintain a conservative D90.

Surface mold brachytherapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer: Canadian patterns of practice.

PURPOSE: We sought to describe the use of surface mold brachytherapy (SMBT) for nonmelanoma skin cancer in Canada. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A list of Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists membership and provincial registries were used for a preliminary survey to identify radiation oncologists and physicists involved in the practice of SMBT. A detailed survey was sent electronically to individuals involved in treating with SMBT. RESULTS: Of 41 centers in Canada, 39 responded, with 7 centers indicating use of SMBT. Seven radiation oncologists and 5 physicists from 6 of 7 treating centers responded to the detailed survey, with an overall 75% individual response rate (12/16). General agreement was found regarding indications for SMBT which included irregular or curved surfaces, avoidance of deep structures, and requirement for small fields. There was consensus regarding some contraindications for SMBT such as tumor depth and size. Hypofractionated schedules were used in 5 of 6 centers and doses ranged from 50 Gy in 5 fractions once per week to 30 Gy in 10 fractions twice a day over 5 days. The most common dosimetric parameters for plan evaluation included D90, D95, D100, and maximum skin dose. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of Canadian centers practice SMBT. In centers practicing SMBT, general agreement exists on general indications for its use. Given the wide variation in dose and fractionation used and the rarity of the indication a phase 2 Canadian protocol would be invaluable.