Cannabis-Based Medicine for Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity-A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI) commonly sustain central neuropathic pain (NP) and spasticity. Despite a lack of consistent evidence, cannabis-based medicine (CBM) has been suggested as a supplement treatment. We aimed to investigate the effect of CBM on NP and spasticity in patients with MS or SCI. We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in Denmark. Patients aged ≥18 years with NP (intensity >3, ≤9 on a numerical rating scale (NRS0-10) and/or spasticity (>3 on NRS0-10) were randomized to treatment consisting of either delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD), a combination of THC&CBD in maximum doses of 22.5 mg, 45 mg and 22.5/45 mg per day, respectively, or placebo. A baseline registration was performed before randomization. Treatment duration was six weeks followed by a one-week phaseout. Primary endpoints were the intensity of patient-reported NP and/or spasticity. Between February 2019 and December 2021, 134 patients were randomized (MS n = 119, SCI n = 15), where 32 were assigned to THC, 31 to CBD, 31 to THC&CBD, and 40 to placebo. No significant difference was found for: mean pain intensity (THC 0.42 (-0.54-1.38), CBD 0.45 (-0.47-1.38) and THC&CBD 0.16 (-0.75-1.08)), mean spasticity intensity (THC 0.24 (-0.67-1.45), CBD 0.46 (-0.74-1.65), and THC&CBD 0.10 (-1.18-1.39), secondary outcomes (patient global impression of change and quality of life), or any tertiary outcomes. We aimed to include 448 patients in the trial; however, due to COVID-19 and recruitment challenges, fewer were included. Nevertheless, in this four-arm parallel trial, no effect was found between placebo and active treatment with THC or CBD alone or in combination on NP or spasticity in patients with either MS or SCI. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT (2018-002315-98).

Real-world outcomes for a complete nationwide cohort of more than 3200 teriflunomide-treated multiple sclerosis patients in The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Teriflunomide is a once-daily, oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). We studied clinical outcomes in a real-world setting involving a population-based large cohort of unselected patients enrolled in The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry (DMSR) who started teriflunomide treatment between 2013-2019. METHODS: This was a complete nationwide population-based cohort study with prospectively enrolled unselected cases. Demographic and disease-specific patient parameters related to treatment history, efficacy outcomes, and discontinuation and switching rates among other clinical variables were assessed at baseline and during follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 3239 patients (65.4% female) started treatment with teriflunomide during the study period, 56% of whom were treatment-naïve. Compared to previously treated patients, treatment-naïve patients were older on average at disease onset, had a shorter disease duration, a lower Expanded Disability Status Scale score at teriflunomide treatment start and more frequently experienced a relapse in the 12 months prior to teriflunomide initiation. In the 3001 patients initiating teriflunomide treatment at least 12 months before the cut-off date, 72.7% were still on treatment one year after treatment start. Discontinuations in the first year were due mainly to adverse events (15.6%). Over the full follow-up period, 47.5% of patients discontinued teriflunomide treatment. Sixty-three percent of the patients treated with teriflunomide for 5 years were relapse-free, while significantly more treatment-naïve versus previously treated patients experienced a relapse during the follow-up (p<0.0001). Furthermore, 85% of the patients with available data were free of disability worsening at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Solid efficacy and treatment persistence data consistent with other real-world studies were obtained over the treatment period. Treatment outcomes in this real-world scenario of the population-based cohort support previous findings that teriflunomide is an effective and generally well-tolerated DMT for relapsing MS patients with mild to moderate disease activity.

Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate: A nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare on-treatment efficacy and discontinuation outcomes in teriflunomide (TFL) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in a real-world setting. METHODS: We identified all patients starting TFL or DMF from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry and compared on-treatment efficacy outcomes between DMF using TFL, adjusted for clinical baseline variables and propensity score-based methods. RESULTS: We included 2,236 patients in the study: 1,469 patients on TFL and 767 on DMF. Annualized relapse rates (ARRs) in TFL and DMF were 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.20) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.07-0.12), respectively. Relapse rate ratio for DMF/TFL was 0.58 (95% CI 0.46-0.73, p < 0.001). DMF had a higher relapse-free survival proportion at 48 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). We observed no difference in Expanded Disability Status Scale score worsening. Discontinuations due to disease breakthrough were 10.2% (95% CI 7.6%-12.8%) and 22.1% (95% CI 19.2%-25.0%) for DMF and TFL, respectively. A subgroup analysis of ARRs in 708 patients with available baseline MRI T2 lesion amount reported similar results after adjustment. CONCLUSION: We found lower ARR, higher relapse-free survival, and lower incidence of discontinuation due to disease breakthrough on treatment with DMF compared with TFL. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with RRMS, DMF is more effective in preventing relapses and has lower discontinuation due to disease breakthrough compared with TFL.

Nonopportunistic infection leading to rapidly progressive dementia in a patient with HIV/AIDS: A case report.

RATIONALE: Cognitive dysfunction is a common presenting symptom in patients with HIV/AIDS. It is usually directly associated with HIV infection or due to opportunistic infection. Rapidly progressive dementia, however, is rarely observed in acute HIV infection or during immune reconstitution. Recently, a case of Creutzfeld-Jakob disease (CJD) has been reported in a patient with chronic HIV infection. The incidence of CJD is not known to be increased among immunocompromised patients. PATIENT CONCERNS: We here report the case of a 59-year-old male patient with a recent diagnosis of HIV/AIDS and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia presenting with secondary behavioral changes and disorientation. Over the course of several weeks, progressive dementia developed characterized by apraxia, gait ataxia, and mutism. DIAGNOSES: After the exclusion of common HIV-associated neurologic conditions, the clinical course as well as findings on electroencephalogram (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and a positive 14-3-3 assay converged into a probable diagnosis of CJD. The diagnosis was later confirmed histopathologically. OUTCOMES: Palliative care was provided, and the patient passed away within 2 months of symptom onset. LESSONS: HIV/AIDS is an important stratifying condition during the work-up of many clinical syndromes including encephalopathy but may prematurely exclude important differential diagnoses. Non-opportunistic etiologies have to be considered as part of a secondary workup as this case of concomitant AIDS and CJD demonstrates. Rapidly progressive dementia should be distinguished from delirium as early as possible in order to be able to choose the correct diagnostic pathway. Despite the common occurrence of neurologic syndromes in the setting of immunodeficiency, an analytical diagnostic approach is advisable to minimize diagnostic bias.

Multiple sclerosis course and clinical outcomes in patients with comorbid asthma: a survey study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if comorbid asthma is associated with accumulation of multiple sclerosis (MS)-related impairment and disability. METHOD: We sent a comprehensive questionnaire to a cohort of patients with MS and examined the association between comorbid asthma and reaching Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores 4.0 and 6.0. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) scores were compared between patients with MS with and without comorbid asthma. RESULTS: 680 patients participated in our study of whom 88 (12.9%) had comorbid asthma. There was no difference in the prevalence of asthma between our MS cohort and the England general population (OR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.17). We did not observe a significant association between having asthma and the risk of reaching EDSS scores 4.0 and 6.0 (HR: 1.29, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.77, and HR: 1.33, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.89, respectively) after controlling for confounders. Patients with MS with asthma reported higher level of psychological impairments (coefficient: 2.29, 95% CI 0.1 to 4.49). CONCLUSIONS: Asthma is a prevalent condition among patients with MS and it may contribute to the psychological impairment in MS. Although we did not observe significant association between comorbid asthma and physical disability in MS, it seems that the two conditions influence one another.