Children's scabies survey indicates high prevalence and misdiagnosis in Auckland educational institutions.

AIM: Here, we present results of a survey of scabies prevalence in childcare centres and primary schools in Auckland. METHODS: Children whose parents agreed to take part in participating centres in the Auckland region were examined for scabies by general practitioners and given questionnaires of relevant symptoms. Diagnoses of clinical or suspected scabies were made according to the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) criteria. The survey was a stratified random sample of schools and early childcare centres. A quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was also used to complement the IACS criteria. RESULTS: A total of 181 children were examined, with 145 children with history information, 16 of whom (11.0%) met the criteria for 'clinical' or 'suspected' scabies. Weighted analysis, accounting for the survey design, indicated that the prevalence of scabies in early childcare centres was 13.2% (95% CI: 4.3 to 22.1), with no school-aged children fulfilling these criteria. A higher proportion had clinical signs of scabies with 23 (12.7%) having typical scabies lesions and a further 43 (23.8%) had atypical lesions. A total of 64 PCR tests were taken and 15 (23%) were positive. None of these cases were receiving treatment for scabies. Five were undergoing topical skin treatment: three with topical steroid and two with calamine lotion. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of children with scabies is high in early childcare centres in Auckland. Misdiagnosis is suggested by several PCR positive cases being treated by topical agents used to treat other skin conditions.

Teaching medical students in general practice when conducting remote consults: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Telehealth involves real-time communication (telephone or video-call) between patients and health providers. The COVID-19 pandemic propelled general practitioners to conduct most consultations remotely, seeing patients face-to-face only when required. Placement opportunities and experience for medical students were reduced. Initially online learning programmes replaced clinical attachments. Subsequently, clinical teachers supervised students to engage in remote consultations, either in clinics or from their homes. This study aimed to explore the experience of New Zealand general practitioners undertaking clinical teaching with medical students when telehealth consulting. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with general practitioners who had taught medical students whilst consulting remotely. General inductive thematic analysis of transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Six female and four male participants aged 40 to over 65 years. Participants often focused on general practicalities of telehealth consultations and effects on the patient-doctor relationship, and needed direction to consider remote consultations with students, which added to the interactions. Four themes were identified: changes needed in teaching delivery format; direct comparison with face-to-face; challenges and advantages to remote teaching, each with subthemes. DISCUSSION: Clinicians needed to determine practical logistics and develop skills for both remote consulting and teaching. New format and structures of consultations needed planning. Differences from face-to-face teaching included scene-setting for the consultation and supervision factors. Telehealth teaching conferred new opportunities for learning but also challenges (e.g. consent, cues, uncertainty). Remote consultations are likely to remain a significant mode for doctor-patient interactions. Preliminary guidelines for teaching and learning using telehealth need to be developed and embedded into medical programmes and then evaluated.

Provision of e-learning programmes to replace undergraduate medical students' clinical general practice attachments during COVID-19 stand-down.

Senior medical students at the University of Auckland, New Zealand spend most of their learning time in clinical attachments. Experiential apprentice-style training is traditionally recognised as an important aspect of obtaining competency. In March 2020 they were stood down from their general practice placements in the context of a national response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acute conversion of their general practice education from experiential clinical exposure to online and offsite learning was required. This paper describes the steps taken and the underlying theoretical foundations for our expediently developed online course. Our online learning programme has three online components, reflecting the domains of educational environment theory: asynchronous discussion forums; a symposium facilitating social interactions and teacher presence, and a portfolio facilitating personal goal aspects. The latter is underpinned by a multi-theories model of adult learning, built upon the scaffolding framework that supports our entire medical curriculum. Within this theory, we propose a five-stage model of learning. Learning from this experience contributes to the body of knowledge around online education, particularly in meeting the needs of a clinical attachment traditionally grounded in experiential learning. It is hoped that the mechanisms described here might be useful to other educators facing similar challenges.

Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST): A validation study of BDST against the reference standard of PHQ-9.

Background: Case finding for low mood is essential in primary care, but it is time-consuming using current depression inventories. The Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) is a short, simple inventory which assesses mood for today, and we aimed to validate it in this study. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with emotional distress seen in a single primary care clinic by one of the authors over 22 months were eligible for this retrospective audit (N = 160). Multiple visits (N = 421) from the same patient were included in the study. The index test was BDST, which assesses the patient's mood for today. The reference standard was the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which assesses mood over the past 2 weeks. PHQ-9 had a cut-off point of ≥10 and BDST had a cut-off point of ≥6 for a significant mood issue. Results: The median age of patients was 35 years, and 63% of the cohort were women. The median BDST score was 8, indicative of moderately low mood, and the median PHQ-9 score was 15, indicative of moderately severe depression. For patients with a BDST score ≥6, the likelihood ratio of a positive test was 2.67. The sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%-96%) and the specificity was 68% (95% CI: 60%-76%). The area under the curve was 84% (95% CI: 80%-87%). Conclusion: This audit validates BDST against PHQ-9 and finds it an excellent case-finding tool compared to PHQ-9. This is the first validation study of BDST.

Emoqol-100: Development and validation of a single question for low mood in primary care. A retrospective audit.

BACKGROUND: Patients with depression need to be diagnosed and managed effectively in primary care. However, current inventories for case-finding low mood are time-consuming when considering the limited time available during appointments. AIM: To validate the diagnostic accuracy of a single question on the emotional quality of life (Emoqol-100) as a measure of depression in symptomatic patients. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective clinical audit, validating the Emoqol-100 compared with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Burns Depression Scale Today (BDST) in South Auckland, New Zealand. METHOD: Consecutive patients with suspected low mood, seen over 22 months in a single primary care clinic by one of the authors, were eligible for this retrospective audit (n = 160). The index test was the verbally asked Emoqol-100: 'How is your emotional quality of life now, with 100 being perfect and 0 being the worst imaginable?' The reference standard was the PHQ-9 (n = 426 visits) with a cut-off point of ≥10 or BDST (n = 513 visits) with a cut-off point of ≥6. RESULTS: The Emoqol-100 range 0-20 had a likelihood ratio (LR) of 25.2 for low mood compared with the BDST as the reference standard; and for Emoqol-100 scores of 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, and 81-100 the LRs were 3.6, 1.7, 0.35, and 0.09, respectively. For the PHQ-9, these were 10.1, 2.9, 1.3, 0.40, and 0.2, respectively. Any score ≤60 was associated with a low mood. CONCLUSION: The Emoqol-100 appears to have high validity, so when it is low (≤60), it is suggestive of a high PHQ-9 or BDST score, and a mood issue probably exists. Emoqol-100 could be helpful for busy primary care professionals and other clinicians.

Psychological treatment of adult depression in primary care compared with outpatient mental health care: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is not yet known whether psychological treatments of depression in primary care have comparable effects to treatments in specialized mental health care. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care. METHODS: We selected studies from an existing database of randomized trials of psychological treatments of depression in adults, which was built through searches in PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to examine the effects of therapies and mixed effects subgroup analyses were used to compare the effects in primary and specialized care. RESULTS: We included 52 trials (7984 patients) in primary care and compared them with 50 trials (3685 patients) in specialized care. The main effect of therapies in primary care was g = 0.43 (95 % CI: 0.32; 0.53; PI: -0.18; 1.03). The overall effects were significantly smaller than those in specialized care (p = 0.006), but this was no longer significant after adjustment for differences between the two settings. The proportion of patients responding to treatment was comparable in primary (0.38; 95 % CI: 0.33; 0.43) and specialized care (0.34; 95 % CI: 0.28; 0.41; p = 0.41), but higher in control conditions in primary care (0.25; 95 % CI: 0.22; 0.28) compared to specialized care (0.16; 95 % CI: 0.12; 0.20; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Psychological treatments are effective in primary care, but somewhat less than in specialized care. Response rates in control conditions in primary care are higher than in specialized care, which may point at a transient nature of depression in primary care.

High prevalence of scabies in Auckland pre-schools.

AIM: Scabies is a difficult disease to diagnose and its prevalence not well established. A strong association between scabies and more serious illnesses in children, for instance acute rheumatic fever, suggests greater understanding of scabies prevalence is warranted. Here, we present initial findings of a study of childcare centres, to estimate the prevalence of scabies in the Auckland community. METHODS: Children in three childcare centres from socio-economically challenged areas were examined for scabies. Diagnoses were made according to the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies (IACS) criteria, whose "clinical" or "suspected" definition consists of examination findings of papules: either "typical" or "atypical" distribution, along with history features of itch and contact with likely other cases. A quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) test was also used. RESULTS: A total of 67 children were examined, with over half (n=38 or 56.7%) showing signs of typical (14; 20.9%) or atypical (24; 35.8%) scabies lesions. History information was available for 50 children. Of these, nine (18%) met the criteria for "clinical" or "suspected" scabies. Of 27 qPCR tests performed nine (33%) tested positive. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of scabies is high in early childcare centres in socio-economically challenged areas of Auckland.

The first consultation with a depressed patient: A qualitative study of GPs' approaches to diagnosis.

Background: The first consultation with a depressed patient is important because many patients do not return for subsequent visits. Therefore, the first consultation provides a unique opportunity for diagnosis (if required) and treatment, but there are risks of both under and over-diagnosis. Aim: To understand how general practitioners utilize diagnosis when patients present with a new episode of depression. Method: We approached a random selection of twenty-one general practitioners (GPs) in Auckland, New Zealand and asked them to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. The interviews explored "the first consultation for a depressed/distressed patient" were undertaken to theme saturation. Interviews were hand-written and later transcribed. Results: We identified three major themes in GPs' approach to diagnosis. The issue of diagnosis was underpinned by a complex understanding of depression and the GP role. GPs did not always make a formal diagnosis, but the experience of a patient's distress/depression was understood by drawing on a range of factors and resources. These included time, screening tools, clinician experience, and patient affect. GPs were careful about how they communicated a diagnosis, both in their documentation and in their conversations with patients. Conclusion: At an initial appointment, the distressed/depressed patient can present to their GP with various symptoms and differing degrees of distress. GPs draw upon a variety of skills and resources to negotiate these complexities. The value of a diagnosis was questioned and issues such as impairment may be more useful concepts for GPs. This is the first study to report the findings of the first visit.

Treatment of depression in the first primary care consultation: A qualitative study.

Introduction: The first primary care consultation for patients with depression can have long-term consequences for patients, but little is known about treatment decisions at this visit. The aim of this study was to explore the treatment of patients presenting in primary care with a new episode of depression and the drivers behind GPs' treatment decisions at the initial consultation. Materials and Methods: A random sample of GPs in Auckland was invited to participate. A qualitative study was undertaken using semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a general inductive approach. Results: Twenty-one GPs were interviewed. We identified three themes as drivers of treatment decisions at the first visit: characteristics of GPs, characteristics of patients, and characteristics of treatment options. Drivers for prescribing were severe depression and time constraints. A driver for non-pharmacological treatment was a strong doctor-patient relationship. Limited time, skill, and training were associated with low confidence using talking therapies. Access to counseling was reported as poor. There was a very wide range of approaches taken. GPs described preferring antidepressants less and talking therapies more with Maori patients. Behavioral activation was used least despite its ease of use and it being one of the most effective treatments for depression. Conclusion: Treatment of depression at the first visit varies widely between practitioners. GPs report multiple barriers to the provision of talking therapies. A move to a more standardized approach may lead to more equitable care. This is the first study to report findings about the initial primary care consultation for depression.

Emoqol 100, an ultra ultra-brief mood case-finding tool: A diagnostic accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: Case-finding for low mood in primary care can be time-consuming using current depression inventories. AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy, of a single verbally administered question on the emotional quality of life (Emoqol 100), for low mood in patients with symptoms of distress in an ambulatory care setting. DESIGN AND SETTING: Eligible patients were consecutive patients seen by one of the authors over 13 months with possible distress/low mood. The index test was the verbally asked Emoqol 100, which is the patient's emotional quality of life now, with 100 being perfect emotional health and 0 being the worst imaginable. The reference standard is the written version of the PHQ-9 with a cut point of ≥10. METHODS: A retrospective audit of consecutive consultations in a single primary care clinic. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were seen during the study period, of which 76 met the eligibility criteria for this audit, and there were 215 test results. For a cut point of <50 on the Emoqol 100 and the PHQ-9 ≥10 the sensitivity was 47% (95% CI 39-54), and the specificity was 93% (95% CI 86-100). The positive predictive value was 95%, and the negative predictive value was 37%. CONCLUSION: This is the first accuracy estimation of the Emoqol 100. It appears to have a high specificity which means when it is positive (<50) it is a good estimate of a high PHQ-9, i.e. a mood issue probably exists. The test will be helpful for busy primary care clinicians as it takes less than 15 seconds to verbally administer.

Survey protocol for exploring video and phone use in Aotearoa New Zealand general practice: considerations for future telehealth.

INTRODUCTION: Telehealth became the most practical option for general practice consultations in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) as a result of the national lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. What is the consumer experience of access to telehealth and how do consumers and providers perceive this mode of care delivery going forward? METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A national survey of general practice consumers and providers who used telehealth services since the national lockdowns in 2020 will be distributed. It is based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework of technology acceptance and the access to care framework. The data will be statistically analysed to create a foundation for in-depth research on the use of telehealth services in NZ general practice services, with a specific focus on consumer experiences and health outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee on 13/11/2020, reference AH2539. The survey will be disseminated online.