How to treat advanced Hodgkin lymphoma?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we analyzed the different therapy options in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). RECENT FINDINGS: The treatment of advanced HL has greatly evolved during the last decade even still based on polychemotherapy. Mature data established that the better strategies require Positron emission tomography (PET)-driven treatments which allow to optimize the balance between disease control and both immediate and late treatment adverse effects, leading to cure most patients while minimizing the risk of toxicity. Indeed, PET-driven deescalated strategies offer the better treatment option. The recent incorporation of targeted therapies, anti-CD30 or anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) in combination with chemotherapy should quickly change the game and be a step forward to still decrease the risk of treatment toxicity and improve the cure rate. SUMMARY: The standard of care for advanced HL remains currently PET-driven chemotherapy and should rapidly evolve with the addition of targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy.

Health-related quality of life profile of newly diagnosed patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas: A real-world study including 3922 patients from the French REALYSA cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Considering the notable advances made in the treatment of lymphoma, assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of lymphoma patients has become a critical aspect to consider both in clinical research and routine practice. However, there is paucity of information about lymphoma specific HRQoL profile at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HRQoL at diagnosis was assessed for 3922 adult patients with newly diagnosed high-grade (HG) (n = 1994), low-grade (LG) (n = 1053) non-Hodgkin (NHL) and Hodgkin (HL) (n = 875) lymphomas included in REal world dAta in LYmphoma and Survival in Adults (REALYSA, NCT03869619), a prospective non-interventional multicentric cohort in France. Disease-specific HRQoL aspects were assessed with three validated EORTC questionnaires, namely, the QLQ-NHL-HG29, the QLQ-NHL-LG20 and the QLQ-HL27, for patients with NHL-HG, NHL-LG and HL, respectively. RESULTS: We confirmed the high-level of completion of these questionnaires in REALYSA cohort, ranging from 84 % for QLQ-HG29 to 88 % for QLQ-HL27. The proportion of patients with impaired global health status was as follows: T-cell NHL, 67 %; diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL), 62 %; Burkitt, 61 %; HL, 53 %; marginal zone, 49 %; mantle cell, 48 %; follicular, 47 %. Multivariable regression analyses for DLBCL, follicular and HL showed that gender, performance status and B symptoms were independently associated with all HRQoL dimensions. However, a variable effect of age and stage were observed among these three subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive analysis was made describing the HRQoL profile of newly diagnosed patients with different types of lymphomas. Our data may help to enhance the interpretation of HRQoL results in future studies using the recently validated EORTC lymphoma specific questionnaires.