Mind the Metabolic Gap: Bridging Migraine and Alzheimer's disease through Brain Insulin Resistance.

Brain insulin resistance has recently been described as a metabolic abnormality of brain glucose homeostasis that has been proven to downregulate insulin receptors, both in astrocytes and neurons, triggering a reduction in glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis. This condition may generate a mismatch between brain's energy reserve and expenditure, mainly during high metabolic demand, which could be involved in the chronification of migraine and, in the long run, at least in certain subsets of patients, in the prodromic phase of Alzheimer's disease, along a putative metabolic physiopathological continuum. Indeed, the persistent disruption of glucose homeostasis and energy supply to neurons may eventually impair protein folding, an energy-requiring process, promoting pathological changes in Alzheimer's disease, such as amyloid-ß deposition and tau hyperphosphorylation. Hopefully, the "neuroenergetic hypothesis" presented herein will provide further insight on there being a conceivable metabolic bridge between chronic migraine and Alzheimer's disease, elucidating novel potential targets for the prophylactic treatment of both diseases.

Alexithymia Increases Pericranial and Cervical Muscle Tenderness in Women with Migraine.

Background/Objectives: Alexithymia is characterized by a deficit in identifying and communicating feelings. Emerging evidence suggests that alexithymia is highly prevalent in migraine, in a complex interplay with psychiatric comorbidity. Pericranial/cervical muscle tenderness is a remarkable clinical feature in a large proportion of migraine patients. This pilot study aimed at investigating the relationship between alexithymia and pericranial/cervical muscle tenderness in female migraineurs. Methods: A total of 42 female patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for migraine were enrolled into this pilot, observational, cross-sectional study after informed consent was obtained. Each patient underwent a psychological assessment to identify any alexithymia by means of TAS-20, anxiety/mood comorbidity (by means of STAI-Y1 STAI-Y2, BDI-II), and migraine-related disability (by means of HIT-6), and a physical cranial/cervical musculoskeletal examination. Palpation of pericranial and cervical muscles was carried out in the standardized manner. A Cumulative Muscle Tenderness (CUM) score (0-6) was calculated for each patient. A multivariate analysis was performed to investigate any association amongst the TAS-20 score, the CUM score, and the following covariates: BDI-II, STAI-Y1, STAI-Y2, and HIT-6 scores, age, disease duration, monthly migraine days, and average head pain intensity in the previous three months. Results: Overall, 35.6% of the sample had alexithymia. The multivariate analysis detected a linear and independent relationship between the TAS-20 and CUM scores, with a statistically significant (p = 0.017) association. Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that alexithymia plays a role in increasing pericranial/cervical muscle tenderness in migraine, independently from psychiatric comorbidity. A novel therapeutical approach, targeting alexithymia, may well reduce muscular tenderness in female migraineurs.

Breakthrough COVID-19 in people with multiple sclerosis on disease modifying treatments: Is it still a severe disease?

INTRODUCTION: Disease modifying treatments (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are effective in preventing both relapses and disability progression. Highly effective treatments (HETs) are more effective than platform therapy in preventing confirmed disability progression (CDP), when used early. Infections may complicate HETs administration, and their prevention through vaccination is crucial in order to assure the safety of people with MS (pwMS). The aim of the present study is to describe the effect of MS DMTs on COVID-19 vaccination and the risk of breakthrough infection in a cohort of pwMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective observational study conducted at the MS center of the Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital in Piacenza, Italy. One hundred and fifty-seven (157) pwMS who received two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (with 80.3 % receiving a booster dose) were included in the study. RESULTS: fifty-six pwMS (35.7 %) were females, the mean age was 48.6 (SD: 12.87) years, and 59 (37.6 %) had at least one comorbidity. Twenty-five (15.9 %) breakthrough infections were observed, with 17 (68.0 %) classified as mild and 8 (32.0 %) as moderate. A multivariable linear regression model confirmed that B-cell suppressor DMTs and EDSS were factors associated with the latest antibody titre. Patients treated with B-cell suppressors exhibited a risk almost four times higher for breakthrough infections compared to other patients, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.72 (95 % CI: 1.50 - 9.27) (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: B-cell suppressor DMTs are associated with the risk of breakthrough COVID-19 in our cohort, but vaccination fully protected pwMS against severe breakthrough disease.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Concomitant Anti-seizure Medications: A Retrospective, Case-Control Study in a Real-World Setting.

PURPOSE: Although prescription of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for epileptic patients on anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is on the increase, international guidelines pose strict restrictions because this may lead to pharmacologic interactions. However, current evidence on their clinical relevance remains scanty. This retrospective, case-control study assessed the frequency of ischemic/hemorrhagic events and epileptic seizures involving DOAC-ASM cotherapy in the real world, compared with DOAC and ASM monotherapy, in age- and gender-matched controls. METHODS: Data on patients who had been prescribed a concomitant DOAC and ASM therapy for at least 6 months were extracted from the database of the Pharmaceutical Service of the Alessandria Province (Italy). After exclusions, the case group included 124 patients, 44 on valproic acid (VPA) and 80 on levetiracetam (LEV) concomitant with a DOAC, and it was compared with the DOAC-control and ASM-control groups. The clinical and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic archives of the hospitals in the same province. FINDINGS: Two (1.6%) ischemic and 2 (1.6%) major hemorrhagic events were observed in the case group. Four (3.2%) ischemic and no hemorrhagic events occurred in the DOAC-control group. There were no statistically significant differences in the ischemic and hemorrhagic events between the case group (patients on concomitant LEV or VPA who were prescribed a DOAC) and the DOAC-control group, and there was no difference in the recurrence rate of epileptic seizures between the case group and the ASM-control group. IMPLICATIONS: Although this study has some limits, mainly the small sample size, our findings indicate that neither LEV nor VPA concomitant treatment significantly affects the effects of DOACs in a real-world setting.