Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biomedicines ; 12(2)2024 Jan 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38397920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous deep vein arterialization (pDVA) is considered a treatment modality in patients with no-option critical limb ischemia. However, there is still a paucity of evidence regarding its safety and efficacy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Web of Science databases as well as the CENTRAL registry up to the end of June 2023. METHODS: This review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023445171). The risk of bias was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS). Primary endpoints included technical success, overall survival and limb salvage during the follow-up. Amputation-free survival at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year as well as complete wound healing, major adverse limb events and reintervention were investigated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Five observational studies, comprising 208 patients (142 Rutherford class 5/77 Rutherford class 6), were included. MINORS revealed a low risk of bias. The meta-analysis reached a pooled technical success rate of 96.2% (95% CI: 91.5-98.4), an overall survival of 82.8% (95% CI: 70.5-95.2) and a limb salvage rate of 77.2% (95% CI: 65.2-89.1) during the follow-up. The amputation-free survival at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year was 87.8%, 68.7% and 65.6%, respectively. Furthermore, pDVA resulted in a complete wound healing rate of 53.4% (95% CI: 30.3-76.5). The pooled reintervention rate was as high as 46.7% (37.1-56.3%). CONCLUSIONS: PDVA seems a feasible bail-out strategy for patients with no option for routine treatment of CLTI. However, due to the small number of studies, the strength of the evidence is low.

2.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(6): 102513, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556144

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The authors aim to investigate the clinical implications of stent use for the management of CoA. METHODS: All observational studies on stent implantation for the treatment of aortic coarctation and the relevant RCTs were systematically retrieved. Outcomes included the immediate success rate, pre- and post-stent gradient, survival, minor and major complications, restenosis, post-stent systolic blood pressure, and reintervention rate. The analysis was further stratified by CoA type, stent type, and the mean age of the patients. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis incorporated 66 eligible studies involving 3,880 patients. The success rates for stent placement, defined as achieving post-treatment gradients of ≤20 mmHg and 10 mmHg, 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95 - 0.97; I2 = 59.83%) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89 - 0.95, I2 = 77.63%) respectively. The complication rates were quite low, with minor and major complication rates of 0.017 (95% CI: 0.013 - 0.021) and 0.007 (95% CI: 0.005 - 0.009), respectively. Unplanned reinterventions were required at a rate of 0.021 (95% CI: 0.015 - 0.026). At a mean follow-up of 2.9 years, 97% of the patients survived and 28% remained on antihypertensive therapy. While immediate effectiveness was consistent across age groups, complications were more prevalent in patients aged <20 years, and long-term efficacy was lower in those aged >20 years. Encouragingly, in neonates and infants, CoA stenting yielded results comparable to those observed in older children. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the overall favorable outcomes of stent placement for aortic coarctation, with considerations for age-related variations in complications and long-term efficacy.


Assuntos
Coartação Aórtica , Stents , Coartação Aórtica/cirurgia , Coartação Aórtica/terapia , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Seguimentos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA