Rapidly improving acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19: a multi-centre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Before the pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), rapidly improving acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mostly defined by early extubation, had been recognized as an increasingly prevalent subphenotype (making up 15-24% of all ARDS cases), associated with good prognosis (10% mortality in ARDSNet trials). We attempted to determine the prevalence and prognosis of rapidly improving ARDS and of persistent severe ARDS related to COVID-19. METHODS: We included consecutive patients with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in three intensive care units (ICU) during the second pandemic wave in Greece. We defined rapidly improving ARDS as extubation or a partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2) greater than 300 on the first day following intubation. We defined persistent severe ARDS as PaO2:FiO2 of equal to or less than 100 on the second day following intubation. RESULTS: A total of 280 intubated patients met criteria of ARDS with a median PaO2:FiO2 of 125.0 (interquartile range 93.0-161.0) on day of intubation, and overall ICU-mortality of 52.5% (ranging from 24.3 to 66.9% across the three participating sites). Prevalence of rapidly improving ARDS was 3.9% (11 of 280 patients); no extubation occurred on the first day following intubation. ICU-mortality of patients with rapidly improving ARDS was 54.5%. This low prevalence and high mortality rate of rapidly improving ARDS were consistent across participating sites. Prevalence of persistent severe ARDS was 12.1% and corresponding mortality was 82.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly improving ARDS was not prevalent and was not associated with good prognosis among patients with COVID-19. This is starkly different from what has been previously reported for patients with ARDS not related to COVID-19. Our results on both rapidly improving ARDS and persistent severe ARDS may contribute to our understanding of trajectory of ARDS and its association with prognosis in patients with COVID-19.

Effect of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: Although several international guidelines recommend early over late intubation of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), this issue is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect (if any) of timing of intubation on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 by carrying out a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched, while references and preprint servers were explored, for relevant articles up to December 26, 2020, to identify studies which reported on mortality and/or morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing early versus late intubation. "Early" was defined as intubation within 24 h from intensive care unit (ICU) admission, while "late" as intubation at any time after 24 h of ICU admission. All-cause mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) were the primary outcomes of the meta-analysis. Pooled risk ratio (RR), pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020222147). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, involving 8944 critically ill patients with COVID-19, were included. There was no statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality between patients undergoing early versus late intubation (3981 deaths; 45.4% versus 39.1%; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, p = 0.08). This was also the case for duration of MV (1892 patients; MD - 0.58 days, 95% CI - 3.06 to 1.89 days, p = 0.65). In a sensitivity analysis using an alternate definition of early/late intubation, intubation without versus with a prior trial of high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive mechanical ventilation was still not associated with a statistically detectable difference on all-cause mortality (1128 deaths; 48.9% versus 42.5%; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99-1.25, p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The synthesized evidence suggests that timing of intubation may have no effect on mortality and morbidity of critically ill patients with COVID-19. These results might justify a wait-and-see approach, which may lead to fewer intubations. Relevant guidelines may therefore need to be updated.

De-escalation of antimicrobial therapy in ICU settings with high prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria: a multicentre prospective observational cohort study in patients with sepsis or septic shock.

BACKGROUND: De-escalation of empirical antimicrobial therapy, a key component of antibiotic stewardship, is considered difficult in ICUs with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and the impact of antimicrobial de-escalation in ICUs with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. METHODS: Multicentre, prospective, observational study in septic patients with documented infections. Patients in whom de-escalation was applied were compared with patients without de-escalation by the use of a propensity score matching by SOFA score on the day of de-escalation initiation. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients (mean age 62.2 ± 15.1 years) were included. Antibiotic-resistant pathogens comprised 62.9%, classified as MDR (12.5%), extensively drug-resistant (49%) and pandrug-resistant (1.2%). In 97 (37%) patients de-escalation was judged not feasible in view of the antibiotic susceptibility results. Of the remaining 165 patients, judged as patients with de-escalation possibility, de-escalation was applied in 60 (22.9%). These were matched to an equal number of patients without de-escalation. In this subset of 120 patients, de-escalation compared with no de-escalation was associated with lower all-cause 28 day mortality (13.3% versus 36.7%, OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.66, P = 0.006); ICU and hospital mortality were also lower. De-escalation was associated with a subsequent collateral decrease in the SOFA score. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed de-escalation as a significant factor for 28 day survival (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.70, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In ICUs with high levels of antimicrobial resistance, feasibility of antimicrobial de-escalation was limited because of the multi-resistant pathogens isolated. However, when de-escalation was feasible and applied, it was associated with lower mortality.

Past history of stage I/II solid tumor malignancy impacts considerably on sepsis mortality: a propensity score matching analysis from the hellenic sepsis study group.

BACKGROUND: Whether past history of solid stage I/II inactive cancer has an impact on 28-day mortality of sepsis remains unclear. We aimed to determine the impact of history of stage I or II solid tumor malignancy in complete remission the last 3 years on sepsis outcome. METHODS: Using the database of the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group from 1553 patients with sepsis admitted in the ICU, 83 patients with sepsis by Sepsis-3 definition with past-history of stage I/II inactive solid malignancy the last 3 years were depicted. A comparator group of 83 patients fully matched for age, severity, type of infection and comorbidities was selected by propensity score matching. RESULTS: Mortality after 28 days was 37.3% in the comparator group and 54.2% in the solid tumor stage I/II group (odds ratio for death 1.98; p: 0.030). Following step-wise forward Cox regression analysis, septic shock (hazard ratio 1.80), acute renal injury (hazard ratio 2.06), history of coronary heart disease (hazard ratio 0.36) and history of stage I/II solid tumor malignancy (hazard ratio 1.79) were the only independent variables associated with 28-day mortality. Serum levels of procalcitonin and of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor were similar between the two groups of comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Past history of stage I/II solid malignancy is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome from sepsis the first 28 days.

The early change of SOFA score as a prognostic marker of 28-day sepsis mortality: analysis through a derivation and a validation cohort.

BACKGROUND: Since the Sepsis-3 criteria, change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score has become a key component of sepsis identification. Thus, it could be argued that reversal of this change (ΔSOFA) may reflect sepsis response and could be used as measure of efficacy in interventional trials. We aimed to assess the predictive performance of ΔSOFA for 28-day mortality. METHODS: Data from two previously published randomized controlled trials were studied: the first reporting on patients with severe Gram-negative infections as a derivation cohort and the second reporting on patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia as a validation cohort. Only patients with sepsis according to the Sepsis-3 definition were included in this analysis. SOFA scores were calculated on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28. RESULTS: We included 448 patients within the derivation cohort and 199 within the validation cohort. Mean SOFA scores on day 1 were 6.06 ± 4.07 and 7.84 ± 3.39, and 28 day mortality 22.8% and 29.6%, respectively. In the derivation cohort, the earliest time point where ΔSOFA score predicted mortality was day 7 (AUROC (95% CI) 0.84 (0.80-0.89); p < 0.001). The best tradeoff for prediction was found with 25% changes (78% sensitivity, 80% specificity); less than 25% decrease of admission SOFA was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio for death 14.87). This finding was confirmed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: ΔSOFA on day 7 is a useful early prognostic marker of 28-day mortality and could serve as an endpoint in future sepsis trials alongside mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT01223690 and NCT00297674.

A prognostic score for the resolution of bacteremia by Gram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenems.

The management of bacteremia by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) necessitates a surrogate marker for response to treatment. We developed a prognostic score of bacteremia resolution using a test and a validation cohort. In the test cohort, five protein biomarkers were measured in serial daily serum samples from 39 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and CRGNB bacteremia. Receiver operator characteristic curves were designed to identify cut-off of over-time changes that were associated with more than 80% specificity for resolution of bacteremia. The developed score was validated in a cohort of 24 patients mostly with primary bacteremia by carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria (CRE). Among the five tested biomarkers, only procalcitonin (PCT) was associated with resolution of bacteremia. More precisely, resolved bacteremia was considered if at least one of three situations occurred: (a) PCT on day 2 was decreased more than 30% and PCT on day 4 was below 0.5 ng/ml; (b) PCT on day 4 was decreased more than 40% and PCT on day 4 was below 0.5 ng/ml; and (c) PCT on day 2 was decreased more than 30% and PCT on day 4 was decreased more than 40%. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the score were 66.7%, 83.3%, 90.0%, and 52.6% respectively. This score was fully validated (p values of comparison between the cohorts 0.623). The developed score is highly predictive of resolution of bacteremia by CRGNB. A prospective clinical study is mandatory to validate the results.

Early increase of VEGF-A is associated with resolution of ventilator-associated pneumonia: Clinical and experimental evidence.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A in the resolution of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was investigated in clinical and mouse pneumonia models. METHODS: VEGF-A was measured for seven consecutive days by an immunosorbent assay in sera of 82 patients with VAP and changes from baseline were correlated with the resolution of VAP. Experimental animals were challenged intratracheally with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mouse bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples and segments of lung tissue were obtained at 24, 48 and 124 h after bacterial challenge. Levels of VEGF-A, tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1ß, interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity were measured in these samples. RESULTS: VAP resolved in 36.1% of patients with a less than 45% increase of VEGF-A on day 5 compared to 65.2% of patients with a more than 45% increase (P = 0.014). This was also accompanied by an earlier resolution of VAP (log-rank: 7.99; P = 0.005) and it was not pathogen-specific. The increase of VEGF-A was an independent variable associated with VAP resolution in forward logistic regression analysis where Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were included as independent variables. VEGF-A in mouse BAL and lung tissue increased significantly at 124 h but not with the other mediators. In mice pre-treated with bevacizumab, VEGF-A concentrations decreased while TNF-α and MPO significantly increased. CONCLUSION: In patients, an association between increased levels of circulating VEGF-A and VAP resolution was observed. The mouse study suggests that elevated VEGF-A levels may be associated with lung inflammation resolution. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00297674 at www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Clarithromycin Leads to Long-Term Survival and Cost Benefit in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and Sepsis.

Increasing numbers of admissions for sepsis impose a heavy burden on health care systems worldwide, while novel therapies have proven both expensive and ineffective. We explored the long-term mortality and hospitalization costs after adjunctive therapy with intravenous clarithromycin in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Two hundred patients with sepsis and VAP were enrolled in a published randomized clinical trial; 100 were allocated to blind treatment with a placebo and another 100 to clarithromycin at 1 g daily for three consecutive days. Long-term mortality was recorded. The hospitalization cost was calculated by direct quantitation of imaging tests, medical interventions, laboratory tests, nonantibiotic drugs and antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and parenteral and enteral nutrition. Quantities were priced by the respective prices defined by the Greek government in 2002. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality; cumulative hospitalization cost was the secondary endpoint. All-cause mortality rates on day 90 were 60% in the placebo arm and 43% in the clarithromycin arm (P = 0.023); 141 patients were alive on day 28, and mortality rates between days 29 and 90 were 44.4% and 17.4%, respectively (P = 0.001). The mean cumulative costs on day 25 in the placebo group and in the clarithromycin group were €14,701.10 and €13,100.50 per patient staying alive, respectively (P = 0.048). Respective values on day 45 were €26,249.50 and €19,303.10 per patient staying alive (P = 0.011); this was associated with the savings from drugs other than antimicrobials. It is concluded that intravenous clarithromycin for three consecutive days as an adjunctive treatment in VAP and sepsis offers long-term survival benefit along with a considerable reduction in the hospitalization cost. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00297674.).

Microcirculatory alterations during continuous renal replacement therapy in ICU: A novel view on the 'dialysis trauma' concept.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate microcirculation over 24 h renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational study, measuring microcirculation parameters, monitored by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) before hemodiafiltration onset (H0), and at six (H6) and 24 h (H24) during CRRT in critically ill patients. Serum Cystatin C (sCysC) and soluble (s)E-selectin levels were measured at the same time points. Twenty-eight patients [19 men (68%)] were included in the study. RESULTS: Tissue oxygen saturation (StO2, %) [76.5 ± 12.5 (H0) vs 75 ± 11 (H6) vs 70 ± 16 (H24), p = 0.04], reperfusion rate, indicating endothelial function (EF, %/sec) [2.25 ± 1.44 (H0) vs 2.1 ± 1.8 (H6) vs 1.6 ± 1.4 (H24), p = 0.02] and sCysC (mg/L) [2.7 ± 0.8 (H0) vs 2.2 ± 0.6 (H6) vs 1.8 ± 0.8 (H24), p < 0.0001] significantly decreased within the 24 h CRRT. Change of EF positively correlated with changes of sCysC within 24 h CRRT (r = 0.464, p = 0.013) while in patients with diabetes the change of StO2 correlated with dose (r = − 0.8, p = 0.01). No correlation existed between hemoglobin and temperature changes with the deteriorated microcirculation indices. sE-Selectin levels in serum were elevated; no difference was established over the 24 h CRRT period. A strong correlation existed between the sE-Selectin concentration change at H6 and H24 and the mean arterial pressure change in the same period (r = 0.77, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the first 24 h of CRRT implementation in critically ill patients, deterioration of microcirculation parameters was noted. Microcirculatory alterations correlated with sCysC changes and with dose in patients with diabetes.

Early administration of hydrocortisone replacement after the advent of septic shock: impact on survival and immune response*.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of early initiation of hydrocortisone therapy on the clinical course of septic shock and on cytokine release. DESIGN: Prospective study in patients with septic shock treated with low doses of hydrocortisone. SETTING: ICUs and general wards. PATIENTS: Over a 2-year period, 170 patients with septic shock treated with low doses of hydrocortisone were enrolled. Blood was sampled from 34 patients for isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokine stimulation before and 24 hours after the start of hydrocortisone. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After quartile analysis, patients were divided into those with early initiation of hydrocortisone (< 9 hr after vasopressors, n = 46) and those with late initiation of hydrocortisone (> 9 hr after vasopressors, n = 124). After adjusting for disease severity and type of infection, a protective effect of early hydrocortisone administration against unfavorable outcome was found (hazard ratio, 0.20; p = 0.012). Time of discontinuation of vasopressors was earlier among patients with initiation of hydrocortisone within 9 hours. Production of tumor necrosis factor-α was lower among patients who had had hydrocortisone early. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving hydrocortisone for septic shock, early initiation of treatment was associated with improved survival. This treatment was also associated with attenuated stimulation of tumor necrosis factor-α.

The effect of high-flow oxygen via tracheostomy on respiratory pattern and diaphragmatic function in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: A randomized, physiological, crossover study.

Background: Compared to conventional oxygen devices, high-flow oxygen treatment (HFOT) through the nasal cannulae has demonstrated clinical benefits. Limited data exist on whether such effects are also present in HFOT through tracheostomy. Hence, we aimed to examine the short-term effects of HFOT through tracheostomy on diaphragmatic function and respiratory parameters in tracheostomized patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation. Methods: A randomized, crossover, physiological study was conducted in our ICU between December 2020 and April 2021, in patients with tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The patients underwent a 30-min spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and received oxygen either via T-piece or by HFOT through tracheostomy, followed by a washout period of 15-min breathing through the T-piece and receipt of 30-min oxygen with the other modality in a randomized crossover manner. At the start and end of each session, blood gasses, breathing frequency (f), and tidal volume (VT) via a Wright's spirometer were measured, along with diaphragm ultrasonography including diaphragm excursion and diaphragmatic thickening fraction, which expressed the inspiratory muscle effort. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled in whom 19 sessions were uneventfully completed; eight patients were studied twice on two different days with alternate sessions; and three patients were studied once. Patients were randomly assigned to start the SBT with a T-piece (n=10 sessions) or with HFOT (n=9 sessions). With HFOT, VT and minute ventilation (VE) significantly increased during SBT (from [465±119] mL to [549±134] mL, P <0.001 and from [12.4±4.3] L/min to [13.1±4.2] L/min, P <0.05, respectively), but they did not change significantly during SBT with T-piece (from [495±132] mL to [461±123] mL and from [12.8±4.4] mL to [12.0±4.4] mL, respectively); f/VT decreased during HFOT (from [64±31] breaths/(min∙L) to [49±24] breaths/(min∙L), P <0.001), but it did not change significantly during SBT with T-piece (from [59±28] breaths/(min∙L) to [64±33] breaths/(min∙L)); partial pressure of arterial oxygen increased during HFOT (from [99±39] mmHg to [132±48] mmHg, P <0.001), but it decreased during SBT with T-piece (from [124±50] mmHg to [83±22] mmHg, P <0.01). In addition, with HFOT, diaphragmatic excursion increased (from [12.9±3.3] mm to [15.7±4.4] mm, P <0.001), but it did not change significantly during SBT with T-piece (from [13.4±3.3] mm to [13.6±3.3] mm). The diaphragmatic thickening fraction did not change during SBT either with T-piece or with HFOT. Conclusion: In patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation, HFOT through tracheostomy compared with T-piece improves ventilation, pattern of breathing, and oxygenation without increasing the inspiratory muscle effort. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ldentifer: NCT04758910.

EARLY TRAJECTORY OF VENOUS EXCESS ULTRASOUND SCORE IS ASSOCIATED WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF GENERAL ICU PATIENTS.

ABSTRACT: Background: Systemic venous congestion, assessed by the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score, has been associated with adverse effects, including acute kidney injury (AKI), in patients with cardiac disease. In general intensive care unit (ICU) patients, the association between VExUS score and outcomes is understudied. We aimed to investigate the association between the trajectory of VExUS score within the first 3 days of ICU admission and the composite clinical outcome of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30). Methods: In this prospective observational study, including patients consecutively admitted to the ICU, VExUS score was calculated within 24 h after ICU admission (day 1) and at 48 to 72 h (day 3). D-VExUS was calculated as the difference between the VExUS score on day 3 minus that on day 1. Development of AKI within 7 days and all-cause mortality within 30 days were recorded. Results: A total of 89 patients (62% men; median age, 62 years; median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 24) were included. Sixty (67%) patients developed AKI within 7 days, and 17 (19%) patients died within 30 days after ICU admission. D-VExUS was associated with MAKE30, even after adjustment for confounders (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.66; P = 0.01). VExUS scores on days 1 or 3 were not associated with MAKE30. Also, VExUS scores on day 1 or on day 3 and D-VExUS were not associated with development of AKI or mortality. Conclusions: In a general ICU cohort, early trajectory of VExUS score, but not individual VExUS scores at different time points, was associated with the patient-centered MAKE30 outcome. Dynamic changes rather than snapshot measurements may unmask the adverse effects of systemic venous congestion on important clinical outcomes.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin and Its Combination with Other Biomarkers for Candidemia in Critically Ill Patients.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of serum procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), and their combination, in distinguishing candidemia from bacteremia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: This is a retrospective study in ICU patients with documented bloodstream infections (BSIs) and with both serum PCT and CRP measurements on the day of the positive blood sample. Illness severity was assessed by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on both admission and BSI day. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data, including PCT and CRP levels and NLR on the day of the BSI, were recorded. Results: A total of 63 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 32 had bacteremia and 31 had candidemia. PCT, CRP, and NLR values were all significantly lower in candidemia compared with bacteremia (0.29 (0.14-0.69) vs. 1.73 (0.5-6.9) ng/mL, p < 0.001, 6.3 (2.4-11.8) vs. 19 (10.7-24.8) mg/dl, p < 0.001 and 6 (3.7-8.6) vs. 9.8 (5.3-16.3), p = 0.001, respectively). PCT was an independent risk factor for candidemia diagnosis (OR 0.153, 95%CI: 0.04-0.58, p = 0.006). A multivariable model consisting of the above three variables had better predictive ability (AUC-ROC = 0.88, p < 0.001), for candidemia diagnosis, as compared to that of PCT, CRP, and NLR, whose AUC-ROCs were all lower (0.81, p < 0.001, 0.78, p < 0.001, and 0.68, p = 0.015, respectively). Conclusions: A combination of routinely available laboratory tests, such as PCT, CRP, and NLR, could prove useful for the early identification of ICU patients with candidemia.

Severe mold fungal infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic put an unprecedented strain on modern societies and healthcare systems. A significantly higher incidence of invasive fungal co-infections was noted compared with the pre-COVID-19 era, adding new diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the critical care setting. In the current narrative review, we focus on invasive mold infections caused by Aspergillus and Mucor species in critically ill COVID-19 patients. We discuss up-to-date information on the incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of these mold-COVID-19 co-infections, as well as recommendations on preventive and prophylactic interventions. Traditional risk factors were often not recognized in COVID-19-associated aspergillosis and mucormycosis, highlighting the role of other determinant risk factors. The associated patient outcomes were worse compared with COVID-19 patients without mold co-infection.

Temporal trends in laboratory parameters in survivors and non­survivors of critical COVID­19 illness and the effect of dexamethasone treatment.

Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced changes in laboratory parameters in patients upon admission have been well-documented, information on their temporal changes is limited. The present study describes the laboratory trends and the effect of dexamethasone treatment on these parameters, in patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU). Routine laboratory parameters, namely white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet (PLT) counts, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and albumin concentrations, were recorded upon admission to the ICU and, thereafter, on days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 21; these values were compared between survivors and non-survivors, as well as between those who were treated with dexamethasone and those who were not. Among the 733 patients in the ICU, (mean age, 65±13 years; 68% males; ICU mortality rate 45%; 76% of patients treated with dexamethasone), the WBC and neutrophil counts were persistently high in all patients, without significant differences over the first 15 days. Initially, low lymphocyte counts exhibited increasing trends, but remained higher in survivors compared to non-survivors (P=0.01). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was persistently elevated in all patients, although it was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (P<0.001). The PLT count was initially increased in all patients, although it was significantly decreased in non-survivors over time. The fibrinogen and LDH values remained similarly elevated in all patients. However, the increased levels of CRP, which did not differ between patients upon admission, further increased in non-survivors compared to survivors after day 10 (P=0.001). Declining trends in albumin levels over time, overall, with a significant decrease in non-survivors compared to survivors, were observed. Dexamethasone treatment significantly affected the temporal progression of fibrinogen and CRP in survivors and that of NLR in non-survivors. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that patients in the ICU with COVID-19 present persistently abnormal laboratory findings and significant differences in laboratory trends of NLR, CRP, PLT and albumin, but not in WBC and neutrophil count, and fibrinogen and LDH levels, between survivors and non-survivors. The temporal progression of fibrinogen, CRP and NLR is affected by dexamethasone treatment.

Compartmentalization of lipid peroxidation in sepsis by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: experimental and clinical evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests a link between excess lipid peroxidation and specific organ failures in sepsis. No study has been performed in sepsis by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: Lethal sepsis was induced in rats by the intraperitoneal injection of one MDR isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Produced malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured in tissues 5 hours after bacterial challenge with the thiobarbiturate assay followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Results were compared with those from a cohort of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and sepsis by MDR Gram-negative bacteria. More precisely, serum MDA was measured on 7 consecutive days, and it was correlated with clinical characteristics. RESULTS: MDA of septic rats was greater in the liver, spleen, and aortic wall, and it was lower in the right kidney compared with sham operated-on animals. Findings were confirmed by the studied cohort. Circulating MDA was greater in patients with hepatic dysfunction and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared with patients without any organ failures. The opposite was found for patients with acute renal dysfunction. No differences were found between patients with ARDS without or with cardiovascular (CV) failure and patients without any organ failure. Serial measurements of MDA in serum of patients indicated that levels of MDA were greater in survivors of hepatic dysfunction and ARDS and lower in survivors of acute renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Animal findings and results of human sepsis are complementary, and they suggest a compartmentalization of lipid peroxidation in systemic infections by MDR gram-negative bacteria.

Editorial for Special Issue "Antimicrobial Therapy in Intensive Care Unit".

Life-threatening infections, either as the initial reason for an admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) or acquired in the ICU, are especially common among critically ill patients [...].

Post Hospital Discharge Functional Recovery of Critical Illness Survivors. Systematic Review.

Background: Millions of people face critical illnesses and need to be hospitalized in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) annually worldwide. Despite the fact that survival rates of these patients have increased, they develop various cognitive, psychological and functional impairments. This study aims to investigate the significance of the recovery interventions following intensive care unit discharge, the effectiveness of the rehabilitative protocols and their possible deficits. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed) and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) were searched for studies analyzing the recovery potentials post-ICU among adults, who spent at least 48 hours at the ICU. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed via PEDro Scale. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included. These took place mainly at specialized rehabilitation gyms as well as patients home environments. Studies analyses showed that treatment group showed improvement in functional ability in relation to control group. Nevertheless, differences between two groups were not statistically significant (P<0.05). The majority of studies assessed cardiorespiratory endurance and muscular strength. Conclusions: The included rehabilitation programs were determined to be effective. Although they didn't prove any statistically significant difference between groups, quality of life enhancements and stress reduction were reported. Hence, new randomized controlled trials are required in order to provide more accurate data on the potential benefits of rehabilitation strategies among post-ICU patients.

Racial and ethnic minority participants in clinical trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

PURPOSE: There is growing interest in improving the inclusiveness of racial and ethnic minority participants in trials of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). With our study we aimed to examine temporal trends of representation and mortality of racial and ethnic minority participants in randomized controlled trials of ARDS. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of eight ARDS Network and PETAL Network therapeutic clinical trials, published between 2000 and 2019. We classified race/ethnicity into "White", "Black", "Hispanic", or "Other" (including Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander participants). RESULTS: Of 5375 participants with ARDS, 1634 (30.4%) were Black, Hispanic, or Other race participants. Representation of racial and ethnic minority participants in trials did not change significantly over time (p = 0.257). However, among participants with moderate to severe ARDS (i.e., partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio < 150), the difference in mortality between racial and ethnic minority participants and White participants decreased over time. In the five most recent trials, including 2923 participants with ARDS, there were no statistically significant differences in mortality between racial/ethnic groups, even after adjusting for potential confounders. In these five most recent trials, mortality was 31% for White, 31.9% for Black, 30.3% for Hispanic, and 37.1% for Other race participants (p = 0.633). CONCLUSION: Representation of racial and ethnic minority participants in ARDS trials from North America, published between 2000 and 2019, did not change over time. Black and Hispanic participants with ARDS may have similar mortality as White participants within trials.