The Association Between Tranexamic Acid and Seizures in Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Tranexamic acid (TXA) administered within 2 h of injury reduces mortality in traumatic brain injury (TBI) with intracranial hemorrhage. TXA also reduces the seizure threshold in a dose-dependent manner. We examined whether a 2-g bolus of prehospital TXA administered in moderate or severe TBI is associated with seizure activity within 72 h of injury. METHODS: Patients from the prehospital TXA for TBI trial with Glasgow Coma Scale < 13, blunt head injury, and time-of-seizure data were included in this analysis. The original trial randomized patients with suspected TBI to placebo, 1-g TXA bolus + 1-g 8-h TXA infusion, or 2-g TXA bolus within 2 h of injury. In this secondary analysis, multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association of treatment group with seizure incidence. The model controlled for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, intracranial hemorrhage, Abbreviated Injury Scale-head, and home antiseizure medication use. RESULTS: Of the 786 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 19 had seizures within 72 h (five in placebo, two in 1-g bolus/1-g infusion, and 12 in 2-g bolus). The 2-g TXA bolus was not associated with increased seizures compared to placebo (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.12-1.18, P = 0.12). Home antiseizure medication use was associated with increased seizures (odds ratio 15.95, 95% confidence interval 3.79-60.57, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A prehospital 2-g TXA bolus in moderate or severe TBI was not associated with increased seizure activity during the first 72 h after injury; however, limited power, limited use of continuous electroencephalography, and unavailable seizure prophylaxis data highlight the need for further study.

Intravenous Versus Intraosseous Use of Tranexamic Acid in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug that has been demonstrated to reduce head injury-related mortality when given within 2 h of injury in patients with traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage. It is usually administered via intravenous (IV) access, which can be difficult to obtain in prehospital and austere settings. Intraosseous (IO) access is fast and offers an alternative when IV access proves challenging; however, TXA administration via IO access has never been studied in humans. We sought to determine if the total drug exposure of TXA given in the prehospital setting in patients with moderate or severe brain injury differs based on route of administration. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the prehospital TXA for traumatic brain injury trial (NCT01990768). Participants who received TXA via IO administration were compared to those who received TXA via IV administration and stratified by renal function category based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. The area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule (Phoenix WinNonlin 8.3, Certara, Princeton NJ) to obtain total drug exposure. The inverse variance method was used to combine observations within strata and calculate mean differences. RESULTS: Of the 966 participants enrolled in the trial, 345 participants received a 2-g TXA prehospital bolus (11 IO, 334 IV); 312 participants received a 1-g TXA prehospital bolus followed by a 1-g TXA infusion in-hospital over 8 h (13 IO, 299 IV). After exclusion because of missing data and extreme estimated AUC, 233 IV and eight IO participants in the 2-g bolus arm and 152 IV and eight IO participants in the 1-g bolus 1-g infusion arm remained. Participants did not differ by age, sex, race, ethnicity, body mass index, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, or clot lysis at 30 min on thromboelastography. No difference in the mean AUCs were observed between IV and IO for either the 2-g bolus group (-2.6 µ g/mL/h [IO] compared to IV, 95% confidence interval: -28.4 to 23.3 µ g/mL/h) or the 1-g bolus/1-g infusion group (-13.0 µ g/mL/h [IO] compared to IV, 95% confidence interval: -236.2 to 210.3 µ g/mL/h). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that the administration of TXA via IO and IV routes may result in similar total drug exposure. Further studies incorporating larger numbers with clinical outcomes are needed to confirm this finding.

Fibrinolysis in Traumatic Brain Injury: Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Considerations.

Posttraumatic coagulopathy involves disruption of both the coagulation and fibrinolytic pathways secondary to tissue damage, hypotension, and inflammatory upregulation. This phenomenon contributes to delayed complications after traumatic brain injury (TBI), including intracranial hemorrhage progression and systemic disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Development of an early hyperfibrinolytic state may result in uncontrolled bleeding and is associated with increased mortality in patients with TBI. Although fibrinolytic assays are not routinely performed in the assessment of posttraumatic coagulopathy, circulating biomarkers such as D-dimer and fibrin degradation products have demonstrated potential utility in outcome prediction. Unfortunately, the relatively delayed nature of these tests limits their clinical utility. In contrast, viscoelastic tests are able to provide a rapid global assessment of coagulopathy, although their ability to reliably identify disruptions in the fibrinolytic cascade remains unclear. Limited evidence supports the use of hypertonic saline, cryoprecipitate, and plasma to correct fibrinolytic disruption; however, some studies suggest more harm than benefit. Recently, early use of tranexamic acid in patients with TBI and confirmed hyperfibrinolysis has been proposed as a strategy to further improve clinical outcomes. Moving forward, further delineation of TBI phenotypes and the clinical implications of fibrinolysis based on phenotypic variation is needed. In this review, we summarize the clinical aspects of fibrinolysis in TBI, including diagnosis, treatment, and clinical correlates, with identification of targeted areas for future research efforts.

Early Tranexamic Acid Administration After Traumatic Brain Injury Is Associated With Reduced Syndecan-1 and Angiopoietin-2 in Patients With Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of early tranexamic acid (TXA) administration on circulating markers of endotheliopathy. SETTING: Twenty trauma centers in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) (MS-TBI) and intracranial hemorrhage who were not in shock (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg). DESIGN: TXA (2 g) or placebo administered prior to hospital arrival, less than 2 hours postinjury. Blood samples and head computed tomographic scan collected upon arrival. Plasma markers measured using Luminex analyte platform. Differences in median marker levels evaluated using t tests performed on log-transformed variables. Comparison groups were TXA versus placebo and less than 45 minutes versus 45 minutes or more from time of injury to treatment administration. MAIN MEASURES: Plasma levels of angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, syndecan-1, thrombomodulin, thrombospondin-2, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, vascular adhesion molecule 1. RESULTS: Demographics and Injury Severity Score were similar between the placebo (n = 129) and TXA (n = 158) groups. Levels of syndecan-1 were lower in the TXA group (median [interquartile range or IQR] = 254.6 pg/mL [200.7-322.0] vs 272.4 pg/mL [219.7-373.1], P = .05. Patients who received TXA less than 45 minutes postinjury had significantly lower levels of angiopoietin-2 (median [IQR] = 144.3 pg/mL [94.0-174.3] vs 154.6 pg/mL [110.4-209.8], P = .05). No differences were observed in remaining markers. CONCLUSIONS: TXA may inhibit early upregulation of syndecan-1 and angiopoietin-2 in patients with MS-TBI, suggesting attenuation of protease-mediated vascular glycocalyx breakdown. The findings of this exploratory analysis should be considered preliminary and require confirmation in future studies.

Effect of Out-of-Hospital Tranexamic Acid vs Placebo on 6-Month Functional Neurologic Outcomes in Patients With Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability due to trauma. Early administration of tranexamic acid may benefit patients with TBI. Objective: To determine whether tranexamic acid treatment initiated in the out-of-hospital setting within 2 hours of injury improves neurologic outcome in patients with moderate or severe TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 20 trauma centers and 39 emergency medical services agencies in the US and Canada from May 2015 to November 2017. Eligible participants (N = 1280) included out-of-hospital patients with TBI aged 15 years or older with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or less and systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Interventions: Three interventions were evaluated, with treatment initiated within 2 hours of TBI: out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) bolus and in-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) 8-hour infusion (bolus maintenance group; n = 312), out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (2 g) bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (bolus only group; n = 345), and out-of-hospital placebo bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (placebo group; n = 309). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was favorable neurologic function at 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score >4 [moderate disability or good recovery]) in the combined tranexamic acid group vs the placebo group. Asymmetric significance thresholds were set at 0.1 for benefit and 0.025 for harm. There were 18 secondary end points, of which 5 are reported in this article: 28-day mortality, 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (range, 0 [no disability] to 30 [death]), progression of intracranial hemorrhage, incidence of seizures, and incidence of thromboembolic events. Results: Among 1063 participants, a study drug was not administered to 96 randomized participants and 1 participant was excluded, resulting in 966 participants in the analysis population (mean age, 42 years; 255 [74%] male participants; mean Glasgow Coma Scale score, 8). Of these participants, 819 (84.8%) were available for primary outcome analysis at 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 65% of patients in the tranexamic acid groups vs 62% in the placebo group (difference, 3.5%; [90% 1-sided confidence limit for benefit, -0.9%]; P = .16; [97.5% 1-sided confidence limit for harm, 10.2%]; P = .84). There was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality between the tranexamic acid groups vs the placebo group (14% vs 17%; difference, -2.9% [95% CI, -7.9% to 2.1%]; P = .26), 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (6.8 vs 7.6; difference, -0.9 [95% CI, -2.5 to 0.7]; P = .29), or progression of intracranial hemorrhage (16% vs 20%; difference, -5.4% [95% CI, -12.8% to 2.1%]; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate to severe TBI, out-of-hospital tranexamic acid administration within 2 hours of injury compared with placebo did not significantly improve 6-month neurologic outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01990768.

Association of fibrinolysis phenotype with patient outcomes following traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Impaired coagulation is associated with elevated risk of mortality in trauma patients. Prior studies have demonstrated increased mortality in patients with hyperfibrinolysis (HF) and fibrinolysis shutdown (SD). In addition, prior studies have demonstrated no effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) on fibrinolysis phenotypes. We examined the association of admission fibrinolysis phenotype with traumatic brain injury (TBI) patient outcomes. METHODS: Data were extracted from a placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial. Patients ≥15 years with TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score, 3-12) and systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg were randomized in the out-of-hospital setting to receive placebo bolus/placebo infusion (Placebo), 1 gram (g) TXA bolus/1 g TXA infusion (bolus maintenance [BM]); or 2 g TXA bolus/placebo infusion (bolus only [BO]). Fibrinolysis phenotypes on admission were determined by clot lysis at 30 minutes (LY30): SD, ≤0.8%; physiologic, 0.9% to 2.9%; HF, ≥3%. Logistic regression was used to control for age, sex, penetrating injury, Injury Severity Score, maximum head AIS, and TXA treatment group. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Fibrinolysis shutdown was the most common phenotype in all treatment groups and was associated with increased age, Injury Severity Score, and presence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Inpatient mortality was 15.2% for SD and HF, and 10.6% for physiologic ( p = 0.49). No differences in mortality, disability rating scale at 6 months, acute kidney injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or multi-organ failure were noted between fibrinolysis phenotypes. CONCLUSION: SD is the most common phenotype expressed in moderate to severe TBI. In TBI, there is no association between fibrinolysis phenotype and mortality or other major complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

TXA does not affect levels of TBI-related biomarkers in blunt TBI with ICH: A secondary analysis of the prehospital TXA for TBI trial.

BACKGROUND: Brain specific biomarkers such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) have been identified as tools for diagnosis in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to decrease mortality in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The effect of TXA on these biomarkers is unknown. We investigated whether TXA affects levels of GFAP, UCH-L1, and MAP-2, and whether biomarker levels are associated with mortality in patients receiving TXA. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the prehospital TXA for TBI trial had GFAP, UCHL-1 and MAP-2 levels drawn at 0 hour and 24 hours postinjury (n = 422). Patients with ICH from blunt trauma with a GCS <13 and SBP >90 were randomized to placebo, 2 g TXA bolus, or 1 g bolus +1 g/8 hours TXA infusion. Associations of TXA and 24-hour biomarker change were assessed with multivariate linear regression. Association of biomarkers with 28-day mortality was assessed with multivariate logistic regression. All models were controlled for age, GCS, ISS, and AIS head. RESULTS: Administration of TXA was not associated with a change in biomarkers over 24 hours postinjury. Changes in biomarker levels were associated with AIS head and age. On admission, higher GFAP (odds ratio [OR], 1.75; confidence interval [CI], 1.31-2.38; p < 0.001) was associated with increased 28-day mortality. At 24 hours postinjury, higher levels of GFAP (OR, 2.09; CI, 1.37-3.30; p < 0.001 and UCHL-1 (OR, 2.98; CI, 1.77-5.25; p < 0.001) were associated with mortality. A change in UCH levels from 0 hour to 24 hours postinjury was also associated with increased mortality (OR, 1.68; CI, 1.15-2.49; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Administration of TXA does not impact change in GFAP, UCHL-1, or MAP-2 during the first 24 hours after blunt TBI with ICH. Higher levels of GFAP and UCH early after injury may help identify patients at high risk for 28-day mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Evaluating and Updating the IMPACT Model to Predict Outcomes in Two Contemporary North American Traumatic Brain Injury Cohorts.

The International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) model is a widely recognized prognostic model applied after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, it was developed with patient cohorts that may not reflect modern practice patterns in North America. We analyzed data from two sources: the placebo arm of the phase II double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial Prehospital Tranexamic Acid for TBI (TXA) cohort and an observational cohort with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria (Predictors of Low-risk Phenotypes after Traumatic Brain Injury Incorporating Proteomic Biomarker Signatures [PROTIPS] cohort). All three versions of the IMPACT model-core, extended, and laboratory-were evaluated for 6-month mortality (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended [GOSE] = 1) and unfavorable outcomes (GOSE = 1-4). Calibration (intercept and slope) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC-AUC]) were used to assess model performance. We then compared three model updating methods-recalibration in the large, logistic recalibration, and coefficient update-with the best update method determined by likelihood ratio tests. In our calibration analysis, recalibration improved both intercepts and slopes, indicating more accurate predicted probabilities when recalibration was done. Discriminative performance of the IMPACT models, measured by AUC, showed mortality prediction ROCs between 0.61 and 0.82 for the TXA cohort, with the coefficient updated Lab model achieving the highest at 0.84. Unfavorable outcomes had lower AUCs, ranging from 0.60 to 0.79. Similarly, in the PROTIPS cohort, AUCs for mortality ranged from 0.75 to 0.82, with the coefficient updated Lab model also showing superior performance (AUC 0.84). Unfavorable outcomes in this cohort presented AUCs from 0.67 to 0.73, consistently lower than mortality predictions. The closed testing procedure using likelihood ratio tests consistently identified the coefficient update model as superior, outperforming the original and recalibrated models across all cohorts. In our comprehensive evaluation of the IMPACT model, the coefficient updated models were the best performing across all cohorts through a structured closed testing procedure. Thus, standardization of model updating procedures is needed to reproducibly determine the best performing versions of IMPACT that reflect the specific characteristics of a dataset.

Predicting Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage in the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial.

Progression of intracranial hemorrhage is a common, potentially devastating complication after moderate/severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Clinicians have few tools to predict which patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on their initial head computed tomography (hCT) scan will progress. The objective of this investigation was to identify clinical, imaging, and/or protein biomarkers associated with progression of intracranial hemorrhage (PICH) after moderate/severe TBI and to create an accurate predictive model of PICH based on clinical features available at presentation. We analyzed a subset of subjects from the phase II double-blind, multi-center, randomized "Prehospital Tranexamic Acid Use for TBI" trial. This subset was limited to the placebo arm of the parent trial with evidence of hemorrhage on the initial hCT and a follow-up hCT 6 h after. PICH was defined as an increase in hemorrhage size by 30% or more, or the development of new hemorrhage in the intra- and extra-axial intracranial vault between the initial and the follow-up hCT. Two independent radiologists evaluated each hCT, and conflicts were adjudicated by a third. Clinical and radiographic characteristics were collected, along with plasma protein biomarkers at admission. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed, and each principal component (PC) was interrogated for its association with PICH. Finally, expert opinion and recursive feature extraction (RFE) were used to select input features for the construction of several supervised classification models. Their ability to predict PICH was quantified and compared. In this subset of subjects (n = 104), 46% (n = 48) demonstrated PICH. Univariate analyses showed no association between PICH and age, sex, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), GCS motor subscore, presence of midline shift, admission platelet count or admission INR. Radiographic severity scores (Marshall score [p = 0.007], Rotterdam score [p = 0.004]), and initial hematoma volume [p = 0.005] were associated with PICH. Higher levels of admission glial fibrillary acidic protein (p < 0.001) and MAP (p = 0.011) were also associated with PICH. Of the PCs, PC1 was significantly associated with PICH (p = 0.0125). Using multimodal data input, machine learning classifiers successfully discriminated patients with or without PICH. Models composed of machine-selected features performed better than models composed of expert-selected variables (reaching an average of 77% accuracy, AUC = 0.78 versus AUC = 0.68 for the expert-selected variables). Predictive models utilizing variables measured at admission can accurately predict PICH, confirmed by the 6-hour follow-up hCT. Our best-performing models must now be externally validated in a separate cohort of TBI patients with low GCS and initial hCT positive for hemorrhage.

State-Level Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence, Abortion Access, and Peripartum Homicide: Call for Screening and Violence Interventions for Pregnant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite representing 4% of the global population, the US has the fifth highest number of intentional homicides in the world. Peripartum people represent a unique and vulnerable subset of homicide victims. This study aimed to understand the risk factors for peripartum homicide. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from the 2018 to 2020 National Violent Death Reporting System to compare homicide rates of peripartum and nonperipartum people capable of becoming pregnant (12 to 50 years of age). Peripartum was defined as currently pregnant or within 1-year postpartum. We additionally compared state-level peripartum homicide rates between states categorized as restrictive, neutral, or protective of abortion. Pearson's chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used. RESULTS: There were 496 peripartum compared with 8,644 nonperipartum homicide victims. The peripartum group was younger (27.4 ± 71 vs 33.0 ± 9.6, p < 0.001). Intimate partner violence causing the homicide was more common in the peripartum group (39.9% vs 26.4%, p < 0.001). Firearms were used in 63.4% of homicides among the peripartum group compared with 49.5% in the comparison (p < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in peripartum homicide between states based on policies regarding abortion access (protective 0.37, neutral 0.45, restrictive 0.64; p < 0.01); the same trend was not seen with male homicides. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nonperipartum peers, peripartum people are at increased risk for homicide due to intimate partner violence, specifically due to firearm violence. Increasing rates of peripartum homicide occur in states with policies that are restrictive to abortion access. There is a dire need for universal screening and interventions for peripartum patients. Research and policies to reduce violence against pregnant people must also consider the important role that abortion access plays in protecting safety.

Prehospital tranexamic acid is associated with a survival benefit without an increase in complications: results of two harmonized randomized clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that prehospital tranexamic acid (TXA) administration following injury is safe and improves survival. However, the effect of prehospital TXA on adverse events, transfusion requirements and any dose response relationships require further elucidation. METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed using harmonized data from two large, double-blinded, randomized prehospital TXA trials. Outcomes, including 28-day mortality, pertinent adverse events and 24-hour red cell transfusion requirements were compared between TXA and placebo groups. Regression analyses were utilized to determine the independent associations of TXA after adjusting for study enrollment, injury characteristics and shock severity across a broad spectrum of injured patients. Dose response relationships were similarly characterized based upon grams of prehospital TXA administered. RESULTS: A total of 1744 patients had data available for secondary analysis and were included in the current harmonized secondary analysis. The study cohort had an overall mortality of 11.2% and a median injury severity score of 16 (IQR: 5-26). TXA was independently associated with a lower risk of 28-day mortality (HR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.54, 0.96, p = 0.03). Prehospital TXA also demonstrated an independent 22% lower risk of mortality for every gram of prehospital TXA administered (HR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.63, 0.96, p = 0.02). Multivariable linear regression verified that patients who received TXA were independently associated with lower 24-hour red cell transfusion requirements (ß: -0.31, 95% CI -0.61, -0.01, p = 0.04) with a dose-response relationship (ß: -0.24, 95% CI -0.45, -0.02, p = 0.03). There was no independent association of prehospital TXA administration on VTE, seizure, or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary analysis of harmonized data from two large randomized interventional trials, prehospital TXA administration across a broad spectrum of injured patients is safe. Prehospital TXA is associated with a significant 28-day survival benefit, lower red cell transfusion requirements at 24 hours and demonstrates a dose-response relationship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Diagnostic Performance of GFAP, UCH-L1, and MAP-2 Within 30 and 60 Minutes of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Importance: Data on the performance of traumatic brain injury (TBI) biomarkers within minutes of injury are lacking. Objectives: To examine the performance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2) within 30 and 60 minutes of TBI in identifying intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) scan, need for neurosurgical intervention (NSI), and clinically important early outcomes (CIEO). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study is a biomarker analysis of a multicenter prehospital TBI cohort from the Prehospital Tranexamic Acid Use for TBI clinical trial conducted across 20 centers and 39 emergency medical systems in North America from May 2015 to March 2017. Prehospital hemodynamically stable adult patients with traumatic injury and suspected moderate to severe TBI were included. Blood samples were measured for GFAP, UCH-L1, and MAP-2. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2023, to March 15, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The presence of CT lesions, diffuse injury severity on CT, NSI within 24 hours of injury, and CIEO (composite outcome including early death, neurosurgery, or prolonged mechanical ventilation ≥7 days) within 7 days of injury. Results: Of 966 patients enrolled, 804 patients (mean [SD] age, 41 [19] years; 418 [74.2%] male) had blood samples, including 563 within 60 minutes and 375 within 30 minutes of injury. Among patients with blood drawn within 30 minutes of injury, 212 patients (56.5%) had CT lesions, 61 patients (16.3%) had NSI, and 112 patients (30.0%) had CIEO. Among those with blood drawn within 60 minutes, 316 patients (56.1%) had CT lesions, 95 patients (16.9%) had NSI, and 172 patients (30.6%) had CIEO. All biomarkers showed significant elevations with worsening diffuse injury on CT within 30 and 60 minutes of injury. Among blood samples taken within 30 minutes, GFAP had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to detect CT lesions, at 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.92), followed by MAP-2 (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.73-0.83) and UCH-L1 (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80). Among blood samples taken within 60 minutes, AUCs for CT lesions were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92) for GFAP, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.80) for MAP-2, and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77) for UCH-L1. Among blood samples taken within 30 minutes, AUCs for NSI were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84) for GFAP, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81) for MAP-2, and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) for UCH-L1; and for CIEO, AUCs were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) for GFAP, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78-0.87) for MAP-2, and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.82) for UCH-L1. Combining the biomarkers was no better than GFAP alone for all outcomes. At GFAP of 30 pg/mL within 30 minutes, sensitivity for CT lesions was 98.1% (95% CI, 94.9%-99.4%) and specificity was 34.4% (95% CI, 27.2%-42.2%). GFAP levels greater than 6200 pg/mL were associated with high risk of NSI and CIEO. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of prehospital patients with TBI, GFAP, UCH-L1, and MAP-2 measured within 30 and 60 minutes of injury were significantly associated with traumatic intracranial lesions and diffuse injury severity on CT scan, 24-hour NSI, and 7-day CIEO. GFAP was the strongest independent marker associated with all outcomes. This study sets a precedent for the early utility of GFAP in the first 30 minutes from injury in future clinical and research endeavors.

The effects of prehospital TXA on mortality and neurologic outcomes in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: a subgroup analysis from the prehospital TXA for TBI trial.

BACKGROUND: In the Prehospital Tranexamic Acid (TXA) for TBI Trial, TXA administered within two hours of injury in the out-of-hospital setting did not reduce mortality in all patients with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We examined the association between TXA dosing arms, neurologic outcome, and mortality in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the Prehospital Tranexamic Acid for TBI Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT01990768]) that randomized adults with moderate/severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale<13) and systolic blood pressure > =90 mmHg within two hours of injury to a 2-gram out-of-hospital TXA bolus followed by an in-hospital saline infusion, a 1-gram out-of-hospital TXA bolus/1-gram in-hospital TXA infusion, or an out-of-hospital saline bolus/in-hospital saline infusion (placebo). This analysis included the subgroup with ICH on initial CT. Primary outcomes included 28-day mortality, 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) < = 4, and 6-month Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Outcomes were modeled using linear regression with robust standard errors. RESULTS: The primary trial included 966 patients. Among 541 participants with ICH, 28-day mortality was lower in the 2-gram TXA bolus group (17%) compared to the other two groups (1-gram bolus/1-gram infusion 26%, placebo 27%). The estimated adjusted difference between the 2-gram bolus and placebo groups was -8·5 percentage points (95% CI, -15.9 to -1.0) and between the 2-gram bolus and 1-gram bolus/1-gram infusion groups was -10.2 percentage points (95% CI, -17.6 to -2.9). DRS at 6 months was lower in the 2-gram TXA bolus group than the 1-gram bolus/1-gram infusion (estimated difference -2.1 [95% CI, -4.2 to -0.02]) and placebo groups (-2.2 [95% CI, -4.3, -0.2]). Six-month GOSE did not differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-gram out-of-hospital TXA bolus in patients with moderate/severe TBI and ICH resulted in lower 28-day mortality and lower 6-month DRS than placebo and standard TXA dosing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, Level II.

The effects of timing of prehospital tranexamic acid on outcomes after traumatic brain injury: Subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic that has shown some promise in improving outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI), but only when given early after injury. We examined the association between timing of prehospital TXA administration and outcomes in patients with moderate to severe TBI. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the multi-institutional, double-blind randomized prehospital TXA for TBI trial with blunt or penetrating injury and suspected TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 12, SBP ≥90) who received either a 2-g TXA bolus or a 1-g bolus plus 1 g 8 hour infusion within 2 hours of injury were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between early administration (<45 minutes from injury) and late administration ≥45 minutes from injury) using a χ 2 , Fischer's exact test, t test, or Mann-Whitney U test as indicated. Logistic regression examined time to drug as an independent variable. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (354 early and 259 late). Twenty-eight-day and 6-month mortalities, 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, and disability rating scale scores were not different between early and late administration. Late administration was associated with higher rates of deep venous thrombosis (0.8 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.02), cerebral vasospasm (0% vs. 2%, p = 0.01), as well as prolonged EMS transport and need for a prehospital airway ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate or severe TBI who received TXA within 2 hours of injury, no mortality benefit was observed in those who received treatment within 45 minutes of injury, although lower rates of select complications were seen. These results support protocols that recommend TXA administration within 45 minutes of injury for patients with suspected TBI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.

Comparative Effectiveness of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring vs No Monitoring in Severe Penetrating Brain Injury Management.

Importance: Civilian penetrating brain injury (PBI) is associated with high mortality. However, scant literature is available to guide neurocritical care monitoring and management of PBI. Objective: To examine the association of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring with mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and dispositional outcomes in patients with severe PBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness research study analyzed data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program of the National Trauma Data Bank in the US from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Patients with PBI were identified, and those aged 16 and 60 years who met these inclusion criteria were included: ICU LOS of more than 2 days, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score lower than 9 on arrival and at 24 hours, and Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 to 5 for the head region and lower than 3 for other body regions. Patients with bilaterally fixed pupils or incomplete data were excluded. A 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching was used to create a subgroup of patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: with vs without ICP monitoring. Data analysis was conducted between September and December 2022. Exposures: Intracranial pressure monitoring vs no monitoring. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were mortality, rate of withdrawal, ICU LOS, and dispositional outcome. Measures were age, initial systolic blood pressure, initial oxygen saturation level on a pulse oximeter, first-recorded GCS score, GCS score at 24 hours, Abbreviated Injury Scale score, midline shift, and pupillary reactivity. Results: A total of 596 patients (505 males [84.7%]; mean [SD] age, 32.2 [12.3] years) were included, among whom 220 (36.9%) died and 288 (48.3%) had ICP monitoring. The PS matching yielded 466 patients (233 in each group with vs without ICP monitoring). Overall mortality was 35.8%; 72 patients with ICP monitoring (30.9%) died compared with 95 patients (40.8%) without ICP monitoring . Patients with ICP monitoring were more likely to survive (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.05-2.25; P = .03; number needed to treat, 10). No difference in favorable discharge disposition was observed. The PS-weighted analysis included all 596 patients and found that patients with ICP monitoring were more likely to survive than those without (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10-1.78; P = .005). The E-value for the OR calculated from the PS-matched data set was 1.79. In addition, ICP monitoring vs no monitoring was associated with an increase in median (IQR) ICU LOS (15.0 [8.0-21.0] days vs 7.0 [4.0-12.0] days; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness research study, PBI management guided by ICP monitoring was associated with decreased mortality and increased ICU LOS, challenging the notion of universally poor outcomes after civilian PBI. Randomized clinical trials that evaluate the efficacy of ICP monitoring in PBI are warranted.

Tranexamic acid is not inferior to placebo with respect to adverse events in suspected traumatic brain injury patients not in shock with a normal head computed tomography scan: A retrospective study of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A 2-g bolus of tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to reduce 28-day mortality in a randomized controlled trial. This study investigates whether out-of-hospital TXA use is associated with adverse events or unfavorable outcomes in suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI) when intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is absent on initial computed tomography. METHODS: This study used data from a 2015 to 2017, multicenter, randomized trial studying the effect of the following TXA doses on moderate to severe TBI: 2-g bolus, 1-g bolus plus 1-g infusion over 8 hours, and a placebo bolus with placebo infusion. Of the 966 participants enrolled, 395 with an initial computed tomography negative for ICH were included in this analysis. Fifteen adverse events (28-day incidence) were studied: myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, seizure, pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac failure, liver failure, renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, cardiac arrest, cerebral vasospasm, "any thromboembolism," hypernatremia, acute kidney injury, and infection. Other unfavorable outcomes analyzed include mortality at 28 days and 6 months, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score of ≤4 at discharge and 6 months, intensive care unit-free days, ventilator-free days, hospital-free days, and combined unfavorable outcomes. In both study drug groups, the incidence of dichotomous outcomes and quantity of ordinal outcomes were compared with placebo. RESULTS: No statistically significant increase in adverse events or unfavorable outcomes was found between either TXA dosing regimen and placebo. Demographics and injury scores were not statistically different other than two methods of injury, which were overrepresented in the 1-g TXA bolus plus 1-g TXA infusion. CONCLUSION: Administration of either a 2-g TXA bolus or a 1-g TXA bolus plus 1-g TXA 8-hour infusion in suspected TBIs without ICH is not associated with increased adverse events or unfavorable outcomes. Because the out-of-hospital 2-g bolus is associated with a mortality benefit, it should be administered in suspected TBI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the prehospital and mass casualty research Delphi survey.

BACKGROUND: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2016 trauma system report recommended a National Trauma Research Action Plan to strengthen and guide future trauma research. To address this recommendation, 11 expert panels completed a Delphi survey process to create a comprehensive research agenda, spanning the continuum of trauma care. We describe the gap analysis and high-priority research questions generated from the National Trauma Research Action Plan panel on prehospital and mass casualty trauma care. METHODS: We recruited interdisciplinary national experts to identify gaps in the prehospital and mass casualty trauma evidence base and generate prioritized research questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. We included military and civilian representatives. Panelists were encouraged to use the Patient/Population, Intervention, Compare/Control, and Outcome format to generate research questions. We conducted four Delphi rounds in which participants generated key research questions and then prioritized the questions on a 9-point Likert scale to low-, medium-, and high-priority items. We defined consensus as ≥60% agreement on the priority category and coded research questions using a taxonomy of 118 research concepts in 9 categories. RESULTS: Thirty-one interdisciplinary subject matter experts generated 490 research questions, of which 433 (88%) reached consensus on priority. The rankings of the 433 questions were as follows: 81 (19%) high priority, 339 (78%) medium priority, and 13 (3%) low priority. Among the 81 high-priority questions, there were 46 taxonomy concepts, including health systems of care (36 questions), interventional clinical trials and comparative effectiveness (32 questions), mortality as an outcome (30 questions), prehospital time/transport mode/level of responder (24 questions), system benchmarks (17 questions), and fluid/blood product resuscitation (17 questions). CONCLUSION: This Delphi gap analysis of prehospital and mass casualty care identified 81 high-priority research questions to guide investigators and funding agencies for future trauma research.

Duplex ultrasound screening detects high rates of deep vein thromboses in critically ill trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: American College of Chest Physician (ACCP) guidelines stratify deep venous thrombosis (DVT) risk in trauma patients based on injury pattern and pharmacologic prophylaxis. Screening is only recommended for patients with high-risk injuries who are unable to receive pharmacologic prophylaxis. However, the prevalence of lower extremity DVT (LEDVT) in trauma patients may be higher than reported in previous studies as many studies on DVT screening have not investigated calf vein DVTs (CVDVT) and have not exclusively targeted critically ill patients. Given that current ACCP guidelines recommend treatment of CVDVTs, we investigated the efficacy of duplex ultrasound (DUS) screening in critically ill trauma patients for all LEDVTs, including CVDVT, regardless of injury pattern, risk factors, or pharmacologic prophylaxis. METHODS: Medical records of 264 intensive care unit trauma patients who received DUS screening for LEDVT were retrospectively examined for the presence of injuries conferring high risk for LEDVT, patient specific DVT risk factors, and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis. RESULTS: Forty (15.2%) patients had LEDVTs found on DUS screening, 24 (60%) were CVDVT, and 30% of all DVTs were diagnosed within 1 week of admission. Patients without high-risk injuries receiving LMWH had a 13.5% DVT rate, which did not differ significantly from the 19.7% DVT rate in high-risk injury patients not receiving LMWH (P = .667). CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity DVT is common in critically ill trauma patients, particularly in the first week following injury, regardless of injury pattern, DVT risk factors, or pharmacologic prophylaxis. Previous studies have underestimated DVT rates by not investigating CVDVTs and not exclusively targeting critically ill patients. We recommend early and continued DUS DVT screening of all critically ill trauma patients.

Validating the Western Trauma Association algorithm for managing patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial.

UNLABELLED: The optimal management of stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASWs) remains a matter of debate. A recent Western Trauma Association (WTA) multicenter trial found that exclusion of peritoneal penetration by local wound exploration (LWE) allowed immediate discharge (D/C) of 41% of patients with AASWs. Performance of computed tomography (CT) scanning or diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) did not improve the D/C rate; however, these tests led to nontherapeutic (NONTHER) laparotomy (LAP) in 24% and 31% of cases, respectively. An algorithm was proposed that included LWE, followed by either D/C or admission for serial clinical assessments, without further imaging or invasive testing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the algorithm in providing timely interventions for significant injuries. METHODS: A multicenter, institutional review board-approved study enrolled patients with AASWs. Management was guided by the WTA AASW algorithm. Data on the presentation, evaluation, and clinical course were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients (94% men, age, 34.7 years ± 0.3 years) were enrolled. Sixty-two (28%) had immediate LAP, of which 87% were therapeutic (THER). Three (1%) died and the mean length of stay (LOS) was 6.9 days. One hundred sixty patients were stable and asymptomatic, and 81 of them (51%) were managed entirely per protocol. Twenty (25%) were D/C'ed from the emergency department after (-) LWE, and 11 (14%) were taken to the operating room (OR) for LAP when their clinical condition changed. Two (2%) of the protocol group underwent NONTHER LAP, and no patient experienced morbidity or mortality related to delay in treatment. Seventy-nine (49%) patients had deviations from protocol. There were 47 CT scans, 11 DPLs, and 9 laparoscopic explorations performed. In addition to the laparoscopic procedures, 38 (48%) patients were taken to the OR based on test results rather than a change in the patient's clinical condition; 17 (45%) of these patients had a NONTHER LAP. Eighteen (23%) patients were D/C'ed from the emergency department. The LOS was no different among patients who had immediate or delayed LAP. Mean LOS after NONTHER LAP was 3.6 days ± 0.8 days. CONCLUSIONS: The WTA proposed algorithm is designed for cost-effectiveness. Serial clinical assessments can be performed without the added expense of CT, DPL, or laparoscopy. Patients requiring LAP generally manifest early in their course, and there does not appear to be any morbidity related to a delay to OR. These data validate this approach and should be confirmed in a larger number of patients to more convincingly evaluate the algorithm's safety and cost-effectiveness compared with other approaches.

Sew it up! A Western Trauma Association multi-institutional study of enteric injury management in the postinjury open abdomen.

BACKGROUND: Use of damage control surgery techniques has reduced mortality in critically injured patients but at the cost of the open abdomen. With the option of delayed definitive management of enteric injuries, the question of intestinal repair/anastomosis or definitive stoma creation has been posed with no clear consensus. The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes on the basis of management of enteric injuries in patients relegated to the postinjury open abdomen. METHODS: Patients requiring an open abdomen after trauma from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2007 were reviewed. Type of bowel repair was categorized as immediate repair, immediate anastomosis, delayed anastomosis, stoma and a combination. Logistic regression was used to determine independent effect of risk factors on leak development. RESULTS: During the 6-year study period, 204 patients suffered enteric injuries and were managed with an open abdomen. The majority was men (77%) sustaining blunt trauma (66%) with a mean age of 37.1 years±1.2 years and median Injury Severity Score of 27 (interquartile range=20-41). Injury patterns included 81 (40%) small bowel, 37 (18%) colonic, and 86 (42%) combined injuries. Enteric injuries were managed with immediate repair (58), immediate anastomosis (15), delayed anastomosis (96), stoma (10), and a combination (22); three patients died before definitive repair. Sixty-one patients suffered intra-abdominal complications: 35 (17%) abscesses, 15 (7%) leaks, and 11 (5%) enterocutaneous fistulas. The majority of patients with leaks had a delayed anastomosis; one patient had a right colon repair. Leak rate increased as one progresses toward the left colon (small bowel anastomoses, 3% leak rate; right colon, 3%; transverse colon, 20%; left colon, 45%). There were no differences in emergency department physiology, injury severity, transfusions, crystalloids, or demographic characteristics between patients with and without leak. Leak cases had higher 12-hour heart rate (148 vs. 125, p=0.02) and higher 12-hour base deficit (13.7 vs. 9.7, p=0.04), suggesting persistent shock and consequent hypoperfusion were related to leak development. There was a significant trend toward higher incidence of leak with closure day (χ for trend, p=0.01), with closure after day 5 having a four times higher likelihood of developing leak (3% vs. 12%, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Repair or anastomosis of intestinal injuries should be considered in all patients. However, leak rate increases with fascial closure beyond day 5 and with left-sided colonic anastomoses. Investigating the physiologic basis for intestinal vulnerability of the left colon and in the open abdomen is warranted.